Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 工學院
  3. 工業工程學研究所
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/51059
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor洪一薰(I-Hsuan Hong)
dc.contributor.authorTing-Ju Ouen
dc.contributor.author歐庭汝zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-15T13:24:32Z-
dc.date.available2021-07-06
dc.date.copyright2016-07-06
dc.date.issued2016
dc.date.submitted2016-06-15
dc.identifier.citationAlonso, E., Gregory, J., Field, F., & Kirchain, R. (2007). Material availability and the supply chain: risks, effects, and responses. Environmental science & technology, 41(19), 6649-6656.
Ang, E., Iancu, D. A., & Swinney, R. (2014). Disruption Risk and Optimal Sourcing in Multi-tier Supply Networks (No. 3244).
Banal-Estañol, A., & Rupérez Micola, A. (2011). Behavioural simulations in spot electricity markets. European Journal of Operational Research, 214(1), 147-159.
Bagwell, L.S., & Bernheim, B.D. (1996). Veblen effects in a theory of conspicuous consumption, The American Economic Review, 86(3), 349.
Boland, J., & Whittington, D. (2000). Water tariff design in developing countries: Disadvantages of increasing block tariffs and advantages of uniform price with rebate designs. IDRC Research Paper.
Cachon, G. P. (2003). Supply chain coordination with contracts. Handbooks in operations research and management science, 11, 229-340.
Cachon, G. P., & Lariviere, M. A. (2005). Supply Chain Coordination with Revenue-Sharing Contracts: Strengths and Limitations. Management Science, 51(1), 30-44.
Chang, P. Y. (2012). The Contract Design for a Two-tier Supply Chain in the Market of Scarce Components.
Chen, K., & Xiao, T. (2009). Demand disruption and coordination of the supply chain with a dominant retailer. European Journal of Operational Research, 197(1), 225-234.
Chopra, S., & Sodhi, M. S. (2012). Managing risk to avoid supply-chain breakdown. MIT Sloan Management Review (Fall 2004).
Dolan, R. J. (1987). Quantity Discounts: Managerial Issues and Research Opportunities. Marketing Science, 6(1), 1-22.
Emmons, H., & Gilbert, S. M. (1998). Note. The Role of Returns Policies in Pricing and Inventory Decisions for Catalogue Components. Management Science, 44(2), 276-283.
Giannoccaro, I., & Pontrandolfo, P. (2004). Supply chain coordination by revenue sharing contracts. International Journal of Production Economics, 89(2), 131-139.
Green, R. J., & Newbery, D. M. (1992). Competition in the British Electricity Spot Market. Journal of Political Economy, 100(5), 929-953.
Hendricks, K. B., & Singhal, V. R. (2005). An empirical analysis of the effect of supply chain disruptions on long‐run stock price performance and equity risk of the firm. Production and Operations management, 14(1), 35-52.
Hayek, F. A. (1945). The Use of Knowledge in Society FA Hayek. American Economic Review, 35(4), 519-30.
Hou, J., Zeng, A. Z., & Zhao, L. (2010). Coordination with a backup supplier through buy-back contract under supply disruption. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 46(6), 881-895.
IHS iSuppli. (2011). Apple Shipment Shortfall Prompts Cut in 2011 iPad Shipment
Forecast. (April 21)
Lal, R., & Staelin, R. (1984). An Approach for Developing an Optimal Discount Pricing Policy. Management Science, 30(12), 1524-1539.
Lian, Z., Deshmukh, A. (2009). Analysis of supply contracts with quantity flexibility. European Journal of Operational Research, 196(2), 526-533.
Li, X., & Wang, Q. (2007). Coordination mechanisms of supply chain systems. European journal of operational research, 179(1), 1-16.
McClure, J., & Kumcu, E. (2008). Promotions and product pricing: Parsimony versus Veblenesque demand. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 65(1), 105 -117.
McIntosh, A. C. (2003). Asian water supplies: IWA publishing.
