請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/70957
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 鄭佳昆 | |
dc.contributor.author | Chih-Yi Chen | en |
dc.contributor.author | 陳芝伊 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T04:45:43Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-08-02 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2018-08-02 | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2018-08-01 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 一、 中文參考文獻
1. 朱永蕙、劉嘉麒(2016)。文化古蹟休閒涉入、遊憩體驗對地方依附與重遊意願影響之研究。休閒觀光與運動健康學報,6(4),1-21。 2. 李瑞興、溫雅惠、黃立博、陳春生(2012)。自行車道使用者休閒涉入與地方依戀之相關研究-以朴子溪自行車道為例。休閒運動期刊,11,1-13。 3. 沈潔姮(2008)。休閒涉入,心流經驗與依戀之研究-以墾丁春天吶喊音樂祭為例。未發表之碩士論文,高雄餐旅學院旅遊管理研究,高雄。 4. 林永森、黃文雄、陳寬裕(2011)。自行車參與者活動涉入、場所依附與目的地忠誠度關係之研究。臺灣體育運動管理學報,11(2),139-163。 5. 林志鈞、呂淑娟、李元方(2016)。滑雪旅遊參與者休閒涉入、知覺風險與場所依戀之研究。嶺東學報,39,119-146。 6. 林志鈞、孫淑芬(2016)。登山健行者戶外遊憩體驗、遊憩衝突、休閒涉入與地方依戀之關係-以大坑登山步道為例。育達科大學報,43,163-196。 7. 林秉毅(2016)。水肺潛水遊憩涉入及場所依戀之研究。休閒觀光與運動健康學報,6(2),1-25。 8. 邱思慈、林欣怡、張家銘(2010)。登山自行車騎士專門化,環境屬性,流暢體驗與場所依戀之關係研究。臺灣體育運動管理學報,(10),65-92。 9. 張良漢、蘇士博、王偉琴(2006)。不同活動涉入程度對地方依戀之研究。運動休閒管理學報,3(2),1-18。 10. 張鉯崴、官綺君、戚令宜(2016)。遊客遊憩涉入、體驗價值與地方依戀關係之研究-以新竹縣內灣風景區為例。觀光與休閒管理期刊,4(1),22-38。 11. 梁英文、曹勝雄(2007)。認真性休閒與場所依戀之關係:遊憩專門化扮演的角色。戶外遊憩研究,20(3),1-24。 12. 梁高倫(2014)。休閒運動涉入程度與流暢經驗之探討。休閒運動保健學報,(7),89-98。 13. 陳宏斌、胡俊傑、范啟敏(2007)。休閒農場遊客活動涉入及場所依戀與再遊意願研究。生物與休閒事業研究,5(2),119-133。 14. 陳琬婷、林我崇(2015)。中高齡生態解說志工活動涉入、地方依附與負責任環境行為關係之探討。臺大實驗林研究報告,29(1),19-33。 15. 陳雅敏(2015)。遊憩場所活動與地方情感之關係探討。未發表之碩士論文,臺灣大學園藝研究所,台北。 16. 陳寬裕、李仕琴、林士豐、林瓊芬(2012)。遊憩涉入、地方依附與社會情境之關係:以登山健行者為例。休閒觀光與運動健康學報,3(1),110-125。 17. 陳寬裕、林士豐、歐人豪(2012)。自行車活動參與者遊憩涉入、地方依戀與目的地忠誠度關係之研究。休閒觀光與運動健康學報,2(2),18-36。 18. 陳寬裕、簡翊芬、歐典灝(2013)。遊憩涉入、場所依戀與環境責任行為關係之研究:以水肺潛水活動為例。休閒產業管理學刊,6(2),1-22。 19. 陳慧玲、林安庭(2011)。登山運動參與者涉入程度,流暢體驗與幸福感之相關研究。臺灣體育運動管理學報,11(1),25-50。 20. 曾慈慧、沈進成,Collins, J. R., & Chen J. Y. (2010)。遊客的休閒涉入、地方感與環境復癒知覺關係之研究:以美國德州大彎國家公園為例。新竹教育大學人文社會學報,3(2),119-145。 21. 潘淑蘭、吳忠宏、周儒(2008)。解說志工活動涉入、地方依附與滿意度之關係研究:以國立自然科學博物館為例。戶外遊憩研究,21(3),23-47。 22. 蔡智欣、黃志成、卓庭宜(2012)。觀光客之遊憩涉入、目的地意象與地方依附關係之研究。休閒運動健康評論,3(2),232-257。 23. 戴有德、陳冠仰、李素馨(2008)。遊憩涉入,場所依賴與場所認同因果關係之研究:以東豐綠色走廊遊憩自行車使用者爲例。戶外遊憩研究,21(4),27-57。 24. 曾詩馨、李明聰(2010)。古蹟旅遊之地方依附,休閒涉入與滿意度關係之研究-台南市安平古堡遊客為例。Journal of TOKO University, 231。 二、 英文參考文獻 1. Agnew, C. R., Van Lange, P. A., Rusbult, C. E., & Langston, C. A. (1998). Cognitive interdependence: Commitment and the mental representation of close relationships. Journal of personality and social psychology, 74(4), 939. 2. Arriaga, X. B., & Agnew, C. R. (2001). Being committed: Affective, cognitive, and conative components of relationship commitment. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 27(9), 1190-1203. 3. Becker, H. S. (1960). Notes on the concept of commitment. American journal of Sociology, 66(1), 32-40. 4. Bloch, P. H., Black, W. C., & Lichtenstein, D. (1989). Involvement with the equipment component of sport: Links to recreational commitment. Leisure Sciences, 11(3), 187-200. 5. Bonaiuto, M., Mao, Y., Roberts, S., Psalti, A., Ariccio, S., Ganucci Cancellieri, U., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2016). Optimal Experience and Personal Growth: Flow and the Consolidation of Place Identity. Frontiers in psychology, 7, 16-54. 6. Bricker, K. S., & Kerstetter, D. L. (2000). Level of specialization and place attachment: An exploratory study of whitewater recreationists. Leisure sciences, 22(4), 233-257. 7. Brown, G., Smith, A., & Assaker, G. (2016). Revisiting the host city: An empirical examination of sport involvement, place attachment, event satisfaction and spectator intentions at the London Olympics. Tourism management, 55, 160-172. 