請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/7644
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 黃心怡(Hsini Huang) | |
dc.contributor.author | Bo-Xiu Huang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 黃博琇 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-19T17:48:51Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-01-04 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-19T17:48:51Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2018-01-04 | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2017-10-30 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 壹、中文部分
方妙玲,2006,《高階主管之變動性薪資與財務績效及社會績效之關聯性研究─代理理論觀點以及利害關係人理論觀點》,行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告。 王怡瀅,2015,《研發成果智慧財產權下放政策之研究:大學校內利害關係人之以國立成功大學為例》(未出版之碩士論文),台北:淡江大學公共行政學系碩士論文。 行政院科技部,2015,《行政院國家科學委員會年報》。網址:http://203.145.193.110/NSC_INDEX/KSP/journalView/journalVolumn.jsp?journalId=J000025&journalSetId=S000001。 李宗勳,2002,《政府業務委外經營的理論與實務》,台北:智勝出版社。 吳育巧,2005,《中央健康保險局經營現況之研究-以代理人理論分析》(未出版之碩士論文),臺北:國立臺灣大學政治學系碩士論文。 吳清山、林天祐,2004,〈產學合作〉,《教育資料與研究》,59:115。 吳智鴻、黃道、耿筠、賴奎魁、徐憲鴻,〈定義大學商業化之關鍵成功因素:科技管理學刊》,15(2):55-82。 林炎旦,1997,《專科學校建教合作策略內涵之研究》(未出版之博士論文),台北:國立臺灣師範大學工業教育研究所博士論文。 林意茵,2009,《我國大學研發成果之專利保護對技術移轉績效之影響性研究─政策順服》(未出版之碩士論文),臺北:淡江大學公共行政學系碩士論文。 柯于璋,2013,〈政府委託研究案代理問題之探討:一個結合賽局理論與代理人理論的研究取向〉,《行政暨政策學報》,57:1-35。 徐仁輝,1995,〈組織經濟學的源起與發展〉,《中國行政評論》,4(3):105-126。 孫煒,2004,〈非營利管理的責任問題:政治經濟研究途徑〉,《政治科學論叢》,20:141-166。 許旭緯,2016,〈台灣學術創業的網絡合作關係初探〉,《科技政策觀點》。網址:https://portal.stpi.narl.org.tw/index/article/10266;jsessionid=E3C83F3827C1169ACD6C7CEE5D2FA00A。 康自立,1997,〈大學與產業界的合作〉,《大學的決策與管理》,頁47-63,臺北:漢文。 張媛甯,2006,〈企業型大學之發展趨勢、待解決問題與對高等教育經營管理的啟示〉,《教育政策論壇》,9(4):77-100。 郭昱瑩、洪綾君,2012,〈行政及政策類委託研究計畫適用政府採購法問題之探討:代理人理論觀點〉,《競爭力評論》,15:7-40。 陳佩伶,2005,《產學技術移轉之研究─建構國內大學技術移轉中心管理模式》(未出版之碩士論文),臺北:國立臺北大學企業管理學系碩士論文。 陳敦源、徐仁輝,1999,〈從「權力授予」概念看台灣的行政立法互動關係:以八十七年預算法修正為例〉,《空大行政學報》,10:155-186。 陳敦源,2002,〈績效制度設計的資訊問題:信號、機制設計、與代理成本〉,《行政暨政策學報》,35:45-69。 曾銘深,1999,〈OECD 國家推動產學合作之作法〉,《經濟情勢暨評論》,5(3):80-98。 楊智傑,2009,〈反省美國拜杜法的理論與經驗〉,《科技法律評論》,6(1):207-240。 廖坤榮,2004,〈台灣金融管制政策的困境:代理人途徑個案分析〉,《中山人文社會科學》期刊,12(2):51-86。 葛孟堯、劉江彬、耿筠,2010,〈影響我國大學技術移轉績效因素之研究〉,《科學發表與技術移轉績效關係的首次揭露〉,《科技管理學刊》,17(2):79-100。 蔡允棟,2001,〈官僚組織回應力之研究:個案實證分析〉,《政治科學論叢》,15:209-240。 劉淑瓊,2005,〈績效、品質與消費者權益保障:論社會服務契約委託的責信課題〉,《社會政策與社會工作學刊》,9(2):31-93。 劉正松,2005,〈銀行託收付款方式適用性之探討─以代理理論觀點〉,《德明學報》,25:47-58。 劉文良,2008,《知識管理》,台北,碁峯資訊。 魯明德,2000,〈科學技術基本法對產官學研各界之影響〉,《智慧財產權》,21:65-73。 戴曉霞,2000,〈新世紀高等教育的展望:回顧與前瞻〉,《教育研究季刊》,44:35-60. 藍婉甄,2014,《政府委託研究案知識應用之研究-以臺北市政府為例》,台北:國立台北大學公共行政暨政策學系碩士論文。 貳、西文部分 Allen, T. J. 1984. Managing the Flow of Technology, Cambridge. MA: MIT Press. Baycan, T. and R. R. Stough 2012. “Bridging knowledge to commercialization: The good, the bad, and the challenging.” Annals of Regional Science, Special Issue Paper. Bell, E.R.J. 1993. “Some current issues in technology transfer and academic-industrial relations: a review,” Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 5(3):307-321. Bercovitz, J., Feldman, M., Feller, I., Burton, R., 2001. “Organizational structure as determinants of academic patent and licensing behavior: an exploratory study of Duke, Johns Hopkins, and Pennsylvania State Universities. ”Journal of Technology Transfer 26:21–35. Bozeman, B. 2000. “Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory.” Research Policy 29:627-655. Bradley, S.R., Hayter,C.S. and A.N. Link. 2013. “Models and Methods of University Technology Transfer.” Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship 9:571–650. Bray, M.J. and J.N. Lee 2000. “University revenues from technology transfer: licensing fees versus equity positions.” Journal of Business Venturing 15(5-6):385-392. Brescia, F., Colombo, G., & Landoni, P. 2016. “Organizational structures of Knowledge Transfer Offices: An analysis of the world top-ranked universities.” Journal of Technology Transfer 41:132–151. Carayannis, E.G 1998. “The strategic management of technological learning in project/program management: the role of extranets, intranets and intelligent agents in knowledge generation, diffusion, and leveraging.” Technovation 18(11):697-703. Carlsson, B. and A. Fridh 2002. “Technology transfer in United States universities: A survey and statistical analysis.” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 12:199-232. Clarysse, B. and N. Moray 2004. “A process study of entrepreneurial team formation: the case of a research-based spin-off.” Journal of Business Venturing 19(1):55-79. Clarysse, B., Wright, M., Lockett, A., and Mustar, P. 2007. “Academic spin-offs, formal technology transfer and capital raising.” Industrial and Corporate Change 16(4):609-640. Colyvas, J., M. Crow, A. Gelijns, R. Mazzoleni, R.R. Nelson, N. Rosenberg, and B.N. Sampat 2002. “How do university inventions get into practice?” Management Science 48(1):61-72. Czarnitzki, D., Gla¨nzel, W., and Hussinger, K. 2007. “Patent and publication activities of German professors: An empirical assessment of their co-activity.” Research Evaluation 16(4):311–319. D’Este, and Perkmann, M. 2011. “Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivation.” Journal of Technology Tranfer 36:316–339. Debackere, K. and R. Veugelers 2005. “The role of academic technology transfer organizations in improving industry science links.” Research Policy 34(3):321-342. Derrick, G. E. 2015. “Integration versus separation: Structure and strategies of the technology transfer office (TTO) in medical research organizations.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 40:105–122. Di Gregorio, D. and S. Shane 2003. “Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others?” Research Policy 32(2):209-227. Etzkowitz, H. 1998. “The Norms of Entrepreneurial Science: cognitive effects of the new university-industry linkages.” Research Policy 27(8):823-833. Etzkowitz, H. 2000. “Technology Transfer and the Eastern European Transition.” Science and Public Policy 27(4):230-234. Etzkowitz, H. 2003. “Research groups as ‘quasi-firms’: The invention of the entrepreneurial university.” Research Policy 32:109–121. Feldman, M. and P. Desrochers 2003. “Research universities and local economic development: lessons from the history of Johns Hopkins University.” Industry and Innovation 10(1):5-24. Florida, R. and Cohen, W. M. 1999. “Engine or infrastructure? The university role in economic development.” in L. M. Branscomb, F. Kodama, & R. Florida (ed.), Industrializing knowledge: University-industry linkages in Japan and the United States Cambridge. MIT Press,589–610. Friedman, J. and J. Silberman 2003. “University technology transfer: do incentives, management, and location matter?” Journal of Technology Transfer 28(1):17-30. Genet, C., K. Errabi and C. Gauthier 2012. “Which model of technology transfer for nanotechnology? A comparison with biotech and microelectronics.” Technovation 32(3-4):205-215. Geuna, A. 1999. The Economics of knowledge production: Funding and the structure of university research. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Geuna, A. and L. Nesta 2006. “University patenting and its effects on academic research: the emerging European evidence.” Research Policy 35(6):790-807. Geuna, A. and A. Muscio 2009. “The governance of university knowledge transfer: a critical review of the literature.” Minerva 47(1):93-114. Goldhor, R. and R. Lund 1983. “University-to-industry advanced technology transfer.” Research Policy 12(3):121-152. Goel, R. K. and Göktepe-Hultén 2017. “What Drives Patentees to Bypass TTOs? Evidence from a Large PRO.” KIEL working paper No. 2097 Grimpe, C. and H. Fier 2010. “Informal university technology transfer: a comparison between the United States and Germany.” Journal of Technology Transfer 35(6):637-650. Gulbrandsen, M. and J.-C. Smeby 2005. “Industry funding and university professors'research performance.” Research Policy 34(6):932–950. Guston, D. H. 1999. “Stabilizing the boundary between US politics and science: the role of the Office of Technology Transfer as a boundary organization.” Social Studies of Science 29:87–111. Hall, B., A. Jaffe and M. Trajtenberg 2001. “The NBER patent citations data file: lessons, insights and methodological tools.” NBER w.p. 8498. Harmon, B., A. Ardishvili, R. Cardozo, T. Elder, J. Leuthold, J. Parshall, M.Raghian, and S. Donald 1997. “Mapping the university technology transfer process.” Journal of Business Venturing 12(6):423-434. Hayter, C. 2011. “In search of the profit-maximizing actor: motivations and definitions of success from nascent academic entrepreneurs.” Journal of Technology Transfer 36(3):340-352. Heinzl, J., A. Kor, G. Orange and H. Kaufmann 2013. “Technology transfer model for Austrian higher education institutions.