請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/80911完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 李紀舍(Chi-she Li) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Angela Chen | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 陳芊如 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-11-24T03:21:35Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2021-10-04 | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-11-24T03:21:35Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2021-10-04 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2021-09-22 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Allen, Judson Boyce and Theresa Anne Moritz. A Distinction of Stories: The Medieval Unity of Chaucer’s Fair Chain of Narratives for Canterbury. Ohio State University, 1981. Ambrisco, Alan S. “‘It lyth nat in my tonge’: Occupatio and Otherness in the Squire’s Tale.” The Chaucer Review, vol.38, no.3, 2004, pp.205-228 Baldick, Chris. “occupatio.” The Oxford Dictionary of Literary Terms, 3rd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008, https://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780199208272.001.0001/acref-9780199208272-e-798. Accessed 10 Nov. 2019. Bennett, Kristen Abbott. “‘I moot speke as I kan’: The Squire’s Optimistic Attempt to Circumvent Rhetorical ‘Following’ in The Canterbury Tales.” This Rough Magic, vol. 2, no. 2, Dec. 2011, pp.1-24 Berry, Craig A. “Flying Sources: Classical Authority in Chaucer’s Squire’s Tale.” ELH, vol. 6, no. 2, 2001, pp.287-313. Braddy, Haldeen. “The Genre of Chaucer’s ‘Squire’s Tale’.” The Journal of English and Germanic Philology, vol.41, no.3, 1942, pp.279-290. Bradfield, Joanna Lee Scott. Canacee’s Mirror: Gender and Treasons in Medieval Literature. Diss. UC Riverside, 2011. Burkhardt, Stephanie D. Chaucer’s Mounted Menagerie: an Intertextual Examination of Horse and Rider Archetypes in the Canterbury Tales. Diss. 2007. Camille, M. The Medieval Art of Love: Objects and Subjects of Desire. Harry N Abrams, 1998b. Cannon, Christopher. Middle English Literature. Polity, 2008. Caxton, William. The History of Reynard the Fox: With Some Account of His Family, Friends, and Associates. D. Nutt, 1894. Chaucer, Geoffrey, and Larry Dean Benson. “The Squire’s Tale.” The Riverside Chaucer, Oxford University Press, 2008. Cherry, John. “Healing through Faith: The Continuation of Medieval Attitudes to Jewellery into the Renaissance.” Renaissance Studies, vol.15, no.2, 2001, pp.154-171. Clouston, W.A. On the Magical Elements in Chaucer’s Squire’s Tale, With Analogues. In Furnivall, ed. 1887089, pp.263-476. Cohen, Jeffrey Jerome. Animal, Vegetable, Mineral: Ethics and Objects. Washington, DC, Oliphaunt Books, 2012. Cohen, Jeffrey Jerome. “The Inhuman Circuit.” Thinking the Limits of the Body, 2003, pp.167-186. Cole, Andrew. “The Call of Things A Critique of Object-Oriented Ontologies.” The Minnesota Review, vol.80, 2013, pp.106-118. Coole, Diana, and Samantha Frost. “Introducing the New Materialisms.” New Materialisms. Duke University Press, 2010, pp.1-44. Crane, Susan. Animal Encounters: Contacts and Concepts in Medieval Britain. University of Pennsylvania Press, 2012. De Lorris, Guillaume, and Jean De Meun. The Romance of the Rose [Le Roman de la Rose]. Translated by Charles Dahlberg, 3rd ed., Princeton UP, 1995. De Weever, Jacqueline. Chaucer Name Dictionary: A Guide to Astrological, Biblical, Historical, Literary, and Mythological Names in the Works of Geoffrey Chaucer. Routledge, 2014. DiMarco, Vincent. “Richard Hole and the ‘Merchant’s’ and ‘Squire’s Tales’: An Unrecognized Eighteenth-Century (1797) Contribution to Source and Analogue Study.” The Chaucer Review, 