請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/70082完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 黃銘傑(Ming-Jye Huang) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Wan-Yu Lee | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 李宛諭 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T03:42:32Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2020-08-21 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2020-08-21 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2020-08-18 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 中文文獻
書籍 Carl Shapiro Hal R. Varian（著），張美惠（譯）（1999），《資訊經營法則》，頁24，臺北：時報出版 Klaus Schwab（著），世界經濟論壇北京代表處（譯）（2017），《第四次工業革命》，臺北：天下文化 公平交易委員會（2019），《認識公平交易法》，臺北：行政院公平交易委員會。 吳秀明（2004），《競爭法制之發軔與展開》，臺北：元照。 車品覺（2014），《大數據的關鍵思考：行動×多螢×碎片化時代的商業智慧》，臺北：天下雜誌。 胡祖舜（2019），《競爭法之經濟分析》，台北：元照。 陳正倉、林惠玲、陳忠榮、莊春發（2016），《產業經濟學：理論與實際》，三版，臺北: 雙葉書廊。 期刊論文 王立達（2018），〈我國聯合行為規範現況之結構反省與革新：事前許可制、積極分流與事後查處制〉，《臺大法學論叢》，47卷2期，頁 1175-1219。 邱文聰(2009)，〈從資訊自決與資訊隱私的概念區分-評「電腦處理個人資料保護法修正草案」的結構性問題〉，《月旦法學雜誌》，168 期，頁172-189。 翁清坤（2013），〈告知後同意與消費者個人資料之保護〉，《臺北大學法學論叢》，87期，頁217-322。 馬泰成（2019），〈掠奪性定價與電子商務〉，《公平交易季刊》，27卷2期，頁145-178。 張陳弘(2018)，〈新興科技下的資訊隱私保護：「告知後同意原則」的侷限性與修正方法之提出〉，《臺大法學論叢》，47卷1 期，頁201-297。 陳志民（2018），〈大數據與市場力濫用行為初探〉，《公平交易季刊》，26卷 3 期，頁1-33。 黃銘傑（2001），〈相對優勢地位濫用與公平交易法之規範〉，《臺大法學論叢》，30卷5期，頁221-268。 黃銘傑（2012），〈讓行政的歸行政、司法的歸司法──跳脫「先行政後司法」後之「先行政無司法」窘態〉，《月旦法學雜誌》，201期，頁91-121。 黃銘傑（2017），〈公平交易法結合管制之問題點與盲點─以結合類型與實體規範要件為中心〉，《公平交易季刊》，25 卷 2 期，頁29-54。 楊宏暉（2004），〈新經濟時代的反托拉斯法挑戰－網路效應與微軟案之初探〉，《政大法學評論》，77 期，頁207-284。 劉靜怡（1999），〈初探網路產業的市場規範及其未來：以 United States v. Microsoft 案的發展為主軸〉，《臺大法學論叢》，28 卷 4 期，頁1-66。 劉靜怡（2002），〈網際網路時代的資訊使用與隱私權保護規範：個人、政府與市場的拔河〉，《資訊管理研究》，4 卷 3 期，頁137-162。 劉靜怡(2019)，〈淺談GDPR的國際衝擊及其可能因應之道〉，《月旦法學雜誌》，286期，頁5-13。 施錦村、馬泰成、單驥、劉姿汝（2018），〈競爭法規範有關事業間交換敏感資訊與聯合行為之研究〉，《公平交易季刊》，26卷2期，頁55-114。 顏雅倫（2016），〈雙邊／多邊市場之競爭與創新──論競爭法的因應〉，《科技法學評論》，第13卷第1期，頁219-266。 學位論文 邱映曦（2019），《競爭法的數位紀元－論數位平台資訊力對競爭法適用之影響》，國立政治大學法律學系博士學位論文，(未出版)，台北。 劉穎蓁（2018），《優步公司訂價演算法關於價格聯合行為爭議之研究─以美國休曼法為中心》，國立政治大學國際經營與貿易學系碩士論文(未出版)，台北。 網路資料 公平交易委員（2016），《公平交易委員會對於相關市場界定之處理原則問答集》，載於：https://www.ftc.gov.tw/internet/main/doc/docDetail.aspx?uid=1345 docid=13940。 公平交易委員會（2019），《不禁止台灣連線金融科技股份有限公司等7事業擬合資新設「連線商業銀行股份有限公司」，另有中華電信股份有限公司等9事業擬合資新設「將來商業銀行股份有限公司」等2件純網路銀行結合案》，載於：https://www.ftc.gov.tw/internet/main/doc/docDetail.aspx?uid=126 docid=16145 公平交易委員會（2020），《不禁止樂天銀行株式會社、樂天Card株式會社與國票金融控股股份有限公司合資成立「樂天國際商業銀行」經營純網路銀行結合案》，載於： https://www.ftc.gov.tw/internet/main/doc/docDetail.aspx?uid=126 docid=16278 張展旗（2019），《公平法專欄：人工智慧訂價決策可能有聯合行為疑慮（下）》，載於：https://www.btlaw.com.tw/web/Home/NewsInfo?key=0227079976 cont=135914 黃彥傑（2011），〈邁Facebook API簡介〉，《國立臺灣大學計算機及資訊網路中心電子報》，16期，載於： http://www.cc.ntu.edu.tw/chinese/epaper/0016/20110320_1605.html 網頁，國家發展委員會網，載於：https://www.ndc.gov.tw/Content_List.aspx?n=726A44EA5D724473。 英文文獻 書籍 Crane, Daniel A. 2014. Antitrust: Law and Litigation. Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer. Ezrachi, Ariel and Maurice E. Stucke. 2016.Virtual Competition: The Promise and Perils of the Algorithm-Driven Economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Graef, Inge. 2016. EU Competition Law, Data Protection and Online Platforms: Data as Essential Facility. Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer. Hovenkamp, Herbert. 2016. Federal Antitrust Policy: The Law of Competition and Its Practice. 5th ed. Eagan, MN: West Group. Mankiw, Gregory. 2015. Principles of Economics (Custom Edition). Boston, MA: South Western. Solove, Daniel. 2018. Information Privacy Law. 6th ed. Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer. Stucke, Maurice E. and Allen P. Grunes. 2016. Big Data and Competition Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 期刊論文 Acquisti, Alessandro, Laura Brandimarte1 and George Loewenstein. 2015. Privacy and human behavior in the age of information. Science 347(6221): 509-514. Adjerid, Idris, Eyal Peer and Alessandro Acquisti. 