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 38(5):607-640. Hellmann, T. 2005. “The Role of Patents for Bridging the Science to Market Gap”, mimeo. Henderson, R., A.B. Jaffe and M. Trajtenberg 1998. “Universities as a source of commercial technology: a detailed analysis of university patenting, 1965-1988.” Review of Economics and Statistics 80(1):119-127. Hoppe, H., and Ozdenoren, E. 2005. “Intermediation in Innovation.” International Journal of Industrial Organization 23:483–503. Huang, W. L. 2015. “Reflections on the research commercialization policy: Have Taiwanese university scientists shifted their interest from basic to applied research?” Public Administration & Policy 60:137-173. Huyghe, A., Knockaert, M., Piva, E., & Wright, M. 2016. “Are researchers deliberately bypassing the technology transfer office? An analysis of TTO awareness.” Small Business Economics 47:589-607. J. Lee and E. Stuen 2016. “University reputation and technology commercialization: evidence from nanoscale science.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 41:586-609. Jensen, M. and W. Meckling. 1976. “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs,and Capital Structure.” Journal of Financial Economics 3:305-360. Jensen, R.A. and M.C. Thursby 2001. “Proofs and prototypes for sale: the licensing of university inventions.” American Economic Review 91(1):240-259. Jensen, R. A., J. G. Thursby and M. C. Thursby 2003. “Disclosure and licensing of university inventions: ‘the best we can do with the S**T we get to work with?” International Journal of Industrial Organization 21(9):1271-1300. Lach, S., Schankerman, M. 2003. “Incentives and invention in universities.”NBER Working Paper No. 9727. Lambe, C.J., Spekman, R.E. 1997. “Alliances, external technology acquisition, and discontinuous technological change.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 14(2):102–116. Lane, J. E. 2005. Public Administration and Public Management: The Principal-agent Perspective. London: Routledge. Liebeskind, J. P., Oliver, A. L., Zucker, L., and Brewer, M. 1999. “Social networks, learning, and flexibility: Sourcing scientific knowledge in new biotechnology firms.” Organization Science 7(4): 428-443. Link, A.N., Siegel, D.S. and Bozeman, B. 2007. “An empirical analysis of the propensity of academics to engage in informal university technology transfer.” Industrial and Corporate Change 16(4):641-655. Litan, R., L. Mitchell, and E. Reedy 2007. “The university as innovator: bumps in the road.” Issues in Science and Technology 23(4):57-66. Louis, K. S., Jones, L. M., Anderson, M. S., Blumenthal, D., and Campbell, E. G. 2001. “Entrepreneurship, secrecy, and productivity: A comparison of clinical and non-clinical life sciences faculty.” Journal of Technology Transfer 26(3):233-245. M. Granieri “Beyond traditional Technology Transfer of Faculty-Generated Inventions: Building a Bridge towards R&D” Nuffield College Working Papers in Politics No. 2002-W33. Macho-Stadler, I., X. Martinez-Giralt, and J.D. Perez-Castrillo 1996. “The role of information in licensing contract design.” Research Policy 25(1):43-57. Markman, G.D., P.T. Gianiodis, P.H. Phan and D.B. Balkin 2004. “Entrepreneurship from the ivory tower: do incentive systems matter?” Journal of Technology Transfer 29(3-4):353-364. Markman, G.D., P.T. Gianiodis, P.H. Phan and D.B. Balkin 2005a. “Innovation speed: transferring university technology to market.” Research Policy 34(7):1058-1075. Markman, G.D., P.T. Gianiodis, P.H. Phan 2005b. “Rent bypassing and sourcing of university-based technology.” In W.D. Bygrave, et al. (Eds.). Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research. Wellesley, MA: Babson College. Markman, G.D., P.H. Phan, D.B. Balkin and P.T. Gianiodis 2005c. “Entrepreneurship and university-based technology transfer.” Journal of Business Venturing 20(2):241-263. Mitchel, W. 1991. “Using academic technology: transfer methods and licensing incidence in the commercialization of American diagnostic imaging equipment research, 1954-1988.” Research Policy 20:203-216. Mitnick, B. M. 1975. “The Theory of Agency:The Policing Paradox and Regulatory Behavior.” Public Choice 24(1):27-42. Mowery, D.C., R.R. Nelson, B.N. Sampat and A.A. Ziedonis 2001. “The growth of patenting and licensing by the U.S. universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980.” Research Policy 30(1):99-119. Mowery, D.C. and A.A. Ziedonis 2002. “Academic patent quality and quantity before and after the Bayh-Dole act in the United States.” Research Policy 31(3):399-418. Mowery, D. C. and B. N. Sampat 2005. “The Bayh-Dole act of 1980 and university-industry technology transfer: a model for other OECD governments?” Journal of Technology Transfer 30(1–2):115-127. Mowery, D.C. 2009. “The Bayh-Dole Act and high-technology entrepreneurship in the United States during the 1980s and 1990s.” in Z.J. Acs, D.B. Audretsch and R.J. Strom (ed.), Entrepreneurship, Growth, and Public Policy. New York: Cambridge University Press,250-283. Nelson,R.R. 2001. “Observations on the Post-Bayh-Dole Rise of Patenting at American Universities.” Journal of Technology Transfer 26:13-19. Owen-Smith, J. and W.W. Powell 2001. “To patent or not: faculty decisions and institutional success at technology transfer.” Journal of Technology Transfer 26(1-2):99-114. Perkmann, M., & Walsh, K. 2008. “Engaging the scholar: Three forms of academic consulting and their impact on universities and industry.” Research Policy 37(10):1884–1891. Perrow, C. 1986. “Economic Theories of Organization.” Theory and Society 15(1-2):11-45. Powell, W.W. 1990. “Neither Market nor Hierarchy: Network Forms of Organization.” Research in Organizational Behavior 12:295-336. Powers, J.B. and P.P. McDougall 2005. “University start-up formation and technology licensing with firms that go public: a resource-based view of academic entrepreneurship.” Journal of Business Venturing 20(3):291-311. Roberts, E.B. and D.H. Peters 1981. “Commercial innovation from university faculty.” Research Policy 10(2):108-126. Rosenberg, N. and R.R. Nelson 1994. “American universities and technical advance in industry.” Research Policy 23(3):323-348. Sampat, B. N., D.C. Mowery, and A.A. Ziedonis 2002. “Changes in university patent quality after the Bayh–Dole act: a re-examination.” International Journal of Industrial Organization 21(9): 1371–1390. Shane, S. 2002. “Executive forum: university technology transfer to entrepreneurial companies.” Journal of Business Venturing 17(6):537-552. Shane, S. 2004. “ Encouraging university entrepreneurship? The effect of the Bayh-Dole Act on university patenting in the United States.” Journal of Business Venturing 19:127-151. Siegel, D.S., D.A. Waldman and A.N. Link. 2003. “Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the productivity of university technology transfer offices: an exploratory study.” Research Policy 32(1):27-48. Siegel, D.S., D.A. Waldman, L. Atwater and A.N. Link. 2003. “Commercial knowledge transfers from universities to firms: improving the effectiveness of university–industry collaboration.” Journal of High Technology Management Research 14:111-133. Siegel, D.S., D.A. Waldman, L. Atwater and A.N. Link. 2004. “Toward a model of the effective transfer of scientific knowledge from academicians to practitioners: qualitative evidence from the commercialization of university technologies.” Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 21:115-142. Siegel, D.S. and P.H. Phan 2005. “Analyzing the effectiveness of university technology transfer: implications for entrepreneurship education.” in G. Liebcap (ed.), Advances in the study of entrepreneurship, innovation, and economic growth. Elsevier Science/JAI Press: Amsterdam,1-38. Siegel, D.S., Veugelers, R. and Wright, M. 2007. “Technology transfer offices and commercialization of university intellectual property: performance and policy implications.