請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/45708
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 高榮禧,紀蔚然 | |
dc.contributor.author | Hung-Ku Kuo | en |
dc.contributor.author | 郭虹谷 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T04:44:55Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2010-08-16 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2010-08-16 | |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2010-08-08 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 中文部分
牛宏寶。《西方現代美學》。上海:上海人民,2002。 王青、陳虎譯。西川直子著。《克里斯托娃:多元邏輯》。石家莊:河北教育,2001。 王聲昌譯。佛洛伊德(Freud, Sigmund)著。《史瑞伯:妄想症案例的精神分析》。臺北:心靈工坊文化,2006。 李平譯。卡勒(J. Culler)著。《文學理論入門:英漢對照》。南京:譯林,2008。 李朝暉譯。格爾達•帕格爾(Gerda Pagel)。《拉康》。北京:中國人民大學,2008。 李俊毅譯。佛洛伊德著。〈論自戀:一篇導論〉。《佛洛伊德的「論自戀:一篇導論」》。台北:五南,2009: 3-35。 汪民安。《福柯的界線》。北京:中國社會科學,2002。 沈志中、王文基譯,陳傳興監譯。尚.拉普朗虛(Jean Laplanche),尚-柏騰.彭大歷斯(J.-B. Pontalis)著。《精神分析詞彙》臺北 : 行人,2000。 余碧平譯。福柯著。《性經驗史》。上海:上海人民,2002。 車文博主編。佛洛伊德著。《弗洛伊德文集第四卷》。長春:長春出版,1998。 杜小真編選。福柯(Michel Foucault)著。《福柯集》。上海:上海遠東,1998。 依達等譯。亨利.阿特朗等著。《人類克隆》。北京:社會科學文獻,2003。 林玉華譯。梅蘭妮.克萊恩著。《兒童精神分析》。臺北:心靈工坊文化,2005。 周憲主編。《文化現代性與美學問題》。北京:中國人民大學,2005。 ——。《文學與認同:跨學科的反思》。北京:中華書局,2008。 紀蔚然。《現代戲劇敘事觀:建構與解構》。台北:書林,2006。 洪文慧。〈父神的陰影〉。《後現代語境中的文化身份研究》。南京:鳳凰,2008: 48-61。 馬海良譯。讓.鮑德里亞著。〈象徵交換與死亡〉及〈仿真與擬象〉。《後現代性的哲學話語:從福柯到賽義德》。汪民安等編。杭州:浙江人民,2001: 302-45。 曹榮湘選編。曹劍波譯。《後人類文化》。上海:上海三聯,2004。 張榮譯。約納斯(H. Jonas)著。《技術、醫學與倫理學:責任原理的實踐》。上海:上海譯文,2008。 張靜二譯。亞瑟米勒(Arthur Miller)著。《推銷員之死》。收錄於《亞瑟米勒的戲劇研究》。台北:書林,1996。 張君玫譯。雀朵洛(Nancy J. Chodorow)著。《母職的再生產:心理分析與性別社會學》。台北:群學,2003。 張敏等譯。肇嘉(L. Zoja)著。《父性:歷史、心理與文化的視野》。北京:中國社會科學,2009。 張一兵。《不可能的存在之真:拉康哲學映像》。北京:商務印書,2006。 張逸帆。〈政治化身體與語言——凱洛邱琪爾的雜成劇場〉。《高雄師大學報》。13(2002): 111-26。 陳少華。《閹割、篡弒與理想化:論中國現代文學中的父子關係》。廣州:廣東人民,2005。 陳祉妍等譯。斯蒂芬.A. 米切爾等著。《弗洛伊德及其後繼者》。北京:商務印書,2007。 黃作。《不思之說——拉康主體理論研究》。北京:人民,2005。 黃素卿。〈從同性社交到同性戀——邱琪兒《九重天》對多重性慾之禮讚〉。《中外文學》。22: 9(1994): 87-112。 焦季蘊。《論邱琪爾〈九重天〉與黃哲倫〈蝴蝶君〉之表演策略所呈現的性別與種族議題》。國立清華大學外國語文學系碩士論文,2001。 褚孝泉譯。拉康(J. M. Lacan)著。《拉康選集》。上海:上海三聯,2001。 劉永謀。《福柯的主體解構之旅——從知識考古學到「人之死」》。南京:江蘇人民,2009。 衛岭。《奧尼爾的創傷記憶與悲劇創作》。北京:中國人民大學,2009。 錢翰譯。福柯著。《必須保衛社會》。上海:上海人民,1999。 戴阿寶譯。瑞安.畢曉普等著。《波德里亞:追思與展望》。開封:河南大學,2008。 鴻鴻譯。馬琉斯.馮.梅焰堡著。《醜男子》。《衛生紙詩刊+》。台北:黑眼睛文化,n2(2009): 60-87。 羅婷。《克里斯特瓦的詩學研究》。北京:中國科學,2004。 英文部分 Aston, Elaine. Caryl Churchill. Plymouth: Northcote House in association with the British Council, 2001. Aston, Elaine. Elin Dimond. “Introduction: on Caryl Churchill.” The Cambridge companion to Caryl Churchill. Ed. Elaine Aston, Elin Dimond. Cambridge, UK ; New York : Cambridge University Press, 2009: 1-17. Barnet, Sylvan, et al. Types of drama: plays and contexts. New York: Longman, 2001. Barnett, Claudia. “A Prisoner of Object Relations: Adrienne Kennedy’s Funnyhouse of a Negro.” Modern Drama 40(1997): 374-84. Becker, Benjamin J. “’Death of a Salesman’: Arthur Miller’s Play in the Light of Psychoanalysis.” American Journal of Psychoanalysis 47: 3(1987): 195-209. Billington, Michael. “The Ugly One.” The Guardian 19 Sep 2007. 11 June 2010. <http://www.royalcourttheatre.com/whatson-reviews.asp?play=492 > Centola, Steven R. “All My Sons.” The Cambridge companion to Arthur Miller. Ed. Christopher Bigsby. Cambridge, U.K.; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997: 48-59. Chaudhuri, Una. “Churchill, Caryl” The Oxford Encyclopedia of British Literature. David Scott Kastan. Oxford University Press 2005. 