2018. Beyond the Privacy Paradox: Objective Versus Relative Risk in Privacy Decision Making. Mis Quarterly 42(2): 465-488. Barth, Susanne and Menno D.T.de Jong. 2017. The Privacy Paradox – Investigating Discrepancies between Expressed pPrivacy Concerns and Actual Online Behavior – A Systematic Literature Review. Telematics and Informatics 34(7): 1038-1058. Bork, Robert H. and J. Gregory Sidak. 2012. What Does The Chicago School Teach About Internet Search And The Antitrust Treatment Of Google?, Journal of Competition Law Economics 8(4): 663-700. Boutin, Xavier and Georg Clemens. 2017. Defining “Big Data” in Antitrust. Comptition Policy International: Antitrust Chronicle. Available at:https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2938397. Cate, Fred H. 1995. The EU Data Protection Directive, Information Privacy, and the Public Interest. Iowa Law Review 80: 431-443. Cooper, James C. 2013. Privacy and Antitrust: Underpants Gnomes, the FirstAmendment and Subjectivity. George Mason Law Review 20: 1129-1146. De Mauro, Andrea, Macro Greco and Michele. 2016.A formal definition of Big Data based on its essential features. Library Review 65(3): 122-135. Evans, David and Richard Schmalensee. 2017. Network Effects: March to the Evidence, Not to the Slogans. Comptition Policy International: Antitrust Chronicle. Available at: https://mitsloan.mit.edu/shared/ods/documents/?DocumentID=4243 Evans, David S. 2009. The Online Advertising Industry: Economics, Evolution, and Privacy. Journal of Economic Perspectives 23(3): 37-60. Evanst, David S. 2003. The Antitrust Economics of Multi-Sided Platform Markets. Yale Journal on Regulation 20: 325-381. Filistrucchi, Lapo, Damien Geradin, Eric van Damme and Pauline Affeldt. 2014. Market Definition in Two-Sided Markets: Theory and Practice. Journal of Competition Law and Economics 10: 293–339. Graef, Inge. 2016. Market Definition and Market Power in Data: The Case of Online Platforms. World Competition: Law and Economics Review 38(4): 473-506. Grunes, Allen P. and Maurice E. Stucke. 2015. No Mistake About It: The ImportantRole ofAntitrust in the Era of Big Data. Antitrust Source. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2600051. Harbour, Pamela Jones and Tara Isa Koslo. 2010. Section 2 in a Web 2.0 World: An Expanded Vision of Relevant Product Markets. Antitrust Law Review 76: 769-797. Kadar, Massimiliano and Mateusz Bogdan. 2017. Big Data’ and EU Merger Control – A Case Review. Journal of European Competition Law Practice 8(8): 479-491. Katz, Michael L. 2019. Multisided Platforms, Big Data, and a Little Antitrust Policy. Review of Industrial Organization 54: 695–716. Khan, Lina M. 2017. Amazon’s Antitrust Paradox. Yale Law Journal 126(3): 710-805. Manne, Geoffrey A. Ben Sperry. 2015. The Problems and Perils of Bootstrapping Privacy and Data into an Antitrust Framework. Comptition Policy International: Antitrust Chronicle. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2617685. McDonald, Aleecia M. and Lorrie Fatith Cranor. 2008. The Cost of Reading Privacy Policies. I/S: A Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society 4(3): 543-568. Newman John M. Antitrust in Digital Markets. Vanderbilt Law Review 72(5): 1497-15161. Newman, John M. 2016. Antitrust in Zero-Price Markets: Applications. Washington University Law Review 94(1): 49-111. Newman, John M. 2018. Silicon Valley Rhetoric: Three Myths Debunked. Comptition Policy International: Antitrust Chronicle. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3192063. Newman, John M. 2018. The Myth of Free. George Washington Law Review 86: 513-586. Ohlhausen, Maureen K. and Alexander Okuliar. 2015. Competition, Consumer Protection, and the Right (Approach) to Privacy. Antitrust Law Review 80: 121-156. Pasquale, Frank A. 2017. When Antitrust Becomes Pro-Trust: The Digital Deformation of U.S. Competition Policy. Comptition Policy International: Antitrust Chronicle. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3020163. Pasquale, Frank. 2013. Paradoxes of Digital Antitrust: Why the FTC Failed to Explain its Inaction on Search Bias. Harvard Journal of Law Technology Occasional Paper Series 1: 1-20. Pasquale, Frank. 2013. Privacy, Antitrust and Power. George Mason Law Review 20(4): 1009-1024. Rochet, Jean-Charles and Jean Triole. 