請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/73377
標題: | 營業秘密侵害之事前預防與事後救濟-以競業禁止條款及定暫時狀態處分為中心 Non-competition and Preliminary Injunctions in view of Trade Secret Infringement |
作者: | Yu-Tai Tsai 蔡雨泰 |
指導教授: | 吳從周(Chung-Jau Wu) |
關鍵字: | 營業秘密,競業禁止,勞動基準法,定型化契約,定暫時狀態處分, Trade Secret,Non-competition,Labor Standards Act,Standard Form Contract,Preliminary Injunctions, |
出版年 : | 2019 |
學位: | 碩士 |
摘要: | 台灣近年偏向高科技產業發展,而高科技產業屬於研發密集之產業,其所投入之研發經費所費不貲,又其產品週期較短且市場競爭激烈,基於保護台灣經濟發展之考量,必須針對產業之營業秘密與重要技術加以保護,以維繫其競爭地位之優勢,但產業間常以不當獲取營業秘密等方式從事商業角力之事時有所聞。營業秘密一旦遭不當的方式取得、利用、揭露,往往造成該營業秘密所有人難以回復之重大損失,再加上營業秘密的經濟價值往往不易計算,須曠日廢時地進行訴訟程序始能爭取到的損害賠償,且往往賠償金額並不符經濟效益。有鑑於此,營業秘密之事前預防措施比事後應變措施顯得更為重要且更具實益,因此高科技產業應著重於簽訂員工保密條款與競業禁止約款等法律手段,並將更多資源運用於保密措施、保密教育、設置保密之軟硬體設施等,即使不幸涉及營業秘密之爭訟,仍能善盡舉證責任,並確認何種資訊屬於營業秘密、企業是否已善盡合理之保密措施,以及舉證侵害行為所在,以提升在訴訟中勝訴之機率。惟在處理競業禁止條款之有效性時,不僅須顧及企業自身商業利益,應同時考量勞工之工作權,以在維護雇主之營業秘密與勞工權益二者間取得平衡,故在這類案件中,多須仰賴法官個案判斷,以尋找最適當的平衡點。
在本篇論文中,將探討重心放在我國營業秘密保護相關法令之介紹、探討各國有關營業秘密之立法例、競業禁止約款與定暫時狀態處分之內涵以及其在司法實務上之處理。並佐以學者之期刊、論文,作為研究論證,探討現行法於實體上規範未周全之處,對於相關法規提出修正之建議,以期探索出針對高科技企業營業秘密之有效保護方法與程序。 Taiwan develops high-tech industry for decades. High-tech industry is a research and development-intensive industry, so it costs a lot of money for investment. The product life of high-tech products is short, and the market is highly competitive. For protecting Taiwan economic development, we should focus on protecting trade secrets. It’s not uncommon that many companies get trade secrets illegally in high-tech industry. When the trade secrets are used in an improper way by the others, the trade secrets owners will get huge losses. In addition, the economic value of the trade secrets is often difficult to calculate, and it takes long time to sue for reasonable damages. We should focus on taking some preventive measures against misappropriating trade secrets. For example, by signing non-disclosure agreements and non-competition clauses, and taking security measures etc.. Even if it is unfortunately that the trade secrets owner involved in the dispute of trade secrets, they should carry the burden of proof, and confirm what kind of information is a trade secret, whether the enterprise has done reasonable and reasonable security measures, and the evidence of the violations to improve the chances of winning the lawsuit. However, in dealing with the validity of the non-competition clause, it’s necessary to consider about the company's own business interests, and the right to work of the labor. It should be considered to balance the trade secrets of the employer with the labor rights. Therefore, in such cases, it is necessary to rely on the judge's judgment to find the most appropriate balance point. In this thesis, we focus on the introduction of laws and regulations related to the protection of trade secrets in Taiwan, the legislative examples of trade secrets in other countries, the essence of non-competition clause and injunctions maintaining a temporary status, and the application in judicial practice. We use the journals and papers of scholars as the research argument to find the inadequacy of the current laws, the suggestions of how to amend laws, and find out the more effective method to protect trade secrets in high-tech industry. |
URI: | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/73377 |
DOI: | 10.6342/NTU201900863 |
全文授權: | 有償授權 |
顯示於系所單位: | 事業經營法務碩士在職學位學程 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-108-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.01 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。