請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/35959完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 奇邁可(Michael Keevak) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Chia Chang Wang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 王嘉章 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T07:48:47Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2005-08-01 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2005-08-01 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2005 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2005-07-26 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Aristotle. Politics. Trans. H. Rackham. Mass.: Harvard UP, 1932.
Aughterson, Kate. Renaissance Woman: A Sourcebook. London: Routledge, 1995. Axton, Marie. The Queen’s Two Bodies. London: Royal Historical Society, 1977. Bamford, Karen. Sexual Violence on the Jocobean Stage. London: MacMillan, 2000. Campbell, Lily B. Shakespeare’s “History”: Mirrors of Elizabethan Policy. London: Methuen, 1964. Champion, Larry S. “‘Answere to this Perillous Time’: Ideological Ambivalence in The Raigne of King Edward III and the English Chronicle Plays.” English Studies 2 (1988): 117-29. Cheang Wai Fong Winifred. “Interfering Voices: Women and History in Shakespeare’s History Plays.” Diss. National Taiwan University, 2000. Clair, Willaim St, and Irmgard Maassen, ed. Introduction. Conduct Literature for Women, 1500-1640. London: Pickering & Chatto, 2000. ix-xli. Delaney, Carol. “Christian Commentary.” Abraham on Trail. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1998. 137-161. Dickinson, Hugh. “The Reformation of Prince Hal.” Shakespeare Quarterly 12.1 (1961): 33-46. Eagleton, Terry, ed. Ideology. London: Longman, 1994. Earnshaw, Steven. The Pub in Literature: England’s Altered State. Manchester: Manchester UP, 2000. Eggert, Katherine. “Nostalgia and Not Yet Late Queen: Refusing Female Rule in Henry V.” ELH. 61.3 (1994): 523-50. Fisher, Will. “Handkerchiefs and Early Modern Ideologies of Gender.” Shakespeare Studies 28 (2000): 199-207. Fulghum, Walter B. Jr. A Dictionary of Biblical Allusions in English Literature. New York: Holt, 1965. Godshalk, W. L. “Dating Edward III.” Notes and Queries 42.3 (1995): 299-300. Greenblatt, Stephen, Walter Cohen, Jean E. Howard, and Katharine Eisaman Maus, ed. The Norton Shakespeare Based on the Oxford Edition. New York: Norton, 1997. Greenblatt, Stephen. “Invisible Bullets: Renaissance Authority and its Subversion, Henry IV and Henry V.” Political Shakespeare: New Essays in Cultural Materialism. Ed. Jonathan Dollimore and Alan Sinfield. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1985. 18-47. Hill, Christopher. “A Nation of Prophets.” The World Turned Upside Down: Radical Ideas During the English Revolution. London: Penguin, 1991. Homilies. Anglican Library. Accessed 10 April 2005. <http://www.anglicanlibrary.org/homilies/> Howard, Jean E. and Phyllis Rackin. Engendering a Nation: A Feminist Account of Shakespeare’s English Histories. London: Routledge, 1997. Jaffa, Harry V. “Chastity as a Political Principle: An Interpretation of Shakespeare’s Measure for Measure.” Shakespeare as Political Thinker. Ed., John E. Alvis and Thomas G. West. Durham: Carolina Academic P, 2000. 203-40. Jankowski, Theodora A. “Pure Resistance: Queer(y)ing Virginity in William Shakespeare’s Measure for Measure and Margaret Cavendish’s The Covent of Pleasure.” Shakespeare Studies. 26(1998): 218-38. Jones, Edwin. The English Nation: The Great Myth. Gloucestershire: Sutton, 1998. Jordan, Constance. “Woman’s Rule in Sixteen-Century British Political Thought.” Renaissance Quarterly. 40.3 (1987): 421-51. Kamps, Ivo. Historiography and Ideology in Stuart Drama. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1996. Kantorowicz, Ernst H. The King’s Two Bodies: A Study in Medieval Political Theology. New Jersey: Princeton UP, 1957. Kelly, Faye L. “Oaths in Shakespeare’s Henry VI Plays.” Shakespeare Quarterly. 24. 4(1973): 357-71. Levine, Nina. “Extending Credit in Henry IV Plays.” Shakespeare Quarterly. 51.4 (2000): 403-431. Melchiori, Giorgio, ed. King Edward III. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1998. ---. “Five Falstaffs and the Countess of Salisbury: Edward III as a Garter Play.” Shakespeare’s Garter Plays. Newark: U of Delaware P, 1994. ---. Introduction. King Edward III. Ed. Giorgio. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1998. 1-51. Merriam, Thomas. “Edward III.” Literary and Linguistic Computing 15 (2000): 157-86. ---. “Influence Alone? Reflections on the Newly Canonized Edward III.” Notes and Queries 46.2 (1999): 200-06. ---. “Marlowe's Hand in Edward III Revisited.” Literary and Linguistic Computing 11.1 (1996): 19-22. Mervyn, James. Society, Politics, and Culture: Studies in Early Modern England. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1986. Muir, Kenneth. “A Reconsideration of Edward III.” Shakespeare Survey—An Annual Survey of Shakespearian Study & Production. Ed. Allardyce Nicoll. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2002. 39-48. Muldrew, Craig. “Credit and Courts: Debt Litigation in a Seventeenth Century Urban Community.” The Economic History Review. 46.1 (1993): 23-38. ---. “The Culture of Reconciliation: Community and the Settlement of Economic Disputes in Early Modern England.” The Historical Journal. 39.4 (1996): 915-42. Norwich, John Julius. Shakespeare’s Kings: The Great Plays and the History of England in the Middle Ages, 1337-1485. New York: Scribner, 1999. Pearlman, E. “Edward III in Henry V.” Criticism 37.4 (1995): 519-36. Peck, Linda Levy. “Kingship, Counsel, and Law in Early Stuart Britain.” The Varieties of British Political Thought 1500-1800. Ed. J. G. A. Pocock. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1993. 80-115. Pocock, J. G. A., ed. The Varieties of British Political Thought, 1500-1800. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1993. Porter, Roy. “Rape—Does it Have a Historical Meaning?” Rape: A Historical and Cultural Enquiry. Ed. Porter and Sylvana Tomaselli. Oxford: Blackwell, 1986. 216-36. Rabkin, Norman. “Rabbits, Ducks and Henry V.” Shakespeare Quarterly 28.3 (1977): 279-96. ---. Shakespeare and the Common Understanding. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1984. ---. Shakespeare and the Problem of Meaning. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1981. Rackin, Phyllis. “Anti-Historians: Women’s Roles in Shakespeare’s Histories” Theater Journal. 37.3 (1985): 329-44. ---. “Misogyny is Everywhere.” A Feminist Companion to Shakespeare. Ed. Dympna Callaghan. Massachusetts: Blackwell, 2000. 42-56. Rex, Richard. “The Crisis of Obedience: God’s Word and Henry’s Reformation.” The Historical Journal 39.4 (1996): 863-894. Rivers, Isabel. Classical and Christian Ideas in English Renaissance Poetry. London: Routledge, 1994. Rossiter, P. Angel with Horns: Fifteen Lectures on Shakespeare. Ed., Graham Storey. London: Longman, 1989. Rudolph, Julia. “Rape and Resistance: Women and Consent in Seventeenth-Century English Legal and Political Thought.” The Journal of British Studies. 39.2 (2000): 157-84. Schell, Edgar T. “Prince Hal’s Second Reformation.” Shakespeare Quarterly 21.1 (1970): 11-16. Shakespeare, William. Edward III. Ed. Giorgio Melchiori. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1998. ---. The Arden Shakespeare King Henry IV Part I. Ed. A. R. Humphreys. London: Methuen, 1985. ---. The Arden Shakespeare King Henry IV Part II. Ed. A. R. Humphreys. London: Methuen, 1985. ---. The Arden Shakespeare King Henry V. Ed. T. W. Craik. London: Methuen, 1995. ---. The Arden Shakespeare King Henry VI Part I. Ed. Andrew S. Cairncross. London: Methuen, 1962. ---. The Arden Shakespeare King John. Ed. E. A. J. Honigmann. London: Methuen, 1954. ---. The Arden Shakespeare Measure for Measure. Ed. J. V. Lever. London: Methuen, 1965. Shanley, Mary Lyndon. “Marriage Contract and Social Contract in Seventeenth Century English Political Thought.” The Western Political Quarterly. 32.1 (1979): 79-91. Shapiro, I. A. “The Text of the Raigne of Edward III.” Notes and Queries 50.1 (2003): 35-37. Sommerville, J. P. Royalists & Patriots: Politics and Ideology in England 1603-1640. 2nd ed. London: Longman, 1999. Sullivan, Vickie. “Prince to Act: Henry V as the Machiavellian Prince of Appearance.” Shakespeare’s Political Pageant: Essays in Literature and Politics. Ed., Alulis, Joseph and Vickie Sullivan. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 1996. 125-52. Taylor, Michael. Shakespeare Criticism in the Twentieth Century. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2001. Tillyard, E. M. W. Shakespeare’s History Plays. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1944. Tillyard, E. M. W. The Elizabethan World Picture. New York: Vintage Books, 1962. Vallance, Edward. “Oaths, Casuistry, and Equivocation: Anglican Responses to the Engagement Controversy.” The Historical Journal 44.1 (2001): 59-77. Wei, Yu-wen. “A Contextual Study: The Religious, Gender, and Identity Politics of Obedience in Edward III.” Diss. National Taiwan Normal U, 2004. Wentersdorf, Karl P. “The Date of Edward III.” Shakespeare Quarterly 16.2 (1965): 227-31. Wentersdorf, Karl P. “The Date of Edward III.” Shakespeare Quarterly 16.2 (1965): 227-31. White, Hayden. The Content of the Form: Narrative Discourse and Historical Representation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1987. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/35959 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 這篇論文探討《愛德華三世》一劇中詭異的意識型態與當代政治、宗教、經濟的關係。我論證本劇中所觀察到的詭異意識足可映射出當代政治、宗教、經濟各方勢力的衝突與融合。
第一章中，藉由對男性角色關係的切入，我將衝突放置在當代對王權、政府組織、與後宗教改革各教派的理論脈絡下，耙梳出隱藏的父權世界。 面對男性對歷史的全面塑型，女性角色在第二章中被形容成詭異現象的孕育者。在主流歷史的男鐘裡敲出畸異女聲。 第三章中我將政治、宗教衝突放置在經濟語彙裡，連結起莎翁舞台與伊麗沙白女王晚期的商業社會。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | In this thesis, I investigate ideological ambivalences in the context of contemporary political, religious, and economical theories, contending that ideological ambivalences mirror out the confrontation and opposition of political, religious, and economical movements of late Elizabethan England.
In the first chapter, I aim to position ideological ambivalences among male relationship through the help of contemporary theories of kingship, allegiance, and biblical appropriation, charting out the hidden patriarchal background in post-Reformation England. In my second chapter, I explore the ambivalences of female roles in history, suggesting that female characters intervene in the patriarchal history and generate a voice of their own. In my third chapter, I situate my previous reading of politics and religions in economical phrases, bridging up the literary world of Shakespearean stage with a period that bears witness to the transition of late Elizabethan world from a lineage society into a civil nation. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T07:48:47Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-94-R90122014-1.pdf: 425513 bytes, checksum: 75dc40ba54fbe0d09479238a464c0e4e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2005 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | Table of Contents
Acknowledgements……………………………………………………3 致謝……………………………………………………………………4 Abstract………………………………………………………………5 摘要……………………………………………………………………6 Introduction Working House of Ideological Ambivalences…………………7 Chapter I Positioning Ambivalences in the Patriarchal World………20 Chapter II Bearers of Ambivalences: Female Characters as the Interfering Voice in Patriarchal History …………………52 Chapter III Commercializing Ambivalences Between the Stage and Late Elizabethan World…………………………………………………76 Works Cited…………………………………………………………97 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.title | 《愛德華三世》中的詭異意識 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Ideological Ambivalences in Edward III | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 93-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 王淑華(Huang Huiya),梁欣榮(Yan-wing Leung) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 意識型態,詭異,《愛德華三世》, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | ideology,Ambivalence,Edward III, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 102 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2005-07-26 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 文學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 外國語文學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 外國語文學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-94-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 415.54 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。