1981, pp.171-180. DiMarco, Vincent. “The Dialogue of Science and Magic in Chaucer’s Squire’s Tale.” Dialogische Strukturen/Dialogic Structures. Festschrift für Willi Ergräber zum, vol.70, 1996, pp.50-68. DiMarco, Vincent. “The Squire’s Tale.” Sources and Analogues of ‘The Canterbury Tales’ I, 2002, pp.169-209. Ebreo, Leone. The Philosophy of Love. Translated by F. Friedeberg-Seeley Jean H. Barnes. The Soncino Press, 1938. Fradenburg, L.O. Aranye. ‘‘Simply Marvelous,’’ Studies in the Age of Chaucer, vol. 26, 2004, pp.1–26. Froissart, Jean. l’Espinette amoureuse, edited by Anthime Fourrier, 1963. Garber, Marjorie B., and Nancy J. Vickers, eds. The Medusa Reader. Psychology Press, 2003. Gibson, James Jerome. “The Theory of Affordances,” The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception, vol. 1, Psychology Press, 1986, pp.67-82. Gilchrist, Roberta. Medieval life: Archaeology and the Life Course. Boydell Press, 2012. Goodman, Jennifer R. “Chaucer’s ‘Squire’s Tale’ and the Rise of Chivalry.” Studies in the Age of Chaucer, vol.5, 1983, pp.127-36. Grabes, Herbert. The Mutable Glass: Mirror-imagery in Titles and Texts of the Middle Ages and English Renaissance. Cambridge University Press, 1982. Greenblatt, Stephen, gen. ed. The Norton Anthology of English Literature. 9th ed., vol. B, Norton, 2012. Gutmann, Sara. “Chaucer’s Chicks: Feminism and Falconry in ‘The Knight’s Tale,’ ‘The Squire’s Tale,’ and The Parliament of Fowls.” Rethinking Chaucerian Beasts, edited by Carolynn Van Dyke, Palgrave Macmillan, 2012, pp. 69-84. Hadow, Grace E. Chaucer and His Times. London: Thornton, Butterworth. Haller, Robert S. “Chaucer’s ‘Squire’s Tale’ and the Uses of Rhetoric.” Modern Philology, vol.62, 1965, pp.285-95. Heffernan, Carol F. The Orient in Chaucer and Medieval Romance. D.S. Brewer, 2006. Iafrate, Allegra. “Solomon, Lord of the Rings: fashioning the Signet of Power from electrum to nuḥās.” Al-Masāq, vol.28, no.3, 2016, pp.221-241. Ingham, Patricia Clare. The Medieval New: Ambivalence in an Age of Innovation. U of Pennsylvania Press, 2015. Jones, Harrie Stuart Vedder. “The Cléomadès and Related Folk-Tales.” Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, 1908, pp.557-598. Kamowski, William. “Trading the ‘Knotte’ for Loose Ends: The ‘Squire’s Tale’ and the Poetics of Chaucerian Fragments.” Style, 1997, pp.391-412. Karnes, Michelle. “Wonder, Marvels, and Metaphor in the Squire’s Tale”. ELH, vol.82, no.2, Summer 2015, pp. 461-490 Karras, Ruth Mazo. From Boys to Men: Formations of Masculinity in Late Medieval Europe. University of Pennsylvania Press, 2003. Kordecki, Lesley. “Chaucer’s” Squire’s Tale”: Animal Discourse, Women, and Subjectivity.” The Chaucer Review, vol.36, no.3, 2002, pp.277-297. Kordecki, Lesley. Ecofeminist Subjectivities: Chaucer’s Talking Birds. Springer, 2011. Koukouti, Maria Danae, and Lambros Malafouris. “Material Imagination: An Anthropological Perspective.” The Cambridge Handbook of the Imagination, 2020, pp.30-46. Kunz, George Frederick. Rings for the Finger. Courier Corporation, 2012. Latour, Bruno. “Network theory| networks, societies, spheres: Reflections of an actor-network theorist.” International Journal of Communication 5, 2011, pp.790-810. Latour, Bruno. We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard UP, 1993. Le Goff, Jacques. The Medieval Imagination. University of Chicago Press, 1992. Lightsey, Scott. “Chaucer’s Secular Marvels and the Medieval Economy of Wonder.” Studies in the Age of Chaucer, vol. 23, 2001, pp.289-316. Lightsey, Scott. Manmade Marvels in Medieval Culture and Literature. Springer, 2007. “list n.