Skip navigation

DSpace JSPUI

DSpace preserves and enables easy and open access to all types of digital content including text, images, moving images, mpegs and data sets

Learn More
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Publication Year
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Advisor
  • Search TDR
  • Rights Q&A
    • My Page
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 法律學院
  3. 法律學系
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/61528
Title: 論虛擬通貨及其交易之課稅─以營業稅及所得稅為中心
A Study on Taxation of Crypto-asset Transactions-based on the discussion of Business Tax and Income Tax
Authors: Chien Lin
林芊
Advisor: 柯格鐘(Ke-Chung Ko)
Keyword: NULL
Publication Year : 2020
Degree: 碩士
Abstract: 虛擬通貨為區塊鏈技術應用下發展出的新興產物,其錯綜複雜且多元的性質對傳統法規範之適用帶來不小衝擊,在課稅上,由於我國除對證券型虛擬通貨明確核定其該當證券交易法上之有價證券外,尚缺乏對支付型、功能型虛擬通貨明確的定性,因此,本篇論文之重點,在於討論出各類型虛擬通貨最適宜之定性,以及基於該定性下,營業稅及所得稅是否課徵及如何課徵。
在支付型虛擬通貨之部份,其討論爭點在於應將其定性為支付工具抑或是數位商品,如為前者,則應無營業稅之課徵餘地;如為後者,於我國,其銷售將會被認定該當勞務之提供,而被課徵營業稅。至於所得稅之討論,其爭點則在所得種類之歸類,及收益認列應適用何種判定基準。
在功能型虛擬通貨之部分,其討論爭點在於應將其定性為表彰一定權利之證書抑或是數位商品,此定性之歧異,將同時影響營業稅及所得稅課徵之介入時點;而在證券型虛擬通貨之部份,其討論爭點則在於證券交易所得免稅稅捐優惠之正當性。
本文將首先參酌國際組織及各國政府對虛擬通貨之定性進行分析,次依序按支付型、功能型、證券型虛擬通貨之順序對其營業稅及所得稅之課徵進行討論,期能找出對我國最適宜之課稅解方。

Blockchain is the technology that enables the existence of crypto-assets. By using smart contracts, a crypto asset can display several functions and characteristics, which constitutes a challenge on government supervision.
There are three types of crypto-assets, including payment token, utility token and security token. In Taiwan, only FSC has officially proclaimed that security tokens are the securities regulated under the Securities and Exchange Act, while the other two kinds of crypto-assets are still lack of legal status. Therefore, this essay will mainly focus on finding out the most appropriate legal status of payment tokens and utility tokens, and discussing the taxation of business tax and income tax.
There are two kinds of legal status probably defined by governments on payment tokens: a means of payment or digital commodity. The latter definition will lead to a levy of business tax since a sale of digital commodity will be regarded as supply of services, while the former will not. As for the levy of income tax, we should find out how an income of selling payment tokens applies to Article 14, Section 1 of the Income Tax Act, and when should we recognize it.
Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore published《IRAS e-Tax Guide - Income Tax Treatment of Digital Tokens》on April. 25, 2020, mentioning that utility token is akin to a voucher. To define utility tokens as certificates or digital commodity will effect the timing of taxation. With regard to security tokens, the issue of law is the legitimacy of tax incentives.
Above all, this essay will start with analyzing the legal status of payment tokens, utility tokens and security tokens. After that, in chapter 3 to chapter 5, this essay will continue to discuss on the taxation of cryptocurrency transactions.
URI: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/61528
DOI: 10.6342/NTU202001147
Fulltext Rights: 有償授權
Appears in Collections:法律學系

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
U0001-2506202010234000.pdf
  Restricted Access
2.56 MBAdobe PDF
Show full item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved