請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/76344
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 王慧玉 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-07-01T08:20:30Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-07-01T08:20:30Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 1997 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 餘民寧。「次序性評定資料的信度分析和因素分析」。教育與心理研究第16期(民國82年9月),頁1-21。 餘民寧。「次序性資料的內容效度係數和同質性信度係數之計算」。測驗年刊第40輯(民國82年1月),頁199-214。 呂卷嬌。「相關概念在資訊檢索中之發展與趨勢」。圖書與資訊學刊第16期(民國85年2月),頁21-32。 李俊平。「訊息鑑別性之次序位置對線上判斷與記憶基礎判斷的影響」。中原大學心理學研究所,碩士論文,民國83年7月。 周祖誠。「民意調查中問卷結構效應的分析??八十三年臺北市長選舉調查的探討」。民意研究季刊192期(民國84年4月),頁50-64。 林珊如。「從終端使用者資訊檢索行為談圖書館的資訊服務政策及角色??實證研究之探討」。圖書與資訊學刊第13期(民國84年5月),頁22-39。 林娟娟、陳瑩芳合著。「Tefko Saracevic」。美國資訊科學學會臺北學生分會會訊第9期(民國85年11月),頁27-51。 陳穆怡。「讀者相關判斷行為之研究」。美國資訊科學學會臺北學生分會會訊第8期(民國84年9月),頁55-74。 傅雅秀。「塔夫克塞拉西維克與資訊檢索」。資訊傳播與圖書館學第l卷第l期(民國83年9月),頁66-74。 黃雪玲。「資訊需求者與次判斷者相關判斷之比較研究」。國立臺灣大學圖書館學研究所,碩士論文,民國84年6月。 黃雪玲。「資訊檢索中『相關』概念與『相關判斷』」。美國資訊科學學會臺北學生分會會訊第6期(民國82年6月)頁84-106。 黃葳葳。「廣電新聞編排次序對閱聽人的影響」。廣播與電視第2卷第3期(民國85年1月),頁91-111。 黃慕萱。「情境模式在解釋資訊尋求行為之適用性探討」。國立臺灣大學圖書館學刊第9期(民國83年12月),頁49-70。 黃寶將等著。「樣品測試次序對BRUCETON分析方法結果的影響」。火藥技術第10卷第1期(民國83年3月),頁65-73。 劉鬱棻。「證據呈現次序與審計判斷關係之研究」。國立臺灣大學會計學研究所,碩士論文,民國84年6月。 劉湘川、許天維、與郭伯臣合著。「一個次序理論和IRT之整合模式」。台中師院學報第10期(民國85年6月),頁1-25。 賴鼎銘。「論資訊科學的起源」。教育資料與圖書館學第32卷第l期(民國83年9月),頁40-49。 二、英文部分 (一)圖書: Bassili, John N., ed. On-line Cognition in Person Perception. Hillsdale, N.J. : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1989. Gescheider, George A. Psychophysics: Method, Theory, and Application. 2d ed. Hillsdale, N.J. : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1985. Harter, Stephen P. Online Information Retrieval: Concepts, Principles, and Techniques. Orland, Fla. : Academic Press, Inc., 1986. Klix, Friedhart, Risto Naatanen, and Klaus Zimmer. Psychophysiological Approaches to Human Information Processing. Amsterdam, Netherlands : Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., 1985. Schuman, Howard, and Stanley Presser. Questions and Answers in Attitude Surveys: Experiments on Question Form, Wording. and Context. Orlando, Fla. : Academic Press, Inc., 1981. Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Cambridge, Mass. : Harvard University Press, 1986. (二)期刊論文: Anderson, Norman H. “Information Integration Theory Applied to Attitudes about U.S. Presidents.” Journal of Educational Psychology 64:1 (1973): 1-8. Anderson, Norman H. “Integration Theory and Attitude Change.” Psychological Review 78:3 (May 1971): 171-206. Anderson, Norman H., and Arthur 3. Farkas. “New Light on Order Effects in Attitude Change.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 28:1 (October 1973): 88-93. Anderson, Norman H., and Stephen Hubert. “Effects of Concomitant Verbal Recall on Order Effects in Personality Impression Formation.” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 2 (1963) : 379-391. Barry, Carol L. “A Preliminary Examination of Clues to Relevance Criteria within Document Representations.” In Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science. Columbus, Ohio, October 24-28. 1993, ed. Susan Bonzi, 104-114. Medford, N.J. : Learned Information, 1993. Barry, Carol L. “User-Defined Relevance Criteria: An Exploratory Study.