請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/68426完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 陳文團 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yen-Nan Chang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 張彥南 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T02:20:40Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2017-08-24 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2017-08-24 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2017-08-20 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 傅柯著作：
Foucault, Michel (1972). Histoire de la folie à l’Âge Classique. Paris: Gallimard. 中譯見《古典時代瘋狂史》，林志明譯，北京：三聯，2005。(縮寫為HF。) --- (1963). Naissance de la clinique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. 中譯見《臨床醫學的誕生》，劉北成譯，南京：譯林，2011。(縮寫為NC。) --- (1966). Les mots et les choses：une archéologie des sciences humaines. Paris: Gallimard. 中譯見《詞與物》，莫偉民譯，上海：上海三聯，2002。(縮寫為MC。) --- (1969). L’archéologie du savoir. Paris: Gallimard. 中譯見《知識考古學》，謝強、馬月譯，北京：生活．讀書．新知三聯，2003。(縮寫為AS。) --- (1971). L’ordre du discours. Paris: Gallimard. (縮寫為OD) --- (1975). Surveiller et punir: Naissance de la Prison. Paris: Gallimard. (縮寫為SP。) --- (1976). Histoire de la sexualité. I. La volanté de savoir. Paris: Gallimard. (縮寫為HS。) --- (1978). Qu’est-ce que la critique? [Critique et Aufklärung] Bulletin de la Société française de Philosophie, Séance du 27 Mai 1978. --- (1984a). Histoire de la sexualité. II. L’usage des plaisirs. Paris: Gallimard. (縮寫為UP。) --- (1984b). Histoire de la sexualité. III. Le souci de soi. Paris: Gallimard. (縮寫為SS。) --- (2001). Dits et écrits. Édition établie sous la direcion de Daniel Defert et François Ewald. Paris: Gallimard, Volume I (1954-1975); Volume II (1976-1988) . (縮寫為DE1、DE2。) --- (2008). Introduction to Kant’s Anthropology. Los Angeles, CA: Semiotext(e). 法蘭西學院演講系列： --- (1997). Il faut défendre la société : cours au Collège de France, 1975-1976. Édition éablie, dans le cadre de l'Association pour le Centre Michel Foucault, sous la direction de François Ewald et Alessandro Fontana, par Mauro Bertani et Alessandro Fontana. Paris: Gallimard. --- (1999). Les anormaux : cours au Collège de France, 1974-1975. Édition éablie, dans le cadre de l'Association pour le Centre Michel Foucault, sous la direction de François Ewald et Alessandro Fontana, par Mauro Bertani et Alessandro Fontana. Paris: Gallimard. 其它文獻： 于奇智 (1995)。〈福柯人論之分析—從知識考古學的觀點看〉，《中國社會科學季刊》，第12期：93-107。 杜小真 (2012)。〈“看”的考古學〉，收錄於《這不是一根煙斗》，Michel Foucault著，頁97-134。桂林：漓江出版社。 柯莉純 (1993)。《傅柯對人文科學的考古學解析初探》。碩士論文。臺北：政治大學哲學系。 洪維信 (2003)。〈譯者導言〉，收錄於《外邊思維》，Michel Foucault著，頁9-80。臺北：行人出版社。 苑舉正 (2007)。〈一個沒有固定方法的方法論：論「典範知識」的「相對主義式誤解」，《政治與社會哲學評論》第21期：47-88。 姜文斌 (2013)。〈從「人是什麼？」到「人之死」──傅柯對康德《實用人類學》的解讀〉，《東海哲學研究集刊》第十九期：71-101。 高宣揚 (2004)。《傅科的生存美學：西方思想的起點與終點》。臺北：五南。 張彥南 (1997)。《傅柯晚期論主體與自我技術》。碩士論文。臺北：臺灣大學社會學系。 莫偉民 (2004)。〈福柯的話語歷史觀及其與薩特的歧異〉，《復旦學報(社會科學版)》，第4期：55-61。 黃冠閔 (2003)。〈檔案、文本、歷史〉，《哲學與文化》，第卅卷第三期：39-60。 楊凱麟 (2006)。〈分裂分析傅柯III──內在性知識論與內在性倫理學〉，《中山人文學報》，第23期：15-28。 --- (2008)。〈分裂分析傅柯IV──界限存有論與邊界—事件系譜學〉，《中外文學》，第37卷第3期：45-61。 --- (2009)。〈分裂分析傅柯：文學布置中的越界〉，《臺大文史哲學報》，第七十一期：185-208。 --- (2010)。〈分裂分析傅柯：布置作為思想—影像與考古—系譜學對偶〉，《中外文學》，第40卷第1期：115-143。 蔡宛芬 (1995)。《試解析傅科之考古學方法》。碩士論文。臺北：輔仁大學哲學系。 蔡錚雲 (1995)。《從現象學到後現代》。臺北：三民。 劉國英 (2003)。〈福柯與胡塞爾的《邏輯研究》：意想不到的法國聯繫〉，《現象學在中國：胡塞爾《邏輯研究》發表一百週年國際會議》，頁61-83。上海：譯文。 龔卓軍 (2006)。〈審美現代性之爭：哈伯瑪斯與傅柯論波特萊爾〉，收錄於《身體部署：梅洛龐蒂與現象學之後》，頁268-306。台北：心靈工坊。 Allen, Amy (2013). “Feminism, Foucault, and the Critique of Reason: Re-reading the History of Madness.” Foucault Studies 16: 15-31. Althusser, Louise (1971). Lenin and philosophy, and other essays. Translated by Ben Brewster. London: New Left Books. Agamben, Giorgio (2009). The Signature of All Thing: On Method. Translated by Luca D’Isanto with Kevin Attell. New York: Urzone, Inc. Bacchi, Carol and Jennifer Bonham (2014). “Reclaiming discursive practices as an analytic focus: Political implications,” Foucault Studies 17: 179-192. Basso, Elisabetta (2012). “On Historicity and Transcendentality Again. Foucault’s Trajectory from Existential Psychiatry to Historical Epistemology.” Foucault Studies 14: 154-178. Le Blanc, Jocelyne (2004). L’archéologie du savoir de Michel Foucault pour penser le corp sexué autrement. Paris: L’Harmattan. Balibar, Étienne (1992). “Foucault and Marx: The question of nominalism,” François Ewald (ed.) Michel Foucault: Philosopher(38-56). Translated by Timothy J. Armstrong. Hertfordshire: Harvester Wheatsheaf. Bianco, Giuseppe (2013). “'Verbose Dialectics' and the Anthropological Circle: Michel Foucault and Jean Hyppolite.” The Warwick Journal of Philosophy. 24: 145-166. Bitbol, Michel and Jean Gayon (2011). 《法國認識論：1830-1970》。比特博爾、伽永主編。鄭天喆、莫偉民譯。北京：商務印書館。 Brossa, Alain (2013). 《傅柯：危險的哲學家》。羅惠珍譯。臺北：麥田。 Brown, Beverley and Mark Cousins (1986). “The Linguistic Fault: The Case of Foucault’s Archaeology,” Mike Gane (ed.) Toward a Critique of Foucault (33-60). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd. Brown, P. L. (1975). “Epistemology and Method: Althusser, Foucault, Derrida.” Philosophy & Social Criticism 3: 147-163. Chartier, Roger (1994). “The Chimera of the Origin: Archaeology, Cultural History, and th French Revolution,” Jan Goldstein (ed.) Foucault and the Writing of History (167-186). Cambridge, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers. Cronin, Joseph (2001). Foucault’s Antihumanist Historiography. New York: The Edwin Mellen Press. Davidson, Arnold I. (1984). “Archaeology, Genealogy, Ethics,” David Couzens Hoy (ed.) Foucault: A Critical Reader (27-40). Oxford: Basil Blackwell Ltd. --- (1997). “Structures and Strategies of Discours: Remarks Towards a History of Foucault’s Philosophy of Language,” Arnold I. Davidson (ed.) Foucault and His Interlocutors (1-17). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. --- (2001). The Emergence of Sexuality: Historical Epistemology and the Formation of Concepts. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. Deleuze, Gilles (1986). Foucault. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit. (中譯見：《德勒茲論傅柯》，楊凱麟譯，台北：麥田，2000。) --- (1992). “What is a dispositif?” François Ewald (ed.) Michel Foucault: Philosopher(159-166). Translated by Timothy J. Armstrong. Hertfordshire: Harvester Wheatsheaf. Derrida, Jacques (1978). Writing and Difference. Translated, with an introd. and additional notes by Alan Bass. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Descombes, Vincent (1980). Modern French Philosophy. Translated by L. Scott-Fox and J. M. Harding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Didi-Huberman, Georges (2015). “Knowing when to cut,” François Caillat (ed.) Foucault Against Himself. Translated by David Homel. Vancouver: Arsenal Pulp Press. Dreyfus, Hubert L. and Paul Rabinow (1983). Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. Second Edition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Dreyfus, Hubert L. (1992). “Being and Power in Heidegger and Foucault,” François Ewald (ed.) Michel Foucault: Philosopher(80-95). Translated by Timothy J. Armstrong. Hertfordshire: Harvester Wheatsheaf. --- (2003). “‘Being and Power’ Revisited,” Alan Milchman and Alan Rosenberg (ed.) Foucault and Heidegger: Critical Encounters (30-54). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. Elden, Stuart (2001). Mapping the Present[electronic resource]: Heidegger, Foucault and the Project of a Spatial History. London: Continuum. --- (2003). “Reading Genealogy as Historical Ontology,” Alan Milchman and Alan Rosenberg (ed.) Foucault and Heidegger: Critical Encounters (187-205). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. Eribon, Didier (1991). Michel Foucault. Translated by Besty Wing. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Havard University Press. Frank, Manfre (1992). “On Foucault’s Concept of Discourse,” François Ewald (ed.) Michel Foucault: Philosopher(99-115). Translated by Timothy J. Armstrong. Hertfordshire: Harvester Wheatsheaf. Flynn, Thomas R. (2005). Sartre, Foucault, and Historical Reason: A Poststrucuralist Mapping of History. Volume Two. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Gadamer, Hans Georg (1975). Truth and Method. Translated and edited by Garrett Barden and John Cumming. NY: Contimuum. Graham, Linda J. (2011). “The Product of Text and ‘Other’ Statements: Discourse Analysis and the Critical Use of Foucault.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 43(6): 663-674. Gros, Frédéric (2006). 《傅柯考》。何乏筆、楊凱麟、龔卓軍譯。臺北：麥田。 Guiot, André (2006). Michel Foucault: Le Philosophe Archéologue. Toulouse: Milan. Gutting, Gary (1989). Michel Foucault’s Archaeology of Scientific Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. --- (2005). Foucault: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Hacking, Ian (1986). “ The Archaeology of Foucult,” David Couzens Hoy (ed.) Foucault: A Critical Reader (27-40). Oxford: Basil Blackwell Ltd. --- (1994). “Michel Foucault’s Immature Science,” Barry Smart (ed.) Michel Foucault: Critical Assessments. Volume Two (176-185). London: Routledge. --- (2002). Historical Ontology. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Havard University Press. Habermas, Jürgen (1984). “Taking Aim at the Heart of the Present,” David Couzens Hoy (ed.) Foucault: A Critical Reader (103-108). Oxford: Basil Blackwell Ltd. Han, Béatrice (2002). Foucault’s Critical Project: Between the Transcendental and the Historical. Translated by Edwald Pile. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. --- (2003). “Foucault and Heidegger on Kant and Finitude,” Alan Milchman and Alan Rosenberg (ed.) Foucault and Heidegger: Critical Encounters (127-162). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. --- (2005). “The Analytic of Finitude and the History of Subjectivity,” Gary Gutting (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Foucault. Second Edition. (176-209). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Heidegger, Martin (1993). Basic Writings: Martin Heidegger. Edited by David Farrell Krell. London: Routledge. --- (1982). On the Way to Language. NY: Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. --- (1998). Pathmarks. Edited by William McNeill. NY: Cambridge University Press. --- (2002). Off the Beaten Track. Edited and translated by Julian Young and Kenneth Haynes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. --- (2008). Being and Time. Translated by John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson. NY: HarperCollins Publishers. Hendricks, Christina (2008). “Foucault’s Kantian critique: Phiosophy and the present.” Philosophy & Social Criticism 34(4): 357-382. Howarth, David (2002). “An Archaeology of Political Discourse? Evaluating Michel Foucault’s Explanation and Critique of Ideology.” Political Studies Vol. 50: 117-135. Hume, David (2000). A Treatise of Human Nature. Edited by David F. Norton and M, J. Norton. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Husserl, Edmund (1970). The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy. Translated by David Carr. Evanston:Northwestern University Press. --- (1973). Logical Investigations. Translated by Findlay, J. N. London: Routledge. --- (1982). Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy. First book, General introduction to a pure phenomenology. Translated by F. Kersten. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. --- (1999). Cartesian Meditations : An Introduction to Phenomenology. Translated by Dorion Cairns. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Hyder, David (2003). “Foucault, Cavaillés, and Husserl on the Historical Epistemology of Sciences.” Perspectives on Science Vol. 11, no. 1: 107-129. Iyer, Arun A. (2010). “Is the Historicity of the Scientific Object a Threat to Its Ideality? Foucault Complements Husserl.” Philosophy Today 54(2): 165-178. --- (2014). Towards an Epistemology of Ruptures: The Case of Heidegger and Foucault. New York: Bloomsbury Academic Janicaud, Dominique. (2015). Heidegger in France. Translated by Frainçois Raffoul and David Pettigrew. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press. Kant, Immanuel (1996). “An Answer to the Question: What is Enlightenment?” James Schmit (ed.) What is Enlightenment: Eighteenth-Century Answers and Twentieth-Century Questions (58-64). LA: University of California Press. --- (1998). Critique of Pure Reason. Translated and edited by Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ---(2006). Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View. Edited by Robert B. Louden. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Karademir, Aret (2013). “Heidegger and Foucault: On the Relation between the Anxiety -- Engendering -- Truth and Being-Towards-Freedom.” Human Studies: A Journal for Philosophy and the Social Sciences 36(3): 375-392. Koopman, Colin (2010). “Historical Critique or Transcendental Critique in Foucault: Two Kantian Lineages.” Foucault Studies No. 8: 100-121. --- (2010). “Historical Conditions or Transcendental Conditions: Response to Kevin Thompson’s Response.” Foucault Studies No. 8: 129-135. --- (2013). Genealogy as Critique [electronic resource] : Foucault and the problems of modernity. Bloomington : Indiana University Press. Lanigan, Richard L. (1992) The Human Science of Communicology: A Phenomenology of Discourse in Foucault and Merleau-Ponty. Pittsburgh PA: Duquesne University Press. Lebrun, Gérard. (1992) “Notes on Phenomenology in Les mots et les choses,” François Ewald (ed.) Michel Foucault: Philosopher(20-37). Translated by Timothy J. Armstrong. Hertfordshire: Harvester Wheatsheaf. Legrand, Stéphane (2008). “ ‘As Close as Possible to the Unlivable’: (Michel Foucault and Phenomenology).” SOPHIA 47: 281-291. Leps, Marie-Christine (2012). “Thought of the Outside: Foucault contra Agamben.” Radical Philosophy: A Journal of Socialist and Feminist Philosophy 175: 22-32. Machado, Roberto (1992). “Archaeology and Epistemology,” François Ewald (ed.) Michel Foucault: Philosopher(3-18). Translated by Timothy J. Armstrong. Hertfordshire: Harvester Wheatsheaf. Major-Poetzl (1983). Pamela. Michel Foucault’s Archaeology of Western Culture: Toward a New Science of History. Brighton, Sussex: The Harvester Press. May, Todd (1993). Between Genealogy and Epistemology: Psychology, Politics, and Knowledge in the thought of Michel Foucault. Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press. McNay, Lois (1994). Foucault: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press. McSweeney, John (2013). “Religion in the Web of Immanence: Foucault and Thinking Otherwise after the Death of God.” Foucault Studies 15: 72-94. McQuillan, Colin (2010). “Transcendental Philosophy and Critical Phisophy in Kant and Foucault: Response to Colin Koopman.” Foucault Study No. 9: 145-155. Miller, James (1993). The Passion of Michel Foucault. NY: Simon & Schuster. Nietzsche, Friedrich (2008). The Gay Science. Translated by Josefine Nauckhoff. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. --- (2003). The Genealogy of Morals. Translated by Horace B. Samuel. NY: Dover Publications. O’Farrell, Clare (2005). Foucault. London: Sage Publications Ltd. Oksala, Johanna (2005). Foucault on Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Patton, Paul (2012). 