Olson, M., Rassenti, S., Rigdon, M., & Smith, V. (2003). Market Design and Human Trading Behavior in Electricity Markets. IIE Transactions, 35(9), 833-849.
Pasternack, B. A. (2008). Optimal pricing and return policies for perishable commodities. Marketing science, 27(1), 133-140.
Phillips, D. C. (Ed.). (2014). Encyclopedia of Educational Theory and Philosophy. Sage Publications.
PwC. (2012) Minerals and metals scarcity in manufacturing: The ticking time bomb.
Salema, M. I. G., Barbosa-Povoa, A. P., & Novais, A. Q. (2007). An optimization model for the design of a capacitated multi-product reverse logistics network with uncertainty. European Journal of Operational Research,179(3), 1063-1077.
Santoso, T., Ahmed, S., Goetschalckx, M., & Shapiro, A. (2005). A stochastic programming approach for supply chain network design under uncertainty.European Journal of Operational Research, 167(1), 96-115.
Shen, Z. J. M., & Qi, L. (2007). Incorporating inventory and routing costs in strategic location models. European journal of operational research, 179(2), 372-389.
Srinivasan, M., Mukherjee, D., & Gaur, A. S. (2011). Buyer–supplier partnership quality and supply chain performance: Moderating role of risks, and environmental uncertainty. European Management Journal, 29(4), 260-271.
Taylor, T. A. (2002). Supply Chain Coordination Under Channel Rebates with Sales Effort Effects. Management Science, 48(8), 992-1007.
Taylor, T. A., & Xiao, W. (2009). Incentives for retailer forecasting: Rebates vs. returns. Management Science, 55(10), 1654-1669.
Tomlin, B. (2006). On the Value of Mitigation and Contingency Strategies for Managing Supply Chain Disruption Risks. Management Science, 52(5), 639-657.
Tomlin, B. (2009). Disruption‐management strategies for short life‐cycle products. Naval Research Logistics (NRL), 56(4), 318-347.
Tsay, A. A. (1999). The Quantity Flexibility Contract and Supplier-Customer Incentives. Management Science, 45(10), 1339-1358.
Tsiakis, P., Shah, N., & Pantelides, C. C. (2001). Design of multi-echelon supply chain networks under demand uncertainty. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 40(16), 3585-3604.
Wang, Y., Jiang, L., & Shen, Z. J. (2004). Channel performance under consignment contract with revenue sharing. Management Science, 50(1), 34-47.
Wong, W. K., Qi, J., & Leung, S. Y. S. (2009). Coordinating supply chains with sales rebate contracts and vendor-managed inventory. International Journal of Production Economics, 120(1), 151-161.
Wall Street Journal. (2006). Solar-Panel Makers' Expansion Is Thwarted by Silicon Shortage. (June 7) 3.
Wall Street Journal. (2011). Japan: The Business Aftershocks From Chips to Banks, Companies Scramble. (March 25) 1.
Walters, A. A. (1963). Production and cost functions: An econometric survey. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1-66.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/51059-
dc.description.abstract目前市場中在上游供應商與下游製造商之間存在各種單價與訂購量之合約,但大多文獻為研究單一種負向的價量關係,因此本研究根據現實生活中的情況,探討商品零組件具有正向與負向價量關係之合約。當零件供應鏈上游產能驟減、供給量突然面臨嚴格限制,或者下游需求突然超出預期(亦即供應鏈發生中斷),造成零件供應呈現正向的價量關係,此時零件稱為“稀缺性資源”,反之則稱為“非稀缺性資源”。本研究以Stackelberg模型為基礎,應用期望值之觀念,建構兩階層之供應鏈模型,並假設存在一家上游供應商與多家下游製造商,以及假定製造商間可能存在Cournot競爭。本研究探討單一價格費率與區段價格費率之兩種不同計價方式對供應商利潤之影響。由於無法準確預測零件何時變為稀缺性資源,故供應商在制訂價量關係之合約時,應同時考量其零件具有稀缺性資源與非稀缺性資源之可能。供應商考量供應鏈中斷的可能,並決定商品零組件合約的價量關係,係為先行者,而製造商獲得價量關係的資訊後,決定自身之訂購量,係為跟隨者。本研究旨在提供供應商面對潛在之供應鏈中斷時,如何最大化自身利潤之合約設計,探討供應商決策的管理意含,以及透過參數分析探討其趨勢。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractA variety types of contracts are applied in current business market. Much work has been done on contracts studying the negative relationship between price and quantity, while little has considered the positive and negative relationship together. This article investigates the contracts for potential scarce components with two charging schemes. A scarce component occurs in supply or demand disruption, with the price and total ordering quantity positively correlated. Otherwise, the components we call non-scarce components, with the price and total ordering quantity negatively correlated. A potential scarce component is the component may be scarce in the future but no one can predict when the component will become scarce. This research applies the concept of the Stackelberg-type model with or without Cournot competition to construct a two-tier supply chain model. The upstream supplier acting as the leader decides the contract of potential scarce components. Then the downstream manufacturers, being informed of contract information and market situations, places an order of the components. We analytically show that our contract can be applied to the potential scarce components with the probability of the supply disrupted. The strategies for the supplier are provided to compare its profits and decisions under the concern of the supply chain disruption. Some characteristics of the equilibrium decisions and managerial insights are suggested for the supplier.en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T13:24:32Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-105-R02546017-1.pdf: 1909176 bytes, checksum: a6a62491314750d3dfba2686532dfdbe (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2016
en
dc.description.tableofcontents口試委員會審訂書 I
謝辭 II
中文摘要 III
ABSTRACT IV
CONTENTS V
LIST OF FIGURES VIII
LIST OF TABLES IX
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1
CHAPTER 2 MULTIPLE IDENTICAL MANUFACTURERS 6
2.1 Model Description 6
2.2 Centralized Manufacturers 12
2.2.1 Uniform Charging Scheme 12
2.2.2 Block Charging Scheme 14
2.3 Decentralized Manufacturers 18
2.3.1 Uniform Charging Scheme 19
2.3.2 Block Charging Scheme 21
CHAPTER 3 TWO DIFFERENT MANUFACTURERS 24
3.1 Model Description 24
3.2 Centralized Manufacturers 25
3.2.1 Uniform Charging Scheme 25
3.2.2 Block Charging Scheme 27
3.3 Decentralized Manufacturers 30
3.3.1 Uniform Charging Scheme 30
3.3.2 Block Charging Scheme 32
CHAPTER 4 NUMERICAL ANALYSIS 34
4.1 Multiple Identical Manufacturers 34
4.1.1 The impact of the probability of the supply chain disruption on the total ordering quantity 36
4.1.2 The impact of the probability of the supply chain disruption on the contract variable 37
4.1.3 The impact of the probability of the supply chain disruption on the supplier’s profit 39
4.2 Two Different Manufacturers 40
4.2.1 The impact of the probability of the supply chain disruption on the contract variable 41
4.2.2 The impact of the probability of the supply chain disruption on the total ordering quantity 42
4.2.3 The impact of the probability of the supply chain disruption on the supplier’s profit 44
CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSIONS 46
APPENDIX A 48
APPENDIX B 58
REFERENCES 64
dc.language.isoen
dc.title具有商品稀缺性之供應鏈合約設計分析zh_TW
dc.titleThe Contract Design for a Supply Chain with Potential Scarce Componentsen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear104-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee黃奎隆(Kwei-Long Huang),余峻瑜(Jiun-Yu Yu),丁慶榮(Ching-Jung Ting),楊曙榮(Shu-Jung Sunny Yang)
dc.subject.keywordStackelberg模型,單位價格與數量正相關,稀缺性資源,供應鏈中斷,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordStackelberg model,positive correlation between price and quantity,scarce component,supply chain disruption,en
dc.relation.page67
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU201600370
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2016-06-16
dc.contributor.author-college工學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept工業工程學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:工業工程學研究所

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-105-1.pdf
  目前未授權公開取用
1.86 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved