請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/68247
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 陳瑪玲 | |
dc.contributor.author | Yu-Wen Hsu | en |
dc.contributor.author | 許瑜雯 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-17T02:15:40Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-01-04 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2018-01-04 | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2017-10-16 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 小山正忠、竹原秀雄
2004 《標準土色帖》。農林水產省農林水產技術會議事務局監修;財團法人日本色彩研究所色票監修。東京:日本色研事業株式會社。 石磊 1960 〈太巴塱的製陶工藝〉。《中央研究院民族學研究所集刊》10:85-199。 朱正宜 1990 〈台東縣馬武窟溪口新石器時代遺址之調查研究〉。國立台灣大學人類學研究所碩士論文。 宋文薰 1980 〈由考古學看臺灣〉。《中國的臺灣》。陳奇祿等編,頁93-220。台北:中央文物供應社。 李坤修 2000 〈台灣東部的繩文陶〉。《宜蘭文獻雜誌》43:38-66。宜蘭縣文化局。 2004 《台九線花東公路第三期拓寬計畫環境影響說明書─文化古蹟遺址》。交通部公路總局四區養護工程處委託。京華環境工程股份有限公司執行。 2014 〈臺東縣多良遺址的考古發現及其文化內涵研究〉。《南島研究學報》 5(1): 31-71。 李坤修、葉美珍 2001 《臺東縣史 ● 史前篇》。臺東:臺東縣政府。 姚書宇 2016 《花蓮縣富源遺址發掘與史前遺構初探》。國立台灣大學人類學系碩士論文。 郭素秋 1995 《臺東縣馬武窟溪流域使前遺址調查與研究》。國立台灣大學人類學研究所碩士論文。 2013 《花蓮縣縣定遺址─掃叭遺址與公埔遺址範圍及內涵研究計畫成果報告》。花蓮縣文化局委託社團法人台灣打里摺文化協會執行。 2014 〈花蓮縣掃叭遺址的文化內涵─兼論麒麟文化〉。《田野考古》17(2):1-58。 連照美、宋文薰、李瑞宗 1996 《都蘭遺址考古學研究報告》。國立台灣大學考古人類學專刊22。 唐麗英、王春和 2008 《SPSS統計分析》。臺北:儒林圖書有限公司。 陳有貝、尹意智、姚書宇 2016 《花蓮縣瑞穗鄉富源遺址文化內涵與遺址範圍調查研究計畫》。花蓮:花蓮縣文化局。 陳仲玉 1986 《太魯閣國家公園人文史蹟調查》。內政部營建署太魯閣國家公園管理處委託中央研究院歷史語言研究所執行。 陳培源 2008 《臺灣地質》。臺灣:科技圖書。 張光直 1987 〈中國東南海岸考古與南島語族起源問題〉。《南方民族考古》1:1-14。 國立東華大學觀光暨遊憩管理研究所編著 2007 《瑞穗鄉志》。花蓮:花蓮縣瑞穗鄉公所。 黃士強 1991 〈從東河地區潭東海岸使前文化即有關問題〉。《田野考古》2(1):1-30。 黃士強、劉益昌 1980 《全省重要史蹟勘查與整修建議─考古遺址與舊社部分》。交通部觀光局委託國立台灣大學考古人類學系之研究報告。 楊昭男 1981 《花蓮瑞穗地區大南澳片岩之岩相構造學研究》。國立台灣大學地質學研究所博士論文。 葉長庚 2008 《臺灣東部巨石文化之相關研究:遺物、類型與意義》。國立台灣大學 人類學研究所碩士論文。 葉美珍 2001 《花崗山文化之研究》。臺東:國立台灣史前文化博物館。 趙金勇 1994 《台東縣長濱鄉長光遺址發掘報告》。國立台灣大學人類學研究所碩士論文。 劉益昌 1990 〈台灣東部地區史前文化的新資料及其檢討〉。中央研究院歷史語言研究所79年度講論會論文。 1996 〈台灣史前文化層序的探討〉。《台灣考古百年紀念研討會會議論文集工作報告》:8-15。中央研究院歷史語言研究所主辦。 2002 〈臺灣東部麒麟文化初步探討〉。《東臺灣研究》2002 (5):71-104。 2004 《臺閩地區考古遺址:宜蘭縣、花蓮縣》。內政部委託 。中央研究院歷史語言研究所執行。 2006 〈史前歷史〉。收錄於《續修花蓮縣志歷史篇》,吳翎君編,頁:1-31。花蓮:花蓮縣政府。 2011 《臺灣全志● 卷三住民志考古篇》。南投:臺灣文獻館。 劉益昌、趙金勇 2010 《花崗國中校舍新建工程遺址搶救發掘計劃成果報告書》。花蓮縣文化局委推中央研究歷史語言研究所執行。 劉瑩三 2005 《續修花蓮縣誌 自然篇》。花蓮市:花蓮縣政府。 駱香林 1958 《花蓮縣誌 卷二 地形》。花蓮縣:花蓮縣文獻委員會。 謝兆申、王明果 1991 《台灣地區主要土類圖輯》。國立中興大學土壤調查試驗中心。 Arnold, Dean 1985 Ceramic Theory and Cultural Processes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2008 Social Change and the Evolution of Ceramic Production and Distribution in a Maya Community. USA: University Press of Colorado. Bagwell, Elizabeth A. 2002 Ceramic Form and Skill: Attempting to Identify Child Producers at Pecos Pueblo, New Mexico. In Children in the Prehistoric Puebloan Southwest.K.A. Kamp ed. Pp.90-107. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City. Binford, L.B. 1968 Archaeological Perspectives. In New Perspectives in Archaeology, S.R. Binford and L. B. Binford, eds. Pp. 265-275. Chicago: Aldine. Binford, S. R., and L. R. Binford 1969 Stone Tools and Human Behavior. Scientific American 220(4):70-84. Botwid, Katarina 2013 Evaluation of Ceramics: Professional Artisanship As A Tool For Archaeological Interpretation. Journal of Nordic Archaeological Science 18:31-44. Brumfiel and Earle, 1987 Specializatin, Exchange and Complex Societies: An Introduction. In Specialization, Exchange and Complex Societies. Elizabeth M. Brumfiel and Timothy K. Earle, eds. Pp.1-9. New York: Cambridge University Press. Budden, S. 2008 Skill Amongst the Sherds: Understanding the Role of Skill in the Early to Late Middle Bronze Age in Hungary. In Breaking the Mould: Challenging the Past Through Pottery. I. Berg, ed. Pp.1-17. Oxford: BAR. Chernov, N. and P.N. Sapirstein 2008 Fitting circles to data with correlated noise. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 52(12): 5328-5337. Childe, V. G. 1950 The Urban Revolution. Town Planning Review 21:3-17. Chilton, Elizabeth S. 1999 Material Meaning and Meaningful Materials: An Introduction. In Material Meaning: Critical Approaches to the Interpretation of Material Culture. Elizabeth S. Chilton, eds. Pp.1-6. Salt Lake City: Univerisity of Utah Press. Chilton, Elizabeth S. 1999 One Size Fits All: Typology and Alternatives for Ceramic Research. In Material Meaning: Critical Approaches to the Interpretation of Material Culture. Elizabeth S. Chilton, eds. Pp.44-60. Salt Lake City: Univerisity of Utah Press. Cochrane, Ethan E. 2002 Explaining the prehistory of ceramic technology on Waya Island, Fiji. Archaeology in Oceania 37(1): 37-50 Cositn, Cathy L. 1991 Craft Specialization: Issues in Defining, Documenting and Explaining the Organization of Production. In Archaeological Method and theory, vol.3. M.B. Shiffer, eds. Pp.1-56.Tuscon: University of Arizona Press. 1998 Introduction: Craft and Social Identity. Archaeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association 8(1): 3-16. 1999 Formal and Technological Variability and the Social Relations of Production: Crisoles from San José de Moro,Peru. In Material Meaning: Critical Approaches to the Interpretation of Material Culture. Elizabeth S. Chilton, eds. Pp.85-102. Salt Lake City: Univerisity of Utah Press. Costin, Cathy L. and Hagstrum, Melissa B. 1995 Standardization, Labor Investment, Skill, and the Organization of Ceramic Production in Late Prehispanic Highland Peru. American Antiquity 60: 619-639. Crown, Patrricia L. 2007 Life Histories of Pots and Potters: Situating the Individual in Archaeology. American Antiquity 72(4):677-690. D’Altroy T. and Ronald Bishop 1990 The Provinvial Organization of Inka ceramic Production. American Antiquity 55(1): 120-138. Darmark, Kim 2010 Measuring Skill in the Production of Bifacial Pressure Flaked Points: a Multivariate Approach Using the Flip-test. Journal of archaeological Science 37(9): 2308-2315. del Río, Angel Polvorinos, Sanjuán, Leonardo García, Pérez, Victor Hurtado and Arnedo, M. Jesús Hernández 2005 Bronze Age Ceramics in Southwest Spain: An Exploratory Archaeometric Study of Technology and Function. Geoarchaeology: An International Journal 20(3): 263-284. Dobres, Marcia-Anne 2000 Technology and Social Agency. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd. Dobres, Marcia-Anne and Christopher R. Hoffman 1994 Social agency and the dynamics of prehistoric technology. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 1(3): 211-258 Earle, Timothy K. 1987 Specialization and the Production of Wealth: Hawaiian Chiefdoms and the Inka Empire. In Specialization,exchange and complex societies. Elizabeth M. Brumfiel and Timothy K. Earle, eds. Pp.64-75. New York: Cambridge University Press. Eerkens, Jelmer W. 2000 Practice Makes Within 5% of Perfect: Visual Perception, Motor Skills, and Memory in Artifact Variation. Current Anthropology 41(4):663-668. Eerkens J. and Carl Lipo 2005 Cultural Transmission, Copy Errors, and the Generation of Variation in Material Culture and the Archaeological Record. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 24(2005): 316-334. Gandon E., Remy Casanova, Patrick Sainton, Thelma Coyle, Valentine Roux, Blandine Bril and Reinoud J. Boostsma. 2010 A Proxy of Potters’ Throwing Skill: Ceramic Vessels Considered in Terms of Mechanical Stress. Journal of archaeological Science 38(5):1080-1089. Graves, Michael W. 1991 Pottery Production and Distribution among the Kalinga: A Study of Household and Regional Organization and Differentiation. In Ceramic Ethnoarchaeology. William A. Longacre, ed. Pp. 112-143. Tucson: University of Arizona Press. Halir, Radim and Jan Flusser 1998 Numerically Stable Direct Least Squares Fitting of Ellipses. Proc. 6th International Conference in CentralEurope on Computer Graphics and Visualization. WSCG 98:125-132. Hally, David J. 1986 The Identification of Vessel Function: A Case Study from Northwest Georgia. Ameircan Antiquity 51(2): 268-295. Henrich, Joseph 2004 Demography and Cultural Evolution: How Adaptive Cultural Processes Can Produce Maladaptive Losses the Tasmanian Case. American Antiquity 69: 197-214. Henrickson, Elizabeth F. and McDonald, Mary M.A. 1983 Ceramic Form and Function: An Ethnographic Search and an Archaeological Application. American Anthroppologist 85(3): 630-643. Hirshman A., Willian A. Lovis and Helen P. Pollard 2010 Specialization of Ceramic Production: A Sherd Assemblage Based Analytic Perspective. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 29:265-277. Hirth, Kenneth G. 1993 Identifying Rank and Socioeconomic Status in Domestic Contexts: An Example from Central Mexico. In Prehispanic Domestic Units in Wester Mesoamerica. Robert S. Santley and Kenneth G. Hirth, eds. Pp.121-146. Boca Raton: CRC Press. Ingold, T. 1990 Narratives of New Netherland, 1609-1664. New York: Barnes and Noble. Inomata, Takeshi 2001 The Power and Ideology of Artistic Creation: Elite Craft Specialists in Classic Maya Society. Current Anthropology 42(3): 321-349. Jiménez, Gonzalo A. 2004 Craft Specialization in Pottery Production During the Bronze Age in South-Eastern Iberia. Journal of Iberian Archaeology 6:157-180. Johnson, M. 1990 Technical and social systems in England, AD 1400-1700. Paper presented at the 55th Meetings of the Society for American Archaeology. Las Vegas. 1993 Housing Culture: Traditional Architecture in an English Landscape. Washington, DC: Smithsonian. Kenoyer, J.M., Massimo Vidale and Kuldeep Kumar Bhan 1991 Contemporary Stone Beadmaking in Khambhat, India: Patterns of Craft Specialization and Organization of Production as Reflected in the Archaeological Record. World Archaeology 23:1. Kent, Susan 1984 Analyzing Activity Areas: An Ethnoarcheological Study of the Use of Space. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press. Kvĕtina, Petr 2010 The Spatial Analysis of Non-Ceramic Refuse from the Neolithic Site at Bylany, Czech Republic. Europiean Journal of Archaeology 13(3): 336-337. Lechtman, H. 1984 Andean Value Systems and the Development of Prehistoric Metallurgy.Technology and Culture 25(1): 1-36. Lemonnier, Pierre 1986 The Study of Material Culture Today: Toward an Anthropology of Technical Systems.Journal of Anthropological Archeology 5(2):147-186. 1990 Topsy Turvy Techniques: Remarks on the Social Representation of Techniques. Archaeological Review from Cambridge 9(1): 27-37. 1992 Elements for an Anthropology of Technology. Museum of Anthropology University of Michgan Anthropological Papers No. 88. Ann Arbor. 1993 Introduction. In Technological Choices: Transformation in Material Cultures Since the Neolithic. Pierre Lemonnier, eds. Pp.1-35. London: Routledge. Loney, Helen L. 2000 Society and Technological Control: A Critical Review of Models of Technological Change in Ceramic Studies. American Antiquity 65(4):646-668. Longacre, W. A. 1999 Standardization and Specialization: What’s the Link? In Pottery and People,J.M. Skibo and G.M. Feinman, eds. Pp. 44-58. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press. Lycett ,Stephen J. 2015 Cultural Evolutionary Approaches to Artifact Variation Over Time and Space: Basis, Progress, and Prospects. Journal of Archaeological Science 56:21-31. Mahias, Marie-Claude 1993 Potteyr Techniques in India: Technical Variants and Social Choice. In Technological Choices: Transformation in material cultures since the Neolithic. Pierre Lemonnier, ed. Pp.157-180. London: Routledge. McClure, Sarah B, Bernabeu,J., García, O., Aura, E., Molina, L., Descantes, C., Speakman, D.R. and Michael D. Glascock. 2006 Testing Technological Practices: Neutron Activation Analysis of Neolithic Ceramics from Valencia, Spain. Journal of Archaeological Science 33(5):671-680. Miller, Heather Margaret-Louise 2007 Archaeological Approaches to Technology. London: Elsevier/Academic Press. Muller, Jon 1987 Salt, Chert, and Shell: Mississippian Exchange and Economy. In Specialization, Exchange and Complex Societies. Elizabeth M. Brumfiel and Timothy K. Earle, eds. Pp.10-21. New York: Cambridge UniversityPress. Orton, Clive, Paul Tyers and Alan Vince 1993 Pottery in Archaeology. New York: University of Cambridge Press. Pigeot, N. 1987 Magdaléniens d’Etiolles: Economie, de Débitage et Organization Sociale. XXV Supplément á Gallia Préhistoire, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.Paris. Read, Dwight 2006 Tasmanian Knowledge and Skill: Maladaptive imitation or Adequate Technology? American Antiquity 71(1):164-184. Rice, Prudence M. 1987 Pottery analysis: A Source Book. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Riguad, Jean-Philippe and Jan F. Simek 1991 Interpreting Spatial Patterns at the Grotte XV: A Multiple-Method Approach. In The Interpretation of Archaeological Spatial Patterning. Ellen M. Kroll and T. Douglas Price, eds. Pp.199-220. New York and London: Plenum Press. Roux, Valentine 2003a Ceramic Standardization and Intensity of Production: Quantifying Degrees of Specialization. American Antiquity 68(4): 768-782. 