請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/41514
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 畢恆達 | |
dc.contributor.author | Chia-Jui Hung | en |
dc.contributor.author | 洪佳瑞 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-15T00:21:21Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2009-02-12 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2009-02-12 | |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2009-02-05 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 于漱、吳淑瓊、楊桂鳳(2003)。〈失智症患者的長期照護服務模式〉。《長期照護雜誌》,7(3),251-264。
內政部社會司(2007a)。〈身心障礙者輔助器具補助標準表〉。檢索日期:Jan. 06 2009, from sowf.moi.gov.tw/05/b1/身心障礙者輔助器具補助標準表.htm 內政部社會司(2007b)。〈老人福利與政策〉。檢索日期:Jan. 06 2009, from http://sowf.moi.gov.tw/04/01.htm 內政部統計處(2008a)。〈內政統計月報:現住人口按三段、六歲年齡組分〉。檢索日期:Jan. 06 2009, from http://sowf.moi.gov.tw/stat/month/m1-05.xls 內政部統計處(2008b)。〈內政統計通報:97年6月底身心障礙者人數統計〉,九十七年第三十四週。檢索日期:Jan. 06 2009, from http://www.moi.gov.tw/stat/week.aspx 尹聖道(2005)。《從大台北地區三家失智老人專門照顧機構之現況調查探討失智老人群體生活照顧單元理念之居住場所設計》。中原大學建築研究所碩士論文。 台北市社會局(2008)。〈改善中低收入老人住宅設施設備補助:97實施計畫〉。檢索日期:Sep. 29 2008, from http://www.bosa.tcg.gov.tw/dn.asp?uid=9142 台灣失智症協會(2008)。《失智症完全手冊:台灣失智症協會專家智慧集結》。台北:健康文化。 失蹤老人協尋中心(2007)。〈數字會說話:個案統計分析〉。檢索日期:Jan. 06 2009, from http://www.missingoldman.org.tw/index7.htm 白秀娟(2005)。《推開醫療機構的大門:嘉義市護醫人員居家照護經驗》。國立台灣大學建築與城鄉研究所碩士論文。 朱育瑩(2005)。《老年失智症家庭照顧者於照顧過程中角色衝擊與變化之初探》。長庚大學護理學研究所碩士論文。 江志雄(2007�09�20)。〈失智翁迷途 騎車穿越5鄉鎮〉。《自由時報》。檢索日期:Sep. 02 2008, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2007/new/sep/20/today-north16.htm 行政院經濟建設委員會(2008)。〈中華民國台灣97年至145年人口推計報告〉。檢索日期:Jan. 06 2009, from http://www.cepd.gov.tw/m1.aspx?sNo=0000455 行政院衛生署(2007a)。〈身心障礙等級〉。檢索日期:Jan. 06 2009, from http://sowf.moi.gov.tw/05/b2/身心障礙等級.htm 行政院衛生署(2007b)。〈社區式遠距照護〉。檢索日期:Jan. 22 2009, from http://8850.tw/takecareservice.aspx 吳曉竹(2006)。《失智症宣導計畫對潛在性患者求助行為影響之追蹤研究》。國立台灣大學社會工作學研究所碩士論文。 李娟娟(2004)。《失智症家屬支持團體之關注主題與成效探討》。國立台北護理學院護理研究所碩士論文。 李靖惠(2008�12�11)。思念之城映後座談會。台北:台灣大學建築與城鄉研究所主辦。 亞太地區阿茲海默症協會(2007)。〈失智症亞太地區盛行率報告〉(巫瑩慧、湯麗玉、陳達夫、邱銘章譯)。《台灣神經學雜誌》,16(3),183-187。 周桂如、陳瑞、陸汝斌、廖艷雪(2004)。《失智症病患照顧者支持團體之成效探討(II)》。國科會專題研究計畫成果報告。 周麗芳、張佳雯、傅中玲、王署君(2001)。〈探究台灣地區老人失智症經濟成本〉。《國立政治大學學報》,82,1-26。 林文華(2008)。〈即將公佈的《建築物無障礙設施設計規範》問題一堆,怎辦?〉。檢索日期:Sep. 02, 2008, from http://www.oceantaiwan.com/society/20080111.htm 林玉子(2004)。《40歲開始打造舒適的家園》(曾思瑜、陳政雄、林真如譯)。台北:田園城市。 林彥良(2003)。《台灣失智老人照護設施之個案比較研究》。東海大學建築學研究所碩士論文。 林敬程(2000)。《失智老人家庭照顧者之負荷與支持性服務需求之探討》。高雄醫學大學行為科學研究所碩士論文。 邱貴玲(2007�07�28)。〈制度吃人 窮人難翻身〉。《中國時報》。檢索日期:Jan. 13, 2009, from http://www.coolloud.org.tw/node/5760 邱逸榛、何玉婷、陳婉庭、徐亞瑛(2003)。〈簡介阿茲海默氏症與其照護〉。《長期照護雜誌》,7(4),289-304。 施麗紅(2003)。《台灣地區老人安養及養護機構照顧失智老人之現況調查研究》。東海大學社會工作研究所碩士論文。 徐文媛(2008)。〈我國長期照顧十年計畫〉。《衛生報導》,134,9-12。 徐亞瑛(1996)。