Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/45789Full metadata record
| ???org.dspace.app.webui.jsptag.ItemTag.dcfield??? | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 李蘭 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yu-Ying Chen | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 陳郁穎 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T04:46:10Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2013-09-09 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2010-09-09 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2010-08-05 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | (中文文獻)
內政部兒童局全球資訊網(2005)。中華民國九十四年臺閩地區兒童及少年生活 狀況調查報告分析(少年摘要版)。台中：內政部兒童局。 內政部兒童局全球資訊網(2005)。中華民國九十四年臺閩地區兒童及少年生活 狀況調查報告分析(兒童摘要版) 。台中：內政部兒童局。 內政部統計處(2001)。臺閩地區兒童生活狀況調查報告。台北：內政部統計處。 行政院主計處(2007)。婦女婚育與就業調查(96年)。台北：內政部行政院主計處。 何姿嫻(2008)。影響國小學童家長送子女參加課後補習之相關因素研究---以桃園 縣中壢市為例。未出版之碩士論文。國立中央大學。 李宜芸(2008)。國小低年級學童之家庭背景、課後照顧對其學習行為、學業成就 之影響。未出版之碩士論文。國立臺灣師範大學。 李新民(2003)。課後托育機構整合國小課程之初探。幼兒保育學刊，1，19-38。 吳明隆(2006)。國小學生學習壓力之研究。正修通識教育學報，3，33-66。 法務部(2004)。補習及進修教育法。台北：法務部。 法務部(2004)。國民小學辦理兒童課後照顧服務及人員資格標準。台北：法務部。 法務部(2008)。兒童及少年福利法。台北：法務部。 林璟斐，(2005)。家長工作時間與學童課後托育需求彈性化之研究。未出版之碩 士論文。國立臺灣大學。 教育部(2008)。扶持 5 歲幼兒教育計畫。台北：教育部。 教育部(2009)。教育部98年推動夜光天使點燈專案計畫。台北：教育部。 國教司(2003)。92年國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要:實施要點。台北:教育部 陳乃慈(2005)。日本托育政策之研究。未出版之碩士論文。國立嘉義大學。 陳雅玟(2003)。大台北地區家長對其學齡子女才藝班消費決策取向之探討。未 出版之碩士論文。國立臺灣師範大學。 陳建州、劉正(2004)。論多元入學教育之教育均等性。教育研究集刊，50，115-146。 張春桂(2005)。國小學童課後補習狀況與家長決策行為之探討-以台南市為例。未 出版之碩士論文。國立臺南大學。 張朝鈞(2008)。國小學童補習、家庭結構、社經地位與城鄉比較之研究。 未出版之碩士論文。國立政治大學。 郭麗玲(1993)。兒童時期的課後活動分析。台北：師菀。 楊淑雯(2004)。高雄市國小教師對才藝教育價值的認知與學齡兒童參加才藝班的 態度。未出版之碩士論文。國立高雄師範大學。 劉正(2006)。補習在臺灣的變遷, 效能與階層化。教育研究集刊，52，1-33。 蘇進棻(2006)九年一貫「一綱多本」教科書政策衍生問題與因應策略。教育研究 與發展期刊，2，63-91。 臺北市政府社會局婦女福利及兒童托育科(2009)。安親班契約範本。臺北：臺北 市政府社會局。 臺北市政府教育局(2006)。臺北市短期補習班管理規則。臺北：臺北市政府教育 局。 臺北市政府社會局。民99年3月10號，取自http://kids.taipei.gov.tw/index.htm (英文文獻) Ainsworth, J. W. (2002). Why does it take a village? The mediation of neighborhood effects on educational achievement. Social Forces, 81(1), 117–152. Australian Bureau of Statistics (2008). Australian Social Trends 2007. Retrieved April 24, 2010, from http://www.abs.gov.au/Ausstats/ABS@.nsf/0/ 3CB461C1588C9677CA25732C00207BC8?opendocument Baker, M., Gruber, J. & Milligan, K. (2008). Universal child care, maternal labor supply, and family well-being. Journal of Political Economy,116(4),709-745. Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall. Barabowski, T., Perry, C.L., & Parcel, G.S. (2002). How Individuals, Environments, And Health Behavior Interact. Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research and Practice, 165-184. Black, S.E., Devereux, P.J., & Salvanes, K.G. (2005). The More the Merrier? The Effect of Family Size and Birth Order on Children's Education. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(2), 669-700. Bidjerano, T. & Newman, J. (2009). Autonomy in After-School Activity Choice Among Preadolescents From Taiwan and the United States. The Journal of Early Adolescence, Article 10.1177/0272431609342986. Retrieved August 24, 2009, from http://jea.sagepub.com Bowes, J., & Grace, R. (2009). Children, families and communities: Contexts and consequences. Oxford, New York. Bronfenbrenner, U.(1977) Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist. 32(7), 513-531. Carver, P.R, & Iruka, I.U. (2006). National Household Education Surveys Program of 2005. Washington, D.C.: National Center for Education Statistics. CareforKids (2010). Child care benefit (CCB). Retrieved April 24, 2010, from http://www.careforkids.com.au/search/location.asp?ut=4&ctype=6 Connelly, R., & Kimmel, J. (2003). Marital Status and Full-time/Part-time Work Status in Child Care Choices. Applied Economics, 35(7), 761-777. Cooper, C.E., Crosnoe, R., Suizzo, M.A., & Pituch K.A. (2009). Poverty, Race, and Parental Involvement During the Transition to Elementary School. Journal of Family Issues, Article 0192513X09351515v1. Retrieved February 1, 2010, from http://jfi.sagepub.com Coulton, C., & Irwin, M. (2009). Parental and community level correlates of participation in out-of-school activities among children living in low income neighborhoods. Children and Youth Services Review, 31(3), 300-308. Denault, A. S., & Poulin, F.