Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/54850
Full metadata record
???org.dspace.app.webui.jsptag.ItemTag.dcfield??? | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 廖勇超(Yung-Chao Liao) | |
dc.contributor.author | Yichee Yang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 楊奕琦 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T03:39:51Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-02-20 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2021-02-20 | |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2021-02-05 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Agamben, Giorgio. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Trans. Daniel Heller-Roazen. Stanford: Stanford UP, 1998. Print. ---. Remnants of Auschwitz: The Witness and the Archive. Trans. Daniel Heller-Roazen. New York: Zone Books, 2002. Print. Azuma, Hiroki. “SF as Hamlet: Science Fiction and Philosophy.” Robot Ghosts and Wired Dreams: Japanese Science Fiction from Origins to Anime. Ed. Christopher Bolton, Istvan Csicsery-Ronay, and Takayuki Tatsumi. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 2007. 75–82. Print. ---. (@hazuma). “Sekaikei to bishōjo gēmu no sōzōyroku. . . .” Twitter, 8 Sep. 2016, 2:57 p.m., twitter.com/hazuma/status/773898097193656321. ---. (@hazuma). Shin Gojira to Kimi no Na wa wo mite omotta nowa. . . .” Twitter, 8 Sep. 2016, 3:10 p.m., twitter.com/hazuma/status/773901267173117952. Booker, M. Keith, and Anne-Marie Thomas. The Science Fiction Handbook. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009. Print. Baccolini, Raffaella, and Tom Moylan. “Dystopia and Histories.” Introduction. Dark Horizons: Science Fiction and the Dystopian Imagination. Ed. Baccolini and Moylan. New York: Routledge, 2003. 1–12. Print. Bolton, Christopher, Istvan Csicsery-Ronay, and Takayuki Tatsumi, eds. Robot Ghosts and Wired Dreams: Japanese Science Fiction from Origins to Anime. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 2007. Print. Braidotti, Rosi. The Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity P, 2013. Print. Butler, Judith. Frames of War: When Is Life Grievable? London: Verso, 2009. Print. ---. Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence. London: Verso, 2006. Print. Campbell, Timothy. “Bios, Immunity, Life: The Thought of Roberto Esposito.” Introduction. Bíos: Biopolitics and Philosophy. By Roberto Esposito. Trans. Campbell. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 2008. vii–xlii. Print. Chang, Hui-chuan. “Critical Dystopia Reconsidered: Octavia Butler’s Parable Series and Margaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake as Post-Apocalyptic Dystopias.” Tamkang Review 41.2 (2011): 3–20. Print. Claeys, Gregory. Dystopia: A Natural History: A Study of Modern Despotism, Its Antecedents, and Its Literary Diffractions. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2017. Print. Csicsery-Ronay, Istvan. “What Do We Mean When We Say ‘Global Science Fiction’? Reflections on a New Nexus.” Science Fiction Studies 39.3 (2012): 478–93. Print. De Boever, Arne. “Bare Life.” Ed. Alex Murray and Jessica Whyte. The Agamben Dictionary 2011. 30–31. Print. De la Durantaye, Leland. Giorgio Agamben: A Critical Introduction. Stanford: Stanford UP, 2009. Print. Derrida, Jacques. “Autoimmunity: Real and Symbolic Suicides—A Dialogue with Jacques Derrida.” Philosophy in a Time of Terror: Dialogues with Jürgen Habermas and Jacques Derrida. Ed. Giovanna Borradori. Trans. Pascale-Anne Brault and Michael Naas. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2003. 85–136. Print. ---. “Faith and Knowledge: The Two Sources of ‘Religion’ at the Limits of Reason Alone.” Acts of Religion. Ed. Gil Anidjar. Trans. Samuel Weber. New York: Routledge, 2002. 