請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/4058
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 呂欣怡 | |
dc.contributor.author | Huei-Jhe Shao | en |
dc.contributor.author | 邵徽哲 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-13T08:41:25Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-09-13 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-13T08:41:25Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2016-09-13 | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2016-08-22 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 丁仁傑
2007 〈在啟示中看見經典:以一貫道的經典運用為例與原教旨主義概念相對話〉。《台灣社會學》14:1-49。 2014 〈新興宗教與「宗教性」:台灣漢人宗教的脈絡〉。「新世紀的社會與文化第二單元─新興宗教與宗教性學術研討會」宣讀論文,清大人社院C310會議室,2月28日∼3月2日。 呂欣怡 2010 〈墮入凡間的烏托邦〉。《人類學視界》5:32-34。 黃應貴 1991 〈柬埔社布農人的新宗教運動──兼論當年台灣社會運動的研究〉。《台灣社會研究季刊》第三卷第二、三期:1-31。 2012a 《反景入深林──人類學的觀照、理論與實踐》。台北:三民。 2012b 《「文明」之路》。台北:中央研究院民族學研究所。 2013 〈新世紀的社會與文化〉。《新批判》2:1-25。 陳文德 2002 《社群研究的省思》。台北:中央研究院民族學研究所。 陶飛亞 2004 《中國的基督教烏托邦:耶穌家庭 (1921-1952) 》。香港:中文大學出版。 2012 《中國的基督教烏托邦研究》。北京:人民出版。 張發誠 1995 〈錫安山空間意義之建構〉。國立台灣大學建築與城鄉研究所碩士論文。 彭菲 1997 〈神示與先知:一個宗教團體的研究〉。收於《台灣宗教變遷的社會政治分析》附錄二。瞿海源著,頁631-701。台北:桂冠。 朱肇華 2005 〈社群組織與集體行動─基督教團體錫安山個案探討〉。發表於「政治與宗教:既神聖又富爭議的連結學術研討會」。高雄:國立中山大學。 2012 〈基督宗教的「理性選擇」?北京守望教會與高雄錫安山政教衝突個案分析〉。國立政治大學政治系博士論文。 謝江平 2007 《反烏托邦思想的哲學研究》。北京:中國社會科學出版。 游謙 2002 〈新興宗教與主流教會的關係〉。《新興宗教現象研討會論文集》。中央研究院社會學研究所,頁85-95。 瞿海源 1988 〈解析新興宗教現象〉。收於《台灣新興社會運動》。徐正光與宋文里編,頁229-243。台北:巨流。 2006 《宗教、術數與社會變遷 (一) 》。台北:桂冠。 高嵐書 2011 〈錫安山新約教徒宗教自由與義務教育的衝突〉。國立成功大學法律學系碩士論文。 張清泉 2003 〈台灣宗教教育之合憲性研究──國民教育之分析〉。國立政治大學宗教研究所碩士論文。 陳穎川 2003 〈威權政治對宗教型非營利組織影響之研究──以錫安山與法輪功為例〉。南華大學非營利事業管理研究所碩士論文。 王振中 2011 〈論當代台灣宗教自由變遷──政教衝突案例比較研究〉。真理大學宗教文化與組織管理學系碩士論文。 顏學誠 2013 〈中國文明的反關係主義傳統〉。《考古人類學刊》78:1-36。 董芳苑 2000 〈類似基督宗教在臺灣:摩門教、耶和華見證人、統一教會之探討〉。《臺灣文獻》51卷3期,頁237-261。 江端儀 1963 《生命證道集》。香港:基督靈恩佈道團出版。 洪以利亞 1982 《神所揀選的一個人一座山》。台北:基督靈恩佈道團出版。 基督靈恩佈道團 2007 〈伊甸神人〉。高雄:基督靈恩佈道團出版。 Andelson, Jonathan and Joshua Lockyer 2006 Anthropology of Intentional Communities and Communal Studies. Anthropology News. May. Pp.30. Brown, Susan L. 2002 Intentional Community: An Anthropological Perspective. New York: State University of New York Press. Boewe, Martin 2015 Chanyuan–A Utopian Community in China Based on Free Love, Communism, and A Vision for Heaven on Earth.「臺灣人類學與民族學學會(TSAE)暨東亞人類學學會(EAAA)─2015聯合年會」宣讀論文,政治大學社會科學學院綜合院館,10月3日∼4日。 Comaroff, Jean 1985 Body of Power, Spirit of Resistance: The Culture and History of a South African People. Chicago : University of Chicago Press. Gerald, and Patricia Gutek 1998 Visiting Utopian Communities: A Guide to the Shakers, Moravians, and Others. University of South Carolina Press. Hardy, Dennis 1979 Alternative Communities in Nineteenth Century England. London: Longman. Harrison, J. F. C. 1984 “Millennium and Utopia”. Utopias. Alexander, Peter & Gill, Roger edit. Hertzler, Joyce O. 1926 The History of Utopian Thought. New York: Macmillan. Kateb, George 1968 Utopias and Utopianism. International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. New York: Macmillan and Free Press. Kanter, Rosabeth Moss 1972 Commitment and community: communes and utopias in sociological perspective. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. 