(2009). Predictors of Adolescent Participation in Organized Activities: A Five-Year Longitudinal Study. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 19(2), 287–311. Department for Children, School and Families (2009). The Essential Guide to Childcare For You and Your Family: 5-11 Years. Retrieved February 25, 2010, from http://www.direct.gov.uk/childcare Ferrer, M. & Fugate A. M. (2003). Home Alone: Children in Self-Care. (#FCS2223).University of Florida, UF/IFAS, Department of Family, Youth and Community Sciences. Family Commission(2010). Leaving children alone. Retrieved April 23, 2010, from www.nzfamilies.org.nz Fauth, R.C., Roth, J.L. & Brooks-Gunn, J. ( 2007). Does the Neighborhood Context Alter the Link Between Youth’s After-School Time Activities and Developmental Outcomes? A Multilevel Analysis. Developmental Psychology, 43(3), 760–777. Gauvain, M., & Perez, S.M. (2005). Parent–Child Participation in Planning Children’s Activities Outside of School in European American and Latino Families. Child Development, 76(2), 371–383. Gerstenblith, S.A., Soule, D.A., Gottfredson, D.C., Lu, S., Kellstrom, M.A., Womer, S.c., & Bryner, W.S. (2005). After-school Programs, Antisocial Behavior, and Positive Youth Development: Ab Exploration of the Relationship Between Program Implementation and Changes in Youth Behavior. Organized activities as contexts of development: Extracurricular activities, after-school and community programs, 457-478. Green, T. (2007, April). The Benefits of OSCAR. Retrieved April 23, 2010, from The OSCAR Foundation Web Site: http://www.oscar.org.nz/index.asp Gottfredson, D.C., Gerstenblith, S.A., Soulé, D.A., Womer, S.C. & Lu, S. (2004). Do After School Programs Reduce Delinquency? Prevention Science, 5(4), 253-266. Hertwig, R., Davis, J.N., & Sulloway, F.J. (2002). Parental Investment: How an Equity Motive Can Produce Inequality. Psychological Bulletin, 128(5),728–745. Jacobs, J.E., Vernon, M.K., & Eccles, J.S. (2005). Activity Choice in Middle Childhood: The Roles of Gender, Self-Beliefs, and Parents’ Influence. Organized activities as contexts of development: Extracurricular activities, after-school and community programs, 235-245. James-Burdumy, S., Dynarski, M. & Deke, J. (2007). When Elementary Schools Stay Open Late:Results From the National Evaluation of the 21st Century Community Learning Centers Program, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 29(4),296–318. Jessor, P., Van Den Bos, J., Vanderryn, J., Costa, F.M., & Turbin, M.S.(1995). Protective Factors in Adolescent Problem Behavior: Moderator Effects and Developmental Change. Developmental Psychology, 31(6), 923-933. Jordan, W.J., & Nettles, S.M.(1999). How students invest their time outside of school: Effects on school-related outcomes. Social Psychology of Education, 3(4), 217-243. Kimmel, J., & Powell, L. M. (2001). Nonstandard Work and Child Care Choice: Implications for Welfare Reform. Washington, D.C.: Upjohn Institute Staff Working Paper No. 01-74. Krueger, A.B., & Whitmore , D.M. (2001).The Effect of Attending a Small Class in the Early Grades on College-Test Taking and Middle School Test Results: Evidence from Project STAR. Economic journal, 111(1), 1-28. Mahoney, J. L., Schweder, A. E., & Stattin, H. (2002). Structured after-school activities as a moderator of depressed mood for adolescents with detached relations to their parents. Journal of Community Psychology, 30(1), 69-86. Mahoney, J. L., Larson, R. W., Eccles, J.S., & Lord, H. (2005). Organized Activities as Development Contexts for Children and Adolescents. Organized activities as contexts of development: Extracurricular activities, after-school and community programs, 3-22. Mahoney, J.L., Lord, H., & Carryl, E. (2005). An Ecological Analysis of After-School Program Participation and the Development of Academic Performance and Motivational Attributes for Disadvantaged Children. Child Development, 76(4), 811 – 825. McLeroy K. R., Bibeau, D., Steckler, A., & Glanz K. (1988). An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Education & Behavior, 15(4), 351-377. Meijvogel, M.C. & Petrie, P. (1996). School-Age Childcare in the European Union. London : European Commission Network on Childcare. Meijvogel, R. (2007).Out-of-School Services in Europe: How We Learn from Each Other. New Directions for Youth Development, 116, 15-22. Meyers, M.K., & Jordan, L.P. (2006). Choice and Accommodation in Parental Child Care Decisions. The Community Development Society, 37(2), 53-70. Miller, B. M., O’Connor, S., & Sirignano, S. W. (1995). Out-of-school time: A study of children in three low-income neighborhoods. Child Welfare, 74(6), 1249-1280. Miller, C.F., Lurye, L.E., Zosuls, K.M., Ruble, D.N.