請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/61114
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 高維泓(Wei H. Kao) | |
dc.contributor.author | Chun-Wei Tsai | en |
dc.contributor.author | 蔡純瑋 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T10:47:18Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2014-11-24 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2013-08-14 | |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2013-08-12 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 一、中文部分
巴爾(Mieke Bal)。《敘述學:敘事理論導論》。譚君強譯。北京:中國社會科學出版社,2003年。 申丹。《敘述學與小說文體學研究》。北京:北京大學出版社,1998年。 ──。《西方敘事學:經典與後經典》。北京:北京大學出版社,2010年。 卡爾維諾(Italo Calvino)。《給下一輪太平盛世的備忘錄》。吳潛誠校譯。臺北:時報文化,1996年。 卡羅爾(Noel Carroll)。《超越美學》。李媛媛譯。北京:商務印書館,2006年。 艾柯(Umberto Eco)。《悠遊小說林》。黃寤蘭譯。臺北:時報文化,2000年。 ──。《詮釋與過度詮釋》。柯里尼(Stefan Collini)編,王宇根譯。北京:三聯書店,2005年。 米勒(J.Hillis Miller)。《解讀敍事》。申丹譯。北京:北京大學出版社,2002年。 何曉芙。《洩密的故事:馬汀麥當納〈枕頭人〉中的「說故事」與「自我欺騙」》。政治大學,2010年。 波特(Roy Porter)。《瘋狂簡史》。巫毓荃譯。台北:左岸文化,2004年。 柯里(Mark Currie)。《後現代敘事理論》。寧一中譯。北京:北京大學出版 社,2003年。 胡開奇。〈卡圖蘭的遭遇的悖論──馬丁•麥克多納的《枕頭人》〉。《枕頭人:英國 當代名劇集》。胡開奇編譯。北京:新星出版社,2010年。 紀蔚然。《現代戲劇敘事觀》。臺北:書林,2007年。 科恩(Steven Cohan)、夏爾斯(Linda M. Shires)。《講故事──對敘事虛構作品的理論分析》。張方譯。板橋市:駱駝出版社,1997年。 翁振盛、葉偉忠。《敘事學》。臺北:文建會,2010年。 費倫(James Phelan)。《作為修辭的敘事》。陳永國譯。北京:北京大學出版社,2003年。 費倫(James Phelan)、拉比諾維茨(Peter J. Rabinowitz)編。《當代敘事理論指南》。 申丹、馬海良等譯。北京:北京大學出版社,2007年。 黃資絜。《跨越寫實藩籬——回憶劇中不可靠的敘述者》,臺灣大學,2010年。 赫爾曼(David Herman)。〈敘事理論的歷史(上):早期發展的譜系〉。《當代敘事理論指南》。費倫(James Phelan)、拉比諾維茨(Peter J. Rabinowitz)編。申丹、馬海良等譯。北京:北京大學出版社,2007年。頁3-21。 劉康。《對話的喧聲:巴赫汀文化理論評述》。台北:麥田,2005年。 賽爾登(Raman Selden)。《文學批評理論:從柏拉圖到現在》。劉象愚、陳永國等譯。北京:北京大學出版社,2003年。 簡奈特(Gerard Genette)。《辭格III》。廖素珊、楊恩祖譯。台北:時報文化,2003年。 簡政珍。《讀者反映閱讀法》。臺北:文建會,2010年。 蘇永旭。《戲劇敘事學研究》。北京:中國戲劇,2004年。 二、英文部分 Abbott, H. Porter. The Cambridge Introduction to Narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002. Print. Alber, Jan, Stfan Iversen, Henrik Skov Nielsen, Brian Richardson. “Unnatural Narratives, Unnatural Narratology: Beyond Mimetic Models.”Narrative 18.2 (2010): 113-36. Project MUSE. Web. 23 May 2012. ─. “What Is Unnatural about Unnatural Narratology? A Response to Monika Fludernik.”Narrative 20.3 (2012): 113-36. Academic Search Complete. Web. 15 Jan. 2013. Alber, Jan, and Rudiger Heinze, eds. Unnatural Narratives – Unnatural Narratology. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter GmbH, 2011. Print. Bakhtin, M. M. Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics. Ed. and Trans. Caryl Emerson. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, 1984. Print. Bal, Mieke. Narratology: Introduction to the Theory of Narrative. Toronto: University of Toronto, 1997. Print. Barthes, Roland. “The Death of the Author.” The Rustle of Language. Roland Barthes. Trans. Richard Howard. New York: Hill and Wang, 1986. 49-55. Print. Booth, Wayne C. A Rhetoric of Irony. Chicago: University of Chicago, 1974. Print. ─. The Rhetoric of Fiction. London: Penguin, 1991. Print. ─. The Essential Wayne Booth. Ed. Walter Jost. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago, 2006. Print. Brooks, Peter. Reading for the Plot: Design and Intention in Narrative. New York: A.A. Knopf, 1984. Print. Carroll, Noel. Philosophy of Art: A Contemporary Introduction. London: Routledge, 1999. Print. ─. Beyond Aesthetics: Philosophical Essays. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge UP, 2001. Print. ─, ed. The Poetics, Aesthetics, and Philosophy of Narrative. Chichester, U.K.:Wiley-Blackwell, 2009. ─. “Martin McDonagh’s The Pillowman, or The Justification of Literature.” Philosophy and Literature, Vol. 35, No. 1, 2011, pp. 168-81. Print. Chambers, Lilian, and Eamonn Jordan, eds. The Theatre of Martin McDonagh: A World of Savage Stories. Dublin: Carysfort Press, 2006. Print. Chatman, Seymour Benjamin. Story and Discourse: Narrative Structure in Fiction and Film. Ithaca, NY: Cornell UP, 1978. Print. Cohan, Steven, and Linda M. Shires. Telling Stories: The Theoretical Analysis of Narrative Fiction. London: Routledge, 1997. Print. Currie, Mark. Postmodern Narrative Theory. New York: Palgrave, 1998. Print. Duff, David, ed. Modern Genre Theory. Harlow, England: Longman, 2000. Print. Dyke, Carolynn Van. The Fiction of Truth: Structures of Meaning in Narrative and Dramatic Allegory. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1985. Print. Eldred, Laura. “Martin McDonagh’s Blend of Tradition and Horrific Innovation.”The Theatre of Martin McDonagh: A World of Savage Stories. Eds. Lilian Chambers and Eamonn Jordan. Dublin: Carysfort, 2006. 198-213. Print. Fludernik, Monika. An Introduction to Narratology. London: Routledge, 2009. Print. Funk, Wolfgang. “Histories of Violence – Fairytales of Identity and Masculinity in Martin McDonagh’s The Lieutenant of Inishmore and The Pillowman.”Performing Masculinity. Eds. Rainer Emig and Antony Rowland. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010. 185-209. Print. Garner, Stanton B, Jr. The Absent Voice: Narrative Comprehension in The Theater. Urbana: University of Illinois, 1989. Print. Grene, Nicholas. “Ireland in Two Minds: Martin McDonagh and Conor McPherson.” The Theatre of Martin McDonagh: A World of Savage Stories. Dublin: Carysfort Press, 2006. 42-59. Hagberg, Garry L. and Walter Jost, eds. A Companion to the Philosophy of Literature. Chichester, U.K.: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010. Harris, Peter James. “Sex and Violence: The Shift from Synge to McDonagh.” Hungarian Journal of English and American Studies 10.1-2 (2004): 51-59. Harvey, Clodagh Brennan. Contemporary Irish Traditional Narrative: The English Language Tradition. Berkeley: University of California, 1992. Print. Jahn, Manfred. “Narrative Voice and Agency in Drama: Aspects of a Narratology of Drama.”New Literary History 32.3 (2001): 659-79. Print. Jordan, Eamonn. “War on Narrative: The Pillowman.”The Theatre of Martin McDonagh: A World of Savage Stories. Eds. Lilian Chambers and Eamonn Jordan. Dublin: Carysfort, 2006. 174-97. Print. ─.“The Native Quarter: The Hyphenated-Real –The Drama of MartinMcDonagh.” Sub-Versions: Trans-National Readings of Modern Irish Literature. Ciaran Ross, ed. New York: Rodopi, 2010. Print. Kermode, Frank. Poetry, Narrative, History. Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 1990. Print. Kiberd, Declan. “Storytelling: the Gaelic Tradition.”The Irish Writer and the World. Cambridge University Press, 2005. Print. McDonagh, Martin. The Pillowman. Lodon, Faber and Faber, 2003. Print. Middeke, Martin, and Peter Paul Schnierer, eds. The Methuen Drama Guide to Contemporary Irish Playwrights. London: Methuen Drama, 2010. Print. Miller, J. Hillis. Reading Narrative. Norman: University of Oklahoma, 1998. Print. O'Hagan, Sean. “The Wild West.” The Guardian 24 March 2001. Web. 06Feb. 2013. O'Toole, Fintan. “Shadows Over Ireland.”American Theatre 15.6 (1998): 16. Academic Search Complete. Web. 3Oct. 2012. Phelan, James. Narrative as Rhetoric: Technique, Audiences, Ethics, Ideology. Columbus: Ohio State UP, 1996. Print. ─. Living to Tell about It: A Rhetoric and Ethics of Character Narration. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 2005. Print. Pilny, Ondřej. Irony and Identity in Modern Irish Drama. Prague: Litteraria Pragensia, 2006. Print. Plato. “Republic.” The Norton Anthology of Theory and Criticism. Eds. Vincent B. Leitch, William E. Cain, Laurie Finke, Barbara Johnson, John McGowan, and Jeffery J. Willliams. New York: Norton, 2001. 49-80. Print. Propp, Vladimir. Theory and History of Folklore. Ed. Anatoly Liberman. Trans. Ariadna Y. Martin and Richard P. Martin. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, 1984. Print. Readings, Bill. “Canon and on: From Concept to Figure.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 57.1 (1989) 149-72. JSTOR. Web. 12Nov. 2012. ─. Introducing Lyotard: Art and Politics. London: Routledge, 1991. Print. Richardson, Brian. “‘Time Is out of Joint’: Narrative Models and the Temporality of the Drama.” Poetics Today, 8.2 (1987): 299-309. Print. ─. “Beyond Poststructuralism: Theory of Character, the Personae of Modern Drama, and the Antinomies of Critical Theory.” Modern Drama, 40 (1997): 86-99. ─. “Voice and Narration in Postmodern Drama.” New Literary History 32.3 (2001) pp. 681-94. Print. ─. Unnatural Voices: Extreme Narration in Modern and Contemporary Fiction. Columbus: Ohio State UP, 2006. Print. Russell, Richard Rankin. Martin McDonagh: A Casebook. London: Routledge, 2007. Print. Scholes, Robert, and Robert Kellogg. The Nature of Narrative. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1966. Print. Sheriff, John K. The Fate of Meaning: Charles Peirce, Structuralism, and Literature. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton UP, 1989. Print. Thorson, Greg. The New Grotesque: The Theatre of Martin McDonagh and Tracy Letts. Saarbrucken, Germany: VDM Verlag Dr. Muller, 2009. Print. Williams, Tennessee. “The Glass Menagerie.” Drama in the Modern World: Plays and Essays. Ed. Samuel A. Weiss. Taipei, Taiwan: Bookman, 1990. 421-54. Print. Wimsatt, William K. and Monroe Beardsley. The Verbal Icon : Studies in the Meaning of poetry. Lexington, Ky.: The University Press of Kentucky, 1954. Print. 三、網路資料 “diminished responsibility.” Encyclopaedia Britannica. Encyclopaedia Britannica Online Academic Edition. Encyclopaedia Britannica Inc., 2013. Web. 09 Apr.2013<http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/163720/diminished-responsibility>. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/61114 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 馬汀•麥多納的《枕頭人》是一個充滿謎題的後設劇本,它一方面充滿各種轉折,另一方面透過這些轉折來指向敘事本身。本研究嘗試運用、修正既有的敘事理論、藝術哲學論述及複調理論,找出《枕頭人》和這些論述的連結方式,藉此探討劇本的結構特徵和文本意涵,尋找文本形式與內容之間的關係。
在形式方面,本論文首先以敘事理論確認《枕頭人》中多位敘事者的在場與作用,並透過修辭性敘事學論述,一方面舉證劇中的敘事聲音如何傳達與之相應的社會現象,另一方面檢驗「作者」與「敘事者」在劇中如何被混淆,進而影響劇情發展和劇中主角卡圖里安的命運。除此之外,戲劇中的敘事具有雙重維度,視覺與聽覺印象同時作用。這種敘事特徵讓卡圖里安同時具備敘事者、說故事者與真實作者的身分與特權,使他顯得「全知」而有罪,而非他所聲稱的無辜冤枉。 在內容方面,透過敘事分析及角色分析,本論文試圖歸納主要角色所體現的不可分割之雙重性,如理智與瘋狂、主觀與客觀。對立的概念被並置在劇中,主要角色的爭議性也因而被突顯出來。不同價值觀與道德觀的衝撞,亦反映在角色對卡圖里安歧異的態度,及他們對短篇故事的詮釋,這些差異呼應了不同的敘事與道德理解關係。然而,該劇並未偏好特定立場,而是讓不同的觀點同時發聲,觀眾在欣賞劇作的過程中,便得以深化自己的道德理解。 《枕頭人》的主角卡圖里安具有不定而浮動的主體意識,這恰好和他曖昧不明的敘事位置相呼應,而這樣的特點證實《枕頭人》是一個複調劇本:它讓各種聲音並存於劇中,確保不同意識形態的對話。《枕頭人》是作為文學批評的虛構作品,它既是一部邀請觀眾參與敘事填充的劇本,也是一個關於敘事本身的論述,各種聲音在《枕頭人》中交會,敘事之於《枕頭人》的重要性因而不容忽視。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | As a metafictional play, Martin McDonagh’s The Pillowman consists of numerous puzzles and twists that make the play itself as a work of narrative art. By using and amending existing theories of narrative, philosophy of art, and polyphonic novel, this research attempts to point out how The Pillowman illustrates these discourses through which we enter into the significance of its multiple structures and stories, and the relation between the two.
