請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/812
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 林萬億(Wan-I Lin) | |
dc.contributor.author | Shu-Hui Huang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 黃淑惠 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-11T05:06:36Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-03-09 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-11T05:06:36Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2019-03-08 | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2019-02-18 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 王千文(2008)。官僚體制中「服從」與「自主」矛盾現象 之探討—韋伯觀點的詮釋。《中國行政》。頁101-127。
王淑貞(2003)。服務品質的領航—初探北市婦女機構中的督導制度。國立政治大學社會學研究所碩士論文。 王惠宜(2005)。找到自己的翅膀-公部門社工督導的轉化歷程。國立臺灣大學社會工作學研究所碩士論文。 石守正(2010)。公部門社會工作員工作壓力、專業承諾與離職意願之研究-以台北縣市政府社會局為例。臺灣師範大學社會教育學系碩士論文。 臺灣社會工作專業人員協會 (2010)。《建立社會工作督導培訓及認證制度座談會》。臺灣社會工作專業人員協會網頁(http://www.tasw.org.tw/p1-news.php) 臺灣社會工作督導服務協會(2016)。督導大數據。取自http://www.sr.org.tw/knowledge_detail_112.htm 行政院(2010)。中央行政機關組織基準法。取自https://www.ey.gov.tw/File/6D03B17B33CF87A5?A=C 江盈誼等(譯)(2000)。《社工督導》(原作者Allan Brown & Iain Bourne)。臺北。學富。 余漢儀(2014)。臺灣兒少保護的變革:兼論高風險家庭服務方案的影響。臺灣社會研究季刊。第96期,頁137-173。 呂季芳(2017)。兒少保督導功能與新進社工員專業知能養成之研究。《臺灣社區工作與社區研究學刊》。第7卷第1期 。頁69-112。 呂學榮(2007)。臺灣公部門社工知覺之督導風格、充權感受與工作滿足感相關研究。國立臺灣大學社會工作學研究所碩士論文。 汪淑媛、蘇怡如(2011)。社工督導功能期待與實踐落差研究–比較督導與受督者之觀點: 以公部門家暴防治社工為例。《臺灣社會工作學刊》,第9期,頁 41-84 。 社會工作註冊局(2009)。Guidelines for Social Work Supervision。取自http://www.swrb.org.hk/documents/Supervision%20Guidelines_Eng.pdf 林萬億(2013)。當代社會工作 : 理論與方法(第三版)。臺北市:五南。 林萬億(2012)。臺灣的社會福利 : 歷史與制度分析。臺北市:五南。 周月清(2002)。臺灣社會工作教專業發展的危機與轉機-社工教育與實務的省 思。《社區發展季刊》,99期,頁90-125。 吳庚(1993),韋伯的政治理論及其哲學基礎,聯經,台北。 吳瓊恩(2001),行政學,三民,台北。 胡幼慧、姚美華(2008)。一些質性方法上的思考:信度與效度?如何抽樣?如何蒐集資料、登錄與分析。載於胡幼慧(主編),質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。(頁117-132)。臺北市: 巨流。 高淑清(2008)。質性研究的18堂課 : 首航初探之旅。高雄市:麗文文化。 陳向明(2002)。社會科學質的硏究。臺北市:五南。 陳秋山(譯)(2008)。社會工作督導:脈絡與概念。(原作者Ming-sum,Tsui)。臺北。心理。 畢恆達(2008)。詮釋學與質性研究。載於胡幼慧(主編),質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。頁21-36。臺北市:巨流。 張淑慧(2014)。公部門社工人員核心能力之探討。2014年兩岸社會福利學術研討會。台北:中華文化社會福利事業基金會。 游美貴、鄭麗珍(2018)。社會工作督導概論。載於游美貴(主編),社會工作督導理論與實務工作手冊。頁3-26。臺北市:雙葉。 許雅惠、張英陣(2016)。 風險管理下的社會工作督導。《社會政策與社會工作學刊》,第2期第20卷,頁 1-41。 許雅惠、廖鳳池(2005)。不同階段個別諮商督導歷程中督導議題與督導策略之分析研究。《輔導與諮商學報》,第27期第1卷,頁65-82。 曾華源(1982)。對督導工作的基本概念和運用,《社區發展季刊》,第19期,頁94-99。 黃源協(2008)。社會工作管理。台北:揚智出版社。 潘淑滿(2003)。質性硏究 : 理論與應用。臺北市:心理。 簡春安、鄒平儀(2005)。社會工作研究法。臺北市:巨流。 蔡秀涓(2009)。臺灣文官的公共服務價值觀與新公共 服務精神的比較:經驗調查初探。《文官制度季刊》。第1卷第4期。頁111-135。 衛生福利部(2018)。強化社會安全網。取自https://www.mohw.gov.tw/cp-3763-40093-1.html 衛生福利部(2018)。衛生福利部組織法。取自https://mohwlaw.mohw.gov.tw/FLAW/FLAWDAT0202.aspx?lsid=FL070575 衛生福利部(2017)。衛生福利部老人身心障礙兒童及少年福利機構組織準則。取自https://www.mohw.gov.tw/dl-45498-3ac4f231-f597-4b26-9c90- 16a0252cde0e.html 衛生福利部(2013)。衛生福利部各醫院組織準則。取自https://mohwlaw.mohw.gov.tw/FLAW/FLAWDAT0202.aspx?lsid=FL042976 衛生福利部社會及家庭署(2018) 。106年度中央對直轄市、縣(市)政府執行社會福利績效考核報告。取自https://www.sfaa.gov.tw/SFAA/Pages/Detail.aspx?nodeid=65&pid=7091 衛生福利部社會及家庭署(2016) 。104年度中央對直轄市、縣(市)政府執行社會福利績效考核報告。取自https://www.sfaa.gov.tw/SFAA/File/Attach/4887/File_166597.pdf 衛生福利部社會及家庭署(2016) 。兒少高風險家庭處遇服務督導及成效評估方案成果報告。取自https://www.sfaa.gov.tw/SFAA/File/Attach/5729/File_167676.pdf 蘇怡如(2008)。探討臺灣家暴社工督導角色功能之應然面與實然面。國立暨南國 際大學社會政策與社會工作學系碩士論文。 AASW (2014). Supervision Standards.取自 https://www.aasw.asn.au/document/item/6027 Adamson, C. (2012). Supervision is Not Politically Innocent. Australian Social Work, 65(2), 185-196. Agbényiga, D. (2009). Child welfare employee recruitment and retention: an organizational culture perspective. Child Welfare, 88(6), 81–104. Austin. M. (1981). Supervisory Management for the Human Services. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc. Beddoe, L. (2012). External Supervision in Social Work: Power, Space, Risk, and the Search for Safety. Australian Social Work, 65(2), 197-213. Beddoe, L., Karvinen-Niinikoski, S., Ruch, G., & Ming-sum, T. (2016). Towards an International Consensus on a Research Agenda for Social Work Supervision: Report on the First Survey of a Delphi Study. British Journal of Social Work, 46(6), 1568-1586. Bennett, S., & Deal, K. H. (2009). Beginnings and Endings in Social Work Supervision: The Interaction between Attachment and Developmental Processes. Journal of Teaching In Social Work, 29(1), 101-117. Bernard, J. M., & Goodyear, R. K. (2009). Fundamentals of clinical supervision, 4th ed. New Jersey: Pearson. Bibus, A. (1994). In Pursuit of a Missing Link: The Influence of Supervision on Social Workers’ Practice with Involuntary Clients. The Clinical Supervisor, 11(2), 7–22. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa Brown, Allan and Ian Bourne (1996). The Social Work Supervisor. Buckingham and Philadelphia: Open University Press. Bruce, E. J., & Austin, M. J. (2000). Social Work Supervision: Assessing the Past and Mapping the Future. Clinical Supervisor, 19(2), 85-109 Cahalane, H., & Sites, E. (2008). The Climate of Child Welfare Employee Retention. Child Welfare, 87(1), 91–114. Caras, A., & Sandu, A. (2014). The Role of Supervision in Professional Development of Social Work Specialists. Journal of Social Work Practice, 28(1), 75-94. Caust, B. L., Libow, J. A., & Raskin, P. A. (1981). Challenges and promises of training women as family systems supervisees. Family Process, 20, 439-447. Claiborne, et al. (2011). 'Child welfare agency climate influence on worker commitment.' Children and youth services review, 33.11:2096-2102. Clare, M. (1988). Supervision, role strain and social services departments. The British Journal of Social Work, 18(5), 489-507. Cojocaru, S. (2010). Appreciative supervision in social work: New opportunities for changing the social work practice. Review and Social Intervention Magazine, 29, 72-91. Cooper, T. (1990). The responsible administrator : an approach to ethics for the administrative role (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers. Cousins, C. (2004). Becoming a social work supervisor: a significant role transition. Australian Social Work, 57(2), 175-185. Crabtree, B. F., & Miller, W. L. (1992). Research methods for primary care In B. F. Crabtree & W. L. Miller (Eds.), Doing qualitative research. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage Publications. Davis, R. T. (2010). Constructing a Profession of Social Work: The Role of Social Work Supervision. Social Work Review / Revista De Asistenta Sociala, 9(1), 20-30. Davys, A., & Beddoe, L. (2010). Best practice in professional supervision: A guide for the helping profession. London, UK: Jessica Kingsley Publishers. Dow, D. M., Hart, G. M., & Nance, D. W. (2009). Supervision Styles and Topics Discussed in Supervision. Clinical Supervisor, 28(1), 36-46. Erera, I. P., & Lazar, A. (1993). Training needs of social work supervisors. The Clinical Supervisor, 11(1), 83-93. Evans , D. (1987). Live supervision in the same room: practice teaching method. Journal of Social Work Education, 6(3), 13-17. Frame, M. W. (2001). The spiritual genogram in training and supervision. Family Journal, 9(2), 109-115. Granvold, D. K. (1978). Training social work supervisors to meet