Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/38868
Title: | 立法委員在常設委員會立法行為之研究-「公共事務類」法案之個案分析 The study of legislative behavior of legislator in the standing committees-“Public affair bill”case study |
Authors: | Chang-Hung Chen 陳昌宏 |
Advisor: | 趙永茂 |
Keyword: | 立法委員,立法行為,發言內容,常設委員會,代議理論, legislator,legislative behavior,standing committee,representative theory, |
Publication Year : | 2005 |
Degree: | 碩士 |
Abstract: | 立法院常設委員會是審查法案最重要機制,立法委員對國家立法負有重責大任,他們在審查法案的各種立法行為都可能直接或間接影響立法結果,因此立委在常設委員會審查法案的行為便顯得十分重要。本文旨在研究立法委員在常設委員會審查法案時的行為,包括:連署、發言、保留院會發言權、參與協商及提出法案等五種主要立法行為,並深入探討立委在審查委員會上的發言內容是否受到政黨、選區、個人及國會制度等因素的影響,根據「代議理論」,國會議員受到何者的影響比較大,國會議員便傾向代表誰。
本文以「公共事務類」的法案-「公共電視法」與「國防法」為個案分析,經過實際檢證,其研究結果有三:第一,立法委員的行為並非只受到單一因素的影響,而是有許多因素在相互競逐;第二,法案的發動機關不同,會衍生法案通過與否的變數;第三,立法院「投機主義」瀰漫,缺乏專業主義精神。 本研究建議應朝向三個方向努力,第一,政黨提名候選人的考量;第二,加強政黨責任;第三,修正常設委員會制度等方面努力,以建立完整而健全的國會審查機制。 “Standing committees” is the most important investigating mechanism in the Legislative Yuan. Legislators are in charge of the legislation, and they are responsible for the whole fellow in the country. The legislators’ behaviors may directly or indirectly affect the legislative process and outcomes. Of all the legislators’ behaviors, the investigation of bills in the standing committees is the most significant one. Therefore, the main purpose of this thesis focuses on legislator’s behavior of investigating bills in the standing committees. It includes signature、 speaking、retain for speaking in the chamber、negotiating and addressed bills. And I will probe into the content of legislator’s speaking in the standing committees. According to the “representative theory”, members will represent that effect them the most. I will take “public affair bill”-“The law of PTS”and “The law of national defense”for case study analysis. By empirical examination, it could be three results: firstly, not only legislator’s behavior affected by single factor but also other factors;secondly, it may create variable of the bill past or not by the different mechanism;furthermore, Legislative Yuan lacked of professionalism but pervaded the opportunism. We suggest that parties and Legislative Yuan should modify “nomination”、“responsibility ”and “institution of the standing committees”to establish a investigated mechanism of Legislative Yuan completed. |
URI: | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/38868 |
Fulltext Rights: | 有償授權 |
Appears in Collections: | 國家發展研究所 |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-94-1.pdf Restricted Access | 846.44 kB | Adobe PDF |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.