請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/51451
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 谷玲玲(Lin-Lin Ku) | |
dc.contributor.author | Ting-Yu Chang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 張庭瑜 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T13:34:42Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-02-15 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2016-02-15 | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2016-01-29 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 王中天(2003)。〈社會資本(Social Capital):概念、源起、及現況〉,《問題與研究》,42(5): 139-163。
王泰俐(2013)。〈「臉書選舉」?2012年台灣總統大選社群媒體對政治參與行為的影響〉,《東吳政治學報》,31: 1-52。 孔令信(2014年3月)。〈社群媒體再度甩開主流媒體〉,《UDN》。取自http://city.udn.com/3028/5068124 江明修、陳欽春(2004),《充實社會資本之研究》,行政院經濟建設委員會委託研究報告。 李金泉(2010)。《易學易用SPSS PASW統計分析實務》,新北市:全華圖書。 李韋廷(2008)。《審議式民主與大眾傳播媒體新角色初探》。政治大學國家發展研究所碩士論文。 谷玲玲(2005年7月)。〈閱聽人賦權:閱聽人與媒體的互動關係〉。「2005中華傳播學會年會」,台灣大學。 吳英明(1993)。〈公私部門協力關係和「公民參與」之探討〉,《中國行政評論》,2(3): 1-14。 吳重禮、鄭文智、崔曉倩(2006)。〈交叉網絡與政治參與:2001年縣市長與立法委員選舉的實證研究〉,《人文及社會科學集刊》,18(4): 599-638。 林奇秀、陳一帆(2011)。〈淺析網路社群知識分享實證研究如何構思社會資本概念〉,《圖書資訊學刊》,9(2): 55-89。 林祐聖、葉欣怡譯(2005)。《社會資本》,台北:洪智文化。(原書Nan Lin. [2001]. Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.) 林聖庭(2012)。〈社群網站很政治:以單純曝光效果探討社群網站使用對政治參與的影響〉。「2012中華傳播學會年會」,靜宜大學。 林聰吉、楊湘齡(2008)。〈台灣社會資本的分佈及其民主效果〉,《東吳政治學報》,26(2): 39-81。 周翔、劉欣、程曉璇(2013年7月)。〈微博用戶公共事件參與的預測因素探索:政治效能感與社會資本〉。「2013中華傳播學會年會」,輔仁大學。 邱政皓(2004)。結構方程模式:LISREL 的理論、技術與應用。臺北:雙葉。 唐婉珊(2013)。〈公民?學生?你今晚選擇哪一個?學生使用者在Facebook上公民參與經驗之探究〉,國立中山大學傳播管理研究所碩士論文。 許文傑(2000)。《公民參與公共行政之理論與實踐-「公民性政府」的理想型建構》,國立政治大學公共行政學系博士論文。 郭宜婷(2011)。〈「朋友」、「噗友」,你選誰?從微網誌使用行為探討網路社會資本〉,國立中正大學電訊傳播研究所碩士論文。 張佑宗、趙珮如(2006)。〈社會脈絡、個人網絡與臺灣2004年立法委員選舉選民的投票抉擇〉,《臺灣民主季刊》,3(2): 1-38。 張美惠譯(2010)。《超級關係》,台北:時報文化。(原書:Koch,R.,Lockwood, G. [2010]. Superconnect :The Power of Networks and the strength of Weak Links. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company. ) 張卿卿(2002)。〈大學生的政治媒介認知、政治媒介行為與其政治效能與政治參與之間的關係〉,《選舉研究》,9(2): 37-63。 張卿卿(2006)。〈網路的功與過:網路使用與政治參與及社會資產關係的探討〉,《新聞學研究》,86: 45-90。 國立編譯館主譯(2008)。《社會資本》,台北市:巨流。(原書:David Halpern. [2005]. Social Capital. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press) 陳怡存(2011)。〈從社會影響的觀點探討 Facebook 使用行為的實徵研究〉,國立中央大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。 陳金貴(1992)。〈公民參與的研究〉,《行政學報》,24: 95-128。 陳恆鈞(2003)。社會資本對政策執行之影響,《行政管理論文選輯》,17: 147-176。 彭芸(2004)。〈我國大學生的媒介使用、社會資本與政治信任對象之關連性研究〉,《新聞學研究》,79: 91-133。 曾淑芬、何振誠(2011)。〈E世代的公民參與行為之研究-以網路知名部落客為例 〉,《資訊社會研究》,20: 109-131。 黃國庭(2007)。〈網路相簿與網絡互動─大學生的網路相簿使用、社會資本及社會參與之關連性研究〉,「2007中華傳播學會研討會」,台北縣淡水。 黃源協、劉素珍(2009)。〈社會資本對台灣社區發展之政策意涵〉,《行政暨政策學報》,48: 155-192。 創市際市場調查顧問公司(2015年7月15日)。〈社群媒體服務調查與台灣社群服務類型網站使用概況〉。取自http://www.dma.org.tw/upload/ResourceReport/20150728040012643.pdf 榮泰生(2006)。《SPSS與研究方法》,台北市:五南。 榮泰生(2009)。《Amos與研究方法》,台北市:五南。 劉正山(2011)。〈媒體與社群:一個政治傳播學者眼中的脈絡〉,《傳播研究與實踐》,1(2): 75-82。 鄭錫鍇(1993)。〈公民意識與公共組織結構慣性的關聯性〉,台大政治學研究所碩士論文。 盧安邦(2010年10月)。〈社群網站的可能性?論網際網路發展與社會資本與公民參與的可能未來〉。「2010 台灣資訊社會研究學會年會暨學術研討會」,交通大學。 蕭蘋(2014)。〈是公民?還是暴民?新媒體的公民政治〉。取自巷子口社會學 http://twstreetcorner.org/2014/03/24/hsiaoping/ 鐘智錦、李艷紅、曾繁旭(2013)。〈網絡環境下大學生的公民參與行為〉,《青年研究》,2: 61-68。 Adler, R. P., Goggin, J. (2005). What do we mean by “Civic Engagement”. Journal of Transformative Education, 3(3), 236-253. Barber, B. (1984). Strong democracy: Participatory politics for a new age. Berkeley: University of California Press. Beck, P. A., Dalton, R. J., Greene, S., & Huckfeldt, R. (2002). The Social calculus of voting: Interpersonal, media, and organizational influences on presidential choices. American Political Science Review, 96(1), 57-73. Bennett, W. L. (2008). Changing citizenship in the digital age. In W. L. Bennett (Ed.), Civic life online: Learning how digital media can engage youth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Berger, C. R. (2009). Interpersonal communication. In D. W. Stacks & M. B. Salwen(Eds.), An integrated approach to communication theory and research (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Bimber, B. (1998). The internet and information transformation: Populism, community, and accelerated pluralism. Polity, 31, 133-160. Bimber, B. (2001). Information and political engagement in America: The search for effects of information technology at the individual level. Political Research Quarterly, 54(1), 53-67. Bimber, B., Cunill, M. C., Copeland, L., & Gibson, R. (2015). Digital media and political participation: The moderating role of political interest across acts and over time. Social Science Computer Review, 33(1), 21-42. Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Burke, M., Marlow, C., Lento, T. (2010). Social network activity and social well-being. Paper presented at the ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems, Atlanta, Georgia. Carpini, D. M. (n.d.). Definitions of civic engagement. Retrieved from http://spotlight.macfound.org/blog/entry/michael-delli-carpinis-definitions-key-terms Carpini, D. M. (2000). Gen.com: Youth, civic engagement, and the new information environment. Journal of Communication, 17, 341-349. Castells, M. (2012). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the internet age. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press. Coleman, S., & Gotze, J. ( 2001). Bowling together: Online public engagement in policy deliberation. London: Hansard Society Press. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95-120. Diller, E. C. (2001). Citizens in service: The challenge of delivering civic engagement training to national service programs. Washington, DC: Corporation for National and Community Service. Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of facebook “friends”: Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143-1168. Gibson, C. (2000). From inspiration to participation: A review of perspectives on youth civic engagement”. New York: Carnegie Corporation of New York. Gil de Zúñiga, H., & Valenzuela, S. (2011). The mediating path to a stronger citizenship: Online and offline networks, weak ties, and civic engagement. Communication Research, 38(3), 397-421. Gil de Zúñiga, H., Jung, N., & Valenzuela, S. (2012). Social media use for news and individuals' social capital, civic engagement and political participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(3), 319–336. Granovetter, M. (1973). The strengh of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380. Hair, J. F. Jr., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall. Hart, D. K. (1972). Theories of government related to decentralization and citizen participation. Public Administration Review, 32, 603-621. Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., Mullen M. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53-60. Hu, L., Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424-453. Hu, L., Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. Jennings, M. K., & Zeitner, V. (2003). Internet use and civic engagement. Public Opinion Quarterly, 67(3), 311-334 Johnson, T. J., & Kaye, B. K. (1997). Trusting the media and 'Joe from Dubuque' online: Comparing internet and traditional sources on media credibility measures. Paper presented at the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Chicago. Lake, R. L. D., & Huckfeldt, R. (1998). Social capital, social networks, and political participation. Political Psychology, 19(3), 567-583. Lampe, C., Ellison, N., & Steinfield, C. (2006). A Face(book) in the crowd: Social searching vs. social browsing. Proceedings of the 2006 20th Anniversary Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW 2006), 167-170. Morpeau, A. (2011). Twitter and political and civic engagement: Is there a relationship? Unpublished maser’s thesis, University at Albany. Mutz, D. C. (2002). Cross-cutting social networks: Testing democratic theory in practice. American Political Science Review,96(1), 111-126. Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266. Newman, N., & Levy, D. (2014). Reuters institute digital news report reuters 2014. Retrieved from: https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/Reuters%20Institute%20Digital%20News%20Report%202014.pdf Norris, P. (2005). The impact of the internet on political activism: evidence from Europe. Social Networking Communities and E-Dating Services: Concepts and Implications. Harvard University, USA. Oldfield, A. (1990). Citizenship and community. London: Routledge. Park, H. M., & Perry, J. L. (2008). Does internet use really facilitate civic engagement? Civic Engagement in a Network Society (pp. 237-269). Information Age Pub Inc: North Carolina. Paxton, P. (1999). Is social capital declining in the United States? A multiple indicator assessment. American Journal of Sociology, 105(1), 88-127. Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: civic traditions in modern Italy. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster. Resnick, P. (2002). Beyond bowling together: SocioTechnical capital. In John M. Carroll (Eds.), Human-computer interaction in the new millennium (pp. 247-272). New York, NY: Addison-Wesley Professional. Robertson, S. P., Vatrapu, R. K., & Medina, R. (2009). The social life of social networks: Facebook linkage patterns in the 2008 US presidential election. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 10th International Digital Government Research Conference, Puebla, Mexico. Scott, J. (1991). Social network analysis: A handbook. London, UK: SAGE. Shah, D. V., Kwak, N., & Holbert, R. L. (2001). “Connecting” and “disconnecting” with civic life: Patterns of internet use and the production of social capital. Political Communication, 18, 141-162. Shirky, C. (2009). Here comes everybody: The power of organizing without organizations. New York, NY: Penguin Press. Skoric, M. M., Ying, D., & Ng, Y. (2009). Bowling online, not alone: Online social capital and political participation in Singapore. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(2), 414-433. Smith, A. (2013). Civic engagement in the digital age. Retrieved from Pew Research: http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/04/25/methodology/ Steinfield, C., Ellison, N.B., & Lampe, C. (2008). Social capital, self-esteem, and use of online social network sites: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29, 434-445. Valenzuela, S., Park, N., & Kee, K. F.(2009). Is there social capital in a social network site? : Facebook use and college students’ life satisfaction, trust, and participation. Journal of computer-mediated communication, 14, 875-901. Verhoef, P.C., Franses, P.H., Hoekstra, J. C. (2002). The effect of relational constructs on customer referrals and number of services purchased from a multiservice provider: Does age of relationship matter? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30(3), 202-216. Warren, A. M., Sulaman, A., & Jaafar, N. I. (2014). Understanding civic engagement behavior on facebook from a social capital theory perspective. Behavior & Information Technology, 34(2), 163-175. Williams, D. (2006). On and off the net: Scales for social capital in an online era. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(2), articale 11. Woolcock, M. (1998). Social capital and economic development: Toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework. Theory and Society, 27(2), 151-208. Zukin, C., Keeter, S., Andolina, M., Jenkins K., & Carpini D. (2006). New engagement? : Political participation, civic life, and the changing American citizen. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/51451 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 近年透過社群媒體參與公共事務的例子越來越多,原因在於其同時具有傳統大眾媒體傳播資訊的特性以及人際網絡互動的功能。本研究以社會資本的角度出發,同時考量媒介使用與人際網絡對公民參與的影響,以Facebook作為研究場域,探討社群媒體的線上社會資本與公民參與間的關聯性。研究方法為網路問卷調查法,蒐集共420份有效問卷。