30 June 2010. <http://www.oxfordreference.com/views/ENTRY.html?subview=Main&entry=t198.e0100> Choudhuri, A.D. “Death of a Salesman: a Salesman’s illusion.” Willy Loman. Ed. Harold Bloom. New York: Chelsea House, 1991: 66-78. Churchill, Caryl. A Number. New York: Theatre Communications Group, 2007. Churchill, Caryl. “Not Ordinary, Not Safe: A Direction for Drama?” Twentieth Century Nov 1966: 443-51. Clark, Eleanor. “Review of Death of a salesman.” Two Modern American Tragedies: Reviews and Criticism of Death of a Salesman and a Streetcar Named Desire. Ed. Hurrell, John D. New York: Scribner's, 1961: 61-64. Evans, Dylan. An Introductory Dictionary of Lacanian Psychoanalysis. London; New York: Routledge, 1996. Feldstein, Richard, Bruce Fink, Maire Jaanus. Reading Seminar XI: Lacan's Four fundamental concepts of psychoanalysis. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1995. Fisher, Philip. “The Ugly One.” 2007. 28 Jan. 2010. <http//www.britishtheatreguide.info/reviews/uglyone-rev.htm> Foster, Richard J. “Confusion and Tragedy: The Failure of Miller’s Salesman.” Two Modern American Tragedies: Reviews and Criticism of Death of a Salesman and a Streetcar Named Desire. Ed. Hurrell, John D. New York: Scribner's, 1961: 82-88. Freud, Sigmund. “On Narcissism: An Introduction.” Freud's 'On narcissism--an introduction.' Ed. Joseph Sandler, Ethel Spector Person, Peter Fonagy London: International Psychoanalytical Association, 2007: 3-32. Fuller, A. Howard. “A Salesman is Everybody.” Arthur Miller: Death of a Salesman; Text and Criticism. Ed. Gerald Weales. New York, Viking Press, 1967: 240-49. Gardner,Lyn. “A Number” The Guardian. 27 Sept. 2002. 6 July 2010. < http://www.guardian.co.uk/stage/2002/sep/27/theatre.artsfeatures1> Gober, R. Darren. “On Performance and Selfhood in Caryl Churchill.” The Cambridge companion to Caryl Churchill. Ed. Elaine Aston, Elin Dimond. Cambridge, UK ; New York : Cambridge University Press, 2009: 1-17. Homer, Sean. Jacques Lacan. London: Routledge, 2005. Hornby, Richard. “Middle-Aged Playwrights.” Hudson Review 58:1(2005): 95-102. Jongh, Nicolas de. “A Handsome Look at Ugliness.” Evening Standard 19 Sep 2007. 11 Jun 2010. <http://www.royalcourttheatre.com/whatson-reviews.asp?play=492> Karim, Sajjadul. “Arthur Miller’s Death of a Salesman: A Nightmare for a Dreamer.” BRAC University Journal 111:2(2006): 67-44. Klein, Melanie. Joan Riviere. Love, Hate and Reparation. New York. London: W. W. Norton& Company, 1964. Klein, Julia M. “Caryl Churchill’s Identity Crisis.” Chronicle of Higher Education 52(2006). 26 May 2006. B15-16. Klein, Melanie. The Psycho-Analysis of Children. Trans. Alix Strachey. New York: Free Press, 1984. Lacan, Jacques. Ecrits: a selections. Trans. Alan Sheridan. New York : Norton, 1977. Lawley, Paul. “Stage of Identity: from Krapp’s Last Tape to Play.” The Cambridge companion to Beckett. Ed. John Pilling. Cambridge: U.K. ; New York : Cambridge University Press, 1993: 88-105. Lyall, Sarah. “The Mysteries of Caryl Churchill.” New York Times 5 Dec 2004. <http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9805E4DA113EF936A35751C1A9629C8B63&pagewanted=all> Maalouf, Amin. In the Name of Identity: Violence and the Need to Belong. Trans. Barbara Bray. New York: Penguin Books, 2003. Mercer, Joyce Ann. “Psychoanalysis, Parents, and God: Julia Kristeva on Subjectivity