20003. Platform Competition in Two-Sided Market. Journal of the European Economic Association1(4): 990-1209. Rohlfs, Jeffrey.1974. A Theory of Interdependent Demand for a Communications Service. The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 5(1): 16-37. Rubinfeld, Daniel L. and Michal S. Gal. 2017. Access Barriers to Big Data. Arizona Law Review 59: 339-381. Sokol, D. Daniel and Roisin Comerford. 2016. Antitrust and Regulating Big Data. George Mason Law Review 23(5): 1129-1161. Stucke, Maurice E. 2018. Should We Be Concerned About Data-opolies? Georgetown Law Technology Review 2: 275-324. Stucke, Maurice E. and Allen P. Grunes. 2015. Debunking the Myths Over Big Data and Antitrust. Comptition Policy International: Antitrust Chronicle. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2612562. Tucker, Catherine E. 2019. Digital Data, Platforms and the Usual [Antitrust] Suspects: Network Effects, Switching Cost, Essential Facility. Review of Industrial Organization 54: 683-694. Tucker, Darren S. and Hill B. Wellford. 2014. Big Mistakes Regarding Big Data. Antitrust Source. Available at :https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2549044. Warren, Samuel and Louis Barandeis. The Right to Privacy. Harvard Law Review 4(5): 193-220. Whitman, James Q. 2004. The Two Western Cultures of Privacy: Dignity Versus Liberty. Yale Law Review 113: 1151-1221. Wu, Tim. 2017. Blind Spot: The Attention Economy and the Law. Antitrust Law Journal 82(3): 771-809. 其他研究論文 Acquisti, Alessandro. 2004. Privacy in Electronic Commerce and the Economics of Immediate Gratification. Available at: https://www.andrew.cmu.edu/user/rk2x/daum/privacy-gratification.pdf. Balto, David A. and Matthew Lane. Monopolizing Water in a Tsunami: Finding Sensible Antitrust Rules for Big Data. Available at: Evans, David S. and Richard Schmalensee. 2013. The Antitrust Analysis of Multi-Sided Platform Businesses. 2 (Univ. of Chi. Inst. for Law Econ. Olin Research, Working Paper No. 623 2013). Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2185373 Lerner, Andres V. 2014. The Role of 'Big Data' in Online Platform Competition. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2482780 . Lim, Yong. 2017. Tech Wars: Return of the Conglomerate - Throwback or Dawn of a New Series for Competition in the Digital Era? Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3051560. Obar, Jonathan A. and Anne Oeldorf-Hirsch. 2016. The biggest lie on the Internet: ignoring the privacy policies and terms of service policies of social networking services. TPRC 44: The 44th Research Conference on Communication, Information and Internet Policy. Available at:.https://ssrn.com/abstract=2757465. Posner, Richard A. 2000. Antitrust in the New Economy. John M. Olin Program in Law and Economics Working Paper No. 106. Prufer, Jens and Christoph Schottmüller. 2017. Competing with Big Data. TILEC Discussion Paper No. 2017-006; CentER Discussion Paper 2017-007 2. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2918726. 機關及研究機構資料 Autorité de la concurrence and Bundeskartellamt. 2016. Competition Law and Data. Available at: https://www.bundeskartellamt.de/SharedDocs/Publikation/DE/Berichte/Big%20Data%20Papier.pdf?__blob=publicationFile v=2. Bundeskartellamt. 2016. Bundeskartellamt initiates proceeding against Facebook on suspicion of having abused its market power by infringing data protection rules. Available at : https://www.bundeskartellamt.de/SharedDocs/Meldung/EN/Meldungen%20News%20Karussell/2016/02_03_2016_Facebook.html. Bundeskartellamt. 2017. Preliminary assessment in Facebook proceeding: Facebook's collection and use of data from third-party sources is abusive. Available at : https://www.bundeskartellamt.de/SharedDocs/Meldung/EN/Meldungen%20News%20Karussell/2016/02_03_2016_Facebook.htmlhttps://www.bundeskartellamt.de/SharedDocs/Meldung/EN/Pressemitteilungen/2017/19_12_2017_Facebook.html. Bundeskartellamt. 2019. Bundeskartellamt prohibits Facebook from combining user data from different sources. Available at : https://www.bundeskartellamt.de/SharedDocs/Meldung/EN/Pressemitteilungen/2019/07_02_2019_Facebook.html. Bundeskartellamt. 