研究發現,線上與線下的公民參與程度差異,僅行動式公民參與在線上展現得較線下多,呼應近年出現許多透過社群媒體串聯的新型態公民參與。在社群媒體使用行為上,資訊蒐集、人際互動動機與臉書使用強度為預測線上公民參與之重要變項。社群媒體使民眾更容易接觸與討論公共議題,將民眾從關心個人生活轉向公民社會。而社群媒體使用強度與人際互動動機為預測社會資本之重要變項,當使用強度越強,其與線上社群的連結越緊密,並藉由人際互動累積個人社會資本,同時提高社群信任與發展出共享的觀點與目標。 不同於過去研究,社群信任對關注型線上公民參與具有負面預測能力,當對社群信任越少,可能會花更多時間在搜尋、瀏覽相關資訊,以確認或獲得更多資訊。社群共享價值對線下行動型公民參與為亦為負向指標,當社群同質性越高,越傾向在固定社群內交流,不易跨出線上社群至現實社會參與公共議題。線上關注型公民參與僅能預測線下關注型與發表型公民參與,然而對經常進行線上行動型公民參與的民眾來說,其對公共事務的關心程度從資訊蒐集提升為意圖改善公共政策,更容易將對公共議題的關注延伸至線下,對線下關注型、發表型與行動型公民參與皆有良好預測效果。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | In recent years, the cases of participating in public affairs through social media have increased because social network sites (SNSs) are combined with features of mass media–information dissemination and interpersonal communication. Based on social capital theory, this thesis aimed to examine the relationship between the use of Facebook, online social networks and civic engagement. Using the online survey method, this thesis collected 420 valid questionnaires.
The results show that SNSs only improve civic actions due to the new pattern of online civic engagement. Regarding the use of SNSs, the motivations of information seeking and interpersonal communication, and the strength of Facebook use have positive effects on online civic engagement. It can be argued that SNSs reduce the obstacles of obtaining and discussing public affairs, thereby making individuals concern toward civil society from private life. Moreover, the strength of Facebook use and motivation for interpersonal communication can strongly predict the amount of social capital. Different from previous studies, the results show that social trust has negative effects on online civic engagement. The lesser the social trust, the more the time spent on seeking and confirming the information. Social shared value also has negative effects on offline civic action. When there is higher homogeneity of SNS, individuals would be accustomed to interacting in specific communities instead of participating in public affairs offline. Online civic attentiveness can only predict offline civic attentiveness and civic deliberation. However, the level of civic engagement of those who frequently take part in online civic actions has enhanced from information seeking to taking action on improving public affairs and extending their concern of public affairs from online to offline. Accordingly, online civic attentiveness can positively predict offline civic engagement. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T13:34:42Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-105-R01342011-1.pdf: 1061529 bytes, checksum: 3b2ded1805cb1f527638a5fc0831082e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝辭 i
中文摘要 ii 英文摘要 iii 目錄 iv 圖目錄 vi 表目錄 vi 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究重點與目的 5 第二章 文獻探討 7 第一節 公民參與(Civic Engagement) 7 一、公民參與概念 7 二、線下公民參與 9 三、線上公民參與 14 第二節 社會資本(Social Capital) 17 一、社會資本定義 17 二、社會資本分析構面 19 第三節 社群媒體、社會資本與公民參與關聯性 24 一、媒介使用與公民參與 24 二、媒介使用與社會資本 27 三、社會資本與公民參與 28 四、由線上至線下的公民參與 31 五、人口變項與公民參與 31 第四節 研究問題與假設 32 第三章 研究方法 37 第一節 研究對象及方法 37 一、網路問卷調查法 37 二、前測與正式施測 37 第二節 問卷設計 38 一、社群媒體使用行為 38 二、公民參與 40 三、個人社會資本 42 四、社群社會資本 43 五、人口變項 44 第三節 問卷之因素分析與信效度檢驗 44 一、量表之模型適配度 44 二、量表之信效度檢測 46 第四章 資料分析與結果 50 第一節 樣本結構分析 50 第二節 相關性分析 53 第三節 迴歸分析 62 第五章 結論 70 第一節 研究結果與討論 70 第二節 研究限制與建議 77 參考書目 79 附錄一:正式施測問卷 88 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 線上社會資本與公民參與關聯性之研究-以Facebook使用者為例 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Relationship Between Online Social Capital and Civic Engagement-The Case of Facebook Users | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 104-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 洪雅慧,許瓊文 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 公民參與,社會資本,社群媒體,政治參與,臉書,Facebook, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | civic engagement,social capital,social media,political participation,SNS,Facebook, | en |
dc.relation.page | 91 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2016-01-30 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 新聞研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 新聞研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-105-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.04 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。