8. Bryan, H. (1977). Leisure value systems and recreational specialization: The case of trout fishermen. Journal of leisure research, 9(3), 174-187. 9. Celsi, R. L., & Olson, J. C. (1988). The role of involvement in attention and comprehension processes. Journal of consumer research, 15(2), 210-224. 10. Chiang, Y. J., & Wang, D. H. (2016). Evaluation of Recreation Motivation and Activity Involvement in Affecting Place Attachment by Hikers. Taiwan Journal of Forest Science, 31(1), 1-17. 11. Crosby, L. A., & Taylor, J. R. (1983). Psychological commitment and its effects on post-decision evaluation and preference stability among voters. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(4), 413-431. 12. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & LeFevre, J. (1989). Optimal experience in work and leisure. Journal of personality and social psychology, 56(5), 815. 13. Csikszentmihalyi, M., Csikszentmihalyi, I. S. (Eds.). (1988). Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 14. Davis, J. L., Green, J. D., & Reed, A. (2009). Interdependence with the environment: Commitment, interconnectedness, and environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(2), 173-180. 15. Davis, J. L., Le, B., & Coy, A. E. (2011). Building a model of commitment to the natural environment to predict ecological behavior and willingness to sacrifice. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31(3), 257-265. 16. Davis, R., & Wong, D. (2007). Conceptualizing and measuring the optimal experience of the Learning environment. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 5(1), 97-126. 17. Dimanche, F., Havitz, M. E., & Howard, D. R. (1991). Testing the involvement profile (IP) scale in the context of selected recreational and touristic activities. Journal of leisure research, 23(1), 51-66. 18. Ditton, R. B., Loomis, D. K., & Choi, S. (1992). Recreation specialization: Re-conceptualization from a social worlds perspective. Journal of Leisure Research, 24(1), 33. 19. Eisenhauer, B. W., Krannich, R. S., & Blahna, D. J. (2000). Attachments to special places on public lands: An analysis of activities, reason for attachments, and community connections. Society & Natural Resources, 13(5), 421-441. 20. Engeser, S., & Rheinberg, F. (2008). Flow, performance and moderators of challenge-skill balance. Motivation and Emotion, 32(3), 158-172. 21. Félonneau, M. L. (2004). Love and loathing of the city: Urbanophilia and urbanophobia, topological identity and perceived incivilities. Journal of environmental psychology, 24(1), 43-52. 22. Gahwiler, P., & Havitz, M. E. (1998). Toward a relational understanding of leisure social worlds, involvement, psychological commitment, and behavioral loyalty. Leisure Sciences, 20(1), 1-23. 23. Geyer, P. D., Brannon, Y. S., & Shearon, R. W. (1987). The prediction of students' satisfaction with community college vocational training. The Journal of Psychology, 121(6), 591-597. 24. Giuliani, M. V. (2003). Theory of attachment and place attachment. In M. Bonnes, T. Lee, & M. Bonaiuto (Eds.), Psychological theories for environmental issues (pp. 137-170). Ashgate, Hants: Aldershot. 25. Greider, T., & Garkovich, L. (1994). Landscapes: The social construction of nature and the environment. Rural sociology, 59(1), 1-24. 26. Gross, M. J., & Brown, G. (2006). Tourism experiences in a lifestyle destination setting: The roles of involvement and place attachment. Journal of Business Research, 59(6), 696-700. 27. Gross, M. J., & Brown, G. (2008). An empirical structural model of tourists and places: Progressing involvement and place attachment into tourism. Tourism management, 29(6), 1141-1151. 28. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks: Sage. 29. Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing theory and Practice, 19(2), 139-152. 30. Hammitt, W. E., Backlund, E. A., & Bixler, R. D. (2004). Experience use history, place bonding and resource substitution of trout anglers during recreation engagements. Journal of Leisure Research, 36(3), 356-378. 31. Hammitt, W. E., Backlund, E. A., & Bixler, R. D. (2006). Place bonding for recreation places: Conceptual and empirical development. Leisure studies, 25(1), 17-41. 32. Hammitt, W. E., Knauf, L. R., & Noe, F. P. (1989). A comparison of user vs researcher determined level of past experience on recreation preference. Journal of Leisure Research, 21(3), 202-213. 33. Han, J. H., Noh, E. J., & Oh, C. O. (2015). Applying the concept of site substitution to coastal tourism. Tourism Geographies, 17(3), 370-384. 34. Havitz, M. E., & Dimanche, F. (1990). Propositions for testing the involvement construct in recreational and tourism contexts. Leisure Sciences, 12(2), 179-195. 35. Havitz, M. E., & Dimanche, F. (1997). Leisure involvement revisited: Conceptual conundrums and measurement advances. Journal of leisure research, 29(3), 245-278. 36. Havitz, M. E., & Dimanche, F. (1999). Leisure involvement revisited: Drive properties and paradoxes. Journal of leisure research, 31(2), 122-149. 37. Havitz, M. E., & Howard, D. R. (1995). How enduring is enduring involvement? A seasonal examination of three recreational activities. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 4(3), 255-276. 38. Havitz, M. E., & Mannell, R. C. (2005). Enduring involvement, situational involvement, and flow in leisure and non-leisure activities. Journal of Leisure Research, 37(2), 152-177. 39. Hidalgo, M. C., & Hernandez, B. (2001). Place attachment: Conceptual and empirical questions. Journal of environmental psychology, 21(3), 273-281. 40. Hill, B., & Green, B. C. (2000). Repeat attendance as a function of involvement, loyalty, and the sportscape across three football contexts. Sport management review, 3(2), 145-162. 41. Hou, J. S., Lin, C. H., & Morais, D. B. (2005). Antecedents of attachment to a cultural tourism destination: The case of Hakka and non-Hakka Taiwanese visitors to Pei-Pu, Taiwan. Journal of Travel Research, 44(2), 221-233. 42. Hwang, S. N., Lee, C., & Chen, H. J. (2005). The relationship among tourists’ involvement, place attachment and interpretation satisfaction in Taiwan’s national parks. Tourism Management, 26(2), 143-156. 43. Inoue, Y., Funk, D., & Jordan, J. S. (2013). The role of running involvement in creating self-sufficiency for homeless individuals through a community-based running program. Journal of Sport Management, 27(6), 439-452. 44. Iwasaki, Y., & Havitz, M. E. (1998). A path analytic model of the relationships between involvement, psychological commitment, and loyalty. Journal of leisure research, 30(2), 256-280. 45. Iwasaki, Y., & Havitz, M. E. (2004). Examining relationships between leisure involvement, psychological commitment and loyalty to a recreation agency. Journal of Leisure Research, 36(1), 45-72. 46. Jackson, S. A., & Marsh, H. W. (1996). Development and validation of a scale to measure optimal experience: The Flow State Scale. Journal of sport and exercise psychology, 18(1), 17-35. 47. Jackson, S. A., & Roberts, G. C. (1992). Positive performance states of athletes: Toward a conceptual understanding of peak performance. The Sport Psychologist, 6(2), 156-171. 48. Jorgensen, B. S., & Stedman, R. C. (2001). Sense of place as an attitude: Lakeshore owners attitudes toward their properties. Journal of environmental psychology, 21(3), 233-248. 