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science 45:3 (April 1994) : 149-159. Bart, William M., and David 3. Krus. “An Ordering-theoretic Method to Determine Hierarchies among Items.” Educational and Psychological Measurement 33:2 (Summer 1973) : 291-300. Belkin, N. J., and P. Kantor. “Combining the Evidence of Multiple Query Representations for Information Retrieval.” Information Processing & Management 31:3 (May-June 1996) : 431-448. Benton, J. Edwin, and John L. Daly. “A Question Order Effect in a Local Government Survey.” Public Opinion Quarterly 55:4 (Winter 1991) : 640-642. Bobertson, S. E., and N. 3. Belkin. “Ranking in Principle.” Journal of Documentation 34:2 (June 1978) : 93-100. Boyce, Bert. “Beyond Topicality : A Two Stage View of Relevance and the Retrieval Process.” Information Processing & Management 18:3 (1982): 105-109. Brooks III, John O., and Michael J. Watkins. “Further Evidence of the Intricacy of Memory Span.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning. Memory. and Cognition 16:6 (November 1990): 1134-1141. Bruce, Harry W. A Cognitive View of the Situational Dynamism of User-Centered Relevance Estimation.” Journal of the American Society for Infomation Science 45:3 (April 1994): 142-148. Burgin, Robert. “Variations in Relevance Judgements and the Evaluation of Retrieval Performance.” Information Processing and Management 28:5 (1992) : 6 19-627. Chalmers, Douglas K. “Repetition and Order Effects in Attitude Formation.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 17:2 (February 1971) : 219-228. Chan, Jason C. “Response-order Effects in Likert-type Scales.” Educational and Psychological Measurement 51:3 (Autumn 1991) : 531-540. Cooper, William S. “A Definition of Relevance for Information Retrieval.” Information Storage and Retrieval 7 (1971): 19-37. Crano, William D. “Primacy versus Recency in Retention of Information and Opinion Change.” Journal of Social Psychology 101 (1977) : 87-96. Crespi, Irving, and Dwight Morris. “Question Order Effect and the Measurement of Candidate Preference in the 1982 Connecticut Elections.” Public Opinion Quarterly 48:3 (Fall 1984) : 578-591. Davidson, David. “The Effect of Individual Differences of Cognitive Style on Judgments of Document Relevance.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science 28:5 (September 1977) : 273-284. DeLosh, Edward L., and Mark A. McDaniel. “The Role of Order Information in Free Recall: Application to the Word-frequency Effect.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning. Memory. and Cognition 22:5 (September 1996): 1136-1146. Dolan, Donna R. “Hedges for Online Searching.” Database 3:1 (March 1980): 79-82。 Einhorn, Hillel J., and Robin M. Hogarth. “Behavioral Decision Theory: Processes of Judgment and Choice.” In Annual Review of Psychology, ed. Mark R. Rosenzweig, v.32, 53-88. Palo Alto, Calif.: Annual Review Inc., 1981. Eisenberg, Michael B. “Measuring Relevance Judgments.” Information Processing & Management 24:4 (1988): 373-389. Eisenberg, Michael B., and Carol Barry, “Order Effects: A Study of the Possible Influence of Presentation Order on User Judgments of Document Relevance.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science 39:5 (September 1988) : 293-300. Eisenberg, Michael B., and Carol Barry. “Order Effects: A Preliminary Study of the Possible Influence of Presentation Order on User Judgments of Document Relevance.” In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science. Chicago. Ill., September 28-October 2. 1986, ed. Julie M. Hurd and Charles H. Davis, 80-86. Medford, N.J. : Learned Information, 1986. Fiske, Susan T. “Attention and Weight in Person Perception: The Impact of Negative and Extreme Behavior.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 38:6 (1980) : 889-906. Froehlich, Thomas J. “Relevance Reconsidered--Towards an Agenda for the 21St Century: Introduction to Special Topic Issue on Relevance Research.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science 45:3 (April 1994): 124-134. Froehlich, Thomas J., and Michael Eisenberg. “SIG/FIS--Relevance: A Dialogue about Fundamentals.” In Proceeding of the 55th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, Columbus, Ohio, October 24-28, 1992, ed. Susan Bonzi, 330-333. Medford, N.J. : Learned Information, 1992. Girotto, Vittorio, Palol Legrenzi, and Antonio Rizzo. “Event Controllability in Counterfactual Thinking.” Acta Psychologica 78:1-3 (December 1991): 111-133. Greene, Robert L., and Rebecca Lasek. “Category-Order Effects in Memory Span.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning. Memory. and Cognition 20:6 (November 1994): 1391-1395. Harter, Stephen P. “Psychological Relevance and Information Science.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science 43:9 (1992) : 602-615. Hayes, Donald P. “Item Order and Guttman Scales.” American Journal of Sociology 70:6 (May 1965): 51-58. Hogarth, Robin M., and Hillel J. Einhorn. “Order Effects in Belief Updating: the Belief-adjustment Model.” Cognitive Psychology 24:1 (January 1992): 1-55. Janes, Joseph W. “On the Distribution of Relevance Judgments.” In Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science. Columbus, Ohio. October 24-28, 1993, ed. Susan Bonzi, 104-114. Medford, N.J. : Learned Information, 1993. Janes, Joseph W. “Other People’s Judgments: A Comparison of Users’ and Others’ Judgments of Document Relevance, Topicality, and Utility.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science 45:3 (April 1994): 160-171. Janes, Joseph W. “Relevance Judgments and the Incremental Presentation of Document Representations.” Information Processing & Management 27:6 (1991): 629-646. Janes, Joseph W. “The Binary Nature of Continuous Relevance Judgments: A Study of Users’ Perceptions.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science 42:10 (December 1991) : 754-756. Janes, Joseph W., and Renee McKinney. “Relevance Judgments of Actual Users and Secondary Judgers: A Comparative Study.” Library Quarterly 62:2 (1992): 150-168. Keen, E. Michael. “Designing and Testing and Interactive Ranked Retrieval System for Professional Searchers.” Journal of Information Science 20:6 (1994) : 389-398. Lee, Joon Ho, Myoung Ho Kim, and Yoon Joon Lee. “Ranking Documents in Thesaurus-based Boolean Retrieval Systems.” Information Processing and Management 30:1 (January/February 199) : 79-91. Lucas, Christopher P. “The Order Effect: Reflections on the Validity of Multiple Test Presentations.” Psychological Medicine 22:1 (February 1992): 197-202. Marcus, R. S., P. Kugel, and A. R. Benenfeld. “Catalog Information and Text as Indicators of Relevance.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science 29 (1978): 15-30. Masin, Sergio Cesare, and Valentina Fanton. “An Explanation for the Presentation-order Effect in the Method of Constant Stimuli.” Perception and Psychophysics 46:5 (November 1989) : 483-486. McFarland, Sam G. “Effects of Question Order on Survey Responses.” Public Opinion Quarterly 45:2 (Summer 1981): 208-215. O’Brien, Ann. “Relevance as an Aid to Evaluation in OPACs.” Journal of Information Science 16:4 (1990) : 265-271. Park, Taemin Kim. “Toward a Theory of User-Based Relevance: A Call for a New Paradigm of Inquiry.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science 45:3 (April 1994): 135-141. Perreault, Wiilliam D. “Controlling Order-effect Bias.” Public Opinion Quarterly 39:4 (Winter 1975) : 544-551. Purgaillis Parker, Lorraine M., and Robert E. Johnson. “Does Order of Presentation Affect Users’ Judgment of Documents” Journal of the American Society for Information Science 41:7 (October 1990) : 493-494. Rittschof, Kent A., et al. “Thematic Maps Improve Memory for Facts and Inferences: A Test of the Stimulus Order Hypothesis.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 19 (April 1994): 129-142. Robertson, S. E. et al. “Weighting, Ranking and Relevance Feedback in a Front-end System.” Journal of Information Science 12:1/2 (1986) : 71-75. Robertson, S. E. “Ranking in Principle.” Journal of Documentation 34:2 (June 1978) : 93-100. Robertson, S. E. “The Probabilistic Character of Relevance.” Information Processing and Management 13:4 (1977) : 247-251. Salton, Gerard, and Chris Buckley. “Improving Retrieval Performance by Relevance Feedback.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science 41:4 (June 1990) : 288-297. Saracevic, Tefko. “Relevance: A Review of and a Framework for the Thinking on the Notion in Information Science.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science 26:6 (November-December 1975) : 321-343. Saracevic, Tefko. “The Concept of ‘Relevance’ in Information Science: A Historical Review.” In Introduction to Informaiton Science, ed. Tefko Saracevic, 111-151. N.Y. : Bowker, 1970. Schamber, Linda, Michael B. Eisenberg, and Michael S. Nilan. “A Re-examination of Relevance: Toward a Dynamic, Situational Definition.” Information Proecssing & Management 26:6 (1990) : 755-776. Schuman, Howard, Stanley Presser, and Jacob Ludwig. “Context Effects on Survey Responses to Questions about Abortion.” Public Opinion Quarterly 45:2 (Summer 1981) : 216-223. Sigelman, Lee. “Question-order Effects on Presidential_Popularity.” Public Opinion Quarterly 45:2 (Summer 1981): 199-207. Sperber, D., and D. Wilson. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Cambridge, N.A. : Harvard University Press, 1986. Spink, Amanda. “Term Relevance Feedback and Mediated Database Searching: Inplications for Information Retrieval Practice and Systems Design.” Information Processing & Management 31:2 (March/April 1995): 161-171. Steinberg, Lynne. “Context and Serial-order Effects in Personality Measurement: Limits on the Generality of Measuring Changes the Measure.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66:2 (February 1994) : 341-349. Su, Louise T. “The Relevance of Recall and Precision in User Evaluation.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science 45:3 (April 1994) : 207-217. Tversky, Amos, and Daniel Kahneman. “Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.” Science 185:4157 (September 1974): 1124-1131. Vickery, B. C. “Subject Analysis for Information Retrieval.” In Proceedings of the International Conference on Scientific Information. Feburary 1958. 855-865. Vickery, B. C. “The Structure of Information Retrieval Systems.” In Proceedings of the International Conference on Scientific Information. Feburary 1958. 