請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/74798
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 林麗雲(Lih-yun Lin) | |
dc.contributor.author | Chiao-Ting Chen | en |
dc.contributor.author | 陳巧婷 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T09:07:47Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-12-02 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2019-12-02 | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2019-11-27 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Amend, E., Kay, L., & Reilly, R. C. (2012). Journalism on the spot: Ethical dilemmas when covering trauma and the implications for journalism education. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 27, 235-247.
Ardener, E. (1975). Belief and the problem of women: The problem revisited. In S. Ardene (Eds.), Perceiving women (pp. 1-27). London: Malaby Press. Argyris, C. (1974). Behind the front page: Organizational self-renewal in metropolitan newspapers. CA: Jossey-Bass Inc. Atkinson, D. (1997). An auto/biographical approach to learning disability research. Aldershot: Avebury. Atkinson, R. (1998). The life story interview. CA: Sage. Ayers, W. (1990). Small heroes: In and out of school with 10-year-old city kids. Cambridge Journal of Education, 20(3), 269-278. Batscha, R. M. (1975). Foreign affairs news and the broadcast journalist. NY: Praeger Publishers. Beam, R. A., Weaver, D. H., & Brownlee, B. J. (2009). Changes in professionalism of U.S. journalists in the turbulent twenty-first century. Journalism and Mass Communication, 86(2), 277-298. Becker, H. S. (1970). The life history and the scientific mosaic. In H. S. Becker (Eds.), Sociological work: method and substance (pp. 63-73). Chicago: Aldine. Berg, B. L. (1998). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. MA: Allyn & Bacon. Bernard, H. R. (1988). Research methods in cultural anthropology. CA: Sage. Bertaux, D. (1981). Biography and society: The life history approach in the social sciences. CA: Sage. Bertaux, D., & Kohli, M. (1984). The life story approach: A continental review. Annual Review of Sociology, 10, 215-237. Boehm, A., & Staples, L. H. (2002). The functions of the social worker in empowering: The voices of consumers and professionals. Social Work, 47(4), 449-460. Boehm, A., & Staples, L. H. (2004). Empowerment: The point of view of consumer. Families in Society, 85(2), 270-280. Bowman, S., & Willis, C. (2003). We media: How audiences are shaping the future of news and information. Retrieved from http://www.hypergene.net/wemedia/download/we_media.pdf Brill, A. M. (2001). Online journalists embrace new marketing function. Newspaper Research Journal, 22(2), 28-40. Butt, R. L., & Raymond, D. (1989). Studying the nature and development of teachers' knowledge using collaborative autobiography. International Journal of Educational Research, 13(4), 403-419. Cassidy, W. P. (2005). Variations on a theme: The professional role conceptions newspaper journalists. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 82(2), 264-280. Chase, S. E. (1995). Taking narrative seriously: Consequences for method and theory in interview studies. In R. Josselson & A. Lieblich (Eds.), Interpreting experience: The narrative study of lives (Vol. 3). CA: Sage. Chung, D. S., & Nah, S. (2013). Media credibility and journalistic role conceptions: Views on citizen and professional journalists among citizen contributors. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 28, 271-288. Cohan, S., & Shires, L. M. (1988). Telling stories: A theoretical analysis of narrative fiction. London: Routledge. Cohen, B. C. (1963). The press and foreign policy. NJ: Princeton University Press. Cox, E. O., & Parsons, R. J. (1994). Empowerment-oriented social work practice with the elderly. CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company. Crabtree, B. F., & Miller, W. L. (1992). Doing qualitative research. CA: Sage. Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications, Inc. Culbertson, H. M. (1983). Three perspectives on American journalism. Journalism Monographs, 83, 1-33. Dennis, E. E., & Merrill, J. C. (1984). Basic issues in mass communication: A debate. NY: MacMillan. Denzin, N. K. (1989). Interpretive biography. CA: Sage. Dewey, J. (1997). Experience and education. New York: Free Press. Downie, L. (1976). The new muckrakers. DC: New Republic Book Co. Downing, J. D. H. (2001). Radical media: Rebellious communication and social movements. CA: Sage. Dunn, D. D. (1969). Public officials and the press. MA: Addison-Wesley. Egger, R. (1994). Biographical research in adult education, in the proceedings of Conference on Life Histories and Learning. University of Sussex. Elliott, P. (1977). Media organizations and occupations: An overview. Mass Communication and Society, 142-73. Ellis, C., & Flaherty, M. G. (1992). Investigating subjectivity: Research on lived experience. CA: Sage. Fontana, A., & Frey, J. (1994). Interviewing: The art of science. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 361-376). CA: Sage. Foote, N. (1951). Identification as the basis for a theory of motivation. American Sociological Review, 16(1), 14-21. Freire, P. (1973). Education for critical consciousness. NY: Seabury Press. Giele, J. Z., & Elder, G. H. (1998). Methods of life course research: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. CA: Sage. Goodson, I. F. (1992). Studying teachers' lives: Problems and possibilities. In I. F. Goodson (Eds.), Studying teachers' lives (pp. 234-249). NY: Teachers College Press. Goodson, I. F., & Walker, R. (1991). Biography, identity and schooling: Episodes in educational research. London: Falmer Press. Grumet, M. (1987). The politics of personal knowledge. Curriculum Inquiry, 17(3), 319-329. Gutierrez, L. M. (1990). Working with women of color: An empowerment perspective. Social Work, 35, 149-154. Gutierrez, L. M., Parsons, R. J., & Cox, E. O. (1998). Empowerment in social work practice: A sourcebook. CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company. Hanusch, F. (2011). A