40–101. Print. ---. Rogues: Two Essays on Reason. Trans. Pascale-Anne Brault and Michael Naas. Stanford: Stanford UP, 2005. Print. Deutscher, Penelope. Immunity, Bare Life, and the Thanatopolitics of Reproduction: Foucault, Esposito, Agamben. New York: Columbia UP, 2017. Print. Critical Life Studies. DiTommaso, Lorenzo. “At the Edge of Tomorrow: Apocalypticism and Science Fiction.” End of Days: Essays on the Apocalypse from Antiquity to Modernity. Ed. Karolyn Kinane and Michael A. Ryan. Jefferson: McFarland, 2009. 221–41. Print. Esposito, Roberto. Bíos: Biopolitics and Philosophy. Trans. Timothy Campbell. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 2008. Print. Trans. of Bíos: Biopolitica e filosofia. Torino: Einaudi, 2004. ---. Communitas: The Origin and Destiny of Community. Trans. Timothy Campbell. Stanford: Stanford UP, 2010. Print. Trans. of Communitas. Origine e destino della comunità. Torino: Einaudi, 1998. ---. “Community, Immunity, Biopolitics.” Community, Immunity and the Proper. Ed. Greg Bird and Jonathan Short. Trans. Zakiya Hanafi. London: Routledge, 2015. 81–88. Print. ---. Immunitas: The Protection and Negation of Life. Trans. Zakiya Hanafi. Cambridge: Polity, 2011. Print. Trans. of Immunitas. Protezione e negazione della vita. Torino: Einaudi, 2002. ---. Terms of the Political: Community, Immunity, Biopolitics. Trans. Rhiannon Noel Welch. New York: Fordham UP, 2013. Print. Trans. of Termini della Politica: Comunità, Immunità, Biopolitica. Sesto: Mimesis, 2008. ---. “The Biopolitics of Immunity in Times of COVID-19: An Interview with Roberto Esposito.” Interview by Tim Christiaens and Stijn De Cauwer. AntipodeOnline.org. Antipode Foundation, 16 June 2020. Web. 18 July 2020. Foucault, Michel. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. 2nd Vintage Books ed. New York: Vintage Books, 1995. Print. ---. Society Must Be Defended: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975-76. Ed. Arnold I. Davidson. Trans. David Macey. Vol. 1. New York: Picador, 2003. Print. ---. The History of Sexuality. Trans. Robert Hurley. Vol. 1. New York: Pantheon Books, 1978. Print. Genkaiken, ed. Posutohyūmanitīzu: Itō Keikaku Igo No SF [Posthumanities: Sf After Project Itoh]. Tokyo: Nanundō, 2013. Print. Horn, Eva. The Future as Catastrophe: Imagining Disaster in the Modern Age. Trans. Valentine A. Pakis. New York: Columbia UP, 2018. Print. Itoh, Project. Itō Keikaku Kiroku [Project Itoh Archives]. Ed. Hayakawa Shobō Henshūbu [Hayakawa Publishing Editorial Department]. Tokyo: Hayakawa, 2010. Print. ---. Genocidal Organ. Trans. Edwin Hawkes. San Francisco: Haikasoru, 2007. Print. ---. Harmony. Trans. Alexander O. Smith. San Francisco: Haikasoru, 2008. Print. Knickerbocker, Dale. “Apocalypse, Utopia, and Dystopia: Old Paradigms Meet a New Millennium.” Extrapolation 51.3 (2010): 345–57. Print. Lemke, Thomas. Biopolitics: An Advanced Introduction. New York: New York UP, 2011. Print. Lewis, Michael. “Of (Auto-)Immune Life: Derrida, Esposito, Agamben.” Medicine and Society, New Perspectives in Continental Philosophy. Ed. Darian Meacham. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2015. 213–31. Print. Matthew, Robert. Japanese Science Fiction: A View of a Changing Society. London: Routledge, 1989. Print. Mbembe, Achille. Necropolitics. Trans. Steve Corcoran. Durham: Duke UP, 2019. Print. Theory in Forms. Moichi, Yoriko. “Japanese Utopian Literature from the 1870s to the Present and the Influence of Western Utopianism.” Utopian Studies 10.2 (1999): 89–97. Print. Moylan, Tom. Demand the Impossible: Science Fiction and the Utopian Imagination. Ed. Raffaella Baccolini. Oxford: Peter Lang, 2014. Print. vol. 14. ---. Scraps of the Untainted Sky: Science Fiction, Utopia, Dystopia. Boulder: Westview P, 2000. Print. Nagasawa, Tadashi. “The Reception of American Science Fiction in Japan.” Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Literature 2016. Web. 7 Dec. 2019. Napier, Susan J. The Fantastic in Modern Japanese Literature: The Subversion of Modernity. London: Routledge, 1996. Print. Okawada, Akira. “Sekai Naisen” to Wazuka Na Kibō: Itō Keikaku, SF, Gendai Bungaku [A Glimmer of Hope in the “Worldwide Civil War”: Project Itoh, Sf, Modern Literature]. Tōkyō: Atorie Sādo, 2013. Print. Patton, Paul. “Agamben and Foucault on Biopower and Biopolitics.” Giorgio Agamben: Sovereignty and Life. Ed. Matthew Calarco and Steven DeCaroli. Stanford: Stanford UP, 2007. 203–18. Print. Roberts, Adam. The History of Science Fiction. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016. Print. Sargent, Lyman Tower. “The Three Faces of Utopianism Revisited.” Utopian Studies 5.1 (1994): 1–37. Print. ---. “US Eutopias in the 1980s and 1990s: Self-Fashioning in a World of Multiple Identities.” Utopianism/Literary Utopias and National Cultural Identities: A Comparative Perspective. Bologna: U of Bologna, 2001. 221–32. Print. Schmeink, Lars. Biopunk Dystopias: Genetic Engineering, Society, and Science Fiction. Liverpool: Liverpool UP, 2016. Print. Liverpool Science Fiction Text and Studies 56. Stapleton, Patricia, and Andrew Byers, eds. Biopolitics and Utopia: An Interdisciplinary Reader. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015. Print. Suvin, Darko. Defined by a Hollow: Essays on Utopia, Science Fiction and Political Epistemology. Oxford: Peter Lang, 2010. 381–412. Print. Ralahine Utopian Studies vol. 6. ---. Metamorphoses of Science Fiction: On the Poetics and History of a Literary Genre. Ed. Gerry Canavan. Oxford: Peter Lang, 2016. Print. Ralahine Utopian Studies vol. 18. Taillandier, Denis. “Coping with Disaster through Technology: ‘Goodbye Me!’―Itō Keikaku’s Future Harmony―.” Ritsumeikan Gengo Bunka Kenkyū [Ritsumeikan Studies in Language and Culture] 25.1 (2013) :173– 97. Print. Tanaka, Motoko. Apocalypse in Contemporary Japanese Science Fiction. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014. Print. Tatsumi, Takayuki. Full Metal Apache: Transactions between Cyberpunk Japan and Avant-Pop America. Durham: Duke UP, 2006. Print. Post-Contemporary Interventions. ---. “Generations and Controversies: An Overview of Japanese Science Fiction, 1957-1997.” Science Fiction Studies 27.1 (2000): 105–114. Print. ---. “Japanese and Asian Science Fiction.” A Companion to Science Fiction. Ed. David Seed. Oxford: Blackwell, 2005. 323–36. Print. ---. “Mr Tagomi’s Planet: Philip K. Dick and Japanese Speculative Fiction.” The World According to Philip K. Dick. Ed. Alexander Dunst and Stefan Schlensag. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015. 137–54. Print. ---. “Transpacific Cyberpunk: Transgeneric Interactions between Prose, Cinema, and Manga.” Arts 7.1 (2018): n. pag. MDPI. PDF file. 15 Apr. 2019. Vieira, Fátima. “The Concept of Utopia.” The Cambridge Companion to Utopian Literature. Ed. Gregory Claeys. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2010. 3–27. Print. Cambridge Companions to Literature. Watson, Janell. “Butler’s Biopolitics: Precarious Community.” Theory and Event 15.2 (2012): n. pag. Print. Wu, Yan, and Veronica Hollinger, eds. Chinese Science Fiction. Spec. issue of Science Fiction Studies 40.1 (2013): 1–206. Print. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/54850 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本論文以日本科幻作家伊藤計劃的《虐殺器官》與《和諧》為文本,以生命政治理論探究政府權力與個人自由在後九一一時代日益加劇的緊張關係。本文將伊藤的兩本小說視為反烏托邦作品,旨在突顯其對於政府政策的批評,探索抵抗政府控制的可能性。本文共分為三個章節。第一章追溯傅柯、阿甘本、姆邊貝與埃斯波西托的著作所討論的死亡政治,探討生命政治思想如何釐清自身與死亡政治的緊密關係。以埃斯波西的「免疫典範」與姆邊貝的「死亡政治」為重,論文的二、三章欲分析死亡政治如何表現在政府的預防措施與主角們的抵抗手段。第二章聚焦於後九一一時代政府的預防措施,而這些政策目的是強化邊界以防範潛在威脅。本章以免疫典範為基礎,分析政府的預防措施如何適得其反,引起自體免疫。第三章檢視自體免疫現象,認為此危機所導致的身體與精神上的死亡如同姆邊貝所說的死亡政治。本章涉及日本科幻脈絡的「世界系」文類,解釋主角們如何把死亡轉化為一種抵抗政府控制的自我宣示。透過生命政治理論閱讀《虐殺器官》與《和諧》,本文認為免疫擁有的自我毀滅的邏輯不僅是導致政府產生死亡政治的原因,亦是主角們用來產生自我免疫的手段。