2003b A Dynamic Systems Framework for Studying Technological Change: Application to the Emergence of the Potter's Wheel in the Southern Levant. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 10(1):1-30. Rye, S. Owen 1981 Pottery Technology: Principles and Reconstruction. Washinton: Taraxacum. Santley, Robert S. 1993 Late Formative Period Society at Loma Torremote: A Consideration of the Redistribution vs. the Great Provider Models as a Basis for the Emergence of Complexity in the Basin of Mexico. In Prehispanic Domestic Units in Wester Mesoamerica. Robert S. Santley and Kenneth G. Hirth, eds. Pp.6-86. Boca Raton: CRC Press. Santley, Robert S. and Kenneth G. Hirth, eds 1993 Household Studies in Western Mesoamerica. In Prehispanic Domestic Units in Wester Mesoamerica. Pp.1-17. Boca Raton: CRC Press. Schiffer, Michael B., James M. Skibo, Janet L. Griffitts, Kacy L. Hollenback and William A. Longacre 2001 Behavioral Archaeology and the Study of Technology. American Antiquity 66(4): 729-737. Schlanger, Sarah H. 1992 Recognizing Persistent Places in Anasazi Settlement Systems. In Space, Time, and Archaeological Landscapes. Jacqueline Rossignol and LuAnn Wandsnider, eds. Pp.91-112. New York: Plenum Press. Sinopoli, Carla M. 1999 Levels of Complexity: Ceramic Variability at Vijayanagara. In Pottery and People: A Dynamic Interaction. James M. Skibo and Gary M. Feinman, eds. Pp. 115-136. Salt Lake City: The University of Utah Press. Sillar, B. 2001 Reply to Comments on ‘Technological Choices in Ceramic Production’. Archaeometry 43: 288–92. Sillar, B. and Tite, M.S. 2000 The Challenge of ‘Technological Choices’ for Materials Science Approaches in Archaeology. Archaeometry 42:2-20. Skibo, J.M. 2013 Understanding Pottery Function. New York: Springer. Stark, Miriam T. 1999 Social Dimensions of Technical Choice in Kalinga Ceramic Traditions. In Material Meaning: Critical Approaches to the Interpretation of Material Culture. Elizabeth S. Chilton, eds. Pp.24-43. Salt Lake City: Univerisity of Utah Press. Stark, Miriam T., Bowser, B.J. and Lee Horne, eds. 2008 Why Breaking Down Boundaries Matters for Archaeological Research on Learning and Cultural Transmission: An Introduction. In Cultural Transmission and Material Culture: Breaking Down Boundaries. Pp.1-16.Tucson: The University of Arizona Press. van der Leeuw, Sander 1977 Towards a Study of the Economics of Pottery Making . In Ex Horreo. Pp. 68-76. Amsterdam: Universiteit van Amsterdam. 1993 Giving the Potter A Choice. In Technological Choices: transformation in material cultures since the Neolithic. Pierre Lemonnier, ed. Pp.238-288. London: Routledge. Wandsnider, LuAnn 1992 The Spatial Dimension of Time. In Space, Time, and Archaeological Landscapes. Jacqueline Rossignol and LuAnn Wandsnider, eds. Pp.257-280.New York: Plenum Press. Weber, E. H. 1894 De Pulen, Resorptione, Auditu et Tacta: Annotationes Anatomicae et Physiologicae. Leipzig: Kohler. Weisler, Marshall I. and Patrick Kirch 1985 The Structure of Settlement Space in a Polynesian Chiefdom: Kawela, Moloka’i, Hawaiian Islands. New Zealand Journal of Archaeology 7:129-158. Whalen, Michael E. 1998 Ceramic Vessel Size Estimation from Sherds: An Experiment and a Case Study. Journal of field archaeology 25:219-227 Willey, Gordon R. and Philip Philips. 1958 Method and Theory in American Archaeology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/68247 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 器物的製作並非僅僅是將物品生產出來這麼簡單,器物的製作技術體系是鑲嵌於社會文化之中,可以反映社會的種種面向,進而探討人群生活的模式。陶器是台灣史前社會常見的物品,本論文研究花蓮縣富源遺址出土之陶片,透過製陶技術體系的研究,並著重於技術成熟度的討論,了解古富源人群的陶容器製作技術以及其反映的社會內涵。本論文也會結合時空脈絡進行分析討論。比較不同時間點陶容器製作體系是否有所變化,亦討論不同空間的陶容器是否有差異。