profile of Australian travel journalist’s professional views and ethical standards. Journalism, 13(5), 668-686. Hatch, J. A., & Wisniewski, R. (1995). Life history and narrative: Questions, issues, and exemplary works. London: Falmer Press. Hess, R. (1984). Thoughts on empowerment. Prevention in Human Services, 3(2-3), 227-230. Hitchcock, G., & Hughes, D. (1989). Research and the teacher: A qualitative introduction to school-based research. London: Routledge. Humphrey, R. (1993). Life stories and social careers: Ageing and social life in an ex-mining town. Sociology, 27(1), 166-178. Hur, M. H. (2006). Empowerment in terms of theoretical perspectives: Exploring a typology of the process and components across disciplines. Journal of Community Psychology, 34(5), 523-540. Janowitz, M. (1975). Professional models in journalism: The gatekeeper and the advocate. Journalism Quarterly, 52(4), 618-626. Johnstone, J. W. C., Slawski, E. J., & Bowman, W. W. (1976). The news peoele: A sociological portrait of American journalists and their work. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. Kincheloe, J. (1995). Meet me behind the curtain: The struggle for a critical postmodern action research. In P. L. McLaren & J. M. Giarelli (Eds.), Criticaltheory and educational research (pp. 71-89). NY: State University of New York press. Knowles, J. G. (1991). Life-history accounts as mirrors: A practical avenue for the conceptualization of reflection in teacher education. In J. Calderhead & P. Gates (Eds.), Conceptualizing reflection in teacher development (pp. 70-92). London: Falmer Press. Kohli, M. (1981). Biography: Account, text, method. In D. Bertaux (Eds.), Biography and society (pp. 61-76). CA: Sage. Kreisburg, S. (1992). Transforming power: Domination, empowerment, and education. NY: State University of New York Press. Kuper, A., & Kuper, J. (1996). The social science encyclopedia (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. Lacey, N. (2000). Narrative and genre: Key concepts in media studies. Basingstoke, Hampshire [England]: Macmillan. Langness, L. L., & Frank, G. (1995). Lives: An anthropological approach to biography. CA: Chandler & Sharp Publishers. Lea, M., Stuart, M., Thomson A., & West, L. (1994). Introduction: Language, the self and education, in the proceedings of Conference on Life Histories and Learning. University of Sussex. Lee, L. (1994). The empowerment approach to social work practice. NY: Columbia University Press. Lieblich, A., Tuval-Mashiach, R., & Zilber, T. (1998). Narrative research: Reading, analysis, and interpretation. CA: Sage. Lips, H. (1991). Women, men and power. CA: Mayfeld. Lukes, S. (1994). Power: A radical view. London: Macmillan Press Ltd. MacDonald, B., & Walker, R. (1975). Case‐study and the social philosophy of educational research. Cambridge Journal of Education, 5(1), 2-11. McCall, M., & Wittner, J. (1990). The good news about life history. In H. Becker & M. McCall (Eds.), Symbolic interactive and cultural studies (pp. 46-89). IL: University of Chicago Press. McQuail, D. (1983). Mass Communication Theory (1st ed.). CA: Sage. Nichols, B. (2001). Introduction to Documentary. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Nimmo, D. (1964). Newsgathering in Washington: A study in political communication. NY: Atherton. Page, N., & Czuba, C. E. (1999). Empowerment: What is it? Journal of Extension, 37(5), 24-32. Parpart, J. L., Rai, S. M., & Staudt, K. (2003). Rethinking empowerment: Gender and development in a global/local world. NY: Routledge. Parsons, R. J. (1991). Empowerment: Purpose and practice principle in social work. Social Work with Groups, 14(2), 7-21. Perkins, D. D., & Zimmerman, M. A. (1995). Empowerment theory, research, and application. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23(5), 569-579. Peterson, N. A., Lowe, J. B., Aquilino, M. L., & Schnider, J. E. (2005). Linking social cohesion and interactional empowerment: Support and new implications for theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 33(2), 233-244. Pinderhughes, E. (1989). Understanding race, ethnicity, and power: The key to efficacy in clinical practice. NY: Free Press. Plummer, K. (1983). Documents of life: An introduction to the problems and literature of a humanistic method. London: Allen & Unwin. Pollock, J. C. (1981). The politics of crisis reporting: Learning to be a foreign correspondent. NY: Praeger Publishers. Rapport, J. (1984). Studies in empowerment: Introduction to the issue. Prevention in Human Services, 3, 1-7. Richardson, L. (2000). Writing: A method of inquiry. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 923-949). CA: Sage. Riessman, C. K. (1993). Narrative analysis. CA: Sage. Riessman, C. K. (2003). Performing identities in illness narrative: Masculinity and multiple sclerosis. Qualitative Research, 3(1), 5-33. Sarbin, T. R. (1986). The narrative as root metaphor for psychology. In T. R. Sarbin (Eds.), Narrative psychology: The storied nature of human conduct (pp. 3-21). NY: Praeger Publishers. Seidman, I. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. New York: Teachers College Press. Shoemaker, P. J., & Reese, S. D. (1991). Mediating the message: Theories of influences on mass media content. NY: Longman. Sigal, L. V. (1973). Reporters and officials: The organization and politics of newsmaking. London: D.C. Heath. Solomon, B. B. (1976). Black empowerment: Social work in oppressed communities. NY: Columbia University Press. Spreitzer, G. M., Kizilos, M. A., & Nason, S. W. (1997). A dimensional analysis of the relationship between psychological empowerment and effectiveness, satisfaction, and strain. Journal of Management, 23(5), 679-704. Staples, L. H. (1990). Powerful ideas about empowerment. Administration in Social Work, 14(2), 29-42. Thomas, K., & Velthouse, B. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An interpretive model intrinsic task motivation. Academy of Management Review, 15, 666-681. Tuchman, G. (1972). Objectivity as strategic ritual: An examination of newsmen's notions of objectivity. American Journal of Sociology, 77(4), 660-679. Tuchman, G. (1978). Making news: A study in the construction of reality. NY: Free Press. Watson, L. C., & Watson-Franke, M. B. (1985). Interpreting life histories: An anthropological inquiry. NJ: Rutgers University Press. Weaver, D. H., & Wilhoit, G. C. (1986). The American journalist: A portrait of U.S. news people and their work. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Weaver, D. H., & Wilhoit, G. C. (1996). The American journalist in the 1990s: U.S. news people at the end of an era. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Weaver, D. H., Beam, R. A., Brownlee, B. J., Voakes, P. S., & Wilhoit, G. C. (2007). The American journalist in the 21st century: U.S. news people at the dawn of a new millennium. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Weber, M. (1946). From Max Weber: Essays in sociology, edited and translated by H. H. Gerth & C. W. Mills. NY: Oxford University Press. Webster's new world dictionary. (2nd college ed.). (1982). NY: Simon & Schuster. West, L. (2000). A masculine point of view? Or perspectives on the stories men and women tell, in the proceedings of the Gender, Learning and Biography Conference. ESREA Research Network. White, D. M. (1950). The “Gate Keeper”: A case study in the selection of news. Journalism Bulletin, 27(4), 383–390. Willnat, L., & Weaver, D. (2003). Through their eyes: The work of foreign correspondents in the United States. Journalism, 4(4), 403-422. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Zimmerman, M. A. (1995). Psychological empowerment: Issues and illustrations. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23(5), 581-599. Zimmerman, M. A., & Rappaport, J. (1988). Citizen participation, perceived control, and psychological empowerment. American Journal of Community Psychology, 16(5), 725-750. Zimmerman, M. A., & Warschausky, S. (1998). Empowerment theory for rehabilitation research: Conceptual and methodological issues. Rehabilitation Psychology, 43(1), 3-16. 王明珂(1996)。〈誰的歷史:自傳、傳記與口述歷史的社會記憶本質〉,《思與言》,34(3):147-184。 王昭正、朱瑞淵譯(1999)。《參與觀察法》,台北:弘智。(原書Jorgensen, D. L. [1989]. Participant observation: A methodology for human studies. CA: Sage Publications.) 王勇智、鄧明宇譯(2003)。《敘說分析》,台北:五南。(原書Riessman, C. K. [1993]. Narrative Analysis. CA: Sage.) 王筱慧(2009)。《站上講台說自己─東南亞文化講師的培力行動歷程》。世新大學性別研究所碩士論文。 王慰慈(2003)。〈台灣紀錄片的類型發展與分析-以Bill Nichols的六種模式為研究基礎〉。《廣播與電視》,20:1-33。 王麗雲(2000)。〈自傳/傳記/生命史在教育研究上的應用〉,中正大學教育研究所(編),《質的研究方法》,頁265-306。高雄:麗文文化。 王麗雲、潘慧玲(2000)。〈教師彰權益能的概念與實施策略〉,《教育研究集刊》,44:173-199。 江文瑜(1996)。〈口述史法〉,胡幼慧(編),《質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例》,頁249-270。台北:巨流。 成露茜(2008)。〈移民/工發聲與媒體〉,夏曉鵑、陳信行、黃德北(編),《跨界流離:全球化下的移民與移工》(下冊),頁129-158。台北:臺灣社會研究叢刊。 李芝瑩(2009)。〈外籍移工攝影作品中的的社會批判分析:以《凝視驛鄉VOYAGE15840》為例〉,《社會科教育研究》,14:277-292。 李金銓(2004)。《超越西方霸權:傳媒與文化中國的現代性》。香港:牛津大學出版社。 李金銓(2005)。《大眾傳播理論》。台北:三民。 李柏萱(2012)。《發聲/組織/運動:以新移民製作草根媒體經驗為例》。世新大學社會發展研究所碩士論文。 李祖舜(2004)。《擺盪在政治與專業之間:報紙政治記者對新聞實務與專業角色的認知》。政治大學新聞學系碩士在職專班論文。 吳芝儀、李奉儒譯(1995)。《質的評鑑與研究》,台北:桂冠。