1973 Communes: Creating and Managing the Collective Life. New York: Harper and Row. Kemper, Robert V. and Julie Adkins 2005 The world as it should be: Faith-based community development in America. Stanley E. Hyland, edit. Community Building in the Twenty-First Century. Pp.71-100. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press. Manuel, Frank E., ed. 1966 Utopias and Utopian Thought. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. More, Thomas 1997 [1516] 《烏托邦》。戴鎦齡譯。第二版第九刷。北京:商務出版。 Oved, Yaacov 1988 Two Hundred Years of American Communes. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers. Petitfils, J. 2007 《十九世紀烏托邦共同體的生活》。梁志婓等譯。上海:人民出版。 Pitzer, Donald E. 1984 Collectivism, Community and Commitment: America’s Religious Communal Utopias from the Shakers to Jonestown. Peter Alexander & Roger Gill, edit. Utopias. Open Court Publishing Company, LA Salle, Illinois. Plato 1980 [350 B. C.] 《柏拉圖理想國》。侯健譯。台北:聯經。 Sargisson, Lucy & Sargent, Lyman T. 2004 Living in utopia: New Zealand's intentional communities. Aldershot, England; Burlington, VT: Ashgate Pub. Co. Sreenivasan, Jyotsna 2008 Utopias in American history. Santa Barbara, Calif. : ABC-CLIO. Spiro, Melford E. 2004 Utopia and Its Discontents:The Kibbutz and Its Historical Vicissitudes. American Anthropologist. Volume 106, Issue 3, Pp.556–568. Turner, Victor 1967 The forest of symbols. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. 1969 The Ritual Process. Chicago: Aldine. Weber, M. 1963 [1922] The Sociology of Religion. Tr. E. Fischoff. Boston: Beacon Press. Wilson, Bryan 1970 Religious Sects: a Sociological Study. London: World University Library. 1973 Magic and the Millennium. New York: Harper & Row Publishers. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/4058 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本論文以新約教會在台灣建立的自主社區「錫安山」為主要研究對象,試圖考察並呈現其當代面貌的發展過程和社會生活實踐以與現有的「烏托邦」研究進行連接與對話。本論文認為,如果把「烏托邦」廣義理解為要在人間實現美好社會生活的一種理想主義,則這種烏托邦「思想」可能存在於許多文化之中。綜觀古今中外,在少數將烏托邦思想轉化為「試驗」或「實踐」而成功建立起居住區的案例裡,似乎以基督教烏托邦團體居多。而在華人世界中,以宗教意識型態建立這種「烏托邦社區」的案例微乎其微,目前保有烏托邦形式最完整並持續實踐的最好案例,恐怕就是台灣新約教會的錫安山。
本論文認為由台灣新約教會(基督靈恩佈道團)所持有並開發的「聖別地」是一個以基督教「信仰」作為文化底蘊和思想藍圖所支持實踐的烏托邦社區。新約教會在全台各地、乃至於海外地區擁有許多大小不一的聖別地,其中最具代表性、最崇高而神聖的即是位於台灣高雄市那瑪夏區舊稱雙連堀的「錫安山」,而其他仿效錫安山典範的聖別地被新約教徒稱為「錫安支嶺」。在刻意與外界隔絕的聖別地內,新約教徒有意識地再現了《聖經》中「伊甸園」和基督教初期教會的「公社」生活方式,過著融合「工作、生活、事奉」為一體而「以神為本」的日子;而在1997年「退出人國」取得自行教育信徒子女的權力之後,這些更趨完備的信仰實踐之生活場域也被稱為「伊甸家園」。 在內容上,首先本論文從歷時性的角度檢視新約教會�錫安山自1960年代以來至今的發展及變遷,指出促成烏托邦的「內在與外在動力」是如何被「人」(新約教徒)所有效結合、進而動態實踐具體的烏托邦社區,同時藉由此個案檢驗和修正有關基督教與烏托邦間的親緣理論。其次,本論文從共時性的角度──神本生活與教育、環境保育與生態村、生產與消費、出世觀與烏托邦建構等面向──呈現錫安山上「錫安子民」的社會生活,並記錄和考察新約教徒的在家教育(神本教育)、日常聚會(信息和見證)以及節期朝聖(2014年住棚大會)之實踐,由此勾勒出錫安山作為基督教烏托邦社區在當代台灣的面貌及特色。 然後,結合歷時性和共時性的研究結果,本論文指出新約教會透過獨特的教義�動員體系靈活詮釋烏托邦社區內外各種「以神之名」的具體行動,主動性地創造意義並賦予價值使之成為「信仰實踐」,一方面對內不斷產生「凝聚」團體成員的效果,一方面對外以「抵抗」的運動方式持續建構出並維持住烏托邦的邊界,進而使錫安山這個基督教烏托邦社區,得以在台灣的特定社會文化與歷史脈絡下不斷合理「轉型」和「適應」來自內部社區和外部社會的挑戰,因而成功經營並延續至今(2016年)達30年而未歇。 本論文最後以錫安山的經驗和模式為例檢視烏托邦社區成功興起和實踐所具備的各種特質和條件。並指出新約教會�錫安山的現象,不僅是一種宗教烏托邦運動,還可能是一種「特殊表現方式」的社會運動。最後試圖比較基督教烏托邦與世俗烏托邦的異同,以與人類學中關於烏托邦的理論假說進行對話。