'Deleuze, Foucault, and History.' Bernd Herzogenrath (ed.) Time and History in Deleuze and Serres (69-83). NY: Continuum International Publishing Group. Piaget, Jean (1970). Structuralism. Translated by Chaninah Maschler. NY: Harper & Row. Powell, Jason L. (2013). Foucault: issues and legacy. New York: Novinka/Nova Science Publishers. Rabinow, Paul (1994). “Modern and countermodern: Ethos and epoch in Heidegger and Foucault,” Gary Gutting (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Foucault (197-214). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Racevskis, Karlis (1983). Michel Foucault and the Subversion of Intellect. NY: Cornell University Press. Rajan, Tilottama (1998). “The Phenomenological Allegory: From ‘Death and the Labyrinth’ to ‘The Ordet of Things’.” Poetics Today Vol. 19, No. 3: 439-466. Rayner, Timothy (2007). Foucault’s Heidegger: Philosophy and Transformative Experience. New York: Continuum International Publishing Group. Revel, Judith (2008). Dictionaire Foucault. Paris: Ellipses. --- (2010). Foucault, Une pensée du discontinu. Paris: Mille et une nuits. Ricciardone, C T. (2014). “‘We Are the Disease’: Truth, Health, and Politics from Plato's Gorgias to Foucault.” Epoche: A Journal for the History of Philosophy Spr. 18(2): 287-310. Rice, John Steadman (1992). “Discursive Formation, Life Stories, and the Emergence of Co-Dependency: ‘Power/Knowledge’ and the Search of Identity.” The Sociological Quarterly Vol. 33, No. 3: 337-364. Rorty, Richard (1986). “Foucault and Epistemology,” David Couzens Hoy (ed.) Foucault: A Critical Reader (41-50). Oxford: Basil Blackwell Ltd. Sabot, Philippe (2009). “Archéologie du savoir et histoire des sciences. Y a-t-l un ‹‹style Foucault›› en épistémologie?” Pierre CASSOU-NOUGUÈS et Pascale GILLOT (ed.) Le concept, le sujet et la science: Cavaillès, Canguilhem, Foucault (109-124). Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin. Said, Edward W (1994) “An Ethics of Language: Review of Michel Foucault’s The Archaeology of Knowledge and The Discours on Language,” Barry Smart (ed.) Michel Foucault: Critical Assessments. Volume Two (69-87). London: Routledge. Sarasin, Philipp (2005). Michel Foucault zur Einführung. Hamburg: Junius Verlag GmbH. (中譯本：《福柯》，李紅艷譯。北京：中國人民大學出版社。) Sardinha, Diogo (2011). Ordre et temps: dans la philosophie de Foucault. Paris: L’Harmattan. Sartre, Jean Paul (1977). Existentialism and Humanism. Translated by Philip Mairet. Brooklyn: Haskel House Publishers. Scheler, Max (1980). Problems of a sociology of knowledge. Translated by Manfred S. Frings. London: Routledge. Schrift, Alan D. (1994) “Foucault and Derrida on Nietzsche and the ‘end(s)’ of ‘man,” Barry Smart (ed.) Michel Foucault: Critical Assessments. Volume Two (278-292). London: Routledge. Schwartz, Michael (2003). “Epistemes and the History of Being,” Alan Milchman and Alan Rosenberg (ed.) Foucault and Heidegger: Critical Encounters (165-186). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. Scott, Charles E. (1991). “Foucault and the Question of Humanism,” David Goicoechea, John Luik and Tim Madigan (ed.) The Question of Humanism: Challenges and Possibilities (205-213). NY: Prometheus Books. Sheridan, Alan (1980). Michel Foucault : The Will to Truth. NY: Tavistock. Singer, J D. (2011). “From a ‘History of Being’ to a ‘History of the Present’: Radical Possibility in Heidegger and Foucault.” The Warwick Journal of Philosophy 22: 138-173. Smart, Bary (1985). Michel Foucault. NY: Tavistock Publications. Spiegelberg, Herbert (1982). The Phenomenological Movement: A Historical Introduction. The Hague : Martinus Nijhoff. Switala, Kristin (1997). “Foucauldian Mutations of Language.” Philosophy Today 41(1): 166-173. Taylor, Charles (1984). “Foucault on Freedom and Truth,” David Couzens Hoy (ed.) Foucault: A Critical Reader (69-102). Oxford: Basil Blackwell Ltd. Thompson, Kevin (2008). “Histority and Transcendentality: Foucault, Cavaillés, and the Phenomenology of the Concept.” History and Theory 47: 1-18. --- (2010a). “Response to Colin Koopman’s ‘Historical Critique or Transcendental Critique in Foucault: Two Kantian Lineages’.” Foucault Studies No. 8: 122-128. --- (2010b). “Appropriation and Permission in the History of Philosophy: Response to McQuillan,” Foucault Study No. 9: 156-164. Touey, Daniel (1998). “Foucault’s Apology.