2019. Facebook, Exploitative business terms pursuant to Section 19(1) GWB for inadequate data processing. Available at : https://www.bundeskartellamt.de/SharedDocs/Entscheidung/EN/Fallberichte/Missbrauchsaufsicht/2019/B6-22-16.html?nn=3600108. Bundeskartellamt. 2019. Facebook, Exploitative business terms pursuant to Section 19(1) GWB for inadequate data processing. Available at: https://www.bundeskartellamt.de/SharedDocs/Entscheidung/EN/Fallberichte/Missbrauchsaufsicht/2019/B6-22 16.pdf;jsessionid=ECA36D016703C9D264603D2E94AD19E3.1_cid378?__blob=publicationFile v=4. CERRE. 2017. Big Data and Competition Policy: Market power, personalised pricing and advertising. Available at: https://www.cerre.eu/sites/cerre/files/170216_CERRE_CompData_FinalReport.pdf Competition Analysis.Available at: http://www.oecd.org/competition/Quality-in-competition-analysis-2013.pdf. Competition and Markets Authority. 2018. Pricing algorithms: Economic working paper on the use of algorithms to facilitate collusion and personalised pricing. Available at : https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/746353/Algorithms_econ_report.pdf. Competition Bureau Canada. 2017. Big data and Innovation: Implications for competition policy in Canada. Available at: https://www.competitionbureau.gc.ca/eic/site/cb-bc.nsf/eng/04304.html#fn35-rf. Department of Justice. 2010. Statement of the Department of Justice Antitrust Division on Its Decision to Close Its Investigation of the Internet Search and Paid Search Advertising Agreement Between Microsoft Corporation and Yahoo! Inc. Available at : https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/statement-department-justice-antitrust-division-its-decision-close-its-investigation-internet. Department of Justice. 2015. Former E-Commerce Executive Charged with Price Fixing in the Antitrust Division's First Online Marketplace Prosecution. Available at: Digital Competition Expert Panel. 2019. Unlocking digital competition: Report of the Digital Competition Expert Panel. Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/785547/unlocking_digital_competition_furman_review_web.pdf. European Commission. 2008. Case No COMP/M.4731 –Google/ DoubleClick. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/decisions/m4731_20080311_20682_en.pdf. European Commission. 2008. Case No COMP/M.5727 – Microsoft/ Yahoo! Search Business. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/decisions/M5727_20100218_20310_261202_EN.pdf. European Commission. 2014. Case No COMP/M.7217 - FACEBOOK/ WHATSAPP. Available at : https://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/decisions/m7217_20141003_20310_3962132_EN.pdf. European Commission. 2014. Mergers: Commission approves acquisition of WhatsApp by Facebook. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_14_1088. European Commission. 2015. Agreement on Commission's EU data protection reform will boost Digital Single Market. Available at: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-15-6321_en.htm. European Commission. 2017. JRC Digital Economy Working Paper 2017-0: The economics ofownership, access and trade in digital data. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/sites/jrcsh/files/jrc104756.pdf. European Commission. 2017. Mergers: Commission fines Facebook €110 million for providing misleading information about WhatsApp takeover. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_17_1369. European Commission. 2018. CASE M.8788 – APPLE / SHAZAM. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/decisions/m8788_1279_3.pdf. European Commission. 2018. Mergers: Commission clears Apple's acquisition of Shazam. Available at: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-18-5662_en.htm. European Commission. 2019. Antitrust: Commission opens investigation into possible anti-competitive conduct of Amazon. Available at : https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_19_4291. European Commission. 2019. Competition Policy for the digital era Final report. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/competition/publications/reports/kd0419345enn.pdf. European Commission. 2019. Defining markets in a new age. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/commissioners/2019-2024/vestager/announcements/defining-markets-new-age_en. European Commission. 2019. General Data Protection Regulation: one year on, Available at: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-15-6321_en.htm. European Commsion. 2008. Guidelines on the assessment of non-horizontal mergers under the Council Regulation on the control of concentrations between undertakings (2008/C 265/07). Available at : https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52008XC1018(03). European Data Protection Supervisor. 2014. Preliminary Opinion-Privacy and competitiveness in the age of big data: The interplay between data protection, competition law and consumer protection in the Digital Economy. Available at: https://edps.europa.eu/sites/edp/files/publication/14-03-26_competitition_law_big_data_en.pdf. Facebook. 2018. Reports Third Quarter 2018 Results. Available at : https://investor.fb.com/investor-news/press-release-details/2018/Facebook-Reports-Third-Quarter-2018-Results/default.aspx. Federal Trade Commision. 2007. Dissenting Statement of Commissioner Harbour In the Matter of Google/DoubleClick. Available at : https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/documents/public_statements/statement-matter-google/doubleclick/071220harbour_0.pdf. Federal Trade Commission. 2007.Statement of the Federal Trade Commission Concerning Google/DoubleClick. Available at: https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/public_statements/418081/071220googledc-commstmt.pdf. Federal Trade Commission. 2014. Data Brokers: A Call for Transparency and Accountability. Available at: https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/reports/data-brokers-call-transparency-accountability-report-federal-trade-commission-may-2014/140527databrokerreport.pdf Federal Trade Commission. 2014. FTC Notifies Facebook, WhatsApp of Privacy Obligations in Light of Proposed Acquisition. Available at : https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2014/04/ftc-notifies-facebook-whatsapp-privacy-obligations-light-proposed. Federal Trade Commission. 2016. Big Data: A Tool for Inclusion or Exclusion?. Available at: https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/reports/big-data-tool-inclusion-or-exclusion-understanding-issues/160106big-data-rpt.pdf Federal Trade Commission. 2018. Hearings on Competition and Consumer Protection in the 21st Century. Available at: https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/public_events/1418693/ftc_hearings_session_7_transcript_day_2_11-14-18_0.pdf. Federal Trade Commission. 2018. Privacy Data Security. Available at : https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/reports/privacy-data-security-update-2018/2018-privacy-data-security-report-508.pdf. Higher Regional Court of Düsseldorf. 2019. Case VI-Kart 1/19 (V). Available at: https://www.d-kart.de/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/OLG-D%C3%BCsseldorf-Facebook-2019-English.pdf. https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/former-e-commerce-executive-charged-price-fixing-antitrust-divisions-first-online-marketplace. Japan Fair Trade Commission Competition Policy Research Center. 2017. Report of Study Group on Data and Competition Policy. Available at: https://www.jftc.go.jp/en/pressreleases/yearly-2017/June/170606_files/170606-4.pdf. McKinsey Global Institute. 2011. Big Data: The Next Frontier for Innovation, Competition and Productivity. Available at: https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/McKinsey/Business Functions/McKinsey Digital/Our Insights/Big data The next frontier for innovation/MGI_big_data_full_report.pdf. McKinsey Global Institute. 2016. The Age of Analytics: Competing in a Data-driven World. Available at: https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/McKinsey/Business Functions/McKinsey Analytics/Our Insights/The age of analytics Competing in a data driven world/MGI-The-Age-of-Analytics-Full-report.pdf. Ministry of Economic Affairs (Netherlands). 