(原書Patton, M. Q. [1990]. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. CA: Sage.) 吳美雲(2001)。《識字教育作為一個「培力」運動:以「外籍新娘生活適應輔導班」為例探討》。世新大學社會發展研究所碩士論文。 吳靜如(主編)(2008)。《凝視驛鄉 VOYAGE15840─移工攝影集》。台北:印刻。 宋麗玉(2006)。〈增強權能量表之發展與驗證〉,《社會政策與社會工作學刊》,10(2):49-86。 林宇玲(2015)。〈從組織運作探討台灣制度化公民新聞的發展:以四家台灣新聞組織為例〉,《新聞學研究》,123:91-143。 林東泰(2015)。《敘事新聞與數位敘事》。台北:五南。 林津如、王介言、吳紹文(2008)。〈新移民女性之組織工作:一個跨領域的實踐嘗試〉,夏曉鵑、陳信行、黃德北(編),《跨界流離:全球化下的移民與移工》(下冊),頁241-298。台北:臺灣社會研究叢刊。 林美珠(2000)。〈敘事研究:從生命故事出發〉,《輔導季刊》,36(4):27-34。 林慕貞(2011)。《社群的記錄、培力的對話—以2009年「婦團暨社工影像教育培訓營」為例》。臺南藝術大學動畫藝術與影像美學研究所碩士論文。 柯妧青(2015)。〈從壓迫到解放:南洋新移民女性自拍影片的反再現與實踐〉,《臺灣教育社會學研究》,15(1):89-131。 胡元輝(2012)。〈新聞作為一種對話-台灣發展非營利性「協作新聞」之經驗與挑戰〉,《新聞學研究》,112:31-76。 胡元輝(2013)。〈追求真實與公眾信賴-新傳播科技所沒有改變的命題〉,《傳播研究與實踐》,3(1):1-12。 胡元輝(2014)。〈更審議的公民,更開放的公共-公共新聞與公民新聞相互關係的思考〉,《新聞學研究》,119:81-120。 胡幼慧(主編)(1996)。《質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例》。台北:巨流。 胡幼慧、姚美華(1996)。〈一些質性方法上的思考〉,胡幼慧(編),《質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例》,頁141-157。台北:巨流。 夏曉鵑(2002)。《流離尋岸─資本國際化下的「外籍新娘」現象》。台北:台灣社會研究叢刊。 夏曉鵑(2006)。〈新移民運動的形成—差異政治、主體化與社會性運動〉,《臺灣社會研究季刊》,61:1-71。 徐展青(2010)。《從語藝取徑看電視新聞記者的角色認定與新聞報導的敘事策略》。世新大學口語傳播學研究所碩士論文。 孫曼蘋(2011)。〈在地發聲、媒介素養與社區行動—彰化縣員林鎮《員林鄉親報》之個案研究〉,《新聞學研究》,108:59-102。 莊迪澎、梁美珊(2013)。《圖解傳播理論》。台北:五南。 張正(2008)。《全球化之下東南亞移民/工社群的跨界文化鬥爭》。暨南國際大學東南亞研究所碩士論文。 張正(2015)。〈閱讀與書寫,點亮每一個人的燦爛時光〉,《全國新書資訊月刊》,198:4-8。 許育光(2000)。〈敘事研究的初步探討—從故事性思考和互為主體的觀點出發〉,《輔導季刊》,36(4):17-26。 陳向明(2002)。《社會科學質的研究》。台北:五南。 陳芸芸、劉慧雯譯(2000)。《最新大眾傳播理論》,台北:韋伯。(原書McQuail, D. [2000]. McQuail’s mass communication theory (4th ed.). CA: Sage.) 陳國明、彭文正、葉銀嬌、安然(2010)。《傳播研究方法》。台北:威仕曼文化。 陳國祥(2016)。《媒體,寶物或怪獸?》。台北:天下文化。 陳順孝(2009)。〈台灣網路公民媒體的發展與挑戰〉,《台灣傳媒再解構》,頁239-276。台北:巨流。 陳順孝(2017a)。〈「公民記者」應是土著人類學家〉,《阿孝札記》。取自:https://axiao.tw/ 陳順孝(2017b)。〈為何寫?寫什麼?怎麼寫?—公民新聞的主題、材料和語言〉,《阿孝札記》。取自:https://axiao.tw/ 陳順孝(2017c)。〈新聞故事:公民新聞文體的想像〉,《阿孝札記》。取自:https://axiao.tw/ 陳順孝(2017d)。〈《打造公民媒體》結論〉,《阿孝札記》。取自:https://axiao.tw/ 郭佳旻(2014)。《臺灣新住民廣電媒體內容產製之研究—由「外」而「內」 的參與觀點》。輔仁大學大眾傳播學研究所碩士論文。 郭姵君(2010)。《從組織雇員到獨立記者:三位新聞工作者的專業意理形塑與實踐》。臺灣大學新聞研究所碩士論文。 連珊惠(1999)。《從報紙呈現之候選人形象看編輯之守門行為—以中國時報、聯合報及自由時報為例》。世新大學傳播研究所碩士論文。 張錦華(2014)。《多元文化主義與族群傳播權—以原住民族為例》。台北:黎明文化。 張麗春、李怡娟(2004)。〈培力概念分析〉,《護理雜誌》,51(2):84-90。 張鐵志(2007)。《反叛的凝視:他們如何改變世界》。台北:印刻。 張讚國(2013)。《匆促的記者:公民新聞、媒體與社會》。香港:香港城市大學出版社。 黃月純(2001)。〈生命史研究在成人教育上的應用〉,《成人教育學刊》,5:219-247。 黃安琪(2015)。《電視新聞攝影記者採訪報導颱風新聞的採訪應變與專業意理》。政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。 黃新生(1990)。《媒介批評:理論與方法》。台北:五南。 馮建三(2002)。〈人權、傳播權與新聞自由〉,《國家政策季刊》,1(2):117-142。 游明儀(2003)。《新聞談話性節目的內容分析暨其節目中記者專業意理實踐之研究:以新聞駭客News98為例》。臺灣大學新聞研究所碩士論文。 游美惠(2002)。〈增能/培力/培力/彰權益能/權力增長〉,《兩性平等教育季刊》,19:98-101。 彭芸(2006)。《媒介管理者認知新聞專業性及組織衝突之研究》。(行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告,NSC 95-2412-H-004-012)。台北:政治大學新聞學系。 彭家發(1992)。《基礎新聞學》。台北:三民。 舒詩偉、許甘霖、蔡宜剛譯(2002)。《行動者的歸來》,台北:麥田。(原書Touraine, Alain. [1984]. Le retour de l'acteur. France: Fayard.) 楊志弘(1992)。《臺灣地區報社總編輯職業角色之研究》。政治大學新聞研究所博士論文。 葉冠妤(2011)。《主流媒體中新聞專業的實踐與追尋:以《中國時報》調查採訪室成員為例》。臺灣大學新聞研究所碩士論文。 詹盛如(2013)。〈個案研究法〉,蔡清田(編),《社會科學研究方法新論》,頁1-26。台北:五南。 臧國仁、蔡琰(2017)。《敘事傳播:故事/人文觀點》。台北:五南。 管中祥(2002)。