請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/47251完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 吳玲玲(Ling-Ling Wu) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kang-Yu Li | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 李岡諭 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T05:52:21Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2013-08-20 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2010-08-20 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2010-08-17 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Anderson, C.(2004). The Long Tail. Wired Magazine, 170-177.
Bar-Ilan, J. (2008, Feb). Which h-index? - a comparison of wos, scopus and google scholar. Scientometrics, 74(2), 257-271. Baskerville, R. L., & Myers, M. D. (2002, Mar). Information systems as a reference discipline. Mis Quarterly, 26(1), 1-14. Brynjolfsson, E., Hu, Y., & Smith, M. D. (2003, Nov). Consumer surplus in the digital economy: Estimating the value of increased product variety at online booksellers. Management Science, 49(11), 1580-1596. Brynjolfsson, E., Hu, Y., & Smith, M. D. (2006, Sum). From niches to riches: Anatomy of the long tail. Mit Sloan Management Review, 47(4), 67-+. Claudia Loebbecke, Olivier Berthod, & Huyskens, C. (2007). RESEARCH IMPORTANCE IN THE INFORMATION SYSTEMS FIELD:ACITATION ANALYSIS. Paper presented at the Twenty Eighth International Conference on Information Systems. Cote, J. A., Leong, S. M., & Cote, J. (1991, Dec). Assessing the influence of journal of consumer research - a citation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 18(3), 402-410. Cronin, B., & Meho, L. I. (2008, Feb 15). The shifting balance of intellectual trade in information studies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(4), 551-564. Elberse, A. (2008). Should you invest in the long tail? Harvard Business Review, 86(7-8), 88-+. Evans, J. A. (2008, Jul 18). Electronic publication and the narrowing of science and scholarship. Science, 321(5887), 395-399. Garfield, Eugene (1979), Citation Indexing: Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities, New York: Wiley. Grover, V., Ayyagari, R., Gokhale, R., Lim, J., & Coffey, J. (2006, May). A citation analysis of the evolution and state of information systems within a constellation of reference disciplines. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 7(5), 270-324. Gomez, I., Fernandez, M. T., Bordons, M., & Morillo, F. (2004). Spanish scientific output in Medicine in the years 1994-1999. Revista Clinica Espanola, 204(2), 75-88. Harter, S. P. (1998). Scholarly communication and electronic journals: An impact study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(6), 507-516. Herring, S. D. (2002). Use of electronic resources in scholarly electronic journals: A citation analysis. College & Research Libraries, 63(4), 334-340. Katerattanakul, P., Han, B., & Rea, A. (2006, May). Is information systems a reference discipline? Communications of the Acm, 49(5), 114-118. Lariviere, V., Archambault, E., & Gingras, Y. (2008, Jan 15). Long-term variations in the aging of scientific literature: From exponential growth to steady-state science (1900-2004). Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(2), 288-296. Lariviere, V., Archambault, E., Gingras, Y., & Vignola-Gagne, E. (2006). The place of serials in referencing practices: Comparing natural sciences and engineering with social sciences and humanities. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(8), 997-1004. Lariviere, V., Gingras, Y., & Archambault, E. (2009, Apr). The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(4), 858-862. Lee, E., Lee, J., & Lee, J. (2006, Dec). Reconsideration of the winner-take-all hypothesis: Complex networks and local bias. Management Science, 52(12), 1838-1848. Levitt, J. M., & Thelwall, M. (2008, Oct). Is multidisciplinary research more highly cited? A macrolevel study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(12), 1973-1984. Lipczynski, J., Wilson, J. and Goddard, J. (2005) Industrial Organization, Competition, Strategy, Policy.Harlow: Prentice Hall. Lockett, A., & McWilliams, A. (2005, Jun). The balance of trade between disciplines - do we effectively manage knowledge? Journal of Management Inquiry, 14(2), 139-150. MacKie-Mason., J. K., Bonn., M. S., Riveros., J. F., & Lougee, W. P. (1999). A Report on the PEAK Experiment Usage and Economic Behavior. D-Lib Magazine, Volume 5. McDonald, J. D. (2007, Jan 1). Understanding journal usage: A statistical analysis of citation and use. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(1), 39-50. Mogge, D., (1999) Seven years of tracking electronic publishing: the ARL Directory of Electronic Journals, Newsletters and. Library Hi Tech,17(1), 17-25. Morillo, F., Bordons, M., & Gomez, I. (2001). An approach to interdisciplinarity bibliometric indicators. Scientometrics, 51(1), 203-222. Mullins, N. C., Hargens, L. L., Hecht, P. K., & Kick, E. L. (1977). Group structure of co-citation clusters - comparative-study. American Sociological Review, 42(4), 552-562. Nambisan, S. (2003, Mar). Information systems as a reference discipline for new product development. Mis Quarterly, 27(1), 1-18. Nederhof, A. J. (2005). Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the social sciences and the humanities: A review. Scientometrics, 66(1), 81-100. Odell, J., & Gabbard, R. (2008, Nov). The interdisciplinary influence of library and information science 1996-2004: A journal-to-journal citation analysis. College & Research Libraries, 69(6), 546-564. Polites, G. L., & Watson, R. T. (2009). Using social network analysis to analyze relationships among is journals. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 10(8), 595-636. Rainer, R. K., & Miller, M. D. (2005, Feb). Examining differences across journal rankings. Communications of the Acm, 48(2), 91-94. Rosen, S. (1981). The Economics of Superstars. American Economic Review, 71(5), 845-858. Schilling, M. A. (2002, Apr). Technology success and failure in winner-take-all markets: The impact of learning orientation, timing, and network externalities. Academy of Management Journal, 45(2), 387-398. Siluo Yang, F. M., Yanhui Song, Junping Qiu. (2010). A longitudinal analysis of citation distribution breadth for Chinese scholars. Scientometrics. Smith, D. R. (2008). Citation Analysis and Impact Factor Trends of 5 Core Journals in Occupational Medicine, 1985-2006. Archives of Environmental & Occupational Health, 63(3), 114-122. Smith, D. R. (2007). Historical development of the journal impact and its relevance for occupational health. Industrial Health, 45(6), 730-742. Tucker, C., & Zhang, J. (2007). Long Tail or Steep Tail? A Field Investigation into How Online Popularity Information Affects the Distribution of Customer Choices. MIT Sloan School of Management. Ucak, N. O., & Al, U. (2009). The Differences Among Disciplines in Scholarly Communication A Bibliometric Analysis of Theses. Libri, 59(3), 166-179. van Leeuwen, T. (2005). The application of bibliometric analyses in the evaluation of social science research. Who benefits from it, and why it is still feasible. Scientometrics, 66(1), 133-154. Vessey, I., Ramesh, V., & Glass, R. L. (2002, Fal). Research in information systems: An empirical study of diversity in the discipline and its journals. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(2), 129-174. Wade, M., Biehl, M., & Kim, H. (2006, May). Information systems is not a reference discipline (and what we can do about it). Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 7(5), 247-267. Walstrom, K. A., & Hardgrave, B. C. (2001, Dec). Forums for information systems scholars: Iii. Information & Management, 39(2), 117-124. Zhang, Y. (2001, Jun). Scholarly use of internet-based electronic resources. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(8), 628-650. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/47251 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | This study utilized a long term and large scale citations analysis to analyze whether the rise of E-journal has helped the reference of the IS field distribute into more diverse disciplines and helped the IS field become more mature.
Results indicate that proportions of references referring to self-field (the IS field) and the Management field have become more stable. References from IS articles to Pure-IS journals grew from 25.77% to 49.26% of the total references for a percentage increase of 23.49%, in addition the HHI of Pure IS has also became more disperse but not concentrated on a few journals. According to the above mentioned phenomena, we believe the IS field has gradually developed into a more mature field after the E-journal arose. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T05:52:21Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-99-R97725046-1.pdf: 1717839 bytes, checksum: 279f23a7faa8342264ec85f91d6a2366 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Research Background 1 1.2 Research Motivation and Purpose 2 CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW 5 2.1 Online availability of journal 5 2.2 Prior study 6 2.3 Long-tail and Winner-take-all 7 2.4 Interdisciplinary Knowledge Flows 9 2.5 Ranking of IS journals 10 2.6 Citation analysis 11 2.7 Concentration indices 12 2.7.1 CR4 Index 12 2.7.2 Gini Index 13 2.7.3 Herfindahl-Hirschman Index 13 CHAPTER 3 METHODOLOGY 15 3.1 Define IS journal 15 3.1.1 Referring to Journal list of AIS 15 3.1.2 Conducting a Questionnaire Survey 15 3.2 Data collection and filtration 17 3.3 Discipline classification 20 3.4 Data analysis 21 CHAPTER 4 Results 22 4.1 Basic analysis of references in IS Field 22 4.1.1 Average age of references 22 4.1.2 Average number of references of each IS article 24 4.2 The Change of Knowledge Originality in IS Field 26 4.2.1 Top 10 Cited journal 26 4.2.2 Reference Disciplines of IS Field is changing 28 4.3 Concentration Analysis of Reference Disciplines Cited by IS Field 33 4.3.1 HHI of all Reference Disciplines Cited by IS Field 33 4.3.2 HHI of Cross Disciplines 35 4.3.3 HHI of IS Field 36 4.3.4 HHI of non-IS Field 38 CHAPTER 5 Conclusion 40 5.1 Summary 40 5.2 Discussion 41 5.2.1 Cumulative Tradition 41 5.2.2 Change of Reference Discipline 42 5.2.3 Will the number of journals in different fields affects patterns of HHI? 43 5.3 Limitation & Future work 44 REFERENCES 46 Appendix A 50 Appendix B 52 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.subject | 知識來源 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 資管領域 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 引用文獻分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 線上可獲性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 集中度 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Concentration | en |
| dc.subject | Online Availability | en |
| dc.subject | Knowledge Origins | en |
| dc.subject | Citation Analysis | en |
| dc.subject | Information System Reasearches | en |
| dc.title | 線上可獲性對資管期刊知識來源之影響 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Impact of Online Availability on Knowledge Origins Information System Researches | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 98-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | 黃慕萱(Mu-hsuan Huang) | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 唐牧群(Muh-Chyun Tang) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 線上可獲性,資管領域,知識來源,引用文獻分析,集中度, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Online Availability,Information System Reasearches,Knowledge Origins,Citation Analysis,Concentration, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 54 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2010-08-18 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 資訊管理學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 資訊管理學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-99-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.68 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。