請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/60350
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 黃宗慧(Tsung-Huei Huang) | |
dc.contributor.author | Hsin-Chang Chen | en |
dc.contributor.author | 陳信彰 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T10:16:06Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-09-01 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2020-08-03 | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2020-07-18 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Abrahamsson, Christian. “Book Review Forum: Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things.” Dialogues in Human Geography, vol. 1, no. 3, SAGE Publications, Nov. 2011, pp. 399-402, doi:10.1177/204382061100100308.
Ahmed, Sara. “Orientations Matter.” Ed. Diana H. Coole and Samantha Frost. New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics. Duke University Press, 2010, pp. 234-257. Alan R., Van Wyk. “What Matters Now? Review of Jane Bennett, Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things.” Cosmos and History: the Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, vol. 8, no. 2, Cosmos and History Publishing Co-op, Nov. 2012, pp. 130-36. Anderson, Ben. “Book Review Forum: Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things.” Dialogues in Human Geography, vol. 1, no. 3, SAGE Publications, Nov. 2011, pp. 393-96, doi: 10.1177/204382061100100306. ---. “Time-Stilled Space-Slowed: How Boredom Matters.” Geoforum, vol. 35, no. 6, Research Gate, Nov. 2004, pp. 739-54, doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2004.02.005. Baker, James R. “Why It’s No Go.” Critical Essays on William Golding. G.K. Hall, 1988, pp. 22-31. ---. William Golding: A Critical Study. St. Martin’s Press, New York, 1965. ---. “William Golding: Three Decades of Criticism.” Critical Essays on William Golding. G.K. Hall, 1988, pp. 1-11. Barad, Karen Michelle. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Duke University Press, 2007. Bennett, Jane. “Author Response.” Dialogues in Human Geography, vol. 1, no. 3, Nov. 2011, pp. 404-406, doi:10.1177/204382061100100310. ---. “A Vitalist Stopover on the Way to a New Materialism.” Ed. Diana H. Coole and Samantha Frost. New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics. Duke University Press, 2010, pp. 47-69. ---. “Of Material Sympathies, Paracelsus, and Whitman.” Ed. by Serenella Iovino and Serpil Oppermann, Indiana University Press, 2014, pp. 239-252. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt16gzq85.20. Accessed 20 April 2020. ---. “Response to Thomas Prince’s Review of Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things.” Perspectives on Politics, vol. 9, no. 1, Mar. 2011, pp. 120-21, doi:10.1017/S1537592710003476. ---. “The Agency of Assemblages and the North American Blackout.” Public Culture, vol. 17, no. 3, Duke University Press, Jan 2005, pp. 445-65, doi:10.1215/08992363-17-3-445. ---. The Enchantment of Modern Life: Attachments, Crossings, and Ethics / Jane Bennett. Princeton University Press, 2001. ---. “Treading Softly: Paths to Ecological Order. By Thomas Princen.” Perspectives on Politics, vol. 9, no. 1, 1 Mar. 2011, pp. 115-17, doi:10.1017/S1537592710003440. ---. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Duke University Press, 2010. Bloom, Harold. Novelists and Novels. The Readers’ Subscription, 2006. Braun, Bruce. “Book Review Forum: Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things.” Dialogues in Human Geography, vol. 1, no.3, Nov. 2011, pp. 390-393, doi:10.1177/2043820611421562. Cheah, Pheng. “Non dialectical Materialism.” Diacritics, vol. 38, no. 1/2, 2008, pp. 143-157. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/20616522. Accessed 6 May 2020. Chuang, Chun-Mei (張君玫). “A Politics of Multiplicity in the Anthropocene” 「⼈類世的多樣性政治」 [“Ren Lei Shih De Duo Yang Shing Jeng Chih”]. Chung Wai Literary Quarterly 《中外⽂學》, vol. 49, no. 1, 2020, pp. 7-11, doi: 10.6637/CWLQ.202003_49(1).0001. Coole, Diana H. “The Inertia of Matter and the Generativity of Flesh.” Ed. Diana H. Coole and Samantha Frost. New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics. Duke University Press, 2010, pp. 92-115. --- and Frost, Samantha. “Introducing the New Materialisms.” Ed. Diana H. Coole and Samantha Frost. New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics. Duke University Press, 2010, pp. 1-43. Eagleton, Terry. Materialism. Yale University Press, 2016. Friedman, Lawrence S. “Grief, Grief, Grief: Lord of the Flies.” William Golding. Continuum, 1993, pp. 19-32. ---. “In Pursuit of Man: The Dialectic of William Golding.” William Golding. Continuum, 1993, pp. 11-18. Gindin, James Jack. “The Fictional Explosion: Lord of the Flies and The Inheritors.” William Golding. Hampshire: Macmillan, 1988, pp. 20-37. Goble, Erika. “Beyond Human Subjectivity and Back to the Things Themselves: Jane Bennett’s Vibrant Matter.” Phenomenology Practice, vol. 11, no. 2, Dec. 2017, pp. 70-78, doi:10.29173/pandpr29352. Golding, William. Lord of the Flies. London: Faber, 1988. ---, James R. Baker, and Arthur P. Ziegler. William Golding’s Lord of the Flies: Texts, Notes Criticism. Casebook Ed. New York, N.Y: Perigee Books, 1983. Hynes, Samuel Lynn. “William Golding’s Lord of the Flies.” Ed. James R. Baker, Critical Essays on William Golding, G.K. Hall, 1988, pp. 13-21. ---. William Golding / by Samuel Hynes. 