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | This research focuses on the study of the autonomous community “Mount Zion” (Mt. Zion), established by the New Testament Church (NTC) in Taiwan. The aim of the research is to examine the contemporary features, present its development and practice of social life, and connect with some previous studies on Utopia. In my study, it is believed that the “thought” of Utopia may exit in various cultures, if Utopia is to be generalized as an idealism of living in a wonderful society in the mortal world. Throughout the world history, it seems that most of the few communities successfully turning the thoughts of Utopia into experiment or practice have been founded by the Christian Utopian ones. On the other hand, in Chinese societies, the case of the “Utopian community” founded by the ideology of religion is scarce. Currently, the best example of this kind of community would be Mt. Zion founded by NTC in Taiwan, which preserves the Utopian way of living in the most complete and sustained fashion.
In my study, I consider that the “Holy-Land” (promised land) owned and developed by NTC in Taiwan is a community that sustains and practices the idea of Utopia by implementing Christian religion as its culture base and blueprint of concept. NTC has many Holy-Lands in different places throughout Taiwan, even overseas. Among all, the most representative and most divine one is Mt. Zion located in Kaohsiung City. As for the other Holy-Lands following the example of Mt. Zion are called “branches of Mt. Zion”. Inside the Holy-Land, which deliberately isolates itself from the outside world, the NTC believers consciously recreates the living style similar to “Eden” and “Commune” in the beginning of the Christian Church recorded in the Bible. They live in the God-based life style, and combine “work, live, serve” as a whole. Moreover, they gained the power of self-educating the disciples’ children from Taiwan government in 1997, hence the religion-practicing living area become more mature, and is therefore called “Eden Homestead”. The content of my thesis firstly through the diachronic view point presents the development of NTC/Mt. Zion from 1960s to the present time, indicating how the “internal and external motivation” of the Utopia was efficiently combined by “people”, and how they further actively realized the concrete Utopia community. At the same time, the close-relationship between Christianity and Utopia was examined and revised through the study of the case of Mt. Zion. Secondly, the current study presents the social life of NTC believers in Mt. Zion through the synchronic view point, including the aspects of God-based life and God-based education, environment preservation and eco-village, production and consumption, the idea of Utopia-construction. It also recorded the NTC’ homeschooling (God-based education), daily congregation (prophecy and witness), and pilgrimage (Feast of Tabernacles in 2014). These aspects above hence depicted the profile of Mt. Zion as a Christian Utopia in contemporary Taiwan. Furthermore, the diachronic and synchronic results show that NTC has vividly interpreted various “in-the-name-of-God” actions, inside and outside the community through its unique religious doctrines and mobilization system, and has actively created meanings and given value to it, making it a “practice of faith”. On one hand, it has internally created cohesion within the members in the group. On the other hand, it has externally produced a motion of resistance to form and sustain the boarder of the Utopia. Therefore, Mt. Zion, the Christian Utopian community, is able to continuously “transform” and “adapt” the challenges arising from inside and outside the community under the specific social, cultural and historical context in Taiwan, and further more continues functioning till present time for over thirty years. Finally, this research takes the example of Mt. Zion experience to examine the qualities and conditions for a successfully established and functioning Utopian community. Moreover, the research indicates that the phenomenon of NTC/Mt. Zion is not only a religious utopian movement, but also a “special way of expression” of social movement. Last, the comparison between of Christian Utopia and secular Utopia is made, in order to enter into a dialogue with the Utopia theories in the field of anthropology. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-13T08:41:25Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-105-R00125001-1.pdf: 4402793 bytes, checksum: 7a6a13c5e64fe33b7a28f201cff76a77 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝……………………………………………………………………………………i
中文摘要……………………………………………………………………………iii 英文摘要……………………………………………………………………………v 目錄…………………………………………………………………………………viii 圖目錄………………………………………………………………………………x 表目錄………………………………………………………………………………x 第一章 緒論…………………………………………………………………………1 第一節 前言………………………………………………………………1 第二節 基督教烏托邦社區研究的多元對話……………………………9 第三節 烏托邦的外在與內在動力: 基督教烏托邦的「天時」與「地利」………………………18 第四節 研究方法與田野過程…………………………………………28 第二章 新約教會�錫安山與烏托邦……………………………………………32 第一節 新約教會與錫安山的結合:烏托邦化的伊始………………32 第二節 錫安山的發展:烏托邦的「獨立」與擴張……………………37 第三節 錫安山的現況:烏托邦社區的社會生活……………………45 第四節 烏托邦內、外動力的結合:基督教烏托邦的「人和」……52 第三章 神本教育──伊甸家園與伊甸人的養成………………………………58 第一節 新約教徒的在家教育…………………………………………58 第二節 伊甸家園與神本教育…...……………………………………64 第三節 神本教材與真理測試…....……………………………………70 第四節 神本教育與烏托邦建構: 兼論基督教烏托邦成員的規訓與不滿…………………80 第四章 日常聚會──成員凝聚與社會控制……………………………………88 第一節 兩種日常模式…………………………………………………88 第二節 聚會空間………………………………………………………90 第三節 聚會結構………………………………………………………95 第四節 日常聚會與教義�動員體系…………………………………112 第五章 柱棚大會──儀式展演與內外權力的再強化………………………119 第一節 節慶朝聖與柱棚節……………………………………………119 第二節 2014年柱棚大會……………………………………………122 第三節 教慶日:柱棚大會與教會治權……………………………135 第四節 神國認同與儀式性反抗運動: 基督教烏托邦內外關係的再確認……………………………137 第六章 結論………………………………………………………………………139 第一節 錫安山經驗和模式的當代意義………………………………139 第二節 基督教烏托邦與世俗烏托邦的比較:與Spiro對話………147 第三節 未來延伸與可能發展…………………………………………160 參考文獻……………………………………………………………………………161 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 當代基督教烏托邦社區的實踐及啟示:以台灣新約教會的錫安山為例 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Practice and Implication of Contemporary Christian Utopian Communities: The Case of Mount Zion of New Testament Church in Taiwan | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 104-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 黃克先,張正衡 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 基督教,烏托邦社區,新約教會,錫安山,聖別地,伊甸家園, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Christianity,utopian community,New Testament Church,Mount Zion,Holy land,Eden Homestead, | en |
dc.relation.page | 165 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201602614 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2016-08-22 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 文學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 人類學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 人類學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-105-1.pdf | 4.3 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。