經過本研究初步的分析與討論,富源製陶技術體系有一定程度的一致性。在技術成熟度上,比較不同類別陶片後仍有所差異,可能與需求、特殊象徵意義、器物功能有關。而在時間脈絡下,發現質地較軟的泥質陶容器隨著時間推演數量明顯下降,在較深層位出土的帶繩紋陶也多屬該類泥質陶容器,推測該類陶容器可能與早期的流行風格相關。另外陶容器燒製技術在晚期有稍加提升,而陶土篩選度稍下降,但整體上富源遺址的技術體系有著相當一致的製陶傳統,並沒有特別劇烈的變化,古富源人群應在當地穩定生活一段時間,並維持一貫的製陶模式。而在本研究討論的空間範圍中並沒有發現不同空間的陶容器有明顯差異,對於富源遺址內空間的利用需由未來的進一步研究來解答。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Craft production is influenced by various factors, including social relations, social organization, the demand for crafts, the environment and cultural symbols. Thus, manufacturing technology can reflect how the ancient society worked. The aim of this study is to examine the technical system on the basis of pottery recovered in a Neolithic site of Hualien ─ Fuyuan Site. Besides, this study focused on the degree of skill which can be analyzed by some indexes. Time and space scales were also discussed in this thesis.
The results revealed that the way the ancient Fuyuan people making their pottery didn’t change much. However, the firing skill improved in the more recent period, there is a possibility that they chose to make more effort to firing process. Overall, their ceramic technical system remained the same tradition for a period of time, showing a certain degree of consistency in pottery manufacturing. The ancient Fuyuan people might not have the need to change their way of living, or even with some incentives, they still decided to perform the same tradition year after year. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-17T02:15:40Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-106-R03125002-1.pdf: 3541596 bytes, checksum: da9ca537389ae438b0743168703f65c4 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄
中文摘要 ………………………………………………………………………………………………………ii Abstract………………………………………………………………………………………………………iii 目錄……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………iv 附圖目錄……………………………………………………………………………………………………………vii 附表目錄…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………ix 第一章 緒論………………………………………………………………………………………………………………1 第一節 前言………………………………………………………………………………………………………………1 第二節 研究動機與目的………………………………………………………………………………………2 第二章 文獻回顧……………………………………………………………………………………………………3 第一節 技術與技術體系………………………………………………………………………………………3 第二節 技術成熟度………………………………………………………………………………………………9 第三節 技術之時間與空間意義……………………………………………………………………15 2.3.1 技術的時間意義……………………………………………………………………………………15 2.3.2 技術的空間意義……………………………………………………………………………………21 第三章 富源遺址概述………………………………………………………………………………………24 第一節 富源遺址的位置與自然環境…………………………………………………………25 第二節 富源遺址之出土遺物與史前文化樣貌………………………………………28 第三節 富源遺址於區域考古之定位…………………………………………………………31 第四章 研究策略與分析方法………………………………………………………………………33 第一節 標本抽樣說明………………………………………………………………………………………33 4.1.1 抽樣探坑概述………………………………………………………………………………………33 4.1.2 陶片抽樣說明………………………………………………………………………………………42 第二節 研究方法與測量…………………………………………………………………………………44 4.2.1 原料準備與處理…………………………………………………………………………………44 