〈茁根理論之介紹:以「台灣地區殘病老人家庭照顧品質」研究為例〉。《護理研究》,4(3),263-272。 徐慧娟、吳淑瓊(1998)。〈提供社區式家庭支持方案能否減少機構式長期照護服務之使用意願〉。《中華衛誌》, 17(4),326-336。 郝雪卿(2007�12�27)。〈台中醫院為失智老人營造團體家屋 更溫馨〉。檢索日期:Jan. 04, 2009, from http://www.epochtimes.com/b5/7/12/28/n1957632.htm 寇世菁(2008�09�02)。〈失智老榮民病臥公園 警伴繞七圈找到回家路〉 [Electronic Version]。中廣新聞網。 張祐瑞(2004)。《照護環境設計對失智症問題行為改善之影響研究:以失智症照護示範中心為例》。國立雲林科技大學空間設計研究所碩士論文。 梅陳玉嬋、楊培珊(2005)。《台灣老人社會工作:理論與實務》。台北:雙葉書廊。 章錦瑜(2001)。〈失智症病人的庭園設計〉。《科學農業》,49(5�6),124-132。 許佩蓉、黃耀榮、林健群、陳永煌、羅慶徽、李世代(2004)。〈居住型態對照護機構內失智症患者問題行為之可能影響〉。《臺灣家庭醫學雜誌》,14(1),13-24。 陳文嬋(2008�08�10)。〈失智老人失蹤 高市上半年近百件〉。檢索日期:Sep. 02, 2008, from http://tw.news.yahoo.com/article/url/d/a/080810/78/vzb.html 陳正芬、吳淑瓊(2006)。〈家庭照顧者對長期照護服務使用意願之探討〉。《人口學刊》,32,83-121。 陳光明(2001)。《寸草心:一位神經科教授照顧年邁失智母親的心路歷程》(林信男、賴其萬譯)。台北:健康文化。 陳昱名(2004)。《社會福利資源與需求的落差:以老年失智症病患家庭照顧者之照顧負荷、需求與困難為例》。臺北醫學大學醫學研究所碩士論文。 陳惠媚(2001)。《阿茲海默氏症病人找路測試與神經心理測驗相關的研究》。高雄醫學大學行為科學研究所碩士論文。 曾建堯(2007)。《探討長期照護機構之環境特徵與失智症住民行為之關係:以臺北市長期照護機構為例》。臺北醫學大學醫務管理學研究所碩士論文。 曾思瑜(1999)。〈痴呆症老人居住設施〉。《空間》,119,65-69。 曾思瑜、陳茂柏(1999)。〈身體障礙老人居家環境改善:以醫院復健科腦中風出院病患為例〉。《建築學報》,29,45-63。 湯麗玉、毛家舲、周照芳、陳榮基、劉秀枝(1992)。〈痴呆症老人照顧者的負荷及其相關因素之探討〉。《護理雜誌》,39(3),89-97。 湯麗玉、葉炳強、陳良娟、謝碧容(2000)。〈失智症家屬支持團體成效初探〉。《應用心理研究》,7,171-190。 黃千秀(1999)。《當生命遇到嬰兒的季節:台北都會區袋鼠媽媽的公共空間之經驗研究》。國立台灣大學建築與城鄉研究所碩士論文。 黃正平(2006)。〈失智症之行為精神症狀〉。《台灣精神醫學》,20(1),3-18。 黃盈慈(2005)。《德國與台灣輪椅使用者家庭之無障礙環境研究》。國立台北科技大學創新設計研究所碩士論文。 黃珠茵(2005)。《老人社區居住環境之剖析》。國立台灣大學建築與城鄉研究所碩士論文。 黃盛璘(2008)。〈黃盛璘〉。檢索日期:Jan. 04, 2009, from http://www.btcc.org.tw/htm/news/2008btfk.htm 黃惠如(2007)。〈失智症:台灣不願面對的14萬個真相〉。《康健》, 107,132-140。 楊珮琪(1990)。《老年痴呆症病患家屬之壓力與需求探討》。東海大學社會工作研究所碩士論文。 溫秀珠(2008)。〈誰成為失能老人的照顧者?以文化規範的脈絡來審視〉。胡幼慧(編),《質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例》(二版,頁305-318)。台北:巨流。 萬育維、王春雅(1998)。〈政策規劃與需求的落差:失智老人與家屬分析〉。《社區發展季刊》,83,92-114。 葉弘傑(2008�01�26)。〈失智婦思老家 兩次走上快速道路 員警從路肩接人〉。NOWnews. 檢索日期:Sep. 20, 2008, from http://www.nownews.com.tw/2008/01/26/329-2223318.htm 葉永騫(2008�01�03)。〈失智老人迷路百公里 警尋回〉。《自由時報》。檢索日期:Sep. 02, 2008, from http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2008/new/jan/3/today-south11.htm 葉炳強(1999)。〈台灣地區失智老人的醫療照護〉。《台灣醫學》,3(6),721-725。 葉炳強、王憶敏、林瑞萍(2006)。〈失智症居家照顧病人家屬支持的介入模式研究〉。行政院衛生署九十四年度科技研究計畫研究報告。 甄瑞興、賈淑麗、盧玉強(2000)。〈多專業整合之失智老人照護模式:以某區域醫院經驗為例〉。《社區發展季刊》,29,206-214。 廖慧燕(2004)。《舊有住宅無障礙化研究:以肢體障礙者為例》。台北:內政部建築研究所。 劉秀枝(2007)。《聰明活到一百歲:劉秀枝談失智與老年照護》。台北:天下雜誌。 劉嘉逸、劉秀枝(2000)。〈阿茲海默氏症之非認知症狀〉。《應用心理研究》,7,89-103。 劉錦鐘(2005)。《以「單元照顧(unit care)」理念建構高齡者日間照顧環境:以台北市某老人服務中心附設日間照顧為例》。中原大學建築研究所碩士論文。 潘欣中(2008�07�22)。〈失智老人 逆向奔馳快速道〉。檢索日期:Sep. 02, 2008, from http://udn.com/NEWS/SOCIETY/SOC5/4436396.shtml 歐淑惠(2007)。《失智症家庭照顧者「尋找平衡點」照顧過程與生活品質之相關性探討》。 長庚大學護理學研究所碩士論文。 蔡淑瑩(2001)。《台北市居家老人生活空間與環境體驗之探討》。國立台灣大學建築與城鄉研究所博士論文。 鄧世雄(2004)。〈失智症社區照顧服務〉。《社區發展季刊》,106,237-244。 鄧光銳、劉長安(1994)。〈癡呆症及其護理原則〉。《榮總護理》,11(3),228-235。 鄭秀容(2005)。《居家失智老人家屬照顧者照顧負荷及照顧需求》。中山醫學大學護理研究所碩士論文。 蕭金菊(1995)。《家屬長期照顧慢性病老人對支持性服務需求之探究》。東海大學社會工作研究所碩士論文。 龍祥燕(2007)。《爸媽,我在這裡!:照顧失智雙親心路歷程》。台中:白象文化。 顏慶全、鐘朱炎(2001)。〈不同體能高齡者的生活空間需求研究〉。《設計學報》,6(1),85-98。 關華山(1999)。〈失智老人居家環境的安排〉。《照顧者》,5,66-80。 關華山(2004)。〈失智者設施多個案空間結構比較研究〉。國科會專題研究計畫成果報告。 顧守昌(2007�09�12)。〈孝子成祕密保鑣,跟蹤老父20年〉。檢索日期:Sep. 20, 2007, from http://tw.news.yahoo.com/article/url/d/a/070912/8/kegs.html Avlund, K., Lund, R., Holstein, B. E., & Due, P. (2004). Social relation as determinant of onset of disability in aging. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 38, 85-99. Bell, P. A., Greene, T. C., Fisher, J. D., & Baum, A. (2001). Environmental cognition. In Environmental psychology (5th ed., pp. 68-96). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace College. Blackman, T., Mitchell, L., Burton, E., Jenks, M., Parsons, M., Raman, S., et al. (2003). The Accessibility of public spaces for people with dementia: A new priority for the 'open city'. Disability & Society, 18(3), 357-371. Bond, J., & Corner, L. (2001). Researching dementia: Are there unique methodological challenges for health services research? Ageing and Society, 21, 95-116. Brawley, E. C. (2006). Design innovations for aging and Alzheimer's: Creating caring environments. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. Buijssen, H. (2005). The simplicity of dementia: A guide for family and carers. London: Jessica Kingsley. Burton, E., & Mitchell, L. (2006). Inclusive urban design: Streets for life. London: Architectural Press. Casey, E. S. (1997). The fate of place: A philosophical history. Berkeley: University of California Press. Chalfont, G. (2008). Design for nature in dementia care. London: Jessica Kingsley. Chapman, N., Hazen, T., & Noeil-Waggoner, E. (2005). Encouraging development and use of gardens by caregivers of people with dementia. Alzheimer's Care Quarterly, 6(4), 349-356. Chen, T.-F., Chiu, M.-J., Tang, L.-Y., Chiu, Y.-H., Chang, S.-F., Su, C.-L., et al. (2007). Institution-type dependent high prevalence of dementia in long-term care Units. Neuroepidemiology, 28(3), 142-149. Cohen-Mensfield, J., & Werner, P. (1999). Outdoor wandering parks for persons with dementia: A survey of characteristics and use. Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders, 13(2), 109-117. Colombo, M., Vitali, G., Molla, P., & Milani, M. (1998). The home environment modification program in the care of demented elderly: Some examples. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Suppl. 6, 83-90. Cotrell, V., & Schulz, R. (1993). The perspective of the patient with Alzheimer's disease: A neglected dimension of dementia research. The Gerontologist, 33(2), 205-211. Day, K., & Calkins, M. P. (2002). Design and dementia. In R. Bechtel & A. Churchman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 374-393). New York: Wiley. Day, K., Carreon, D., & Stump, C. (2000). The therapeutic design of environments for people with dementia: A review of the empirical research. The Gerontologist, 40(4), 397-416. de la Cuesta, C., & Sandelowski, M. (2005). Tenerlos en la casa: The material world and craft of family caregiving for relatives with dementia. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 16(3), 218-225. Deasy, C. M., & Lasswell, T. E. (1990). Designing places for people. New York: Whitney Library of Design. “dement.” (1989). Oxford English Dictionary Online (2 ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Ezzy, D. (2002). Qualitative analysis: Practice and innovation. London: Routledge. Ferri, C. P., Prince, M., Brayne, C., Brodaty, H., Fratiglioni, L., Ganguli, M., et al. (2005). Global prevalence of dementia: A delphi consensus study. Lancet, 366, 2112-2117. Festinger, L. (1962). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Fogel, B. (1992). Psychological aspects of staying at home [Electronic Version]. Generations, 16, 15-19. Frumkin, H. (2001). Beyond toxicity: Human health and the natural environment. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 20(3), 234-240. Fuh, J.-L. (2006). Study of Behbavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia in Taiwan. Acta Neurologica Taiwanica, 15, 154-160. Furness, S., & Moriarty, J. (2006). Designing a garden for people with dementia: In a public space. Dementia, 5(1), 139-143. Gitlin, L. N., & Corcoran, M. (2000). Making homes safer: Environmental adaptations for people with dementia. Alzheimer's Care Quarterly, 1(1), 50-58. Gitlin, L. N., & Corcoran, M. (2005). Occupational therapy and dementia care: The home environmental skill-building program for individuals and families. Bethesda, MD: ACTA Press. Given, C. W., Collins, C. E., & Given, B. A. (1988). Sources of stress among families caring for relatives with Alzheimer's disease. Nursing Clinics of North America, 23(1), 69-82. Golant, S. M. (1984). The effects of residential and activity behaviors on old people's environmental experiences. In I. Altman, M. P. Lawton & J. F. Mohlwill (Eds.), Elderly people and the environment (pp. 239-278). New York: Plenum Press. Green, E., Hebron, S., & Woodward, D. (1990). The process of social control in public and private spheres. In Women's leisure, what leisure? (pp. 113-139). London: Macmillan. 〈公共與私人領域的社會控制過程〉(殷寶寧譯)。《性別與空間研究室通訊》,第四期,81-99。 