2017. Ecorys, Big data and Competition. Available at: https://zoek.officielebekendmakingen.nl/blg-813928.pdf. OECD. 2013. Exploring the Economics of Personal Data: A Survey of Methodologies for Measuring Monetary Value. Available at: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/5k486qtxldmq-en.pdf?expires=1592596391 id=id accname=guest checksum=692AA48ED94523AD1D100EA723FFD136. OECD. 2013. The Role and Measurement of Quality in OECD. 2015. Data-Driven Innovation: Big Data for Growth and Well-being. Available at : https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/science-and-technology/data-driven-innovation_9789264229358-en - page1. OECD. 2016. Big Data: Bringing Competition Policy to the Digital Era. Available at : https://one.oecd.org/document/DAF/COMP(2016)14/en/pdf. OECD. 2017. Algorithms and Collusion: Competition Policy in the Digital Age. Available at : http://www.oecd.org/daf/competition/Algorithms-and-colllusion-competition-policy-in-the-digital-age.pdf. OECD. 2018. Rethinking Antitrust Tools for Multi-Sided Platforms. Available at : https://www.oecd.org/daf/competition/Rethinking-antitrust-tools-for-multi-sided-platforms-2018.pdf Office of the Attorney General and Department of Financial Regulation. 2017. Report to the General Assembly of the Data Broker Working Group issued pursuant to Act 66 of 2017. Available at: http://119.3.12.182/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/2017-12-15-Data-Broker-Working-Group-Report.pdf Stigler Committee. 2019. Stigler Committee on Digital Platforms, Final Report. Available at : https://research.chicagobooth.edu/-/media/research/stigler/pdfs/digital-platforms---committee-report---stigler-center.pdf. 網路資料 Accenture. (last visited May 14, 2020). Big Success with Big Data. Availabel at: https://www.accenture.com/t20150523T020852__w__/us-en/_acnmedia/Accenture/Conversion-Assets/DotCom/Documents/Global/PDF/Digital_1/Accenture-Big-Data-POV.pdf. Bitton, Daniel S and Leslie C Overton. 2019. United States – E-commerce and Big Data: Merger Control, Gcr. Availabel at: https://globalcompetitionreview.com/insight/e-commerce-competition-enforcement-guide-second-edition/1209650/united-states-%E2%80%93-e-commerce-and-big-data-merger-control. Buttarelli, Giovanni. 2019. This is Not an Article on Data Protection and Competition Law, Cpi . Availabel at: https://edps.europa.eu/sites/edp/files/publication/19-03-11_cpi_buttarelli_en.pdf. Competition Policy International. 2019. US: Oscar Health suit against Blue Cross Blue Shield dismissed. Availabel at: https://www.competitionpolicyinternational.com/us-oscar-health-suit-against-blue-cross-blue-shield-dismissed/. Dasym, 2018. The Rise of the Digital Conglomerate, dasym. Availabel at: https://www.dasym.com/the-rise-of-the-digital-conglomerate/. DXC Digital Directions. 2019. The value of orthogonal data to insurers, DXC.technology. Availabel at: https://blogs.dxc.technology/2017/07/19/the-value-of-orthogonal-data-to-insurers/ Harford, Tim. 2014. Big data: A big mistake?, Financial times. Availabel at: https://rss.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1740-9713.2014.00778.x. Hiltbrand, Troy. 2018. A Framework for Data Monetization, Upside. Availabel at: https://tdwi.org/articles/2018/10/09/biz-all-a-framework-for-data-monetization.aspx. https://blogs.dxc.technology/2017/07/19/the-value-of-orthogonal-data-to-insurers/ Laney, Doug. 2001. 3D Data Management: Controlling Data Volume, Velocity, and Variety, Meta Group. Available at: https://blogs.gartner.com/doug-laney/files/2012/01/ad949-3D-Data-Management-Controlling-Data-Volume-Velocity-and-Variety.pdf Lanxner, Eyal. 2020. The Amazon Buy Box: How It Works for Sellers, and Why It’s So Important, Bigcommerce . Availabel at: https://www.bigcommerce.com/blog/win-amazon-buy-box/#the-essential-buy-box-elements. Madden, Mary. 2014. Public Perceptions of Privacy and Security in the Post-Snowden Era, Public Research Center. Availabel at: https://www.pewinternet.org/2014/11/12/public-privacy-perceptions/. Mäger, Thorsten and Philipp Otto Neideck. 