(2009). Accessibility of gender stereotype domains: Developmental and gender differences in Children. Sex roles, 60(11-12), 870-881. National Youth Violence Prevention (2007). After-School Programs Fact Sheet. Available:www.safeyouth.org NSPCC (n.d.). Home alone: your guide to keeping your child safe. Retrieved March 19, 2010, from http://www.nspcc.org.uk/HelpAndAdvice/ Parentsandcarers/ HomeAlone/homealone_wda35965.html Pettit, G., Laird, R.D., Dodge, K.A., & Bates, J.E.(1997) Patterns of After-School Care in Middle Childhood: Risk Factors and Developmental Outcomes. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 43(3), 515-538. Pierce, K.M., Hamm, J.V., & Vandel, D.L. (1999). Experiences in after-school programs and children's adjustment in first-grade classrooms. Child Development. 70(3), 756-767. Public/Private Ventures (P/PV). (2002, January). Multiple Choices After School: Findings from the Extended-Service Schools Initiative. Retrieved February 22 , 2010, from http://www.ppv.org Presser, H.B. (2003). Working in a 24/7 economic: Challenges for American families. Reading, New York. Rowley, S.J., Kurtz-Costes, B., Mistry, R., & Feagans, L.(2007). Social status as a predictor of race and gender stereotypes in late childhood and early adolescence. Social Development, 16(1), 150-168. Shumow, L., Smith, T.J. & Smith, M.C. (2009). Academic and Behavioral Characteristics of Young Adolescents in Self-Care. Journal of Early Adolescence, 29(2), 233-257. Stokols, D. (1996). Translating social ecological theory into guidelines for community health promotion. American Journal of Health Promotion, 10(4), 282-298. Sutfin, E.L., Fulcher, M., Bowles, R.P., & Patterson, C.J.(2008). How Lesbian and Heterosexual Parents Convey Attitudes about Gender to their Children: The Role of Gendered Environments. Sex Roles, 58(7-8), 501–513. Tennant, C. (2002). Life events, stress and depression: a review of recent findings. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 36(2), 173 – 182. The Couch. (2006). Childcare needs for school children. Retrieved May 23,2010, from http://www.thecouch.org.nz/member/report/5 The OSCAR Foundation. (January, 2009). National OSCAR Sector Wage and Fee Survey Result 2009 Overview. Retrieved April 23, 2010, from http://www.oscar.org.nz/index.asp Greater New Milford (n.d.). Who has time for a family meal? You do! Retrieved October 5, 2000, from http://www. familymealtime.org U. S. Department of Education (2000). 21st Century community learning centers: Providing quality after-school learning opportunities for America's families. Available:http://www.ed.gov/pubs/Providing_Quality_Afterschool_Learning/index. Vandell, D.L., & Shumow, L. (1999). After-school child care programs. The Future of children, 9(2), 64-80. Weiss, H., Little, P., Bouffard, S., Deschenes, S. & Malone., S.H. (2008). The Federal Role in Out-of-School Learning: After-School, Summer Learning, and Family Involvement as Critical Learning Supports. Center on Education Policy. Retrieved from http://www.cep-dc.org/index.cfm?fuseaction= Page.viewPage& pageId=536&parentID=481. Wilson, D.M., Gottfredson, M., Cross., A., Rorie, M. & Connell, N. (2009). Youth Development in After-School Leisure Activities. The Journal of Early Adolescence, Article 10.1177/0272431609341048. Retrieved March 20, 2010, from http://jea.sagepub.com Wimer, C. & Simpkins, S.D. (2008). Predicting Youth Out-of-School Time Participation Multiple Risks and Developmental Differences. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 54(2), 179-207. Yu, W., & Su, H. (2006). Gender, Sibship Structure, and Educational Inequality in Taiwan: Son Preference Revisited. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68(4), 1057-1068. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/45789 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 目的：課後安排是無國界的議題，它對於學童個人、家庭和社會都有很大的影響。本研究目的是希望瞭解和比較學童在國小低、中年級時，參與課後安親班和才藝班與個人、家庭和學校因素的相關性，觀察家庭對於不同課後照顧的需求以及做出決策的相關因素。方法：資料來源為兒童與青少年行為之長期發展研究(Child and Adolescent Behaviors in Long-Term Evolution)部分資料，進行次級資料分析，總納入研究樣本為1744人。結果：1.研究樣本於二年級中，參與安親班和才藝班的比率很高，但是到了四年級時參與率顯著下降。2.不同層面的因素都與學童參與安親班和才藝班有相關，在家中為第一個孩童、居住在台北市、家庭收入較高以及就讀學校為大型學校的學童，參與安親班和才藝班的機率顯著較高；學童因父母親教育程度、母親職業的差異，參與安親班或才藝班情形有所不同；家庭的互動與學童在四年級時是否會參與安親班有關，而個人的健康和學校同儕的互動則與學童在四年級時是否會參與才藝班有關。建議：在未來的研究中，可以加入由親友照顧等非正式的照顧，由於一般家庭在使用課後安排時，會傾向使用一種以上的安排，因此可以探討不同的因素以及不同課後組合安排的關聯性。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Objective: After-school care is a worldwide issue, having enormous influence on children, families and society. The purpose of this study is to realize the conditions of students participating in daycare and extra-curricula in the second and fourth grades. Besides, the research examines the association among personal, family and school factors, and willingness of participating. Methods: The data are from the Child and Adolescent Behaviors in Long-Term Evolution project and the total sample includes 1744 people after conducting secondary data analysis. Result: 1.High participating rate in daycare and extra-curricula is in the second grade. However, the participating rate decreases dramatically in the fourth grade. 2. Personal, family and school factors all have close relation to participate in daycare and extra-curricula. Student is the first child in families, living in Taipei city, born into rich families or studying in big schools, factoring in significantly high rate to participate in daycare and extra-curricula. Parents’ education level and mother’s job have other relations to participate in daycare or extra-curricula; Family interaction is related to fourth grade students’ participation of daycares. Peer interaction and students’ health condition are related to fourth grade students’ participation of extra-curricula. Conclusions: The study confirms that after-school care of students is the utmost importance. When parents choose daycares and enrichment classes, they usually consider more than one caring options for their children. Researchers can subsume informal care and make different types of combined after-school care to have further discussion in future research. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T04:46:10Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-99-R97845108-1.pdf: 1360459 bytes, checksum: 0307af78511b13b23fc3928c3c5060a9 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 I
誌謝 II 中文摘要 III 英文摘要 IV 圖表目錄 VII 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景 1 第二節 研究目的 5 第二章 文獻探討 6 第一節 課後安排內容相關的定義 6 第二節 各國學童課後安排的情形 8 第三節 課後安排對於學童的影響 11 第四節 學童參與課後安排的相關因素 14 第五節 以生態模式探討課後安排 21 第三章 研究方法 24 第一節 研究樣本 24 第二節 研究架構 26 第三節 研究變項 27 第四節 資料分析 36 第四章 研究結果 38 第一節 研究樣本的特質 38 第二節 樣本二年級和四年級時參與課後安排的情形 41 第三節 樣本二年級和四年級參與安親班之相關因素 42 第四節 研究樣本二年級和四年級時參與安親班和才藝班相關因素 46 第五章 討論 51 第一節 學童參與安親班和才藝班在二年級和四年級時的變化 51 第二節 學童參與安親班和才藝班的相關因素探討 52 第三節 研究限制 59 第六章 結論與建議 60 第一節 結論 60 第二節 建議 63 參考文獻 64 附錄一2002年CABLE兒童問卷植物版 70 附錄二2002年CABLE兒童問卷動物版 77 附錄三2002年CABLE家長問卷女性版 84 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 安親班 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 兒童 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 才藝班 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | children | en |
| dc.subject | extra-curricula | en |
| dc.subject | daycare | en |
| dc.title | 學童二年級和四年級時參與安親班和才藝班的相關因子 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Factors Associated with Daycare and Extra-curricula Attendance in Students during Second Grade and Fourth Grade | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 98-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 張新儀,石兆蓮 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 安親班,才藝班,兒童, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | daycare,extra-curricula,children, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 99 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2010-08-05 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 公共衛生學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 衛生政策與管理研究所 | zh_TW |
| Appears in Collections: | 健康政策與管理研究所 | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-99-1.pdf Restricted Access | 1.33 MB | Adobe PDF |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.