49. Kaplanidou, K., Jordan, J. S., Funk, D., & Ridinger, L. L. (2012). Recurring sport events and destination image perceptions: Impact on active sport tourist behavioral intentions and place attachment. Journal of Sport Management, 26(3), 237-248. 50. Kerstetter, D. L., & Kovich, G. M. (1997). An involvement profile of Division I women’s basketball spectators. Journal of Sport Management, 11(3), 234-249. 51. Kim, S. S., Scott, D., & Crompton, J. L. (1997). An exploration of the relationships among social psychological involvement, behavioral involvement, commitment, and future intentions in the context of birdwatching. Journal of Leisure Research, 29(3), 320-341. 52. Kowal, J., & Fortier, M. S. (1999). Motivational determinants of flow: Contributions from self-determination theory. The Journal of Social Psychology, 139(3), 355-368. 53. Kyle, G. T., & Mowen, A. J. (2005). An examination of the leisure involvement—agency commitment relationship. Journal of Leisure Research, 37(3), 342-363. 54. Kyle, G. T., Kerstetter, D. L., & Guadagnolo, F. B. (1999). The Influence of Outcome Messages and Involvement on Participant Reference Price. Journal of Park & Recreation Administration, 17(3). 55. Kyle, G. T., Mowen, A. J., & Tarrant, M. (2004a). Linking place preferences with place meaning: An examination of the relationship between place motivation and place attachment. Journal of environmental psychology, 24(4), 439-454. 56. Kyle, G., Absher, J., Norman, W., Hammitt, W., & Jodice, L. (2007). A modified involvement scale. Leisure Studies, 26(4), 399-427. 57. Kyle, G., Bricker, K., Graefe, A., & Wickham, T. (2004b). An examination of recreationists' relationships with activities and settings. Leisure Sciences, 26(2), 123-142. 58. Kyle, G., Graefe, A., Manning, R., & Bacon, J. (2004c). Effects of place attachment on users’ perceptions of social and environmental conditions in a natural setting. Journal of environmental psychology, 24(2), 213-225.74. 59. Kyle, G., Graefe, A., & Manning, R. (2003a). Satisfaction derived through leisure involvement and setting attachment. Leisure/Loisir, 28(3-4), 277-305. 60. Kyle, G., Graefe, A., Manning, R., & Bacon, J. (2003b). An examination of the relationship between leisure activity involvement and place attachment among hikers along the Appalachian Trail. Journal of leisure research, 35(3), 249-273. 61. Lalli, M. (1992). Urban-related identity: Theory, measurement, and empirical findings. Journal of environmental psychology, 12(4), 285-303. 62. Laurent, G., & Kapferer, J. N. (1985). Measuring consumer involvement profiles. Journal of marketing research, 41-53. 63. Le, B., & Agnew, C. R. (2003). Commitment and its theorized determinants: A meta–analysis of the Investment Model. Personal Relationships, 10(1), 37-57. 64. Lee, S. H., Graefe, A. R., & Li, C. L. (2007). The effects of specialization and gender on motivations and preferences for site attributes in paddling. Leisure Sciences, 29(4), 355-373. 65. Lee, T. H. (2011). How recreation involvement, place attachment and conservation commitment affect environmentally responsible behavior. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 19(7), 895-915. 66. Lee, T. H., & Shen, Y. L. (2013). The influence of leisure involvement and place attachment on destination loyalty: Evidence from recreationists walking their dogs in urban parks. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 33, 76-85. 67. Lewicka, M. (2011). Place attachment: How far have we come in the last 40 years? Journal of environmental psychology, 31(3), 207-230. 68. Lyons, W. E., & Lowery, D. (1989). Citizen responses to dissatisfaction in urban communities: A partial test of a general model. The Journal of Politics, 51(4), 841-868. 