2018. European Union – Data-related Abuse of Dominance, Gcr. Availabel at: https://globalcompetitionreview.com/insight/e-commerce-competition-enforcement-guide/1177726/european-union-%E2%80%93-data-related-abuse-of-dominance. Murray, Grant. 2018. Apple/Shazam: 5 observations on the data-related aspects, Kluwer Competition Law Blog. Availabel at: http://competitionlawblog.kluwercompetitionlaw.com/2018/12/05/appleshazam-5-observations-on-the-data-related-aspects/?doing_wp_cron=1590752924.9420399665832519531250. Ng, Alfred. 2019. Tech giants ask Congress for a data privacy bill to bypass state laws, cnet. Availabel at: https://www.cnet.com/news/tech-giants-ask-congress-for-a-data-privacy-bill-that-would-bypass-state-laws/. Perrin, Nicole. 2018. Amazon Is Now the No. 3 Digital Ad Platform in the US, eMarketer. Availabel at: https://www.emarketer.com/content/amazon-is-now-the-no-3-digital-ad-platform-in-the-us. Rao, Justin, Aadharsh Kannan, Di He, Tao Qin, Tie-Yan Liu. 2015. Measuring Scale Economies in Search. Available at: http://www.learconference2015.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/McAfee-slides.pdf. Reynolds, Matt. 2017. If you can't build it, buy it: Google's biggest acquisitions mapped, wired. Availabel at: https://www.wired.co.uk/article/google-acquisitions-data-visualisation-infoporn-waze-youtube-android. Smith, Mark 2020. ANALYSIS: Next Stop Brussels on the Road to Federal Privacy?, Bloomberg law. Availabel at: https://news.bloomberglaw.com/bloomberg-law-analysis/analysis-next-stop-brussels-on-the-road-to-federal-privacy. Solove, Daniel J. (last visited May 13, 2020). CALIFORNIA CONSUMER PRIVACY ACT (CCPA) Frequently Asked Questions, TeachPrivat. Availabel at: https://teachprivacy.com/ccpa-faq/. Statista. 2020. Global IP data traffic from 2016 to 2021. Available at: https://www.statista.com/statistics/499431/global-ip-data-traffic-forecast/. Statista. 2020. Global mobile data traffic from 2017 to 2022. Available at: https://www.statista.com/statistics/271405/global-mobile-data-traffic-forecast/. Swiher, Kara. 2015. White House. Red Chair. Obama Meets Swisher, Vox. Availabel at: https://www.recode.net/2015/2/15/11559056/white-house-red-chair-obama-meets-swisher. The Economist. 2009. Diversification. Availabel at: https://www.economist.com/news/2009/10/07/diversification. The Economist. 2017. The world’s most valuable resource is no longer oil, but data. . Available at: https://www.economist.com/leaders/2017/05/06/the-worlds-most-valuable-resource-is-no-longer-oil-but-data. Transcript courtesy of Bloomberg Government. 2018. Transcript of Mark Zuckerberg’s Senate hearing, The washinton Post. Availabel at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2018/04/10/transcript-of-mark-zuckerbergs-senate-hearing/?noredirect=on utm_term=.336e0601e3b5. Venkatraman, N. Venkat. 2015. Alphabet Isn’t a Typical Conglomerate, Harvard Business Review. Availabel at: https://hbr.org/2015/08/alphabet-isnt-a-typical-conglomerate. Vestager, Margrethe. 2016. Competition in a big data world. Available at: https://wayback.archive-it.org/12090/20191129204050/https://ec.europa.eu/commission/commissioners/2014-2019/vestager/announcements/competition-big-data-world_en. Vogels, Emily A and Monica Anderson. 2019. Americans and Digital Knowledge, Pew Research Center. Availabel at: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2019/10/09/americans-and-digital-knowledge/. Zuckerman, Ethan. 2014. The Internet’s Original Sin, ATLANTIC. Availabel at: http:// www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2014/08/advertising-is-the-internets-original-sin/376041/ | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/70082 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 大數據對於數位經濟之發展扮演不可或缺的角色，而作為箇中典型的數位平台，其商業模式更高度仰賴個人資料的收集與利用。本文從大數據的特性及大數據生態系的概覽出發，探討市場參與者間的互動關係及資料對競爭的重要性；並從隱私與競爭優勢此二面向分析與資料相關的損害理論：就提升隱私保護的目的而言，競爭法並非最適合處理隱私問題的制度選擇；而在資料相關的競爭優勢，有別於傳統上認為數位市場進入障礙低、抑或大數據隨處可得的說法，資料實際上可能構成進入障礙。