Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/69258
Title: | 中國大陸訴訟時效制度之研究 A Study on Extinctive Prescription System in China |
Authors: | Xing-AN Sun 孫星安 |
Advisor: | 簡資修(Tze-Shiou Chien) |
Keyword: | 訴訟時效,時效中斷,價值理由,舉證困難,民法總則, Limitation of Action,Interruption of Prescription,Valuable Justification,Quote Difficultly,General Part of Civil Code, |
Publication Year : | 2018 |
Degree: | 碩士 |
Abstract: | 中國大陸的訴訟時效本質上屬於歐陸法傳統上的消滅時效,起初訴訟時效的效力採勝訴權消滅主義,在2008年之後才改採抗辯權發生主義。2017年所頒佈施行的《中華人民共和國民法總則》中的訴訟時效內容較之原先的《中華人民共和國民法通則》沒有實質性的改變,其中的一些具體規定的遣詞用語也直接延用了民法通則,然時過境遷其中的一些延用已經不再適宜,反而會造成混淆。
中國大陸訴訟時效的立法理由主要還是基於效率與秩序的公共利益之考慮,沒有顧及到訴訟時效可以作為保護債務人舉證困難的手段。而臺灣、德國、日本、DCFR都將其作為消滅時效制度存在的重要理由,很多具體規則也是圍繞此而構建,因而中國大陸訴訟時效的不少具體規定與臺灣、德國、日本、DCFR的消滅時效有著不小的差別。在中國大陸如今已經脫離經濟發展初期的法治匆促,其訴訟時效制度應該要回歸正常了。 In essence, Chinese Limitation of Action belong to Civil Law System’s Limitation of Action. In the beginning, the legal effect of expiration of limitation takes the theory of Elimination of The Right to win. After 2008, the effect takes the theory of Occur of The Right to Refuse. Comparing to General Principles of The Civil Law of The People’s Republic of China, Limitation of Action in General Part of Civil Code makes no fundamental changes in basic value orientations and the institutional framework. Limitation of Action’s Reason of Legislation basis on Public Interest, instead of protecting the debtor from quote difficulty. However, it is very important Reason of Legislation in Germany、Japan and DCFR. |
URI: | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/69258 |
DOI: | 10.6342/NTU201801566 |
Fulltext Rights: | 有償授權 |
Appears in Collections: | 法律學系 |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-107-1.pdf Restricted Access | 1.5 MB | Adobe PDF |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.