請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/4536
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 楊東謀(Tung-Mou Yang) | |
dc.contributor.author | Yang-Chou Lai | en |
dc.contributor.author | 賴泱州 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-14T17:43:07Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2017-08-16 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-14T17:43:07Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2015-08-16 | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2015-08-11 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 一、中文部分
行政院研究發展考核委員會(2010)。政府資訊公開制度實施成效評估。臺北市:行政院研究發展考核委員會。 余孝先(2012)。政府資料開放發展趨勢與發展建議。民102年10月22日,檢自:http://pcs.csie.nctu.edu.tw/course/2012Fall/content/OpenData_NCTU.ppt 宋力文(2014)。建構以開放資料為基礎運用於軍事單位之服務模式―坡地災害為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國防大學資訊管理學系碩士論文,桃園縣。 李治安、林誠夏、莊庭瑞 (2014)。開放政府資料的基本原則與相關政策議題。公共治理專刊,2(1),頁65-76。 尚榮安(譯)(2001)。個案研究法(原作者:Robert K. Yin)。臺北:弘智文化。(原著出版年:1994) 法務部法律事務司(2007)。政府資訊公開法。臺北市,法務部。 法務部法律事務司(2012)。政府資訊公開法問答暨解釋彙編。臺北市,法務部。 政府資料開放平臺(2015)。政府資料開放授權條款正式上線了!。民104年8月5日,檢自:http://data.gov.tw/node/18695 政府資料開放平臺(2013)。Open Data聯盟於9月14日正式成立,期促進政府資料活化應用,讓民眾、企業與政府共享便利。民102年9月18日,檢自: http://data.gov.tw/opendata/News?newsid=News20 紀振清 (2008)。我國「政府資訊公開法」之制定與開展。軍法專刊,54(5),73-99。 胡龍騰、曾冠球、張智凱、黃榮志(2013)。電子化跨域治理影響因素之研究:多個案之探索。公共行政學報,45,頁1-39。 張心玲(2013)。政府資料開放(Open Data)近期推動現況與觀察。臺灣雲報,102年3月號。檢自: http://www.twcloud.org.tw/Cloud/upload/newEpaper/201305071/index/10203_Policy.pdf?no=66120002&msgno=309309 陳向明(2002)。社會科學質的研究。臺北市:五南書局。 陳怡君(2013)。開放政府資料迎接資料民主新時代。公共治理專刊,1(1),頁156-163。 陳舜伶、林珈宏、莊庭瑞(2013)。藏智於民:開放政府資料的原則與現況。臺北市:中央研究院資訊科技創新研究中心臺灣創用CC計畫。 曾冠球、胡龍騰、莊文忠(2010)。電子治理下的跨域整合管理第二階段暨G2G成效評估。臺北市:國家發展委員會。 湯德宗(2009)。政府資訊公開法改進之研究。臺北市:法務部委託研究。 項靖、楊東謀(2012)。資訊分享與共榮:政府機關資料公開與加值。臺北市:行政院研究發展考核委員會。 項靖、楊東謀、羅晉(2013)。政府開放資料加值營運模式之研究。臺北市:國家發展委員會。 黃彥男、柴惠珍、吳碧珠、周駿呈(2012)。Open Data風潮興起應用效益可期。網路通訊國家型科技計畫簡訊,42,頁2-8。 蘇怡文(2011)。世界銀行建置公開數據網站以提高工作成果之透明性。檢自:http://www.wtocenter.org.tw/SmartKMS/do/www/readDoc?document_id=116565 二、西文部分 Akbulut, Asli Yagmur, Kelle, Peter, Pawlowski, Suzanne D., Schneider, Helmut, & Looney, Clayton A. (2009). To share or not to share? Examining the factors influencing local agency electronic information sharing. International Journal of Business Information Systems, 4(2), 143-172. Albano, Cláudio Sonáglio. (2013). Open government data: A value chain model proposal. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 14th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research. Archived - open government - resolution of canada’s access to information and privacy commissioners. (2010). from https://www.priv.gc.ca/media/nr-c/2010/res_100901_e.asp Banisar, David. (2006). Freedom of information around the world 2006. Privacy International. Bigdeli, Alinaghi Ziaee, Kamal, Muhammad Mustafa, & de Cesare, Sergio. (2013). Electronic information sharing in local government authorities: Factors influencing the decision-making process. International Journal of Information Management, 33(5), 816-830. Cresswell, Anthony M, & Connelly, D. (1999). Reconnaissance study. Developing a business case for the integration of criminal justice information. Center for Technology in Government, Albany, NY. Dahlan, A. R. A., Dahan, H. M., & Saman, M. Y. M. (2013). The government information sharing (gis) in natural disaster management and risk reduction. Paper presented at the Information and Communication Technology for the Muslim World (ICT4M), 2013 5th International Conference on. The data act is the nation's first legislative mandate for data transparency. (2014). from http://datacoalition.com/issues/data-act.html Dawes, Sharon. (1996). Interagency information sharing: Expected benefits, manageable risks. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 15(3), 377-394. Dawes, Sharon, & Pardo, TheresaA. (2002). Building collaborative digital government systems. In W. McIver, Jr. & A. Elmagarmid (Eds.), Advances in digital government (Vol. 26, pp. 259-273): Springer US. Denzin, Norman K. (1970). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods: Transaction publishers. Estevez, Elsa, Fillottrani, Pablo, Janowski, Tomasz, & Ojo, Adegboyega. (2011). Government information sharing–a framework for policy formulation. E-Governance and Cross-boundary Collaboration: Innovations and Advancing Tools. Fan, Jing, Zhang, Pengzhu, & Yen, David C. (2014). G2g information sharing among government agencies. Information & Management, 51(1), 120-128. Fedorowicz, Jane, Gogan, Janis L., & Williams, Christine B. (2007). A collaborative network for first responders: Lessons from the capwin case. Government Information Quarterly, 24(4), 785-807. G8 open data charter – canada's action plan. (2014). from http://open.canada.ca/en/g8-open-data-charter-canadas-action-plan Gil-Garcia, J. R., Chengalur-Smith, I., & Duchessi, P. (2007). Collaborative e-government: Impediments and benefits of information-sharing projects in the public sector. European Journal of Information Systems, 16(2), 121-133. Gil-Garcia, J. R., Schneider, C. A., Pardo, T. A., & Cresswell, A. M. (2005, 03-06 Jan. 2005). Interorganizational information integration in the criminal justice enterprise: Preliminary lessons from state and county initiatives. Paper presented at the System Sciences, 2005. HICSS '05. Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on. Graves, Alvaro, & Hendler, James. (2013). Visualization tools for open government data. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 14th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research. Hazell, Robert, & Worthy, Ben. (2010). Assessing the performance of freedom of information. Government Information Quarterly, 27(4), 352-359. Heeks, R. (2006). Implementing and managing egovernment: An international text: SAGE Publications. Hogge, Becky. (2010). Open data study. from http://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/sites/default/files/open-data-study-20110519.pdf Janssen, Marijn, Charalabidis, Yannis, & Zuiderwijk, Anneke. (2012). Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government. Information Systems Management, 29(4), 258-268. Kalampokis, Evangelos, Tambouris, Efthimios, & Tarabanis, Konstantinos. (2011). Open government data: A stage model Electronic government (pp. 235-246): Springer. Kassen, Maxat. (2013). A promising phenomenon of open data: A case study of the chicago open data project. Government Information Quarterly, 30(4), 508-513. Lam, Wing. (2005). Barriers to e‐government integration. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 18(5), 511-530. Landsbergen Jr, David, & Wolken Jr, George. (2001). Realizing the promise: Government information systems and the fourth generation of information technology. Public Administration Review, 61(2), 206-220. Luna-Reyes, Luis F., Gil-Garcia, J. Ramon, & Cruz, Cinthia Betiny. (2007). Collaborative digital government in mexico: Some lessons from federal web-based interorganizational information integration initiatives. Government Information Quarterly, 24(4), 808-826. Martin, Erika G, Helbig, Natalie, & Shah, Nirav R. (2014). Liberating data to transform health care: New york’s open data experience. JAMA, 311(24), 2481-2482. Mayo, Ed, & Steinberg, Tom. (2007). The power of information: An independent review. Merriam, Sharan B. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach: Jossey-Bass. Ojo, Adegboyega, & Janssen, Marijn. (2013). Aligning core stakeholders' perspectives and issues in the open government data community. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 14th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research. Open government data toolkit. (n. d.). from http://data.worldbank.org/about/open-government-data-toolkit/knowledge-repository Open knowledge:What is open? (2012). from https://okfn.org/opendata/ Pardo, Theresa A., & Tayi, Giri Kumar. (2007). Interorganizational information integration: A key enabler for digital government. Government Information Quarterly, 24(4), 691-715. Park, Joo-Yeon, & Kim, Joon S. (2005). The impact of is sourcing type on service quality and maintenance efforts. Information & Management, 42(2), 261-274. Schooley, Ben L., & Horan, Thomas A. (2007). Towards end-to-end government performance management: Case study of interorganizational information integration in emergency medical services (ems). Government Information Quarterly, 24(4), 755-784. Shepherd, Elizabeth, Stevenson, Alice, & Flinn, Andrew. (2009). The impact of freedom of information on records management and record use in local government: A literature review. Journal of the Society of Archivists, 30(2), 227-248. Strauss, Anselm Leonard, & Corbin, Juliet M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research (Vol. 15): Sage Newbury Park, CA. Sullivan, William E, & Ngwenyama, Ojelanki K. (2005). How are public sector organizations managing is outsourcing risks?: An analysis of outsourcing guidelines from three jurisdictions. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 45(3), 73-87. Tinati, Ramine, Carr, Les, Halford, Susan, & Pope, Catherine. (2012). Exploring the impact of adopting open data in the uk government. Tornatzky, L.G., Fleischer, M., & Chakrabarti, A.K. (1990). The processes of technological innovation: Lexington Books. Ubaldi, Barbara. (2013). Open government data: Towards empirical analysis of open government data initiatives: OECD Publishing. Veljković, Nataša, Bogdanović-Dinić, Sanja, & Stoimenov, Leonid. (2014). Benchmarking open government: An open data perspective. Government Information Quarterly, 31(2), 278-290. The world bank policy on access to information (2010). from http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2010/06/03/000112742_20100603084843/Rendered/PDF/548730Access0I1y0Statement01Final1.pdf Yang, Tung-Mou, & Maxwell, Terrence A. (2011). Information-sharing in public organizations: A literature review of interpersonal, intra-organizational and inter-organizational success factors. Government Information Quarterly, 28(2), 164-175. Yang, Tung-Mou, & Wu, Yi-Jung. (2014). Exploring the determinants of cross-boundary information sharing in the public sector: An e-government case study in taiwan. Journal of Information Science, 40(5), 649-668. Yin, RK. (1994). Case study research: Design and method.(2nd) sage publications. Thousand Oaks. Yukl, G.A. (2013). Leadership in organizations: Pearson. Zhang, Jing, Dawes, Sharon S., & Sarkis, Joseph. (2005). Exploring stakeholders' expectations of the benefits and barriers of e‐government knowledge sharing. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 18(5), 548-567. Zhang, Jing, & Sharon, S. Dawes. (2006). Expectations and perceptions of benefits, barriers, and success in public sector knowledge networks. Public Performance & Management Review, 29(4), 433-466. Ziaee Bigdeli, Alinaghi. (2012). Inter-departmental information sharing in local government authorities (lgas): The case of the united kingdom. School of Information Systems, Computing and Mathematics. Zuiderwijk, Anneke, & Janssen, Marijn. (2014). Open data policies, their implementation and impact: A framework for comparison. Government Information Quarterly, 31(1), 17-29. Zuiderwijk, Anneke, Janssen, Marijn, Choenni, Sunil, Meijer, Ronald, & Sheikh_Alibaks, R. (2012). Socio-technical impediments of open data. Electronic Journal of e-Government, 10(2), 156-172. Zuiderwijk, Anneke, Janssen, Marijn, & Parnia, Armin. (2013). The complementarity of open data infrastructures: An analysis of functionalities. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 14th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/4536 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 政府開放資料可以視為尚未被大量開發的巨大資源,此種資源可被自由地使用、再使用與散佈,並在各種領域發揮其價值。世界各國認知其重要性,於數年前便已著手推動相關計畫。而隨著國外開放資料趨勢所影響,國內開放資料議題也逐漸熱門,政府機關對其自身的資料所採取的態度也從傳統保守的保護政策轉向開放資料以及資料透明化的理念,並藉由推動開放資料政策達到政府資料透明化的目的。目前我國政府推動開放資料是鼓勵各縣市政府自行釋出開放資料,然而當前開放資料議題的研究多半著重在政府應釋出何種資料集,抑或政府如何推動開放資料,較少探討地方政府釋出開放資料的意願受何影響。