organizational and worker objectives. Journal of Education for Social Work, 14(2), 38-45. Haldane, D., & McCluskey, U. (1980). Working with couples and families: Experience of training, consultation and supervision. Journal of Family Therapy, 2(2), 163-179. Harkness, D., & Hensley, H. (1991). Changing the focus of social work supervision: Effects on client satisfaction and generalized contentment. Social Work, 36(6), 506-12. Itzhaky, H. (2000). The secret in supervision: an integral part of the social worker’s professional development. The Journal of Contemporary Human Services: Families in Society, 81(5), 529-537. John R. Culbreth (2001). The Wisconsin Clinical Supervision Training Model, The Clinical Supervisor, 20:1, 61-71. Kadushin, A. (1992). Supervision in Social Work. 4th ed. NY: Columbia University Press. Kadusin, A. & Harkness, D. (2002). Supervision in Social Work. 4th ed. N.Y.:Columbia University Press. Manthorpe, J., Moriarty, J., Hussein, S., Stevens, M., & Sharpe, E. (2015). Content and Purpose of Supervision in Social Work Practice in England: Views of Newly Qualified Social Workers, Managers and Directors. British Journal of Social Work, 45(1), 52-68. Maynard, S. P., Mertz, L. P., & Fortune, A. E. (2015). Off-Site Supervision in Social Work Education: What Makes It Work? Journal of Social Work Education, 51(3), 519-534. McAuliffe, D., & Sudbery, J. (2005). ‘‘Who do I tell?’’ Support and Consultation in Cases of Ethical Conflict. Journal of Social Work, 5, 21-43. Miller, M. M., Korinek, A., & Ivey, D. C. (2004). Spirituality in MFT training: Development of the spiritual issues in supervision scale. Contemporary Family Therapy, 26(1), 71-81. Morbarak, M., Nissly, J., & Levin, A. (2001). Antecedents to Retention and Turnover among Child Welfare, Social Work, and Other Human Service Employees: What Can We Learn from Past Research? A Review and Meta-analysis. Social Service Review, 75(4), 625–661. Munro, E. (2010). Learning to Reduce Risk in Child Protection. British Journal of Social Work, 40(4), 1135-1151. Munson, C. (1979). Social Work Supervision: classic statements and critical issues. NY: The Free Press. Munson, C.E. (2002). Handbook of Clinical Social Work Supervision. 3rd ed. N.Y.:The Haworth Social Work Practice Press. NASW (2013). Best Practice Standards in Social Work Supervision.取自https://www.socialworkers.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=GBrLbl4BuwI%3d&portalid=0 O'Donoghue, K., & Ming-sum, T. (2015). Social Work Supervision Research (1970-2010): The Way We Were and the Way Ahead. British Journal of Social Work, 45(2), 616-633. Perry, C. W. (2012). Constructing professional identity in an online graduate clinical training program: Possibilities for online supervision. Journal of Systemic Therapies, 31(3), 53-67. doi: http://dx.doi.org/101521jsyt201231353. Perlman, H. H. (1979). Relationship: The heart of helping people. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Pisani, A. (2005). Talk to me: Supervisee disclosure in supervision. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 75(1), 29-47. Plugaru, A. & Ponea, S. (2010). Evaluation of supervision practice of the social services provided to elderly in Home Care Centre, Postmodern Openings, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 49–70. Reamer, F. G. (1989). Liability Issue in Social Work Supervision, Social Work, 34, 445-448. Richards, M., Payne, C. & Shepperd, A. (1990). Staff Supervision in Child Protection Work, London, National Institute for Social Work. Rushton, A., & Nathan, J. (1996). The supervision of child protection work. The British Journal of Social Work, 26(3), 357-374. Schein, E. (2004). Organizational culture and leadership (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Scherz, F. H. (1979). A Concept of Supervision Based on Definitions of Job Responsibility, in Munson, C. E. (Ed.), Social Work Supervisors: Classic Statements and Critical Issues, 83-93, New York: Free Press. Smith, S. H. (2003). An assessment of multicultural competence in supervision: Implications for continuing education. Professional Development: The International Journal of Continuing Social Work Education, 6(3), 4-12. Stahl, G. O. (1976). Public Personnel Administration, 7th ed. New York: Harper. Sundet, P. A., Mermelstein, J., & Watt, J. W. (2003). The role demonstration model of supervision. Professional Development: The International Journal of Continuing Social Work Education, 6(1-2), 60-67. Turner, B. (2000). Supervision and mentoring in child and family social work: The role of the first-line manager in the implementation of the post-qualifying framework. Social Work Education, 19(3), 231-240. Wasik, B. H., & Roberts, R. N. (1994). Home visitor characteristics, training, and supervision: Results of a national survey. Family Relations, 43(3), 336. Williams, L. (1994). A tool for training supervisors: Using the supervision feedback form (SFF). Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 20(3), 311-315. Wilson, W. (1987). The Study of Public Administration. Political Science Quarterly, 2(2), 197-222. Wonnacott, J. (2012). Mastering social work supervision. London, UK: Jessica Kingsley Publishers. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/812 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 社會工作督導是社工專業養成的重要因素之一,社會工作督導的專業能力更影響社會工作的品質以及服務對象的權益。近年來,社會環境的變化與新公共管理主義的盛行,身處在公部門組織脈絡下的社工督導也因著公部門的政策、行政與服務衍生培育不同能力的需求;故本研究以公部門社工督導為研究對象,欲探討公部門社工督導能力養成的脈絡、理解其身在公部門的組織特質中發揮專業能力的優勢與限制,以及對督導知能養成的期待與建議。
本研究採質化研究深度訪談法,透過立意抽樣的方式,訪談9位公部門社工督導。研究發現,就組織層面而言,公部門係依組織法律或命令,行使公權力的組織,公部門社工督導主要工作職掌係以社會工作專業知能與技術,協助社工完成公部門組織依法要達成的任務與目標,除了專業角色中行政、教育、支持的督導功能外,尚須具有法規明定執行公權力、行政管理者以及服務系統中協調的中介者、資源分配者等多元角色。另外,公部門社工督導在依法行政的科層體制與框架之中,尚須面對專業展現與組織任務的兩難以及人力發展的限制。雖然公部門的組織環境賦予督導多元的角色功能,但多數督導卻未受過正式的督導訓練或養成機制,即使部分公部門訂有督導訓練課程,但缺乏系統性的規劃,社工督導仍以個人的養成經驗、受督導的經驗及擔任實習生督導或實務指導的經驗等個別性的方式累積督導知能;且不論督導知能如何養成,公部門督導皆是在公部門組織脈絡下發揮專業價值,擔負專業傳承的使命。 依據研究發現,本研究建議:公部門社工督導知能養成應有系統性規劃,增加儲備督導的訓練機制、規劃專業及行政管理的督導課程、輔以實務演練的訓練方式;另因應公部門組織脈絡所需知能,增加督導對於政策的理解及行政管理與協調能力;檢討公部門社工督導合理配置與升遷制度,鼓勵社工督導專職久任。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Social work supervision is one of the essential factors for the development of the social work profession. The professional competence of social work supervisor affects the quality of social work and the rights of the recipients of the service significantly. The change in the social environment and the prevalence of the new public management theory over the years dictated the needs of different types of competence for social works supervision under the organization network of the public sector in line with the development of public policies, administration, and services. This study aims at social work supervision of the public sector with an attempt to explore the network developed under the development of social work supervision competence of the public sector, find out the strength and limitation of the professional competence deriving from the special traits of the organizations in the public sector, and the expectation with recommendation on the development of supervision competence.