1275-1289. Voiskunskii, Vladimir G. “Evaluation of Search Results: A New Approach.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science 48:2 (February 1997): 133-142. Wallis, Peter, and James A. Thom. “Relevance Judgments for Assessing Recall.” Information Processing & Management 32:3 (May 1996) : 273-286. Wang, Peiling, and Dagobert Soergel. “Beyond Topical Relevance: Document selection Behavior of Real Users of UK systems. In Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, Columbus, Ohio, October 24-28, 1993, ed. Susan Bonzi, 87-92. Medford, N.J. : Learned Information, 1993. Willick, Daniel H., and Richard K. Ashley. “Survey Question Order and the Political Party Preferences of College Students and Their Parents.” Public Opinion Quarterly 35:2 (Summer 1971): 189-199. Wilson, Patrick. “Situational Relevance.” Information Processing & Management 9 (1973) : 457-471. Yates, J. Frank, and Shawn P. Curley. “Contingency Judgment: Primacy Effects and Attention Decrement.” Acta Psychologica 62:3 (August 1986) : 293-302. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/76344 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 隨著資訊時代的來臨,電腦資訊檢索系統之重要性與日俱增,而良好系統之設計與評估實有賴對讀者相關判斷行為之研究。事實上,相關判斷的影響因素極多,其中文獻展現次序這項變數是系統所易於操控的變數,且許多研究發現,訊息呈現次序的不同可能導致受試者的反應產生改變。有鑑於此,本文擬針對文獻展現次序對讀者相關判斷所造成之影響進行深入探討,並建立本土化之實證研究結果。 本論文探討之重點有下列幾項:1.整理並探討次序效應之相關文獻;2.印證Eisenberg及Barry所提出之「賭注效應」,亦即驗證文獻依相關性由高至低排序時其相關評分值是否較隨機排序時為低,反之,依相關性由低至高排序時其評分值是否較隨機排序時為高;3.探討文獻序列位置對相關判斷評分結果之影響;4.探討文獻序列位置對相關判斷所費時問之影響;5.探討文獻筆數與次序效應之關係。本論文以國內受過圖書館學大專以上教育之受試者為對象,以兩階段實驗取得受試者對不同排序方式文獻之相關評分結果及判斷時問:第一階段實驗文獻係採隨機排序的方式呈現,第二階段實驗則依文獻相關程度向高至低及由低至高排序。實驗結果經統計分析得到下列結論:1.六種不同筆數文獻組的判斷結果中,僅5篇組與75篇組未產生賭注效應,其餘各組皆符合賭注效應之基本假設;2.文獻隨機排序時,其相關評分值不受文獻序列位置之影響;3.不論文獻隨機排序或依相關性排序,其各文獻相關判斷所費時間皆隨著文獻序列位置之增加而有明顯下降之趨勢;4.文獻判斷時間除受文獻序列位置影響外,亦受到文獻相關性及文獻組筆數之影響;5.文獻筆數愈多,各文獻判斷時間隨序列位置之增加而遞減的趨勢愈明顯。 本論文並就上述研究結果提出若干建議,並針對進一步研究提出多項建議,以作為後續研究之參考。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-07-01T08:20:30Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 1997 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 摘要………i 目次.....iii 表目次………………v 圖目次.........vii 第一章 緒論 第一節 問題陳述..............1 第二節 研究目的............3 第三節 研究假設...........4 第四節 研究範圍與限制.........4 第五節 研究方法................5 第六節 解釋名詞.........6 註釋.............8 第二章 文獻分析 第一節 文獻展現次序與相關判斷............9 第二節 次序效應概說.........14 第三節 次序效應相關理論..............18 第四節 次序效應相關實證研究......23 註釋...................31 第三章 研究設計與實施 第一節 研究對象....................37 第二節 研究設計..........41 第三節 研究實施程式................45 第四節 資料處理與統計分析.......48 註釋............51 第四章 文獻展現次序對相關判斷之影響實證分析 第一節 實驗所得基本資料分析.....52 第二節 文獻隨機排序與依相關性排序判斷結果之比較….63 第三節 文獻序列位置與判斷時問之關係......81 第四節 本研究之其他發現..........105 註釋..............109 第五章 結論與建議 第一節 結論.......112 第二節 建議.............116 第三節 進一步研究之建議............118 註釋............122 參考書目............123 附錄 附錄一 相關判斷之指引說明...............136 附錄二 相關判斷評分表................142 附錄三 判斷時間記錄表.............144 附錄四 受試者背景資料表........146 附錄五 第一階段實驗各文獻平均評分....147 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 文獻展現次序對讀者相關判斷影響之研究 | zh_TW |
dc.date.schoolyear | 86-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.relation.page | 148 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 文學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 圖書館學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 圖書資訊學系 |
文件中的檔案:
沒有與此文件相關的檔案。
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。