69. Manfredo, M. J., & Anderson, D. (1987). The influence of activity importance and similarity on perception of recreation substitutes. Leisure Sciences, 9(2), 77-86. 70. Manzo, L. C. (2005). For better or worse: Exploring multiple dimensions of place meaning. Journal of environmental psychology, 25(1), 67-86. 71. Massimini, F., Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Delle Fave, A. (1988). Flow and biocultural evolution. In Csikszentmihalyi, M. (Ed.), Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness (pp. 60–83). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 72. McGehee, N. G., Yoon, Y., & Cárdenas, D. (2003). Involvement and travel for recreational runners in North Carolina. Journal of Sport Management, 17(3), 305-324. 73. McIntyre, N., & Pigram, J. J. (1992). Recreation specialization reexamined: The case of vehicle‐based campers. Leisure Sciences, 14(1), 3-15. 74. Moore, R. L., & Graefe, A. R. (1994). Attachments to recreation settings: The case of rail‐trail users. Leisure sciences, 16(1), 17-31. 75. Needham, M. D., & Vaske, J. J. (2013). Activity substitutability and degree of specialization among deer and elk hunters in multiple states. Leisure Sciences, 35(3), 235-255. 76. Oh, C. O., Lyu, S. O., & Hammitt, W. E. (2012). Predictive linkages between recreation specialization and place attachment. Journal of Leisure Research, 44(1), 70-87. 77. Ping Jr, R. A. (1997). Voice in business-to-business relationships: Cost-of-exit and demographic antecedents. Journal of Retailing, 73(2), 261-281. 78. Pomfret, G. (2006). Mountaineering adventure tourists: a conceptual framework for research. Tourism management, 27(1), 113-123. 79. Prayag, G., & Ryan, C. (2011). The relationship between the ‘push’and ‘pull’factors of a tourist destination: The role of nationality–an analytical qualitative research approach. Current Issues in Tourism, 14(2), 121-143. 80. Pritchard, M. P., Havitz, M. E., & Howard, D. R. (1999). Analyzing the commitment-loyalty link in service contexts. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 27(3), 333-348. 81. Pritchard, M. P., Howard, D. R., & Havitz, M. E. (1992). Loyalty measurement: A critical examination and theoretical extension. Leisure Sciences, 14(2), 155-164. 82. Privette, G. (1983). Peak experience, peak performance, and flow: A comparative analysis of positive human experiences. Journal of personality and social psychology, 45(6), 1361. 83. Proshansky, H. M., Fabian, A. K., & Kaminoff, R. (1983). Place-identity: Physical world socialization of the self. Journal of environmental psychology, 3(1), 57-83. 84. Putnam, D. E., Finney, J. W., Barkley, P. L., & Bonner, M. J. (1994). Enhancing commitment improves adherence to a medical regimen. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62(1), 191. 85. Ramkissoon, H., & Mavondo, F. T. (2015). The satisfaction–place attachment relationship: Potential mediators and moderators. Journal of Business Research, 68(12), 2593-2602. 86. Richins, M. L., & Bloch, P. H. (1986). After the new wears off: The temporal context of product involvement. Journal of Consumer research, 13(2), 280-285. 87. Rusbult, C. E. (1980). Commitment and satisfaction in romantic associations: A test of the investment model. Journal of experimental social psychology, 16(2), 172-186. 88. Rusbult, C. E., & Buunk, B. P. (1993). Commitment processes in close relationships: An interdependence analysis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10(2), 175-204. 89. Rusbult, C. E., Martz, J. M., & Agnew, C. R. (1998). The investment model scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal relationships, 5(4), 357-387. 90. Rusbult, C. E., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (1996). Interdependence processes. In E. T. Higgens & A. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 564-596). New York: Guilford. 91. Schreyer, R., Jacob, G. R., & White, R. G. (1981). Environmental Meaning as a Determinant of Spatial Behavior in Recreation. In J. W. Frazier & B. J. Epstein (Eds.), Proceedings of Applied Geography Conferences (Vol. 4, pp. 294-300). Binghamton, N.Y: State University of New York at Binghamton. 92. Schuett, M. A. (1993). Refining measures of adventure recreation involvement. Leisure Sciences, 15(3), 205-216. 93. Scott, D., & Shafer, C. S. (2001). Recreational specialization: A critical look at the construct. Journal of Leisure Research, 33(3), 319-343. 94. Seamon, D., Buttimer, A., & Seamon, D. (1980). Afterword: community, place, and environment. The human experience of space and place, 188-196. 95. Selin, S. W., & Howard, D. R. (1988). Ego involvement and leisure behavior: A conceptual specification. Journal of leisure Research, 20(3), 237-244. 96. Shamai, S. (1991). Sense of place: An empirical measurement. Geoforum, 22(3), 347-358. 97. Shelby, B., & Vaske, J. J. (1991). Resource and activity substitutes for recreational salmon fishing in New Zealand. Leisure Sciences, 13(1), 21-32. 98. Stein, G. L., Kimiecik, J. C., Daniels, J., & Jackson, S. A. (1995). Psychological antecedents of flow in recreational sport. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 21(2), 125-135. 99. Stokols, D., & Shumaker, S. A. (1981). People in Places: A Transactional View of Settings. In J. H. Harvey (Ed.), Cognition, Social Behavior, and the Environment (pp. 441-488). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. 100. Sutton, S. G., & Ditton, R. B. (2005). The substitutability of one type of fishing for another. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 25(2), 536-546. 101. Sutton, S. G., & Oh, C. O. (2015). How do recreationists make activity substitution decisions? A case of recreational fishing. Leisure Sciences, 37(4), 332-353. 102. Um, S., & Crompton, J. L. (1986). The Importance of Testing for a Significant Difference Between Two Pearson Product-Moment Correlation Coefficients. Journal of Leisure Research, 18(3), 206-209. 103. Vorkinn, M. (1998). Local attitudes towards natural resource management–the significance of place attachment and social identity. Environmental Management, 22(5), 737-746. 104. Watson, A. E., Roggenbuck, J. W., & Williams, D. R. (1991). The influence of past experience on wilderness choice. Journal of Leisure Research, 23(1), 21. 105. Wiley, C. G., Shaw, S. M., & Havitz, M. E. (2000). Men's and women's involvement in sports: An examination of the gendered aspects of leisure involvement. Leisure Sciences, 22(1), 19-31. 106. Williams, D. R., & Roggenbuck, J. W. (1989, October). Measuring place attachment: Some preliminary results. In Abstracts: 1989 leisure research symposium (Vol. 32). Arlington, VA: National Recreation and Park Association. 107. Williams, D. R., & Vaske, J. J. (2003). The measurement of place attachment: Validity and generalizability of a psychometric approach. Forest science, 49(6), 830-840. 108. Williams, D. R., Patterson, M. E., Roggenbuck, J. W., & Watson, A. E. (1992). Beyond the commodity metaphor: Examining emotional and symbolic attachment to place. Leisure sciences, 14(1), 29-46. 109. Williams, D. R., Stewart, W. P., & Kruger, L. E. (2013). The emergence of place-based conservation. In Place-Based Conservation (pp. 1-17). Springer, Dordrecht. 110. Wöran, B., & Arnberger, A. (2012). Exploring relationships between recreation specialization, restorative environments and mountain hikers’ flow experience. Leisure Sciences, 34(2), 95-114. 111. Wu, C. C., Hsu, S. Y., & Wang, W. C. (2008). Experience use history and typology of substitutability among hikers. Advances in hospitality and leisure , 4, 121-137. 112. Wu, C. H. J., & Liang, R. D. (2011). The relationship between white-water rafting experience formation and customer reaction: a flow theory perspective. Tourism Management, 32(2), 317-325. 113. Wynveen, C. J., Kyle, G. T., & Sutton, S. G. (2012). Natural area visitors' place meaning and place attachment ascribed to a marine setting. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(4), 287-296. 114. Wynveen, C. J., Kyle, G. T., & Sutton, S. G. (2014). Environmental worldview, place attachment, and awareness of environmental impacts in a marine environment. Environment and Behavior, 46(8), 993-1017. 115. Xu, Z., & Zhang, J. (2016). Antecedents and consequences of place attachment: A comparison of Chinese and Western urban tourists in Hangzhou, China. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 5(2), 86-96. 116. Yuksel, A., Yuksel, F., & Bilim, Y. (2010). Destination attachment: Effects on customer satisfaction and cognitive, affective and conative loyalty. Tourism management, 31(2), 274-284. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/70957 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 近年來人與地點的關係日益受到重視,人們透過遊憩活動和地點互動進而形成情感,這種情感連結需要與地點長期互動而逐漸產生。因此遊憩者所表現出對於活動不同程度的參與和地方依附之間的關係相當重要。目前在休閒遊憩領域中已有相當多的文獻探討活動涉入與地方依附之間的關係,認為活動涉入是地方依附的前提條件,然而針對不同的活動種類的研究,兩者間的關係並不一致:一些研究指出活動涉入與地方依附具有正向關係,但是在另一些研究中兩者卻是無關。此外,早期研究主要探討活動涉入和地方依附之間的直接關係,少有研究探討活動涉入如何影響地方依附,其影響機制尚不明確。本研究主要研究不同特性的活動特性對於活動涉入和地方依附之間關係的影響,並釐清活動涉入對於地方依附的影響機制。研究分為三部分以探討活動涉入和地方依附之間的關係,前兩部分主要探討活動特性對涉入和依附之間關係的影響。過去曾有研究指出,不同活動對於特定地點的依賴程度似乎有所不同:一些活動可能高度依賴特定地點,而有些則否。另一方面,心流體驗為一種活動的特徵,容易使遊憩者從事活動時心無旁騖,某些活動會讓遊憩者較為專注於活動本身,而另一些活動則較容易使遊憩者同時專注於活動和地點。本研究認為活動對於地點的相依特性以及活動的心流特徵會對於活動涉入和地方依附之間的關係造成影響。而在第三項研究中則是探討活動涉入、投資模型與地方依附的關係以了解活動涉入對於地方依附的影響模式。所有研究皆為現地問卷調查,第一個研究結果表明,當活動與環境的相依性較低時,活動涉入與地方依附無關,當活動與環境的相依性較高時則活動涉入與地方依附呈現正相關。在第二個研究結果表示,對於較容易產生心流體驗的活動而言,活動涉入與地方依附無關,對於其他一般性活動而言,活動涉入與地方依附正相關。最後在第三個研究的部分,研究結果發現活動涉入透過投資模型影響地方依附之模型成立,活動涉入會透過滿意度、投資程度正向影響地方依附;活動涉入會透過替代方案負向影響地方依附。本研究發現在探討活動涉入和地方依附之間的關係時,必須考慮活動特性的影響。本研究亦發現兩個概念間的關係會被投資模型的三個因素所中介,將不同的影響因素納入考量有助於釐清活動涉入對於地方依附影響機制。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Recreational activity is one of the most important means for people to develop emotional bonding with recreation settings. Such emotional connection is developed gradually through long-term interaction with place. Although researchers believed that activity involvement is an antecedent of place attachment, but the associations between the two is not very consistent. Depending on the types of activity, studies have found the relationships between activity involvement and place attachment could be positive or insignificant. In addition, previous studies mostly explored the direct relationship between activity involvement and place attachment, and only few studies had examined how activity involvement leads to setting attachment. The present study intended to investigate the effect of different activities on the relationship between activity involvement and place attachment, as well as to understand how activity involvement led to place attachment. The relationship between activity and affective bonding in recreational sites was investigated with three studies. The first two studies focused on the influence of activity chractoristics on the relationship between involvement and attachment. Previous studies have suggested that depending on the nature of the activities, their level of resource