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior 28(1): 83-106. Tran, Van Doan (2013). “The Search for Authentic Understanding and the Birth of Radical Hermeneutics.” Budhi: A Journal of Ideas and Culture 17.2: 60-78. Varela, Charles R. (2013a). “The Romantic Realism of Michel Foucault: The Scientific Temptation.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 43(1): 1-22. --- (2013b). “The Romantic Realism of Michel Foucault Returning to Kant.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 43(2): 226-245. Veyne, Paul (2010). Foucault: His Thought, His Character. Translated by Janet Lloyd. Cambridge: Polity Press. Visker, Rudi (1999). Truth and Singularity: Taking Foucault into Phenomenology. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. --- (2003). “From Foucault to Heidegger: A One-Way Ticket?” Alan Milchman and Alan Rosenberg (ed.) Foucault and Heidegger: Critical Encounters (324-346). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. White, Hayden (1987). Topics of Discourse: Essays in Cultural Criticism. London: The Johns Hopkins Press Ltd. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/68426 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本論文要研究的是米歇爾．傅柯提出的「考古學」，討論作為一種「方法」的考古學是什麼。首先追溯傅柯的提問，討論傅柯所詮釋的康德，經由討論各個時期的傅柯對康德的詮釋，可以看到經由傅柯重新詮釋和轉化後的「批判」已經不同於康德的批判哲學，這是一種不斷越界的態度。透過這些討論，可以歸納出傅柯考古學方法的四個特性(可能性條件、知識、越界、啟蒙)。接著以這四個特性作為分析架構，把《詞與物》當成傅柯運用其考古學方法的一個案例，可以從中看到考古學特性的發揮，並得出「人之終結」的結論。與《詞與物》相關的是《知識考古學》這本專論方法的著作，透過對這本書的討論，可以釐清傅柯對過去觀念史研究所使用的分析單位之檢討，看到考古學如何有別於其他觀念史、思想史、科學史等等研究方法，並再次展現了本研究歸納出的考古學四個特性。最後，將討論考古學之後的發展。即使後來傅柯轉向系譜學，但是考古學方法並未被放棄。然而傅柯和後現代的關係引起了質疑，因此必須要討論傅柯對尼采的詮釋，透過不同時期傅柯對尼采的不同詮釋，可以澄清這些方法上的特性以及基本立場。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This study is about Michel Foucault’s “archaeology” and discusses what is archaeology as a method. First, by reviewing the question about Kant asked by Foucault and discussing Foucault’s interpretation of Kant, we can see the difference between Kant’s critical philosophy and the “critique” interpreted by Foucault, which is an attitude of persistent transgression. Under these discussion, we can get four characteristics of Foucault’s archaeological method. They are the conditions of possibility, savoir, transgression and enlightment. And then, apply these four characteristics as an analytical framework, we can see The Order of Things, which reveals the characteristics of archaeology, as a case of the application of the archaeological method and get a conclusion of “the end of man”. Then under the discussion of The Archaeology of Knowledge that is related to The Order of Things, we can clarify the units used by the historians of ideas that are criticized by Foucault, and we can discover the differences between the method of Foucault’s archaeology and the others (such as the historians of ideas, thoughts and sciences). It reveals the four characteristics of archaeology inducted from our study again. Finally, the development after Foucault’s archaeology is the genealogical turn, but the archaeological method was not quitted by Foucault. However, the genealogical turn induced the questions of post-modernism which guide the discussion of the relationship between Foucault and Nietzsche. By discussing Foucault’s interpretation of Nietzsche, we can review the characteristics of Foucault’s method and his fundamental positions. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T02:20:40Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-106-D97124004-1.pdf: 3106790 bytes, checksum: 46a0cf64196e78b7fc3c7af0ebc59936 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員審定書………………………………………………………….i
中文摘要………………………………………………………………...iii 英文摘要……………………………………………………………...…iv 第一章 導論……………………………………………………………..1 第一節 研究動機和目的………………………………………………………….3 一、研究動機……………………………………………………………………3 二、傅柯的考古學………………………………………………………………5 三、研究目的……………………………………………………………………5 第二節 研究背景………………………………………………………………….8 一、傅柯「知識」研究的重要性……………..……………………………….8 二、60年代歐洲的思潮和社會背景………………………………………….12 三、考古學時期在傅柯思想中的重要性………………………………..……14 四、研究現況…………………………………………………………….……15 第三節 研究方法……………………………………………………………….20 第四節 章節安排…………………………………………………………………22 第二章 康德人類學和越界的考古學批判………………………..…27 第一節 傅柯對康德人類學的詮釋…………….……………………………..30 一、康德式的提問……………………………………………..……………….30 二、康德的人類學與批判計劃……………………………………………..….31 三、康德與現代哲學的危機………………………………………………...…32 第二節 考古學的研究對象………….……..……………………………………34 一、考古學方法與傅柯的「知識」……………………………………………...34 二、savoir和connaissance的區分…………………………………………...39 三、對知識的質問……………………….……………………………………..40 四、知識和權力………………………………………………………………..41 第三節 越界和域外……………………………………………………………...44 一、巴塔耶與越界運動………………………………………………………..44 二、布朗肖的域外思維………………………………………………...………46 三、瘋狂：作品的缺席……………………………………………………….48 第四節 批判和啟蒙…………………………………………………………...…51 一、〈何謂批判〉…..…………………………………………………………….51 二、〈何謂啟蒙〉………..……………………………………………………….54 第三章 人文科學考古學………………………………………………62 第一節 作為分析方法與研究對象的知識型……………………………….....64 第二節 文藝復興時期的知識型：相似性……………………………………..67 第三節 古典時期的知識型：表象……………….……………………………....72 一、普通文法學…………………………………………………………...……76 二、自然史……………………………………………………………………..77 三、財富分析…………………………………………………………………..79 第四節 現代的知識型：人………………………………………………………..81 一、三個知識領域的轉變…………………………………………………….81 二、人的出現與人文科學…………………………………………………….82 三、人的有限性分析論……………………………………………………….87 四、人的終結………………………………………………………………….88 第五節 知識型的分析和考古學方法……………………………………………90 第四章 考古學方法的總結與反省……………………………………94 第一節 《知識考古學》對考古學方法的總結…………………………………....96 一、論述………………………………………………………………………..96 二、再談論述形構的分析……………………………………………………97 三、陳述……………………………………………………………………...101 四、對陳述的描述…………………………………………………………...104 五、陳述分析的特性…………………………………………………………110 六、考古學和歷史的先天……………………………………………………111 第二節 考古學方法的貢獻…………………………………………………….113 一、考古學與觀念史的不同………………………………………………….113 二、科學與知識……………………………………………………………….115 三、再論考古學方法的特性………………………………………………….115 第三節 對考古學方法的檢討………………………………………………….118 第五章 考古學、系譜學以及之後的發展……………………………123 第一節 論述的秩序…………..……………………………………………….125 一、控制論述生產的步驟………………………………………………...125 二、方法上的四個原則……………………………………………………….129 第二節 系譜學轉向…………………..……………………………………...…132 一、系譜學是對出身和出現的研究………………………………………….132 二、系譜學是對權力關係的研究…………………………………………….133 三、從系譜學得出不再思我們之所思的可能性…………………………….134 第三節 尼采的遺產…………………………………………………………….136 一、詮釋學家尼采……………………………………………………………136 二、系譜學家尼采……………………………………………………………137 三、權力理論家尼采…………………………………………………………137 第四節 傅柯與後現代………………………………………………………….140 一、關於現代之「後」……………………………………………………….140 二、「後現代」………………………………………………………………..140 三、傅柯對後現代的影響………………………………………………….…141 第六章 結論…………………………………………………………..144 參考文獻………………………………………………………………151 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.title | 論傅柯的考古學作為一種方法 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Archaeology as a Method: On Foucault's Archaeology | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 105-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | 苑舉正 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 黃冠閔,龔卓軍,黃筱慧 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 傅柯,方法,康德,詞與物,知識考古學, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Foucault,method,Kant,The Order of Things,The Archaeology of Knowledge, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 164 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201704098 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2017-08-21 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 文學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 哲學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 哲學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-106-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 3.03 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。