請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/37832完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 謝德宗(Der-Tzon Hsieh) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Hsin-Hua Huang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 黃欣華 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T15:46:11Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2008-07-02 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2008-07-02 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2008 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2008-07-01 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 參考文獻
一、中文文獻: 1. 王宣惠(2005),「我國匯率、資本移動與總體經濟指標關係之研究」,私立朝陽科技大學財務金融研究所碩士論文 2. 余麗珠(2003),「匯率決定因素之探討」,國立中山大學財務管理研究所碩士在職專班碩士論文 3. 吳家瑋(2002),「資本移動對匯率之影響-以泰國及馬來西亞為例」,國立中山大學經濟學研究所未出版碩士論文 4. 呂桂玲(1989),「新台幣對美元匯率決定之實證研究」,私立逢甲大學經濟學研究所碩士論文 5. 林憶華(2004),「利用結構VAR模型推估臺灣貨幣政策之效果」,國立台北大學經濟學研究所碩士論文 6. 邱玉玲(1997),「均衡實質匯率決定因素之研究-台灣之實證分析」,私立逢甲大學經濟學研究所碩士論文 7. 俞海琴(1986),「我國央行外匯干預行為之研究」,台灣大學商學研究所未出版碩士論文 8. 張晴如(2005),「實質匯率波動之研究-以台灣為例」,國立中山大學中山學術研究所碩士論文 9. 許登芳(1993),「共整合與購買力平價說:臺灣實證研究」,私立逢甲大學經濟學研究所碩士論文 10. 許瓊瑛(1998),「匯率與資本移動間共整合關係之研究-台灣實證分析」,東吳大學經濟學研究所未出版碩士論文 11. 陳旭昇(2007),時間序列分析-總體經濟與財務金融之應用,初版,台北市,東華書局 12. 陳冠樺(2000),「均衡實質匯率與亞洲金融風暴」,國立台北大學經濟學研究所碩士論文 13. 陳國興(2005),「台灣遠期美元外匯市場平價條件及效率性探討-以30、90天期實證分析」,國立中山大學經濟學研究所碩士論文 14. 黃淑卿(1995),「資產組合平衡學派之匯率決定與預測」,國立中正大學國際經濟研究所碩士論文 15. 黃緯祺(2003),「資產間接互補性和實質匯率決定」,私立世新大學經濟學研究所碩士論文 16. 楊奕農(2005),時間序列分析:經濟與財務上之應用,初版,台北市,雙葉書廊 17. 葉海寧(2002),「台灣實質利差匯率模型之研究」,國立台北大學經濟學研究所碩士論文 18. 蔡雅媚(2005),「亞太地區國家購買力平價理論之實證研究」,國立中山大學經濟學研究所碩士論文 19. 謝孟錡(2005),「實質匯率波動之因素-區域性之比較分析」,國立中山大學經濟學研究所碩士論文 二、西文文獻: 1. Allen, Polly Reynolds and Stein, Jerome L.(1990), “Capital Market Integration,” Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol. 14, pp. 909-928. 2. Balassa, B.(1964), “The Purchasing Power Parity Doctrine: A Reappraisal,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 72, pp. 584-596. 3. Benigno, Gianluca(2004), “Real Exchange Rate Persistence and Monetary Policy Rules,” Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 51, pp. 473-502. 4. Boughton, James M.(1988), “Exchange Rates and the Term Structure of Interest Rates,” International Monetary Fund Staff Papers, Vol. 35, pp. 36-62. 5. Branson, William H., Halttunen, Hannu and Masson, Paul(1977), “Exchange Rates in the Short Run: The Dollar-Deutschemark Rate,” European Economic Review, Vol. 10, pp. 303-324. 6. Caroline, M. Betts and Timothy J. Kehoe (2006), “U.S. Real Exchange Rate Fluctuations and Relative Price Fluctuations,” Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 53, pp. 1297-1326. 7. Cheung Y. and K.S. Lai (2000), “On Cross-country Differences in the Persistence of Real Exchange Rates,” Journal of International Economics, Vol. 50, pp.375-397. 8. Christiano, Lawrence J. and Eichenbaum, Martin(1991), “Identification and the Liquidity Effect of a Monetary Policy Shock,” National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, NBER Working Papers: 3920. 9. Clarida, Richard and Gali, Jordi(1994), “Sources of Real Exchange Rate Fluctuations: How Important are Nominal Shocks?” National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, NBER Working Papers: 4658. 10. De Gregorio, Jose and Wolf, Holger C.(1994), “Terms of Trade, Productivity, and the Real Exchange Rate,” National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, NBER Working Papers: 4807. 11. Dickey, D. A. and W. A. Fuller (1981), “Likelihood Ratio Statistics for Autoregressive Times Series with a Unit Root,” Econometrica, Vol. 49, pp. 1057-1072. 12. Domowitz, Ian and Hakkio, Craig S.(1985), “Conditional Variance and the Risk Premium in the Foreign Exchange Market,” Journal of International Economics, Vol. 19, pp. 47-66. 13. Dornbusch, R. (1976), “Expectations and Exchange Rate Dynamics,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 84, pp. 1161-1176. 