dependency seems to be different. Therefore, some activities may highly rely on resource while others don't. In addition, flow experience can be regarded as a feature of activity, which is an optimal psychological state. When in flow, a person becomes totally involved in an activity and focuses on the activity itself. Some activities will make people more focus on the activity itself, while others are easy to focus on activities and place. In the third study, activity involvement, investment model and place attachment were investigated to find out how emotional bonding in place can be formed through activity involvemen. On‐site surveys were conducted for all three experiments. The results of study 1 showed that place attachment correlated positively with activity involvement when the activity is highly dependent on resources, while no significant correlation was found in the low resource dependent activities. Similarly, the second study showed that place attachment correlated positively with activity involvement for the low flow experience activities, while no significant correlation was found in the high flow experience activities. The results of the third study revealed that the model of activity involvement influencing place attachment was valid, which indicated the factors of investment model mediate the relationship between activity involvement and place attachment. The current study suggested that positive involvement-attachment association must be on the premise of resource-dependent activities or lower flow experience activities. When exploring the relationship between activity involvement and place attachment, it is necessary to consider the impact of the nature of activity. The current study also indicated the necessity to consider other factors between the two, which will contribute to our understanding of the relationship between activity involvement and place attachment. The current results would also help landscape designer to manage better landscape planning and design in the future. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T04:45:43Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-107-R05628307-1.pdf: 2824914 bytes, checksum: 1f61243ef1ffcad0b8559635fbb6524b (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 I
中文摘要 II 英文摘要 IV 目錄 VI 圖目錄 VIII 表目錄 VIII 第一章、 緒論 1 第一節、 研究緣起 1 第二節、 研究目的 2 第三節、 研究流程 3 第二章、 文獻回顧 5 第一節、 地方依附 5 第二節、 活動涉入 7 第三節、 心流體驗 14 第四節、 承諾投資模型 16 第五節、 小結 22 第三章、 活動涉入、活動與地點相依特性與地方依附之關係探討 25 第一節、 研究背景 25 第二節、 研究方法 26 第三節、 研究結果 28 第四節、 小結 33 第四章、 活動涉入、心流體驗與地方依附之關係探討 35 第一節、 研究背景 35 第二節、 研究方法 36 第三節、 研究結果 38 第四節、 小結 45 第五章、 以承諾投資模型探討活動涉入與地方依附之關係 47 第一節、 研究背景 47 第二節、 研究方法 48 第三節、 研究結果 52 第四節、 小結 69 第六章、 討論與建議 71 第一節、 研究結論與討論 71 第二節、 未來應用與建議 78 參考文獻 81 附錄 97 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 活動涉入與地方依附之關係探討 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Exploring the Relationship between Activity Involvement and Place Attachment | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 106-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林晏州,張俊彥,林建堯,張伯茹 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 活動,地方情感,心流體驗,投資模型, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Activity,Place,Flow,Investment model, | en |
dc.relation.page | 105 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201802377 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2018-08-02 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 園藝暨景觀學系 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 園藝暨景觀學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-107-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 2.76 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。