請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/7450完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 劉碧珍(Bih-Jane Liu) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yao Lee | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 李曜 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-19T17:43:56Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-09-13 | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-05-19T17:43:56Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2018-08-18 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2018-08-15 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 中文部分：
黄烨菁 (2008). 開放條件下的技術進步-從技術引進到自主創新. 世界經濟研究, 2008(6), 14-18. 英文部分： Abraham, F., Konings, J., & Slootmaekers, V. (2010). FDI spillovers in the Chinese manufacturing sector. Economics of Transition, 18(1), 143-182. Aitken, B. J., & Harrison, A. E. (1999). Do domestic firms benefit from direct foreign investment? Evidence from Venezuela. American Economic Review, 89(3), 605-618. Blomström, M., & Kokko, A. (1998). Multinational corporations and spillovers. Journal of Economic Surveys, 12(3), 247-277. Borensztein, E., De Gregorio, J., & Lee, J. W. (1998). How does foreign direct investment affect economic growth? 1. Journal of international Economics, 45(1), 115-135. Bruhn, N. C. P., & Calegario, C. L. L. (2014). Productivity spillovers from foreign direct investment in the Brazilian processing industry. BAR-Brazilian Administration Review, 11(1), 22-46.Caves, R. E. (1974). Multinational firms, competition, and productivity in host-country markets. Economica, 41(162), 176-193. Chuang, Y. C., & Lin, C. M. (1999). Foreign direct investment, R&D and spillover efficiency: Evidence from Taiwan's manufacturing firms. The Journal of Development Studies, 35(4), 117-137. Damijan, J. P., Rojec, M., Majcen, B., & Knell, M. (2013). Impact of firm heterogeneity on direct and spillover effects of FDI: Micro-evidence from ten transition countries. Journal of Comparative Economics, 41(3), 895-922. Du, L., Harrison, A., & Jefferson, G. (2011). Do institutions matter for FDI spillovers? The implications of China’s “special characteristics”. Du, L., Harrison, A., & Jefferson, G. H. (2012). Testing for horizontal and vertical foreign investment spillovers in China, 1998–2007. Journal of Asian Economics, 23(3), 234-243. Fatima, S. T. (2016). Productivity spillovers from foreign direct investment: evidence from Turkish micro-level data. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 25(3), 291-324. Girma, S., Gong, Y., & Gorg, H. (2006). Can you teach old dragons new tricks? FDI and innovation activity in Chinese state-owned enterprises. Girma, S., Görg, H., & Pisu, M. (2008). Exporting, linkages and productivity spillovers from foreign direct investment. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, 41(1), 320-340. Gorodnichenko, Y., Svejnar, J., & Terrell, K. (2014). When does FDI have positive spillovers? Evidence from 17 transition market economies. Journal of Comparative Economics, 42(4), 954-969. Hamida, L. B., & Gugler, P. (2009). Are there demonstration-related spillovers from FDI? Evidence from Switzerland. International Business Review, 18(5), 494-508. Haskel, J. E., Pereira, S. C., & Slaughter, M. J. (2007). Does inward foreign direct investment boost the productivity of domestic firms?. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 89(3), 482-496. Huang Jr, T. (2004). Spillovers from Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Macau investment and from other foreign investment in Chinese industries. Contemporary Economic Policy, 22(1), 13-25. Javorcik, B. S. (2004). Does foreign direct investment increase the productivity of domestic firms? In search of spillovers through backward linkages. American Economic Review, 94(3), 605-627. Javorcik, B. S., & Spatareanu, M. (2008). To share or not to share: Does local participation matter for spillovers from foreign direct investment?. Journal of Development Economics, 85(1-2), 194-217. Jeon, Y., Park, B. I., & Ghauri, P. N. (2013). Foreign direct investment spillover effects in China: Are they different across industries with different technological levels?. China Economic Review, 26, 105-117. Jin, S., Guo, H., Delgado, M. S., & Wang, H. H. (2017). Benefit or damage? The productivity effects of FDI in the Chinese food industry. Food Policy, 68, 1-9. Kokko, A. (1994). Technology, market characteristics, and spillovers. Journal of Development Economics, 43(2), 279-293. Kokko, A., Tansini, R., & Zejan, M. C. (1996). Local technological capability and productivity spillovers from FDI in the Uruguayan manufacturing sector. The Journal of Development Studies, 32(4), 602-611.Kugler, M. (2006). Spillovers from foreign direct investment: within or between industries?. Journal of Development Economics, 80(2), 444-477. Lall, S. (1980). Vertical inter‐firm linkages in LDCs: an empirical study. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 42(3), 203-226. Levinsohn, J., & Petrin, A. (2003). Estimating production functions using inputs to control for unobservables. The Review of Economic Studies, 70(2), 317-341. Lipsey, R. E., & Sjöholm, F. (2005). The impact of inward FDI on host countries: why such different answers?. Does foreign direct investment promote development, 23-43. Lin, P., Liu, Z., & Zhang, Y. (2009). Do Chinese domestic firms benefit from FDI inflow?: Evidence of horizontal and vertical spillovers. China Economic Review, 20(4), 677-691. Liu, X., Siler, P., Wang, C., & Wei, Y. (2000). Productivity spillovers from foreign direct investment: Evidence from UK industry level panel data. Journal of International Business Studies, 31(3), 407-425. MacDougall, G. D. A. (1960). The benefits and costs of private investment from abroad: A theoretical approach. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 22(3), 189-211. Moulton, B. R. (1990). An illustration of a pitfall in estimating the effects of aggregate variables on micro units. The review of Economics and Statistics, 334-338. OECD (2005). OECD science, technology and industry scoreboard 2005. OECD, 181-183 Olley, S., Pakes, A., (1996). The dynamics of productivity in the telecommunications equipment industry. Econometrica 64(6), 1263–1298. Orlic, E., Hashi, I., & Hisarciklilar, M. (2018). Cross sectoral FDI spillovers and their impact on manufacturing productivity. International Business Review. Sachs, J., & Woo, W. T. (1994). Structural factors in the economic reforms of China, Eastern Europe, and the former Soviet Union. Economic policy, 9(18), 101-145. Teece, D. J. (1977). Technology transfer by multinational firms: The resource cost of transferring technological know-how. The EconomicJjournal, 87(346), 242-261. UNCTAD (2017). World Investment Report: Investment and the digital economy, New York: United Nations Veugelers, R., & Cassiman, B. (1999). Make and buy in innovation strategies: evidence from Belgian manufacturing firms. Research Policy, 28(1), 63-80. Whalley, J., & Xian, X. (2010). China's FDI and non-FDI economies and the sustainability of future high Chinese growth. China Economic Review, 21(1), 123-135. Xiaoning Long, C., Hale, G., & Miura, H. (2014). Productivity Spillovers from FDI in the People's Republic of China: A Nuanced View. Asian Development Review, 31(2), 77-108. Xu, X., & Sheng, Y. (2012). Productivity spillovers from foreign direct investment: firm-level evidence from China. World Development, 40(1), 62-74. Zahra, S. A., & Hayton, J. C. (2008). The effect of international venturing on firm performance: The moderating influence of absorptive capacity. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(2), 195-220. Zhang, K. H. (2005). Why does so much FDI from Hong Kong and Taiwan go to Mainland China?. China Economic Review, 16(3), 293-307. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/7450 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 過去不少文獻對於外國直接投資(foreign direct investment, FDI)對中國廠商生產力外溢效果加以研究，然而至今尚未獲得一致的結論。本文利用2000年至2007年中國製造業追蹤資料，除追隨文獻將外資來源區分為香港、澳門以及台灣(HMT)與其他來源(XHMT)兩類外，也進一步將中國產業依其技術密度分為高、中與低技術產業，並同時考慮這兩種因素(外資來源與產業技術)對FDI水平、向前、與向後三種外溢效果的影響，期能更精確的分析FDI所帶來的外溢效果。本文發現整體而言，FDI對中國所帶來的水平外溢效果為負，且來自HMT的負面效果大於來自XHMT的負面效果；整體向前外溢為正，主要來自HMT；整體向後外溢效果不顯著，主要由於HMT對高、中技術密度產業所帶來之負面效果，抵銷XHMT對高技術密度產業之正面效果所致。此外，本文也發現，對於技術密度越低的產業，HMT所帶來的負向水平外溢效果越大；但對於技術密度越高的產業反而產生越大的負向向後外溢效果。XHMT外資則正好相反，在技術密度越高的產業會產生越大的負向水平外溢效果；而在越高技術的產業，則會產生越大的正向向後外溢效果。這些結果顯示，不同外資來源會對不同技術密度的產業，帶來不同的外溢效果。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Using a large panel dataset of manufacturing firms in China from 2000 to 2007, this paper examines the productivity spillover effects of foreign direct investment (FDI) on domestic firms. We divide FDI into two sources: Hong Kong, Macao, Taiwan (HMT) and others; we also divide Chinese industries into three groups based on technology intensity: high, medium and low technology industries. Our results suggest that the negative horizontal spillover from HMT invested firms tend to be stronger in industries with lower technology, while the negative backward spillover of HMT firms is stronger in industries with higher technology. In contrast to HMT firms, non-HMT firms generate stronger negative horizontal spillover on higher technology industries, but will have stronger positive backward spillover on higher technology industries. These findings suggest that, the differences of FDI source and industrial technology are both crucial factors that determine the outcome of FDI spillover. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-19T17:43:56Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-107-R01323043-1.pdf: 1544513 bytes, checksum: 21b214489097551e03e25d237ee49c53 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 i
摘要 ii Abstract iii 第一章 前言 1 1.1 研究動機 1 1.2 研究目的 4 1.3 研究架構 5 第二章 文獻回顧 6 2.1 外溢效果定義 6 2.2 FDI的外溢效果類型 7 2.3 影響FDI的外溢效果因素 9 第三章 研究方法 15 3.1 迴歸模型 15 3.2 生產力估計 20 3.3 資料統計 22 第四章 實證結果 30 4.1 整體FDI對中國廠商生產力的外溢效果 30 4.2 不同外資來源對生產力的影響 32 4.3 FDI對不同技術密度的產業內廠商的影響 35 4.4 穩定性檢測 40 第五章 結論 42 參考文獻 45 附錄A 51 附錄B 53 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.title | 外資來源、產業技術與外國直接投資外溢效果：中國製造業實證 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Origins of FDI, Industrial Technology and FDI Spillovers: Evidence from Chinese Manufacturing Industry | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 106-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 鄭秀玲(Show-Ling Jang),李顯峰(Hsien-Feng Lee) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 中國製造業,外國直接投資,半參數估計法,外溢效果,外資來源,技術密度, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | China study,Foreign direct investment,Semi-parametric estimation,Spillover effect,Technology intensity, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 54 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201803309 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2018-08-16 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 經濟學研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2024-09-13 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 經濟學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-107-1.pdf | 1.51 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。