(2).”Middle English Dictionary. Ed. Robert E. Lewis, et al. University of Michigan Press, 1952-2001. Online edition in Middle English Compendium. Ed. Frances McSparran, et al., Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Library, 2000-2018, http://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/middle-english-dictionary/. Accessed 10 Nov. 2019. Lowes, John L. “The Squire’s Tale and the Land of Prester John.” Washington University Studies, vol.1, 1913, pp.3-18. Lydgate, John, and Giovanni Boccaccio. Lydgate's Fall of Princes. Carnegie Institution of Washington, 1923. Lynch, Kathryn L. Chaucer’s Cultural Geography. London, Routledge, 2014. Malafouris, Lambros. How Things Shape the Mind. MIT Press, 2013. Malafouris, Lambros. “Thinking as ‘Thinging’: Psychology with Things.” Current Directions in Psychological Science, vol.29, no.1, 2020, pp.3-8. Manly, John M., and Edith Rickert. “The ‘Hengwrt’ Manuscript of Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales.” NLWJ, vol.1, 1939, pp.59-75. McCall, John P. “The Squire in Wonderland.” The Chaucer Review, 1966, pp.103-109. Melchoir-Bonnet, Sabine. The Mirror: A History. Routledge, 2014. Miller, Robert P. Chaucer’s Rhetorical Rendition in Mind: The Squire’s Tale. In Leigh A. Arrathoon, 1986, pp.219-40. Murrin, Michael. Trade and Romance, The University of Chicago Press, 2014. “newfangledness” Oxford English Dictionary Online, June 2020, oed.com.db29.linccweb.org/view/Entry/178498?rskey=KMsv72 result=1#contentWrapper. Accessed 6 July 2020. “park n.” Middle English Dictionary. Ed. Robert E. Lewis, et al. University of Michigan Press, 1952-2001. Online edition in Middle English Compendium. Ed. Frances McSparran, et al., Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Library, 2000-2018, http://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/middle-english-dictionary/. Accessed 10 Nov. 2019. Pearsall, Derek. “The Squire as Story-Teller.” UTQ, vol.34, 1964, pp.82-92. Pozzi, Giulia, Federico Pigni, and Claudio Vitari. “Affordance theory in the IS Discipline: A Review and Synthesis of the Literature.” AMCIS 2014 Proceedings, 2014, pp.1-12. Pugin, Augustus Welby Northmore. Glossary of Ecclesiastical Ornament and Costume. Quaritch, 1868. Robertson, Kellie. “Medieval Materialism: A Manifesto.” Exemplaria, vol.22, no.2, 2010, pp.99-118. Saunders, Corinne J. Magic and the Supernatural in Medieval English Romance. Vol. 13. Boydell Brewer, 2010. Schechner, Sara J. “Between Knowing and Doing: Mirrors and their Imperfections in the Renaissance.” Early Science and Medicine, vol.10, no.2, 2005, pp.137-162. Schless, Howard H. Chaucer and Dante: A Revaluation. Pilgrim Books, 1984, p. 202. Scholey, Anna. Magical Rings in Middle English Romance: An Interdisciplinary Study in Medieval Literature and Material Culture. Diss. University of Birmingham, 2009. Seymour, Michael C. “Some Satiric Pointers in the Squires Tale.” English Studies, vol.70, no.4, 1989, pp.311-314. Standley, Eleanor. “Ladies Hunting: A Late Medieval Decorated Mirror Case from Shapwick, Somerset.” The Antiquaries Journal, vol.88, 2008, pp.198-206. Stock, Lorraine Kochanske. “Foiled by fowl: The Squire’s peregrine falcon and the Franklin’s Dorigen.” Rethinking Chaucerian Beasts. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, 2012. 85-100. Stillwell, Gardiner. “Chaucer in Tartary.” The Review of English Studies, vol.24, no.95, 1948, pp.177-188. “The Squire’s Introduction and Tale: An Interlinear Translation.” The Geoffrey Chaucer Page, President and Fellows of Harvard College, 26 Jan. 2003, https://sites.fas.harvard.edu/~chaucer/teachslf/sqt-par.htm. Truitt, Elly Rachel. Medieval Robots: Mechanism, Magic, Nature, and Art. Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press, 2015. Van der Tuin, Iris, and Rick Dolphijn. New Materialism: Interviews Cartographies. Open Humanities Press, 2012. Vernon, Arthur. The History and Romance of the Horse. Boston: Waverly House, 1939. “vī̆siǒun n.” Middle English Dictionary. Ed. Robert E. Lewis, et al. University of Michigan Press, 1952-2001. Online edition in Middle English Compendium. Ed. Frances McSparran, et al., Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Library, 2000-2018, http://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/middle-english-dictionary/. Accessed 10 Nov. 2019. Walsh, Patrick Gerard, trans. and ed. Andreas Capellanus on Love. Duckworth, 1982. Warton, Thomas. The History of English Poetry. Vol.1, J. Dodsley, 1774, pp.413-4. Weimann, Klaus, ed. Middle English Animal Literature. University of Exeter, 1975. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/80911 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本論文自馬拉佛瑞斯（Lambros Malafouris）所提出的物質互動理論(Material Engagement Theory）及並啟符號（enactive sign）出發，探討傑弗里·喬叟代表作《坎特伯雷故事集》裡《騎士隨從的故事》中，物質所具有的能動性和型態如何觸發和影響故事的編寫。我提出《騎士隨從的故事》的結構和劇情來自於並啟物件的故事性和說故事者的認知之間所發生的互動。 我首先爬梳關於這些物件在喬叟時代的使用方法（affordance）和文化形態的文獻，以驗證這些物件在《騎士隨從的故事》中所展現的特性是有實際依據，在分析騎士隨從的認知，論述他作為說故事者如何仰賴和受限於這些物件的並啟性。第一章描述銅馬和劍及他們所個別帶來的焦慮如何影響了故事情節。第二章討論鏡子和戒指的物質特性及他們登場後如何推動故事情節。第三章分析《騎士隨從的故事》第二部分出現的鷹籠，提出故事敘述完終將成為並啟物件，擁有獨立述說故事的能力。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2022-11-24T03:21:35Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-1709202111324600.pdf: 1287927 bytes, checksum: d363f6bcd4c038da5944de921e53725a (MD5) Previous issue date: 2021 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | Table of Contents Acknowledgements……………………………………………………………….i Chinese Abstract………………………………………………………………ii English Abstract……………………………………………………………iii Introduction…………………………………………………………………....1 Chapter One…………………………………………………………………....13 Chapter Two…………………………………………………………………....34 Chapter Three…………………………………………………………………..60 Conclusion………………………………………………………………….....74 Works Cited…………………………………………………………………....76 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.subject | 能供性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 喬叟 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 騎士隨從 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 物質性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 並啟性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 新物質理論 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | affordance | en |
| dc.subject | Chaucer | en |
| dc.subject | Squire | en |
| dc.subject | materiality | en |
| dc.subject | enactivism | en |
| dc.subject | New Materialism | en |
| dc.title | 並啟物件與《騎士隨從的故事》:物質互動和編織故事之間的關聯性 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Enactive Objects and the “Squire’s Tale': Material Engagement and Storytelling | en |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 109-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | 劉雅詩(Sophia Ya-shih Liu) | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 楊明蒼(Hsin-Tsai Liu),胡心瑜(Chih-Yang Tseng) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 喬叟,騎士隨從,物質性,並啟性,新物質理論,能供性, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Chaucer,Squire,materiality,enactivism,New Materialism,affordance, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 85 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202103231 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2021-09-23 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 文學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 外國語文學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 外國語文學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| U0001-1709202111324600.pdf 授權僅限NTU校內IP使用（校園外請利用VPN校外連線服務） | 1.26 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。