2d Ed. Columbia University Press, 1968. Khan, Gulshan Ara. “Vital Materiality and Non-Human Agency: An Interview with Jane Bennett.” Ed. Gary Browning, Raia Prokhovnik, and Maria Dimova-Cookson. Dialogues with Contemporary Political Theorists. Palgrave Macmillan, London, 2012, pp. 42-57, doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137271297_3. Kinkead-Weekes, Mark and Ian Gregor. “Perspectives.” Ed. James R. Baker, Critical Essays on William Golding, G.K. Hall, 1988, pp. 83-98. Krause, Sharon R. “Bodies in Action: Corporeal Agency and Democratic Politics.” Political Theory, vol. 39, no. 3, 2011, pp. 299-324. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/23036147, doi: 10.1177/0090591711400025. Assessed 12 July 2020. Latour, Bruno. “On Actor-Network Theory: A Few Clarifications.” Soziale Welt, vol. 47, no. 4, 1996, pp. 369-381. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/40878163. Assessed 12 July 2020. Lemke, Thomas. “An Alternative Model of Politics? Prospects and Problems of Jane Bennett’s Vital Materialism.” Theory, Culture Society, 2018, vol. 35, no. 6, Nov. 2018, pp. 31-54, doi: 10.1177/0263276418757316. Nietzsche, Friedrich. On the Genealogy of Morals / Ecce Homo. Trans. Walter Kaufmann and R. J. Hollingdale. Ed. Walter Kaufmann. Vintage, 1989. Oldsey, Bern, and Stanley Weintraub. “Beelzebub Revisited: Lord of the Flies.” The Art of William Golding, Indiana University Press, 1965, pp. 13-40. Oppermann, Serpil. “Material Ecocriticism.” Gender: Nature. Ed by Iris van der Tuin, Macmillan Reference USA, 2016, pp. 89-102. Macmillan Interdisciplinary Handbooks. Gale ebooks, https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/CX3644300018/GVRL?u=866ntu sid=GVRL xid=75315140. Accessed 18 Sept. 2019. Peterson, Christopher. “The Scandal of the Human: Immanent Transcendency and the Question of Animal Language.” Monkey Trouble: The Scandal of Posthumanism. Fordham University, New York, 2018, pp. 23-42, doi: 10.2307/j.ctt1xhr5xz.4. Assessed 11 July 2020. Povinelli, Elizabeth A. Geontologies: A Requiem to Late Liberalism. Duke University Press, 2016. Prince, G., et al. “Mechanistic Insight of Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 5 in Modulating Lung Cancer Growth.” Chinese Journal of Physiology, vol. 62, no. 6, Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd., Nov. 2019, pp. 231-40, doi:10.4103/CJP.CJP_67_19. Princen, Thomas. “Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. By Jane Bennett. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2010. 176p. $74.95 Cloth, $21.95 Paper.” Perspectives on Politics, vol. 9, no. 1, 2011, pp. 118-120, doi:10.1017/S1537592710003464. Redpath, Philip. “Doorways Through Walls: Lord of the Flies and The Inheritors.” William Golding: A Structural Reading of His Fiction. Vision; Totowa, New Jersey: Barnes Noble, 1986, pp. 78-99. Stormer, Nathan. “Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things.” Quarterly Journal of Speech, vol. 101, no. 1, Routledge, 2 Jan. 2015, pp. 317-20, doi:10.1080/00335630.2015.994892. Subbarao, V. V. “‘The Nemesis of Civilization:’ Lord of the Flies.” William Golding: A Study. Envoy Press, 1987, pp. 6-23. Sun, Chia-Hung (孫嘉鴻) and Paulus S. Wang (王錫崗). “Effects of Environmental Estrogen on Lung Cancer Cell.” Adaptive Medicine, vol. 11, no. 1, Society of Adaptive Science in Taiwan Airiti Press, Mar. 2019, pp. 7-11, doi:10.4247/AM.2019.ABJ225. Valente, Allyson L., et al. “Chronic Inflammation in Cancer: The Role of Human Viruses.” Advances in Tumor Virology, vol. 5, no. 2015, Libertas Academica, Dec. 2015, pp. 1-11, doi:10.4137/ATV.S19779. Van Wert, Kathryn. Modern Language Studies, vol. 43, no. 2, 2014, pp. 66-71, www.jstor.org/stable/24616735. Assessed 12 June 2020. Watson, Janell. “Eco-Sensibilities: An Interview with Jane Bennett.” Minnesota Review, vol. 81, no. 1, 2013, pp. 147-58, doi: https://muse.jhu.edu/article/526431. Whitley, John S. Golding: Lord of the Flies. Studies in English Literature 42, 1970. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/60350 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 威廉.⾼汀的《蒼蠅王》將⼈性詮釋為⼀種本質穩固、獨立且全能自主的健全主體,並以⼈性原罪做為其唯⼀墮落的開端。不過,⾼汀這⽅對⼈性的根本構思遑論隱約觸及了⼈本決定論。如取徑於班尼特的⽣機物質主義,我們不難發現,⼈之主體性應為⼀種無疆界之非自治場域,攙雜著⼈與非⼈即興演出的雜音混曲多重奏。換⾔之,為了鬆動⾼汀的論述脈絡,本論⽂在訴諸於班尼特的理論後指出《蒼蠅王》所建構之⼈類主體性巧妙地忽略那些無法收攏納⼊⼈類意義與規則的物質能動性。除了擺脫傳統桎梏——即⼈之特殊性永遠優於非⼈,班尼特將該物質能動性定義為⼀種極易變、不穩定且超越⼈本主義所能涵蓋的能動量,甚⾔之,該物質能動性恍若隨時能與⼈共構成組配系統。