〈從Habermas的溝通觀再思考媒體傳播過程的權力意義〉,《中華傳播學刊》,2:185-220。 管中祥(2011)。〈弱勢發聲、告別污名:台灣另類「媒體」與文化行動〉,《傳播研究與實踐》,1(1):105-135。 管婺媛(2008)。《台灣1980年代《自立晚報》社會運動線記者的專業意理形成與實踐》。臺灣大學新聞研究所碩士論文。 熊同鑫(2001)。〈窺、潰、餽︰我與生命史研究相遇的心靈起伏〉,《應用心理研究》,12︰107-131。 趙善如(1999)。〈「增強力量」觀點之社會工作實務要素與處遇策略〉,《臺大社會工作學刊》,1:231-262。 蔡敏玲、余曉雯譯(2003)。《敘說研究:質性研究中的經驗與故事》,台北:心理。(原書Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. [2000]. Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. CA: Jossey-Bass Inc.) 蔡士敏(2008)。《自立事件核心記者的生命故事》。臺灣大學新聞研究所碩士論文。 潘淑滿(2003)。《質性研究:理論與應用》。台北:心理。 潘慧玲(2006)。〈彰權益能評鑑之探析〉,《當代教育研究季刊》,14(1):1-24。 謝世軒(2012)。《東南亞新移民女性的認同建構與培力:三項媒介文化行動的個案研究》。中正大學電訊傳播研究所碩士論文。 謝世軒(2016)。〈文化行動與培力的交會:南洋姊妹劇團〉,《臺灣社會研究季刊》,104:243-255。 蕭長展(2009)。《基進音樂的文化抵抗與公共領域的另類想像:黑手那卡西的實踐經驗分析》。南華大學社會學研究所碩士論文。 蕭蘋(1989)。《環保記者專業意理及其影響因素之研究》。政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。 韓香芸(1992)。《電視新聞從業人員個人特質與專業取向之關聯性研究》。政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。 藍佩嘉(2008)。《跨國灰姑娘:當東南亞幫傭遇上台灣新富家庭》。台北:行人。 簡偉斯(2011)。〈從移民∕移工影展看離散者的主體發聲〉,《藝術觀點》,48:86-91。 羅文輝(1985)。〈客觀與新聞報導〉,《報學》,7(5):110-116。 顧瑜君(2002)。〈生命史研究運用在教育研究的價值:對「窺、潰、饋:我與生命史研究相遇的心靈起伏」一文的回應〉,《應用心理研究》,13︰7-16。 龔尤倩(2002)。〈外勞政策的利益結構與翻轉的行政實驗初探—以台北市的外勞行政、文化實踐為例〉,《台灣社會研究季刊》,48:235-285。 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/74798 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 從整體來看,現今的東南亞移民不再只是被動的閱聽眾,而可以是主動的傳播者。有人自行創辦媒體、有人擔任媒體內部的編輯或記者,也有人獨立於媒體之外傳佈事實性和意見性的資訊,這反映出化無聲為有聲的集體力量以及「公民傳播權」的在地實踐。本研究基於關照東南亞移民自主報導的現象,選取生命史研究作為途徑、越南新移民阮金紅作為個案,試圖探討阮金紅是如何透過自我培力成為報導者(紀錄片導演和公民記者),以及她的角色認同為何。
本研究採用敘說研究中「整體-內容」的視角來閱讀、分析和詮釋資料,並將阮金紅的生命故事劃分為六個階段進行講述:(一)有苦難言:失去婚姻的新移民;(二)發聲練習:培養用影像說故事的興趣和能力;(三)為同樣命運的人做報導:新移民紀錄片《失婚記》;(四)為同胞做報導:移工紀錄片《再見 可愛陌生人》;(五)為公眾做報導:參與《PeoPo》公民新聞的製作;(六)未完待續:影像之內與影像之外的文化行動。 本研究結果發現,阮金紅主動地掌握鑲嵌於生命歷程中的各種培力機會,並體現不同層次的培力結果:在個人層次,擁有自尊、自我效能和掌控感,能夠訂定目標,並採取行動以達成目標;在人際層次,和新移民組織成員、影像專業工作者乃至報導對象形成共同學習、相互支持的關係,從中培養出自主發聲所需的知識、能力和資源;在社會政治層次,透過紀錄片、影音新聞和其他形式的文化行動,發揮廣及臺灣民眾、深及公共對話的影響力。除此之外,阮金紅具備不只一種的報導者角色,其中又以「說故事者」作為核心不變的自我定位。 本研究進一步討論並指出,首先,阮金紅由失婚到再婚、由封閉自我到走進社會、由沉默無聲到自主發聲、由單一到多元的報導身分與題材,此培力歷程呈現出螺旋式上升的發展軌跡。再者,依據阮金紅對於為何報導、如何報導和報導什麼的自我敘說,「說故事者」的角色內涵和啟示包括以下五項:(一)新聞故事的製作和傳播模式展現出公民參與的精神;(二)秉持順其自然而不刻意安排的態度來蒐集報導素材;(三)採取陪伴者的身分來和被報導者建立關係並參與其生活過程;(四)發掘具有報導價值的身邊故事、重視特定角度的主觀揭露;(五)建立培力機制,培育更多公民報導者。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Southeast Asian immigrants/migrants are no longer passive audience, but active disseminators. Many of them have created their own media, some serving as editors or journalists inside the media, while others spreading facts and opinions. They have paid their efforts in breaking through the silence and the localization practice of 'citizens' communication rights'. This study is dedicated to the self-reported phenomenon of Southeast Asian immigrants. Life history research has been adopted as the main approach and Vietnam immigrant “Nguyễn Kim Hồng” was chosen for case study. The study has attempted to explore how Nguyễn Kim Hồng becomes a reporter (documentary filmmaker and citizen journalist) through self-empowerment and which type of reporter role she identifies with.
