請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/4021
標題: | 《日講易經解義》研究──由士大夫《易》學至帝王《易》學 The Features of Imperial Scholarship on the I-Ching during K’ang-Hsi’s Reign |
作者: | Mun-Kit Low 羅文傑 |
指導教授: | 何澤恆(Chak-Hang Ho) |
關鍵字: | 康熙,日講,經筵,帝王易學,日講易經解義,周易傳義大全, K’ang-Hsi,Daily Lectures on the Yi,political philosophy,I-Ching, |
出版年 : | 2016 |
學位: | 碩士 |
摘要: | 《日講易經解義》是清帝康熙習《易》時,翰林院日講官為其所撰寫之講章。
帝王圖治,必由乎學。學必從師。帝王為學,必以人臣為師。然儒生所務與帝王所尚,容有不同。本文以此發想,藉由人臣習《易》文本與帝王治《易》講章之詳讀精校,試圖釐清兩者差別所在,並且探討後者如何由前者蛻化而成。 中國文化之精神偏重於人文。而儒家之抱負,厥在修齊治平。孔門四科雖以德行為首,言語、政事關乎經綸,而文學、德行,又通乎言語、政事。孔學所論,不外乎內聖、外王之道。先秦以降,漢儒講求經世致用,偏於外王一端;宋儒闡明天人性理,著重內聖之學,要之,皆各得孔學之一偏。自有清以來,專事考據,其先雖懸「訓詁明而後義理明」為鵠的,但最終竟昧失其途,與孔學內聖、外王之道相距日遠。今人治經,每視經書為史料,經學之本質乃蕩然無存。本文以帝王《易》學為研究主題,正欲探討其所蘊含之精神,思考其對今後經學發展可有之啟發。 This thesis investigates the features of imperial scholarship on the I-Ching during K’ang-Hsi’s reign (1622-1722). By examining the Daily Lectures on the Yi and K’ang-Hsi Shi Lu, this thesis explores how K’ang-Hsi’s imperial lecturers interpreted the I-Ching, how K’ang-Hsi applied the interpretation to governance, as well as the interaction between K’ang-Hsi and the Classics Colloquium’s lecturers. Traditionally, I-Ching was regarded as a Confucian classic of the theory of life and the theory of the universe. Although I-Ching contains much political philosophy, this political philosophy did not exert great influence on politics until K’ang-Hsi’s reign. As crown prince, K’ang-Hsi studied the Confucian classics since his childhood. Distinct from the emperors of the past, K’ang-Hsi paid great attention to I-Ching’s political philosophy. He demanded the imperial Classics Colloquium’s lecturers to interpret I-Ching in relation to administration of the kingdom. |
URI: | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/4021 |
全文授權: | 同意授權(全球公開) |
顯示於系所單位: | 中國文學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-105-1.pdf | 1.64 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。