14. Edison, Hali J. and Pauls, B. Dianne(1993), “A Re-assessment of the Relationship between Real Exchange Rates and Real Interest Rates: 1974-1990,” Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 31, pp. 165-187. 15. Edwards, Sebastian(1989), “Real Exchange Rates, Devaluation, and Adjustment: Exchange Rate Policy in Developing Countries,” pp. xi, 371, Cambridge, Mass. and London: MIT Press. 16. Elbadawi, Ibrahim and Aron, Janine(1994), “Foreign Exchange Auction Markets in sub-Saharan Africa: Dynamic Models for Auction Exchange Rates,” The World Bank, Policy Research Working Paper Series: 1396. 17. Engel, Charles(1993), “Real Exchange Rates and Relative Prices: An Empirical Investigation,” Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 32, pp. 35-50. 18. Engel, Charles(2000), “Long-run PPP may not hold after all,” Journal of International Economics, Vol. 57, pp. 243-273. 19. Engel, Charles and Morley, James C.(2001), “The Adjustment of Prices and the Adjustment of the Exchange Rate,” National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, NBER Working Papers: 8550. 20. Felmingham, Bruce and SuSan Leong(2005), “Parity Conditions and the Efficiency of the Australian 90 and 180 Day Forward Markets,” Review of Financial Economics, Vol. 14, pp. 127-145. 21. Frenkel, Jacob A. and Levich, Richard M.(1979), “Covered Interest Arbitrage and Unexploited Profits? Reply,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 87, pp. 418-422. 22. Frenkel, Jacob A.(1981), “The Collapse of Purchasing Power Parities during the 1970's,” European Economic Review, Vol. 16, pp. 145-165. 23. Granger, C. W. J. and P. Newbold (1974), “Spurious Regressions in Econometrics,” Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 12, pp. 111-120. 24. Kim, Soyoung and Roubini, Nouriel(2000), “Exchange Rate Anomalies in the Industrial Countries: A Solution with a Structural VAR Approach,” Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 45, pp. 561-586. 25. Krugman, Paul R.(1990), “Equilibrium Exchange Rates; International Policy Coordination and Exchange Rate Fluctuations,” pp. 159-187, A National Bureau of Economic Research Conference Report Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press. 26. Krugman, Paul R.(1978), “Purchasing Power Parity and Exchange Rates: Another Look at the Evidence,” Journal of International Economics, Vol. 8, pp. 397-407. 27. MacDonald, R. (1995), “Long-Run Exchange Rate Modeling: A Survey of the Recent Evidence,” IMF Staff Paper, Vol. 43, pp. 437-489. 28. MacDonald, Ronald and Taylor, Mark P.(1994), “The Monetary Model of the Exchange Rate: Long-Run Relationships, Short-Run Dynamics and How to Beat a Random Walk,” Journal of International Money and Finance, Vol. 13, pp. 276-290. 29. Meese, Richard and Rogoff, Kenneth(1989), “Was it Real? The Exchange Rate-Interest Differential Relation, 1973-1984,” National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, NBER Working Papers: 1732. 30. Moreno, Ramon; Pasadilla, Gloria and Remolona, Eli(1998), “Asia's Financial Crisis: Lessons and Policy Responses,” Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, Pacific Basin Working Paper Series, PB 98-02. 31. Mundell, R.A. (1963), “Capital Mobility and Stabilization Under Fixed and Flexible Exchange Rate,” Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science,Vol. 29, pp. 50-60. 32. Ng, Serena(2003), “Can Sticky Prices Account for the Variations and Persistence in Real Exchange Rates?” Journal of International Money and Finance, Vol. 22, pp. 65-85. 33. Obstfeld, Maurice and Rogoff, Kenneth(1995), “Exchange Rate Dynamics Redux,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 103, pp. 624-660. 34. Ogaki, Masao(1999), “A Theory of Exchange Rates and the Term Structure of Interest Rates,” Ohio State University, Department of Economics, Working Papers: 99-21. 35. Rogoff, Kenneth(1992), “Traded Goods Consumption Smoothing and the Random Walk Behavior of the Real Exchange Rate,” Monetary and Economic Studies, Vol. 10, pp. 1-29. 