and the Imaginary Father.” Pastoral Psychology 50: 243-58. Miller, Arthur, et al. “A Matter of Hopelessness in Death of a Salesman.” Two Modern American Tragedies: Reviews and Criticism of Death of a Salesman and a Streetcar Named Desire. Ed. Hurrell, John D. New York: Scribner's, 1961: 76-81. Morley, Sheridan. “Stage Lites.” Newstatesman 14 Oct 2002: 46. Oberg, Arthur K. “Death of a Salesman and Arthur Miller’s Search for Style.” Criticism 9:4: 303-11. Oliver, Kelly. Reading Kristeva: Unraveling the Double-bind. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1993. Pinter, Harold. The Homecoming. London : Methuen, 1967. Poster, Mark. Jean Baudrillar: Selected Writings. Stanford: Standard University Press, 1988. Roudané, Matthew C. “Death of a Salesman and the Poetics of Arthur Miller” The Cambridge companion to Arthur Miller. Ed. Christopher Bigsby. Cambridge, U.K.; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997: 60-85. -----.ed. Approaches to teaching Miller's Death of a salesman. New York: Modern Language Association of America, 1995. Schneider, Daniel E. “Play of Dreams.” Arthur Miller: Death of a Salesman; Text and Criticism. Ed. Gerald Weales. New York, Viking Press, 1967: 250-57. Segal, Hanna. Introduction to the Work of Melanie Klein. New York: Basic Books, 1974. Stanton, Kay. “Women and the American Dream of Death of a Salesman.” Willy Loman. Ed. Harold Bloom. New York: Chelsea House, 1991:129-56. Sternlicht, Sanford. Masterpieces of modern British and Irish drama. Westport, Conn. : Greenwood Press, 2005. Worton, Michael. “Waiting for Godot and Endgame.” The Cambridge companion to Beckett. Ed. John Pilling. Cambridge: U.K. ; New York : Cambridge University Press, 1993: 67-87. Zheng Danqing. “Who is to Blame for Willy Loman’s Death—On Arthur Miller’s Death of a Salesman.” Canadian Social Science 3:4(2007): 25-29. 姜翠芬. “Negative Self-Actualization in Caryl Churchill’s Top Girls.”《外國語文研究》9(2009): 1-19. -----. “A Hot Christmas in Africa: the Dismantling Climate in Caryl Churchill’s Cloud Nine.” 《外國語文研究》4(2006): 71-79. 張逸帆. “Engaging in the Public Sphere: Caryl Churchill and Her Women Characters in Owners and Top Girls.” 《東海學報》37:1(1996): 141-71. 黃裕惠. “Rage on the Page, Roar on the Stage—Two ‘Docu-Plays’ of the Feminist Playwright Caryl Churchill.”《人文社會學報(世新大學)》1(1999): 73-116. -----. “Staging Beyond Patriarchy: The Satanic Power Amplifies in Churchill’s Vinegar Tom”《世界新聞傳播學院人文學報》6(1997): 173-99. 劉雪珍. “Subjectivity in Caryl Churchill’s Fen and Softcops.” 《中山人文學報》11(2000): 1-16. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/45708 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本論文主要以拉康的主體相關理論與其他精神分析理論,探究英國劇作家邱琪爾(Caryl Churchill)《一些》(A Number)之中,父子之間難解的矛盾情感,以及隨之而來雙方的主體危機。鹽工(Salter)和伯納德(Bernard)的父子之情糾葛至深,探究其因,父親的天性與兒子的伊底帕斯情結,不免為父子關係埋下惡化的種子,早逝的母親更是關鍵。由於複製事件被揭穿,父子之間長久以來埋藏的問題也隨之揭露,雙方各自必須面對不堪的過去與現在,主體的危機因而產生,他們便各自因應其危機而發展了挽救自我的策略,無奈策略失敗,伯納德選擇玉石俱焚以終結脆弱的自我,鹽工則繼續找尋其他複製的兒子以重建父親身份。此外,進一步延伸比較來對照《一些》的複製自我與父子關係議題,發現《醜男子》(The Ugly One)的列特(Lette)與伯納德經歷類似的自我認同危機,他的選擇竟是愛上其中一個複製自我,而挽回了破碎的自我。《推銷員之死》(Death of a Salesman)的威利(Willy)與畢甫(Biff)則是一種自戀式的父子關係,但和《一些》的父子一樣,闡明了父與子因仰賴彼此而反至仇視的悖論。本論文將就父子之間難解的矛盾之情,主體本身困難重重的建構及其可能出路予以釐清。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The thesis analyses the ambivalent feelings between the father and the son and their crises of subject in Caryl Churchill’s A Number with mainly Lacan’s theories about the subject and with other psychoanalytic theories. Salter and Bernard have a complex relation owing to the temper of father and the son’s Oedipus complex, but most of all, the absence of Bernard’s mother. Due to the disclosed secret of cloning, the problem buried under the surface between the father and the son is revealed. Therefore, they are forced to face the unpleasant past, and crises of subject happen. To save their selves, they develop some strategies according to the crises but in vain. Finally, Bernard decides to destroy both of the cloning one and himself, and Salter keeps searching for other cloning sons in order to reconstruct his identity of father. Besides, we would compare to A Number’s theme of self reproduction and father-son relationship with those of two plays: The Ugly One by Marious von Mayenburg and Death of a Salesman by Arthur Miller. We find Lette in The Ugly One also experiences similar identity crises, and he chooses to love one of his reproduced man so as to save his broken self in the end. Willy and Biff, the father and the son in Death of a Salesman, build their relation on some kind of narcissism . Just as the father-son relationship in A Number, Willy and Biff depend on each other so much that their hate toward one another occurs. This thesis would explore further whether it exists the possible solution to the complex feelings between fathers and sons and their difficult construction of subjects. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T04:44:55Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-99-R95129010-1.pdf: 776885 bytes, checksum: c9707b1c6839ee195a7c2bb86ab410fe (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論 ………………………………………………………………1
第一節 研究動機與目的 ……………………………………………1 第二節 文獻回顧 ……………………………………………………2 第三節 研究範圍與限制 …………………………………………14 第二章 研究方法 ………………………………………………………15 第一節 研究架構 …………………………………………………15 第二節 引述理論 …………………………………………………16 第三章 《一些》之分析 …………………………………………………35 第一節《一些》之中的父子關係 …………………………………35 第二節《一些》之中的主體危機 …………………………………47 小結 …………………………………………………………………72 第四章 延伸與比較………………………………………………………78 第一節 綜論:現代戲劇中的父子關係與主體性…………………78 第二節《醜男子》:「我愛我」……………………………………86 第三節《推銷員之死》:主體之銷毀………………………………93 小結…………………………………………………………………108 第五章 結論 ……………………………………………………………111 引用書目 ………………………………………………………………120 附錄:名詞解釋…………………………………………………………127 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 拉康式閱讀——邱琪爾《一些》中的父子關係與主體危機 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Lacanian Reading—the Father-son Relationship and Crises of the Subject in Churchill's A Number | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 98-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 姜翠芬,謝筱玫 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 父子關係,主體危機,複製人,自我認同,鏡像階段, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | father-son relationship,crises of subject,clone,self-identity,mirror stage, | en |
dc.relation.page | 137 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2010-08-08 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 文學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 戲劇學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 戲劇學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-99-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 758.68 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。