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 23:640–660. Swamidass, P.M. and Vulasa, V. J. 2009. “Why university inventions rarely produce income? Bottlenecks in university technology transfer.” Journal of Technology Tranfer 34(4):343–363. Thursby, J.G., R.A. Jensen and M.C. Thursby 2001. “Objectives, characteristics and outcomes of university licensing: a survey of major U.S. universities.” Journal of Technology Transfer 26(1-2):59-70. Thursby, J.G. and M.C. Thursby 2002. “Who is selling the ivory tower? Sources of growth in university licensing.” Management Science 48(1):90-104. Thursby, J.G. and S. Kemp 2002. “Growth and productive efficiency of university intellectual property licensing.” Research Policy 31(1):109-124. Van Looy, B., Ranga, M., Callaert, J., Debackere, K., and E. Zimmermann 2004. “Combining entrepreneurial and scientific performance in academia: towards a compounded and reciprocal Matthew effect?” Research Policy 33(3):425-441. Vohora, A., M. Wright and A. Lockett 2004. “Critical junctures in the development of university high-tech spinout companies.” Research Policy 33(1):147-175. Wright,M., B. Clarysse, P. Mustar, and A. Lockett 2007. Academic entrepreneurship in Europe, London, Edward Elgar. Zucker, L. G. and Darby, M. R. 1996. “Star scientists and institutional transformation: Patterns of invention and innovation in the formation of the biotechnology industry.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 93(23):12709–12716. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/7644 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本研究以代理人理論之觀點探討在大學技術商業化的過程中,大學校方、技轉中心以及大學研究者之間的互動,如何影響大學技術商業化的發展。本研究採質化訪談的方式,訪問台灣大學、中原大學、中正大學和淡江大學四所學校的研究者以及技轉中心人員,發現在大學技術商業化的過程中,確實存在代理問題。這些代理問題包括在大學校方與技轉中心的委託─代理關係中,技轉中心並沒有善盡大學技術財的守門人角色,監督大學研究者規避技轉中心的行為;在大學校方與大學研究者的委託─代理關係中,大學研究者並沒有善盡其必須向技轉中心揭露其發明技術的義務;在大學研究者與技轉中心的委託─代理關係中,技轉中心作為一雙重委託者,因需同時滿足校方政策與研究者的委託,無法發揮協助大學研究者從事技術商業化活動的功能,造成部分大學研究者選擇採取規避技轉中心。
本研究認為,造成技轉中心無法有效協助大學研究者從事商業化活動的原因,在於大學校方對於技轉中心的定位。若大學校方僅將技轉中心定位為技術財守門人的角色,而非將技轉中心建構為協助研究者從事技術商業化活動的機構,則技轉中心無法提供大學研究者有價值的技術商業化服務。因此本研究提出以下四點建議:一、各大學應重視技術商業化活動,而非僅關注技轉件數、專利件數等績效指標。二、改變技轉中心的角色定位,並提供技轉中心足夠的資源與誘因以協助研究者從事技術商業化活動。三、為鼓勵大學研究者從事技術商業化活動,學校應提高分配給大學研究者的技轉金比例,並降低大學研究者分攤專利費用的比例。四、各校應向大學研究者宣導智財權相關規範,並正視研究者規避技轉中心的行為。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | This research investigates the effects of the intertwined relationships among the university administration, TTO, and university faculties on the commercialization of university technologies. By interviewing university faculties and TTO staffs at National Taiwan University, Chung Yuan Christian University, National Chung Cheng University and Tamkang University, we discover two major agency problems in the process of university commercialization. Firstly, TTO staffs avoided their responsibilities to supervise and monitor the bypass behaviors of university researchers who did not disclose the inventions to the TTO but disclosed to affiliated private companies. Secondly, due to being a dual agent and the misalignment of objectives between the university administration and university faculties, TTO staffs were not able to fully support and assist university faculties in licensing university technologies.
We conclude that how does university position its TTO is crucial. The university should position TTO as a facilitator, but not a gatekeeper of university technologies. Findings of this thesis propose the following recommendations: 1. The position of TTO should be viewed as a facilitator, and university should supply TTO with sufficient resources and incentives to help researchers engage in commercialization of university technologies. 2. In order to encourage researchers to engage in commercialization of university technologies, university should raise the percentage of licensing royalties and reduce the percentage of patent fees for researchers. 3. University should instruct researchers about IP, provide TTO a guidance to monitor bypass, and deal with researchers’ bypass behaviors. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-19T17:48:51Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-106-R03343009-1.pdf: 2948862 bytes, checksum: cf5a2b3b437c3bb437c3befba4de40c8 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員審定書............................................................................................i