為探討影響地方政府釋出開放資料的因素為何,本研究以臺中市政府為個案進行探索性研究,並至臺中市政府轄下的機關局處進行深度訪談,以跨機關資訊分享的四大面向:科技技術面向、組織面向、法令與政策面向以及外部環境面向進行探討。 研究發現,影響地方政府釋出開放資料的因素,在科技技術面向包含資訊系統操作以及資料類型與格式;組織面向則有高層支持度、成本、經費與預算、績效成果以及獎勵考核制度;法令與政策面向則是法令的制定與規範,為影響地方政府釋出開放資料最重要的因素;外部環境面向則包含社會壓力以及同儕競爭。此外,研究也顯示地方政府釋出開放資料也受業務承辦人的個人角度觀點所影響。最後,本研究依研究結果提出實務建議,期能對地方政府機關後續推動開放資料有所助益。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Open data has been an important trend among the government administrations around the world. The concept of open data is that, without violating privacy and national security, government data should be open, freely used, and redistributed by the public. It is expected that open data can promote transparency of government. In addition, open data has the potential to stimulate economic growth through value-added applications developed by the public, including citizens, private enterprises, and non-profit organizations. In Taiwan, when realizing the importance of open data, Taiwan government has started promoting the related initiatives in both the central government and local governments. In this research field, most studies have focused on the central government level, on the discussions of the types of open data to be released, and on the promotion of open data activities. Nevertheless, there is still limited research discussing the determinants of open government data, particularly there is a lack from the perspective of local governments.
In order to fill this gap, this study explores the determinants of open data by selecting Taichung City Government as a case study. Specifically, this study attempts to identify the factors influencing government agencies’ intentions of open data participation. The influential factors are explored from four perspectives: technology, organization, legislation and policy, and environment. In the technological perspective, the identified factors are information system operation, data type, and data format. Second, in the organizational perspective, the influential factors are top management support, cost and benefit, budget and resource, and performance evaluation. Third, legislation and policy is found to have the most significant impact on government agencies. Fourth, in the perspective of environment, both social pressure and peer effect are found to be the influential factors. Lastly, practical implications, limitations, and future research directions are also discussed in the study. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-14T17:43:07Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-104-R00126009-1.pdf: 1137138 bytes, checksum: b5be70d9f4a73336e48e3573edffa22b (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 中文摘要 I
英文摘要 II 圖目次 VI 表目次 VII 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的與問題 4 第二章 文獻探討 5 第一節 政府資訊公開與開放資料 5 第二節 國內外開放資料的發展 13 第三節 國內外開放資料相關文獻 25 第四節 政府資訊分享相關文獻 29 第三章 研究設計與實施 39 第一節 研究流程 40 第二節 研究架構 42 第三節 研究對象 43 第四節 資料蒐集與分析 45 第四章 研究結果分析與討論 51 第一節 科技技術面向 51 第二節 組織面向 56 第三節 法令與政策面向 64 第四節 外部環境面向 67 第五節 影響因素探討 71 第六節 個人角度討論 78 第七節 實務建議 81 第五章 結論 87 第一節 研究貢獻 87 第二節 研究總結 88 第三節 研究限制與未來研究方向 90 參考文獻 93 一、中文部分 93 二、西文部分 95 附錄一 103 附錄二 105 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 地方政府機關開放資料分享之影響因素探討─以臺中市政府為例 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Exploring the Determinants of Open Government Data: A Case Study of Taichung City Government | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 103-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 廖興中(Hsin-Chung Liao),張鎧如(Kai-Ju Chang) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 開放政府,開放資料,政府資訊分享,電子化政府, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | open data,open government,government information sharing,electronic government, | en |
dc.relation.page | 106 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2015-08-12 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 文學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 圖書資訊學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 圖書資訊學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-104-1.pdf | 1.11 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。