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | This thesis explores the growing tensions in the post 9/11 era between governmental power and individual freedom in Japanese SF writer Project Itoh’s Genocidal Organ and Harmony through a biopolitical theoretical framework. I consider Itoh’s two novels as literary dystopias to highlight their criticism towards government policies and explore possible resistances against government control. Chapter One examines how biopolitical thought seeks to untangle its close ties with the politics of death, tracing the politics of death discussed in the works of Michel Foucault, Giorgio Agamben, Achille Mbembe, and Roberto Esposito. Through a biopolitical approach centered on Esposito’s immunitary paradigm and Mbembe’s necropolitics, the subsequent two chapters analyze how the politics of death are demonstrated in the preventive measures from the governments and counter-strategies from the protagonists. Chapter Two focuses on the post-9/11 governments’ preventive measures that aim to establish borders to defend themselves from potential threats. Based on the immunitary paradigm, this chapter examines how the preventive measures backfire and cause autoimmunity. Chapter Three analyzes the autoimmunity crisis and considers the consequent physical and spiritual deaths as necropolitical forms of death and dying. This chapter includes the Japanese context of sekaikei works to discuss how the protagonists transform death into a declaration of agency against government oppression. Through a biopolitical reading of Itoh’s Genocidal Organ and Harmony, this thesis suggests that the self-destructive logic of immunity is not only what causes the governments to produce the politics of death, but serves as the means used by the protagonists to immunize themselves. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T03:39:51Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-0402202123585300.pdf: 1199395 bytes, checksum: 1616845e81da55247dfdd11a52651a6f (MD5) Previous issue date: 2021 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Table of Contents Acknowledgments i Chinese Abstract ii English Abstract iii Introduction 1 Literature Review 4 Methodology 12 Chapter One: An Overview of Biopolitics and the Politics of Death 18 Foucault’s Notion of Biopolitics 18 Post-Foucauldian Biopolitics and the Politics of Death 23 Roberto Esposito and the Immunitary Paradigm 29 Chapter Two: Post-9/11 Governments and Their Negative Turn 37 Life and Death in Dystopian Societies 37 The War on Terror as the Enlightenment 41 The Land of the Living Dead 48 Chapter Three: The Politics of Death as A Counter-Strategy Against Autoimmunity 58 Coping with the End of the World 58 “My Own Tale of Genocide” 62 “The Story of the Defector” 68 Conclusion: The Possibility of an Affirmative Community 75 Works Cited 81 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 伊藤計劃的《虐殺器官》與《和諧》中的生命政治與死亡政治 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Biopolitics and the Politics of Death in Project Itoh’s Genocidal Organ and Harmony | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 109-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 趙恬儀(Tien-Yi Chao),楊乃女(Nai-Nu Yang) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 伊藤計劃,生命政治,免疫典範,死亡政治,反烏托邦,世界系, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Project Itoh,biopolitics,immunitary paradigm,thanatopolitics,necropolitics,dystopia,sekaikei, | en |
dc.relation.page | 87 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202100550 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2021-02-06 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 文學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 外國語文學研究所 | zh_TW |
Appears in Collections: | 外國語文學系 |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
U0001-0402202123585300.pdf Restricted Access | 1.17 MB | Adobe PDF |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.