In terms of structure, this thesis, by applying narrative theories, confirms multiple narrators’ presence and functions in The Pillowman. In light of the rhetorical narratology, narrative voices in the play can be social phenomena in which the ideas of author and narrator are so integrated that causes the protagonist Katurian to be destructed by external and internal forces. Moreover, the quality of being virtually real in theatre allows Katurian an omniscient perspective as a narrator, storyteller and author, while he cannot feel guilty about his own mixed roles in the incidents he creates. This thesis also analyzes the narrative techniques used in The Pillowman, specifying how its characters embody the inseparable dualism, for instance, reason/ madness, subjectivity/ objectivity. The juxtaposition of these conflicting concepts manifests the controversy over characters. That is, their various judgments on Katurian reflect how diverse the interpretations of Katurian’s stories can be. Having ensured the reliability of different narratives, the play allows the audience to see causes and effects of incidents from different perspectives in this play. The Pillowman is a polyphonic play in which Katurian’s mixed roles result in his ambiguous narrative positions. With diverse points of view, the play invites the audience to reevaluate their sense of morality. The play, therefore, is a work of narrative art that not only guarantees the dialogue between various ethical concepts but also extends the limits of different narratives. As a fictional work that questions the feasibility of narratology, The Pillowman is where narratives meet, and where more dialogues begin. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T10:47:18Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-102-R98129001-1.pdf: 1214852 bytes, checksum: b785b039c5e2ffd195f6613a343b8cc4 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 i
誌謝 iii 中文摘要 vi 英文摘要 vii 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機與宗旨 1 第二節 文獻回顧 4 第三節 研究範圍及方法 8 第二章 曝光的作者 13 第一節 敘事者存在嗎? 13 一、敘事者的特權 13 二、戲劇中的敘事者 17 三、是「我」還是「他」? 21 第二節 事關修辭 24 一、作為修辭的敘事 24 二、第三種敘事聲音 27 (一)聲音中的社會回響 28 (二)變聲�變身? 31 第三節 複數作者 36 一、作者的復活 36 二、詮釋實境秀 39 三、重疊的作者幻象 43 第三章 雙重性 47 第一節 講述與呈現 47 一、換句話說 47 二、三位一體 51 三、反客為主 54 第二節 一體兩面 58 一、理智與瘋狂 58 二、向心與離心 61 三、作家與兄弟 64 第三節 好壞參半 68 一、詮釋與權勢 68 二、正義與爭議 74 三、枕頭人 79 第四章 敘事、道德與真實 85 第一節 文學及其辯護 86 一、自足為上? 86 二、美善為準? 89 三、沒有問題的故事 91 第二節 作者及其審判 94 一、柏拉圖曰 94 二、模仿犯 97 三、澄清觀 101 第三節 真相及其幻象 105 一、虛構真實 105 二、單音複調 110 (一)複調小說 110 (二)複調戲劇 113 第五章 結論 118 第一節 敘事的重要 118 第二節 聲音的交會 121 第三節 文學的批評 123 參考文獻 127 一、中文部分 127 二、英文部分 129 三、網路資料 134 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 敘事的交會:馬汀•麥多納《枕頭人》研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Where Narratives Meet: A Study of Martin McDonagh’s The Pillowman | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 101-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 紀蔚然(Wei-Jan Chi),王寶祥(Pao-Hsiang Wang) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 馬汀‧麥多納,枕頭人,敘事,作者,道德理解,真實,複調, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Martin McDonagh,Pillowman,narrative,author,moral understanding,truth,polyphony, | en |
dc.relation.page | 134 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2013-08-12 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 文學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 戲劇學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 戲劇學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-102-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.19 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。