Nguyễn's life history is divided into six phases while being told: (a) Being voiceless and powerless as a new immigrant who lost her marriage; (b) Trying to express: develop interest and ability to tell stories with images; (c) Reporting for people of the same fate: New immigrant documentary 'Out/Marriage'; (d) Reporting for compatriots: Migrant Workers documentary 'See You, Lovable Strangers'; (e) Reporting to the public: Participation in the content production of the Citizen Journalism Platform 'PeoPo'; (f) Unfinished, to be continued: Cultural actions within the image and outside the image. The results of this study indicate that Nguyễn has actively grasped the empowerment opportunities in life and reached different levels of empowerment: At the personal level, she has self-esteem, self-efficacy, and sense of control, as a person who can set goals and take relative action to achieve goals; at the interpersonal level, she has formed a relationship for co-learning and mutual support between members of the immigrant communities and nurtured the knowledge, abilities and resources needed to express opinions; at the political level, she has exerted influences and built public dialogue through documentaries, audiovisual news and other forms of cultural action. In addition, Nguyễn has played more than one type of reporter role, with 'the Storyteller' as the core self-positioning. This study has further pointed out that Nguyễn's life course consists of divorce and remarriage, from closed self to society, from silence to autonomous expression, from single to plural, with such reporting status and subject matter, this empowerment process presents a spiraling development trajectory. Furthermore, based on Nguyễn's self-narration on why, how and what to report, this study concludes that the role of 'The Storyteller' includes the following five elements: (a) The production and dissemination of news stories demonstrates the spirit of civic engagement; (b) Collecting the material of the report with the attitude of trend following and not deliberately arranged; (c) Taking the status of a companion and establishing a relationship with the person being reported and participating in his or her life; (d) Discovering the little stories around is, while paying attention to subjective disclosures at specific perspectives; (e) Establishing general empowerment-mechanisms to cultivate more citizen reporters. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T09:07:47Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-108-R03342032-1.pdf: 3256785 bytes, checksum: 1c2e378ec82aba1ab9cf1335e2f51804 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝辭 i
摘要 iii Abstract v 目錄 vii 圖目錄 x 表目錄 x 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 問題意識 1 第二節 研究重要性 7 第二章 文獻探討 9 第一節 自我培力 9 壹、培力的概念初探 9 貳、國內東南亞移民/工與傳播培力相關研究 14 第二節 報導者角色認同 22 壹、傳統的新聞專業意理 22 貳、報導者角色的四種類型 24 參、報導者角色相關研究 29 第三節 研究架構 36 第三章 研究方法 40 第一節 研究途徑 40 壹、生命史研究途徑 40 貳、採用生命史研究的理由 42 參、生命史研究的策略 45 第二節 研究方法:深度訪談與敘說分析 47 壹、資料蒐集:深度訪談(in-depth interview) 47 貳、資料分析:敘說分析(narrative analysis) 49 第三節 研究流程與對象 53 壹、研究流程 53 貳、研究對象 56 第四章 研究結果 58 第一節 有苦難言:失去婚姻的新移民 59 壹、吃苦長大的越南女孩 辛苦與心苦的共存 59 貳、聽說臺灣是個好地方 遠嫁來臺追尋幸福 60 參、不堪夫家的惡意對待 八年婚姻劃下句點 61 肆、謀生與走入社會艱難 為了女兒勇敢承擔 62 第二節 發聲練習:培養「用影像說故事」的興趣和能力 64 壹、因關心新移民而結緣 與蔡崇隆終成伴侶 64 貳、丈夫以影像記錄為業 漸感興趣從零學習 66 參、認知到紀錄片的真實 盼能用影像說小人物的故事 67 肆、參與協會服務新移民 同時拍攝身邊人事 69 第三節 為同樣命運的人做報導:新移民紀錄片《失婚記》 71 壹、為何報導 71 貳、如何報導 72 參、報導什麼 75 肆、報導影響力 79 第四節 為同胞做報導:移工紀錄片《再見 可愛陌生人》 85 壹、關心無法出聲的失聯移工 聽見他們的悲與苦 85 貳、為何報導 89 參、如何報導 91 肆、報導什麼、報導影響力 93 第五節 為公眾做報導:參與《PeoPo》公民新聞的製作 96 壹、投身公民記者的角色 發表八篇影音報導 96 貳、參考紀錄片製作方式 說更多人物的故事 100 第六節 未完待續:影像之內與影像之外的文化行動 103 第五章 結論 105 第一節 主要發現 105 第二節 研究討論 113 壹、螺旋式上升的自我培力歷程 113 貳、說故事者(Storyteller)的角色內涵 115 第三節 研究限制與建議 122 壹、研究限制 122 貳、研究建議 123 參考文獻 125 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 新移民報導者的自我培力與角色認同:以阮金紅為例 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Self-Empowerment and Role Identity of the New Immigrant Reporters: A Case Study of “Nguyễn Kim Hồng” | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 108-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳順孝(Shun-Hsiao Chen),張春炎(Chun-Yen Chang) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 公民報導者,自我培力,角色認同,說故事者,新移民,阮金紅,生命史研究, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Citizen Reporter,Self-Empowerment,Role Identity,Storyteller,New Immigrant,Nguyen Kim Hong,Life History Research, | en |
dc.relation.page | 140 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201904329 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2019-11-27 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 新聞研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 新聞研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-108-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 3.18 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。