4.2.2 形塑方式與表面處理…………………………………………………………………………45 4.2.3 厚度與其變異程度………………………………………………………………………………45 4.2.4 陶片顏色…………………………………………………………………………………………………46 4.2.5 口頸部位測量…………………………………………………………………………………………47 4.2.6 部位圓弧與最接近真圓之差異程度……………………………………………48 4.2.7 小結……………………………………………………………………………………………………………49 第三節 統計分析方法………………………………………………………………………………………50 第五章 分析結果…………………………………………………………………………………………………52 第一節 陶類與各屬性的關係…………………………………………………………………………52 5.1.1 摻和料密度………………………………………………………………………………………………52 5.1.2 摻和料密度之變異係數………………………………………………………………………53 5.1.3 摻和料粒徑大小與種類一致程度……………………………………………………54 5.1.4 形塑方式與表面處理……………………………………………………………………………57 5.1.5 厚度與其變異程度…………………………………………………………………………………58 5.1.6 內外壁顏色………………………………………………………………………………………………60 5.1.7 顏色均勻度………………………………………………………………………………………………62 5.1.8 內外壁顏色一致與否……………………………………………………………………………63 5.1.9 燒透與否……………………………………………………………………………………………………64 第二節 層位與空間的差異………………………………………………………………………………66 5.2.1 陶類………………………………………………………………………………………………………………66 5.2.2 摻和料密度………………………………………………………………………………………………69 5.2.3 摻和料粒徑大小與種類一致程度……………………………………………………71 5.2.4 形塑方式與表面處理……………………………………………………………………………74 5.2.5 厚度與其變異程度…………………………………………………………………………………75 5.2.6 內外壁顏色…………………………………………………………………………………………………77 5.2.7 顏色均勻度…………………………………………………………………………………………………82 5.2.8 內外壁顏色一致與否………………………………………………………………………………83 5.2.9 燒透與否………………………………………………………………………………………………………85 第三節 特徵部位………………………………………………………………………………………………………87 5.3.1 口頸部位………………………………………………………………………………………………………87 5.3.2 折肩與圈足…………………………………………………………………………………………………90 5.3.3 與最適圓之差距…………………………………………………………………………………………91 第四節 小結…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………93 5.4.1 各陶類之特徵…………………………………………………………………………………………… 93 5.4.2 層位與空間的差異……………………………………………………………………………………96 第六章 討論………………………………………………………………………………………………………………99 第一節 富源遺址之製陶技術體系……………………………………………………………………99 第二節 富源遺址之製陶技術成熟度…………………………………………………………107 第三節 陶容器種類與功能的討論………………………………………………………………112 第四節 富源遺址技術體系時間與空間變化……………………………………………119 6.2.1 時間脈絡下的變化………………………………………………………………………………119 6.2.2 空間脈絡下的差異………………………………………………………………………………123 第五節 富源遺址的區域互動關係……………………………………………………………124 第七章 結論………………………………………………………………………………………………………129 參考文獻 …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………137 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 富源遺址出土陶容器之製作技術體系兼技術成熟度分析 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Pottery Technical System and Skill of Fuyuan Site | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 106-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林圭偵,陳維鈞,陳有貝 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 陶器分析,技術體系,技術成熟度,文化變遷,富源遺址, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | pottery analysis,technical system,skill,cultural transmission,Fuyuan Site, | en |
dc.relation.page | 151 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201704295 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2017-10-16 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 文學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 人類學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 人類學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-106-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 3.46 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。