Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/58610
Title: | 臺灣與英國離職後競業禁止條款之比較法研究
─以有效性判斷標準與代償措施之研究為中心 A Comparative Study on Post-Employment Covenants Not to Compete between Taiwan and England ─Focusing on the Study on Criteria and Consideration |
Authors: | Man-Yu Wang 王曼瑜 |
Advisor: | 王能君(Neng-chun Wang) |
Keyword: | 競業禁止條款,代償措施,判斷標準,花園休假條款, Non-compete Clause,Consideration,Criteria,Garden Leave, |
Publication Year : | 2014 |
Degree: | 碩士 |
Abstract: | 臺灣產業結構近年來以電子資訊業為大宗,再加上傳統產業受到國際市場的競爭,也致力於技術研究,以求產品與服務上的創新進步。另一方面,勞工為了尋求更佳待遇而不斷更換效力對象亦為常態,惟具有專業技術的人才,攜帶著從原雇主處所研發的成果,其去留往往是科技產業的獲利關鍵,為避免研發人員跳槽,簽訂競業禁止條款是現今常見的做法。
我國自1997年6月10日臺北地方法院85年勞訴字第78號判決出現五標準說以後,開始採用若干標準說的理論來處理勞工離職後競業禁止問題。又儘管目前實務以四標準說或五標準說為主流,但是關於代償措施是要件或審酌因素的議題,莫衷一是,而從此所衍生出值得深思的課題,即在實務或學說表示係採取三標準說時,代償措施果真未於判斷上發揮任何作用嗎?又在實務或學說表示係採取四標準說、五標準說時,代償就真的佔有不可或缺的地位嗎? 本文認為要探討此類問題,應該從不同的角度出發,嘗試以代償措施為判斷重點,重新檢視傳統的四標準說、五標準說,而歸納為四、五標準下的若干要件若干審酌因素說。此外,尚有眾多與代償措施相關的議題並未解決,例如:到底實務上代償有以那些不同型態出現,法院對這些型態之代償所持態度又如何;代償措施與其他要件,諸如雇主值得保護的利益、限制競業的範圍、期間、地域等有何關聯性;得否經由代償額度的高低調整來彌補限制範圍的不當。對於上述種種疑問,本文期望以目前可以取得的競業禁止條款相關判決,經由實務判決的觀察,輔以學說見解的整合,提出代償應具有何等地位,不但可供將來立法上參考,尚能使競業禁止條款是在充分權衡勞雇雙方權益的基礎上簽訂。 In recent years, the structure of industry in Taiwan has been electronics industry. And the traditional industry has been dedicated to pursuing the innovation of technology. Therefore, people with professional skill are the key to benefit electronics industry. To avoid job-hopping, the employers often sign the post-employment covenants not to compete with employees. The courts in Taiwan use four criteria and five criteria to deal with the validity of the post-employment covenants not to compete. However, there is no consensus on whether the consideration is a necessary condition or a judging factor. Therefore, there is an issue. That is, whether the consideration doesn’t serve its function at all when the courts or the scholars adopt three criteria? Or, whether the consideration actually plays an indispensable role when the courts or the scholars adopt four criteria or five criteria? In order to discuss this issue, I should regard the consideration as the judeging key point, and convert the traditional criteria into new model named with “n- necessary conditions and n-judging factors”. Besides, there are several issues related to consideration that are not yet solved. As a result, I hope to research on the judgments related to post-employment covenants not to compete that can be found, refer to the points of view of the scholars, and give my view about the role of consideration. I also hope that my viewpoints can provide some advices on legislation, and help the employers and employees sign the post-employment covenants not to compete on an equal basis. |
URI: | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/58610 |
Fulltext Rights: | 有償授權 |
Appears in Collections: | 法律學系 |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-103-1.pdf Restricted Access | 2.47 MB | Adobe PDF |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.