歸國學人何處去？ 大學系所人才招募之社會學分析

Abstract

學術界制度中的正當性基礎為聲望地位，因此一系所在雇用師資的選擇上，應以畢業生之聲望地位作為選擇的考量。然而在對資料的初步檢視後，卻發現以聲望地位作為雇用師資考量的現象並不十分明確。本研究根據新制度論中的概念，試圖分析在學術組織－系所－中，留美師資畢業系所聲望上的差異，藉以探討除了學術界制度要求之聲望地位外，使否仍有其他外在環境中的不同制度來源，共同地影響了一系所在雇用師資上的選擇。 運用具有跨層級特性的階層線性模型進行分析之後發現，聲望地位作為一學術組織所應遵循的正當性基礎，並沒有顯著地在人才雇用的過程中產生影響，而其他的系所層級預測變項對於系所內留美師資畢業系所聲望的差異，也沒有顯著的解釋效力。然而，本研究發現，透過學校層級與系所層級間的互動關係，會產生差異的效果程度和方向，間接地解釋了其內部系所中留美師資的差異。

The prestige status is the legitimacy in the form of academic community, therefore it should be considered the prestige status of a department that graduates belonging while meet the selection of employing a teacher. However, the selection based on the prestige status is not very clear and definite after the data was been primarily checked. According to some concepts new-institutionalism, this study analyzed the differences in prestige status among department of faculty returned from America in academic organization－department, to find if there are still any other different orders of legitimacy in external environment besides prestige status to work upon collectively the selection of recruitment.. It was found that the legitimacy based on prestige status adhered by academic community do not acts a strong character of recruitment in an analysis by cross-level model. The other departmental level predictors also haven’t a (statistics) significant effect on the difference of the prestige status among department of faculty that returned from America. This research discovered that through the process of interaction between the factors of school-level and department-level, the difference of the prestige status among department of faculty that returned from America has been explained by various degree and the direction of independent variables.