針對⼈與非⼈之本體關係的重新思考,我們將對《蒼蠅王》所展現之腐化⼈性有迥然不同於傳統認知的開創性理解。不過,眾多評論家也點出,班尼特這般對非⼈相關概念的討論是否也帶來替⼈類卸責之疑義?針對那些彷彿盡失原意的誤解,本論⽂嘗試佐證,班尼特所論及的組配論其實並未替⼈類卸責:⼈類也是共同參與者,其能動性或意向性也在不同程度上左右整個組配系統的運作軌跡,⽽該組配論甚⾄犀利道出,我們對非⼈之能動性的策略性顛覆理解能強化作為⼈理論上該承擔的責任。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | In William Golding’s Lord of the Flies, human nature is understood as a stable endin-itself or an autonomous entirety, inevitably haunted by humans’ original sin. This presentation that alludes to a deterministic form of human subjectivity seems amenable to reanalysis. As this thesis maintains, we should reimagine, via the resort to Jane Bennett’s theory, that humanity should be an open, non-self-governing space, as a form of ontological configuration that involves a mutuality of human and nonhuman agency. Namely, the images of humanity that disregard the acknowledgement of the forces outside the sovereignty of humans are redefined. Then Bennett’s materialist comprehension, beside its insistence upon a radical revision of the hierarchical order between humans and nonhumans, espouses a form of efficacy in excess of human designs or meanings. This efficacy, which is highly volatile or recalcitrant and has a resistance to stability or to being exclusively localized to humans, is self-compelled by its own distributive tendency to spread across any available assemblages. The expression of this vital force, regarding the force’s persistent creativity and its inherent diversity, offers a host of new ways to explore the ontological possibilities of agencies and may, as argued by this thesis, also help reenvision the causes of human depravity in Lord of the Flies as not solely a consequence of the human-directed acts. Concerning the fact that such a discernment lends no help to echo to the existing human-centered theories, about humans’ will, distinctiveness, or intentionality, many critics inquire if Bennett’s concentration on material vitality exempts humans from responsibility. Yet, a return to Bennett’s theory should dissolve such a concern as we learn that humans are held as a critical co-participant, whose agency and thus responsibility are nonetheless entailed in the assemblages. Other than omitting humans’ responsibility, our acknowledgement of the nonhuman efficacies can even enhance the responsibility of human individuals. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T10:16:06Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-0707202011321700.pdf: 1050300 bytes, checksum: d052d5d71bebe3a7f532aec715c9fd42 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Acknowledgements ··············································································· i 摘要 ································································································· iii Abstract ····························································································· v Table of Contents ··············································································· vii Introduction ······················································································· 1 Chapter One ····················································································· 11 Human Subjectivity Destabilized ························································· 11 Chapter Two ····················································································· 35 Human Responsibility Reconsidered ···················································· 35 Chapter Three ··················································································· 59 Human-Nonhuman Assemblages and Thing-Power Reidentified ················· 59 Conclusion ······················································································· 81 Works Cited ······················································································ 85 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 以⽣機物質主義之視角重審《蒼蠅王》中的腐化⼈性 | zh_TW |
dc.title | A Vibrant Materialist Reading of the Human Depravity in Lord of the Flies | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 108-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 李紀舍(Chi-She Li),涂銘宏(Ming-Hung Tu) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 《蒼蠅王》,人類主體性,人類責任,原罪,生機物質論,組配論,能動性, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Lord of the Flies,human subjectivity,human responsibility,original sin,vibrant materialism,assemblage,agency, | en |
dc.relation.page | 92 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202001354 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2020-07-20 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 文學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 外國語文學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 外國語文學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
U0001-0707202011321700.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.03 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。