Hooyman, N. R., & Kiyak, H. A. (2002). Social gerontology: A multidisciplinary perspective (6th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon. House, J. S. (1981). Work stress and social support. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Imrie, R. (2004). From universal to inclusive design in the built environment. In J. Swain, S. French, C. Barnes & C. Thomas (Eds.), Disabling barribers, enabling environments (pp. 279-284). London: Sage. Jacobs, J. (2005)。《美國大城市的死與生》(金衡山譯)。南京:譯林。 Jansson, W., Nordberg, G., & Grafström, M. (2001). Patterns of elderly spousal caregiving in dementia care: An observational study. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 34(6), 804-812. Kaplan, R. (2001). The nature of the view from home: Psychological benefits. Environment and Behavior, 33(4), 507-542. Kearns, A., & Parkinson, M. (2001). The significance of neighborhood. Urban Studies, 38(12), 2103-2110. Kitwood, T. M. (1997). Dementia reconsidered: The person comes first. Buckingham: Open University Press. Klafki, H.-W., Staufenbiel, M., Kornhuber, J., & Wiltfang, J. (2006). Therapeutic approaches to Alzheimer's disease. Brain, 129, 2840-2855. Lavery, I., Davey, S., Woodside, A., & Ewart, K. (1996). The vital role of street design and management in reducing barriers to older peoples' mobility. Landscape and Urban Planning, 35, 181-192. Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers. New York: Harper. Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Mace, N. C. & Rabins, P. V. (1996)。《癡呆症病患家屬手冊》(楊培珊譯)。台北:遠流。 Messecar, D. C., Archbold, P. G., Stewart, B. J., & Kirschling, J. (2002). Home environmental modification strategies used by caregivers of elders. Research in Nursing & Health, 25, 357-370. Mitchell, L., Burton, E., & Raman, S. (2004). Dementia-friendly cities: Designing intelligible neighbourhoods for life. Journal of Urban Design, 9(1), 89-101. Mitchell, L., Burton, E., Raman, S., Blackman, T., Jenks, M., & Williams, K. (2003). Making the outside world dementia-friendly: Design issues and considerations. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 30, 605-632. Mollenkopf, H., Marcellini, F., Ruoppila, I., Flaschenträger, P., Gagliardi, C., & Spazzafumo, L. (1997). Outdoor mobility and social relationship of elderly people. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 24, 295-310. Moore, K. D. (1999). Dissonance in the dining room: A study of social interaction in a special care unit. Qualitative Health Research, 9(1), 133-155. Murata, C., Kondo, T., Tamakoshi, K., Yatsuya, H., & Toyoshima, H. (2006). Factors associated with life space among community-living rural elders in Japan. Public Health Nursing, 23(4), 324-331. Orona, C. J. (1997). Temporality and identity loss due to Alzheimer's disease. In A. Strauss & J. Corbin (Eds.), Grounded theory in practice (pp. 171-196). London: Sage. Parker, M., Baker, P. S., & Allman, R. M. (2001). A life-space approach to functional assessment of mobility in the elderly. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 35(4), 35-55. Passini, R., Pigot, H., Rainville, C., & Tétreault, M.-H. (2000). Wayfinding in a nursing home for Aadvanced dementia of the Alzheimer's type. Environment and Behavior, 32(5), 684-710. Passini, R., Rainville, C., Marchand, N., & Joanette, Y. (1998). Wayfinding and dementia: Some research finding and a new look at design. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 15(2), 133-151. Protor, G. (2001). Listening to older women with dementia: Relationships, Voices and power. Disability & Society, 16(3), 361-376. Rainville, C., Passini, R., & Marchand, N. (2001). A multiple case study of wayfinding in dementia of the Alzheimer type: Decision making. Aging Neuropsychology and Cognition, 8(1), 54-71. Regnier, V. (2002). Design for assisted living: Guidelines for housing the physically and mentally frail. New York: Wiley. Reid, D., Ryan, T., & Enderby, P. (2001). What does it mean to listen to people with dementia? Disability & Society, 16(3), 377-392. Rowles, G. D. (1981). The surveillance zone as meaningful space for the aged. The Gerontologist, 21(3), 304-311. Rowles, G. D. (1978). Prisoners of space?: Exploring the geographical experience of older people. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Sheldon, M., & Teaford, M. (2002). Caregivers of people with Alzheimer's dementia: An analysis of their compliance with recommended home modification. Alzheimer's Care Quarterly, 3(1), 78-81. Shumway-Cook, A., Patla, A., Stewart, A., Ferruci, L., Ciol, M. A., & Guralnik, J. M. (2003). Environmental components of mobility disability in community-living older persons. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 51(3), 393-398. The AIA Design for Aging Center (2004). Design for aging review (6th ed.). Mulgrave, Australia: The Images. Ulrich, R. S. (1984). View through a window may infludence recovery from surgery. Science, 224(4647), 420-421. Valentine, G. (2001). At the drawing board: Developing a research design. In M. Linmb & C. Dwyer (Eds.), Qualitative methodologies for geographers: Issues and debates (pp. 41-54). London: Arnold. Van der Roer, N., Goes, E., Blom, M., & Busschbach, J. (2000). Model of costs of care for dementia: Community-dwelling vs. institutionalization. Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr, 31(2), 55-61. Varley, A. (2008). A place like this? Stories of dementia, home, and the self. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 26, 47-67. Ward, R. A., La Gory, M., & Sherman, S. R. (1988). The Environment for aging: Interpersonal, social, and spatial contexts. Tuscaloosa: The University of Alabama Press. Whitlatch, C. J. (2001). Including the person with dementia in family care-giving research. Aging & Mental Health, 5(supplement 1), S20-S22. Wiles, J. (2003). Daily geographies of caregivers: Mobility, routine, scale. Social Science and Medicine, 57, 1307-1325. Wimo, A., Winblad, B., & Jönsson, L. (2007). An estimate of the total worldwide societal costs of dementia in 2005. Alzheimer's & Dementia, 3, 81-91. Yantzi, N. M., Rosenberg, M. W., & McKeever, P. (2006). Getting out of the house: The challenges mothers face when their children have long-term care needs. Health and Social Care in the Community, 15(1), 45-55. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/41514 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 台灣失智症患者據估計約十四萬人,老人罹患失智症對其家庭影響甚鉅,然而,國內目前有關失智症照顧的研究雖不在少數,但它們不是偏重探討軟體服務的輸送,就是只聚焦於機構化的照顧環境。因此,本研究嘗試將失智老人居家照顧的經驗,融入其生活空間的調整與變遷中來討論,不只涵括實質空間,也包含社會人際網絡,以期了解這些人們和環境的關係。
我採用的主要研究方法為深入訪談,共計有18個長期照顧居家失智老人家庭的成員受訪,並與五位失智老人進行非結構性訪談,此外亦採用生活空間認知圖、環境現況評估,以及參與式觀察的方法收集資料輔助分析。經過研究資料蒐集並回頭參考文獻後,我決定以參考並調整Rowles(1978)與蔡淑瑩(2001)對老人地理經驗研究所提出的生活空間模型,來分析受訪失智老人及照顧家屬的生活空間營造經驗,分析層次為家、雙重監視區、生活與社會鄰里、鄰里之外,以及想像的地理經驗。 研究結果發現失智老人家屬對於老人生活空間的營造,事實上是一個不斷進行調整的動態過程,家庭中通常都會出現一名成員主責老人的照顧相關事務,他們一方面必須對老人家的狀況變化作出回應,另一方面也需要在照顧理念、家庭狀況與關係,以及個人能力之間進行不斷的磨合與調整,以期創造他們可以對失智老人照顧安心,同時也儘可能繼續維持自己基本生活要求的生活空間。在生活空間的調整上,家屬最重視的是失智老人在環境中的安全性及便利性,也有家屬會安排對老人家具適當刺激的環境,讓他們多接觸熟悉的事物及活動,或是與增加老人與他人互動的機會。家屬除了對家中實質環境做出變更,也會安排相關活動加以輔助,此外,老人和照顧家屬之間的關係也會因長者狀況和照顧需求而產生變化,而他們的外出活動模式也需要重新調整。 雖然每位失智老人表現出來的症狀不一,每個失智老人家庭生活空間的變遷過程也不盡相同,但大致上來說仍可從這些受訪家庭的經驗中歸納出其生活空間變遷的主要方向:當老人家愈往重度失智發展,家屬為他們營造的生活空間中,家環境所佔比重愈加提高,鄰里或鄰里之外的活動都很可能減縮。對於一些行動不便或是難以自行外出的失智老人而言,雙重監視區則是重要的觀看並與外界進行連結的管道,由於老人位於視線範圍之中,家屬亦能確保老人的安全。除了生活能力日漸衰退之外,老人一些狀況的出現,譬如走失、體能與行動能力的退化,或是當他們表現出錯亂的時空定向感時,都可能促使家屬在短期內重新調整他們的生活空間。 家屬和失智老人的生活空間屬於高度相關的共變關係;大多數家屬會調整老人的生活空間,好讓自己得以掌握大部份的基本生活及照顧事務,少部份家屬由於兩人關係較難著力改變老人的生活空間,因而轉以調整自己生活空間的方式,或是引入社會鄰里等資源的協助,來因應不斷變化的照顧需求。許多內外在的作用力量都影響了家屬對於失智老人生活空間的調整過程,老人家因高齡以及因失智而來的症狀變化、家庭狀況、家庭關係及資源,還有社會資源與居住區域等大環境的不同,都使得這些家庭營造出來的生活空間各不相同。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The number of people afflicted with dementia in Taiwan was estimated to be about 140,000, among which the majority receive informal care given by family members. In order to create a better living environment for people with dementia and their caregiving family, it is essential to understand the changes in their life space, including both physical environments and social interpersonal networks.