In this study, the qualitative approach through in-depth interview is adopted and carried out by purposive sampling method for interviews with 9 social work supervisors of the public sector. The findings of the study indicated that, the public sector exercised public power under applicable legal rules governing organizations of the public sector at the organizational level. The primary function of the social work supervisors of the public sector is to provide assistance to the social workers to accomplish the missions and goals of the public sector as required by law with their professional knowledge and skills in social work. These social work supervisors have to play the role of multiple functions, including administrative, educational, and support supervision, and mediation among the exercise of public power under law, administrators of public administration, and service system, as well as the allocator of resources. These social work supervisors of the public sector also confronted the dilemma of the exhibition of professionalism and performance of organizational tasks under the administrative hierarchy and framework, and the limitation of human resources development. Although the organizational environment of the public sector allows for a multi-purpose role, most social work supervisors have received no formal training or skill development in supervision. In other words, the public sector has established programs for the training of supervision, where there is no systematic planning. Social work supervisors tend to base on their personal experience, experience of under supervision, interns in supervision, or experience in the practice of supervision to accumulate their supervisory skills. Regardless of how the professional capacity of supervision is developed, the mission of supervision in the public sector is the realization of the professional value and succession of professional skills under the organization of the public sector. The findings from this study led to the recommendation that: the development of professional competences in social work supervision of the public sector should be systematically planned with the introduction of reserve supervisor training mechanisms, professional planning, and administrative management supervisory program, supported by practical drills training. The understanding of public policies and the improvement of the capacity in administrative management and coordination of the supervisors should be enhanced. Finally, the placement and promotion system for the social work supervisors should be subject to review for encouraging social work supervisors to take this as a perpetual career. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-11T05:06:36Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-108-R97330003-1.pdf: 1385206 bytes, checksum: b8aedf6e675d23a882780972ae4ec078 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝辭 I
摘要 III 英文摘要 IV 目錄 VI 表次 VII 第一章 研究動機與目的 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究重要性與目的 4 第二章 文獻探討 8 第一節 社會工作督導 8 第二節 公部門的社會工作 20 第三節 公部門社會工作督導現況 24 第三章 研究設計與方法 28 第一節 研究設計 28 第二節 研究方法 29 第三節 研究者角色與研究倫理 38 第四章 研究發現與分析 40 第一節 9位公部門社工督導的職涯歷程與工作經驗 40 第二節 公部門社會工作督導的組織環境 48 第三節 公部門社工督導養成的機制 73 第五章 結論與建議 87 第一節 研究結論 87 第二節 研究建議 92 第三節 研究限制與未來研究建議 97 參考文獻 98 訪談同意書 105 訪談大綱 106 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 公部門社會工作督導知能養成之研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | On the Competence Development of Social Work Superviser in Public Sector | en |
dc.date.schoolyear | 107-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 曾華源(Hua-Yuan Tseng),鄭麗珍(LI-CHEN CHENG) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 社會工作督導,公部門,督導知能,行政治理, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | social work supervision,public sector,supervision competence,administrative governance, | en |
dc.relation.page | 106 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201900545 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2019-02-18 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 社會工作學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 社會工作學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-108-1.pdf | 1.35 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。