謝辭...............................................................................................................ii 中文摘要......................................................................................................iv 英文摘要......................................................................................................vi 第一章 緒論.................................................................................................1 第一節 研究動機與問題.........................................................................1 第二章 文獻回顧.........................................................................................5 第一節 大學技術商業化活動.................................................................5 第二節 大學技術商業化的過程...........................................................13 第三節 大學研究者技術商業化的方式...............................................23 第四節 代理人理論...............................................................................36 第三章 研究方法.......................................................................................50 第一節 個案研究...................................................................................50 第二節 訪談法.......................................................................................53 第三節 研究流程...................................................................................56 第四章 個案說明.....................................................................................57 第一節 國立台灣大學...........................................................................57 第二節 中原大學...................................................................................63 第三節 國立中正大學...........................................................................67 第四節 淡江大學...................................................................................71 第五節 各大學技術商業化政策之比較...............................................77 第五章 研究結果.....................................................................................80 第一節 大學研究者的技術商業化路徑...............................................80 第二節 大學技術商業化過程中的代理問題.......................................87 第三節 各校代理問題的比較...............................................................99 第六章 結論...........................................................................................107 第一節 研究結果整理.........................................................................107 第二節 研究貢獻與建議.....................................................................110 第三節 研究限制.................................................................................113 參考文獻...................................................................................................114 附錄...........................................................................................................127 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 以代理人理論分析大學研究者商業化其研究成果之過程與選擇 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Process and Researcher’s Choices in Commercializing University Technologies: From a Principal-Agent Theory Perspective | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 106-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 黃婉玲(Wan-Ling Huang),朱斌妤 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 大學技術商業化,技術移轉中心,代理人理論, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Commercialization of University Technologies,Technology Transfer Office,Principal-Agent Theory, | en |
dc.relation.page | 120 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201704324 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2017-10-31 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 公共事務研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 公共事務研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-106-1.pdf | 2.88 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。