The major research method employed is semi-structured interviews with members in 18 families caring for relatives with mild to severe dementia. In these families 5 people with dementia participated in the study with non-structured interview. Cognitive mapping, physical enivorment assessment, and participatory observation were also used as multi-research methods. The life space frameworks proposed by Rowles(1978) and Tsai(2001) were modified to analyse the life space modification experiences of people with dementia and of their caregiving family members. The aspects of their life space consist of home, double surveillance zone, living neighborhood, social neighborhood, and fantasy. It is found that the life space of most people with dementia undergoes notable changes, and family caregivers play a key role in this dynamic change process. Family caregivers would accommodate their home to the safety and convenience of the person afflicted. They might also attempt to create a living environment—by spatial modification and activity arrangement–that can provide moderate stimuli for the elderly. Besides, the relationship and interaction pattern between the person with dementia and the caregiving family member also need some adjustment. As to life space beyond home, family caregivers would usually attempt to modify the outdoor activity patterns of people with dementia. To those elderly who are not allowed to go out by themselves or those whose mobility is limited, double surveillance zone may serve as a significant channel to get connected with the outside world. As the person with dementia stays at (or near) home to get in touch with the outdoor environment, family caregiviers can also make sure of their safety and well-being. Great heterogeneity exists in these families’ experiences of dementia home care and life space modification. A major changing tendency of their life space can be observed, however. As dementia progresses, the life space of the people afflicted concentrates more and more upon home environment. Activities inside or beyond their living neighborhood would most likely decrease. The occurrence of some events usually prompts family caregivers to modify the life space of people with dementia. Once the persons with dementia get loss or their physical strength and mobility declines to certain degree, or as they begin to show serious time and space disorientation, their life space might face further compression. A variety of factors influence the dynamic changing process in which family caregivers try to shape a suitable caregiving life space for people with dementia. On the one hand, family caregivers need to respond to the elderlys’ changing conditions whether from their ageing or from their cognitive and noncognitive symptoms. On the other hand, family caregivers try hard to find balance among internal factors such as caregiving values, family conditions, family relationships, and resources, as well as external and structural factors such as social welfare accessability and living area environment. The life space of family caregivers turns out to be in covariation with that of people with dementia. In order to take control of caregiving and living requirements, most family caregiviers would modify the life space of the elderly carereceiver. In this modification process the caregiver’s own life space also undergoes changes to different extents. Some family caregivers, on the contrary, find it hard to alter the life space of the people with dementia due to the dyad’s relationship. They resort to changing their own life space or help from social networks so as to react to constantly-changing caregiving requirements. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-15T00:21:21Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-98-R94544009-1.pdf: 3262519 bytes, checksum: 533b8c3f22a78126a933ddd7761a85b8 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論......1
一、研究緣起......1 二、研究背景......4 (一)漫長的告別之路—失智症......4 (二)當嬰兒潮變成老人潮......7 (三)台灣的失智老人住在哪裡?......7 (四)失智老人變成失蹤老人?......8 (五)失智老人的在地老化......8 第二章 文獻回顧......13 一、生活空間......13 二、家庭照顧者的日常地理與公共空間經驗......15 三、失智症與空間......17 (一)失智老人的環境認知......17 (二)為失智老人而設計?......18 第三章 研究方法與歷程......25 一、研究發問......25 二、研究方法......25 三、研究歷程......27 (一)研究對象與範圍的設定......27 (二)尋找失智老人家屬的漫漫長路......28 (三)訪談過程......36 四、分析架構的形成......41 第四章 營造安心、安全的失智老人生活空間......45 一、家有失智老人—居家生活空間的安排......45 (一)實質環境和活動的調整......45 (二)家庭生活的轉變......57 二、失智老人走出家門?......61 (一)在出門與不出門之間的中介:雙重監視區......61 (二)生活鄰里......64 (三)鄰里之外......71 三、失智老人生活空間的變遷過程......76 (一)失智老人生活空間變遷的兩種模式......77 (二)失智老人生活空間變遷的關鍵轉折點......79 四、小結......88 第五章 不得不面對的現實—照顧家屬在失智老人生活空間營造過程中的調整與調適......93 一、照顧家屬與失智老人生活空間的共變......93 二、照顧家屬自身生活空間的變化與調適......96 (一)成為家庭照顧者的調適......96 (二)獨自外出的疑慮......100 (三)社會鄰里的支持......101 (四)從照顧者轉為探訪家屬—老人接受機構照顧......104 三、影響家屬營造失智老人生活空間過程的各種力量......105 (一)家庭狀況、關係和資源的磨合......105 (二)大環境與結構因素......109 四、失智老人家庭生活空間動態變化的兩個實例......115 五、小結......121 第六章 結論......123 一、結論......123 二、關於研究的省思......125 參考文獻......129 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 失智老人的生活空間變遷 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Modifications in the life space of people with dementia | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 97-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 劉可強,楊培珊,蔡淑瑩,李靖惠 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 失智老人,生活空間,家庭照顧者,居家環境,雙重監視區,生活鄰里,社會鄰里, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | people with dementia,life space,family caregiver,home modification,double surveillance zone,living neighborhood,social neighborhood, | en |
dc.relation.page | 136 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2009-02-05 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 建築與城鄉研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 建築與城鄉研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-98-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 3.19 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。