對於大數據相關的反競爭行為，既有之競爭法分析工具需加以調整。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Big data plays an integral role in the rapid development of digital economy, the predominant type of which, digital platform, is characterized with the business models based on the collection and exploitation of personal data. This thesis explores the characteristics of big data and big data ecosystem, the market dynamics and the significance of data for competition. With regard to data-related theories of harm, two aspects of big data can be analyzed: as to the strengthening of privacy protection, competition law is ill-suited to address privacy concerns; as to data-related competitive advantage, contrary to the orthodox arguments purporting inherently low entry barriers in digital markets and ubiquitousness of big data, entry barriers created by big data can be high. Existing competition analysis tools, while being supple enough, should be modified to tackle data-related anti-competitive conducts. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T03:42:32Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-1708202019445700.pdf: 2657040 bytes, checksum: f1e7b5b5a1715c7b9fd905b463b64aec (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 問題意識 1 第二節 研究方法及範圍 2 第三節 研究架構 3 第二章 大數據概述：資料驅動之數位經濟 5 第一節 大數據之定義與特性 5 第一項 資料 5 第一款 以個人資料為中心 5 第二款 結構性資料與非結構性資料 7 第二項 大數據之定義與特性 8 第三項 競爭法對大數據定義之關注重心 12 第二節 大數據分析之商業模式 14 第一項 大數據生態系 14 第一款 大數據價值鏈 14 第二款 大數據生態系之組成 17 第二項 網路效應與回饋迴路 21 第一款 網路效應：直接網路效應與間接網路效應 21 第二款 回饋迴路：資料驅動的網路效應 24 第三項 大數據生態系之中心：多邊平台 27 第一款 多邊平台之定義與特性 27 第二款 多邊平台之應用：以搜尋引擎、社群網路、電子商務平台為例 31 第三節 大數據對競爭之重要性 34 第一項 提升事業營運效率 35 第二項 資料變現補貼使用者之免費服務 40 第三項 跨足其他產業的競爭優勢 43 第四項 小結 45 第三章 大數據與競爭法之交錯：隱私與競爭優勢 47 第一節 大數據與隱私保護 48 第一項 數位經濟時代的資訊隱私保護與其困境 49 第一款 資訊隱私之概念及歐盟、美國及我國之個人資料保護相關規範 49 第二款 數位經濟時代之資訊隱私困境與國際規範動向 53 第二項 競爭法與隱私的交會 58 第一款 隱私相關的競爭問題 58 第二款 以競爭法處理隱私問題之可能路徑及限制 60 第二項 隱私納入競爭法分析的實效性：以德國Facebook濫用市場支配地位案為例 63 第一款 案例簡介 63 第二款 案例評析：以資料保護規範認定榨取性濫用的路徑 72 第二節 大數據與競爭優勢 74 第一項 資料驅動之數位市場特性 74 第一款 多邊市場與網路效應 74 第二款 多棲性 77 第三款 市場動態 79 第二項 資料的稀少性（scarcity） 81 第一款 非敵對性（non-rivalry） 81 第二款 資料的可取得性（availability） 83 第三項 資料收集的規模經濟與範疇經濟 85 第四章 大數據對既有競爭法分析之影響 89 第一節 相關市場界定與市場力量評估 89 第一項 相關市場界定 89 第二項 市場力量評估 95 第二節 結合 99 第一項 資料驅動結合之潛在問題 100 第二項 相關案例介紹 106 第一款Google/DoubleClick案 106 第二款 Microsoft/Yahoo!案 108 第三款 Facebook/WhatsApp結合案 109 第四款 歐盟Apple/Shazam結合案 110 第五款 國內三件純網路銀行之結合案：連線商業銀行、將來商業銀行、樂天國際商業銀行 113 第三節 市場地位濫用 115 第一項 拒絕資料近用 116 第二項 資料近用的差別待遇 117 第三項 資料近用的獨家交易 118 第四項 資料庫的搭售與交叉使用 118 第五項 以大數據差別取價 119 第六項 大數據的掠奪行為 120 第四節 聯合行為 121 第一項 演算法與聯合行為 122 第二項 資料共享與聯合行為 127 第五章 結論 131 參考文獻 133 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 大數據 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 競爭法 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 隱私 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 進入障礙 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 數位經濟 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | digital economy | en |
| dc.subject | big data | en |
| dc.subject | competition law | en |
| dc.subject | privacy | en |
| dc.subject | barrier to entry | en |
| dc.title | 大數據與競爭法 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Big Data and Competition Law | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 108-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 顏雅倫(Ya-Lun Yen),莊弘鈺(Hung-Yu Chuang) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 大數據,競爭法,隱私,進入障礙,數位經濟, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | big data,competition law,privacy,barrier to entry,digital economy, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 148 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202003848 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2020-08-19 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 法律學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 法律學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 法律學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| U0001-1708202019445700.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 2.59 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。