36. Schwart, G. W. (1987), “Effects of Model Specification on Tests for Unit Roots in Macroeconomic Data,” Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 20, pp. 77-103. 37. Sims, Christopher A.and Zha, Tao(1996), “Bayesian Methods for Dynamic Multivariate Models,” Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, Working Paper: 96-113. 38. Soto, Raimundo and Elbadawi, Ibrahim A.(1994), “Capital Flows and Long-term Equilibrium Real Exchange Rates in Chile,” The World Bank, Policy Research Working Paper Series: 1306. 39. Williamson, O. E.(1983), “Credible Commitments: Using Hostages to Support Exchange,” American Economic Review, Vol.73, pp. 519-538. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/37832 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本文研究影響台灣匯率之決定因素。首先,選擇台灣與美國的生產水準、利率水準、貨幣供給及物價水準,建立基本模型。其次,在眾多總體變數中,逐步篩選適合且可能影響匯率的變數放入基本模型,作為延伸與最後完整模型的考量。藉由結構性轉變檢定,將明顯具有不同走勢的匯率資料做區隔,再對不同時段之資料做單根檢定,並利用相關性分析篩選適合的解釋變數。接著利用多條不同時段所估得之複迴歸模型,檢視影響匯率的各種可能總體變數之變動與相互關係。最後,根據最具解釋力的迴歸估計式,對近三年匯率走勢做預測並加以比較。
實證結果發現:(1)台灣採用浮動匯率以來,匯率深受美國利率及台灣物價水準影響。(2)美國物價在整段資料期間與金融風暴發生前,係以生產者物價指數顯著影響匯率,風暴發生後則以消費者物價指數顯著影響匯率。(3)美國貨幣供給僅包含金融風暴的整段期間,以美國M1貨幣總計數NSA為顯著影響匯率的解釋變數。(4)台灣貨幣供給在整段資料期間係以M1B餘額為顯著解釋變數,在金融風暴發生前後,貨幣供給變數皆不顯著。(5)就台灣利率而言,整段資料期間與金融風暴發生前係以商業本票次級市場利率31-90天期為解釋變數且整段期間顯著,在風暴發生後則以台灣重貼現率做為解釋變數。(6)台灣生產水準替代變數在各時期皆顯著影響台灣匯率。(7)除基本變數外,整段資料期間影響匯率顯著變數係為核准對外投資金額-美國與外匯存底,金融風暴發生前後分別為央行國外資產與台灣發行量加權股價指數,可發現資金流出與資金投入股市及央行透過公開市場操作干預匯市,皆是影響匯率主要因素。(8)金融風暴發生所造成的結構性轉變,導致美國利率、美國貨幣供給、外匯存底及政府公債餘額合計等變數對匯率的影響與整體匯率走勢有顯著改變。(9)不同時期完整迴歸模型(包含精簡模型)的解釋能力,調整後R-square均在三成五左右, d.w.值均無自我相關,顯示各時期完整模型均對匯率有合理且穩定的解釋能力。(10)對2004/07∼2007/12的預測能力以金融風暴發生前的迴歸模型預測能力與配適度最佳,整體各項評判模型預測能力的指標(Theil’s Inequality Coefficient U值、偏差比例與協方差比例)都為最優,原因可能在於風暴發生前與預測期間,匯市波動幅度皆相對穩定且呈現緩升走勢,即在匯率波動平穩的時期,模型會具有較好的預測能力。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T15:46:11Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-97-R95323011-1.pdf: 4053137 bytes, checksum: af3ec60f64bf477992d3ce86c54b3541 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄
口試委員會審定書 I 誌謝 II 摘要 III 目錄 IV 圖目錄 VII 表目錄 VIII 第一章 緒論 1 1.1 研究動機 1 1.2 研究目的與範圍 3 1.3 本文架構 4 第二章 文獻回顧 6 2.1 台灣外匯市場發展 6 2.2 匯率理論文獻回顧 6 2.2.1 國際收支平衡學派 7 2.2.2 購買力平價理論 7 2.2.3 利率平價理論 9 2.2.4 貨幣分析理論 11 2.2.5 資產平衡理論 12 2.2.6 均衡實質匯率理論 14 2.3 其他相關理論文獻 16 第三章 實證模型的建立 18 3.1 實證模型的建立 18 3.2 資料分段與處理 23 3.2.1 資料來源 23 3.2.2 資料分段-Chow-test檢定 24 3.2.3 時間序列資料的單根檢定 25 3.2.4 相關性分析-基本模型 29 第四章 實證結果分析 33 4.1 實證結果一(1989/01∼2004/06) 33 4.1.1 基本模型 33 4.1.2 延伸模型 35 4.1.3 完整模型 38 4.1.4 結構性轉變的影響 40 4.2 實證結果二(1989/01∼1997/06) 43 4.2.1 基本模型 43 4.2.2 延伸模型 45 4.2.3 完整模型 48 4.3 實證結果三(1997/07∼2004/06) 50 4.3.1 基本模型 50 4.3.2 延伸模型 52 4.3.3 完整模型 55 4.4 模型預測能力 56 第五章 結論與建議 62 5.1 結論 62 5.2 建議與後續研究 64 參考文獻 65 一、中文文獻: 65 二、西文文獻: 66 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 單根檢定 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 匯率 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 結構性轉變 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | unit root test | en |
| dc.subject | exchange rate | en |
| dc.subject | structual change | en |
| dc.title | 影響台灣匯率因素之實證研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | An Empirical Study on the Determinants of Taiwan Exchange Rate | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 96-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林惠玲,李顯峰 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 匯率,結構性轉變,單根檢定, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | exchange rate,structual change,unit root test, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 69 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2008-07-01 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 經濟學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 經濟學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-97-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 3.96 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
