請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/35138
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 黃光國 | |
dc.contributor.author | Ching-Jung Liang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 梁靜蓉 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T06:42:00Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2005-08-01 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2005-08-01 | |
dc.date.issued | 2005 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2005-07-31 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 一、中文部份
危芷芬(2001)。「華人的關係類型與人際義務」(未發表之博士論文)。台北:國立台灣大學心理學研究所。 朱瑞玲(1983)。「有關『面子』的心理與行為現象之實徵研究」(未發表之博士論文)。台北:國立台灣大學心理學研究所。 朱瑞玲(1989)。「面子」壓力及其因應行為。見楊國樞(主編):「中國人的心理與行為」,頁177-211。台北:桂冠。 朱瑞玲(1993)。中國人的慈善觀念。見楊國樞、余安邦(主編):「中國人的心理與行為1992¬¬-文化、教化及病理篇」,頁1-38。台北:桂冠。 金玉澄、張治庫(1993)。學生集體中的人際交往及其教育價值。「海南大學學報」,4,頁87-92。 金耀基(1988a)。人際關係中人情之分析。見楊國樞(主編):「中國人的心理」,頁75-104。台北:桂冠。 金耀基(1988b)。「面」、「恥」與中國人行為之分析。見楊國樞(主編):「中國人的心理」,頁319-345。台北:桂冠。 周美伶、何友暉(1992)。從跨文化觀點分析面子的內涵及其在社會交往中的運作。見楊國樞(主編):「中國人的心理與行為:理念及方法篇」,頁205-254。台北:桂冠。 陳之昭(1988)。面子心理的理論分析與實際研究。見楊國樞(主編):「中國人的心理」,頁155-237。台北:桂冠。 張治庫(1992)。學生集體中的人際交往及其教育價值。「教育評論」,6,24-27。 黃光國(1995)。「知識與行動---中國文化傳統的社會心理全釋」。台北:心理。 黃光國(1998)。兩種道德:台灣社會中道德思維研究的再詮釋。「本土心理學研究」,9,頁121-176。 黃光國(2001)。儒家關係主義與華人臉面觀的分析。未發表之論文。 黃光國(2004a)。自尊與面子(Ⅱ):儒家社會中的生活目標。未發表之論文。 黃光國(2004b)。面子與成就。未發表之論文。 費孝通(1948)。鄉土中國(再版)。台北:綠洲。 楊宜音(1991)。中學生友人間執行「分享分擔」規範的研究。「心理學報(北京)」,3,325-332。 楊國樞(1993)。中國人的社會取向:社會互動的觀點。見楊國樞、余安邦(主編):「中國人的心理與行為¬¬—理念及方法篇(1992)」,頁177-211。台北:桂冠。 劉丁瑋(2002)。「台灣大學生對他人情緒的評估與社會關係」(未發表之碩士論文)。台北:國立台灣大學心理學研究所。 劉厚琴 (1994)。論儒家與兩漢師生關係。「山東大學學報」,1,41-47。 蘇珊筠(2002)。「退休老人與大學生在生活場域中的關係與面子」(未發表之碩士論文)。台北:國立台灣大學心理學研究所。 二、英文部份 Alexander, C. N., & Knight, G. W. (1971). Situated identities and social psychological experimentation. Socimetry, 34, 65-82. Alexander, C. N., & Lauderdale, P. (1977). Situated identities and social influence. Sociometry, 40, 225-233. Alexander, C. N., & Rudd, J. (1981). Situated identities and response variables. In J. T. Tedeschi (Ed.), Impression management theory and social psychological research. New York: Academic Press. Alexander, C. N., & Wiley, M. C. (1980). Situated activity and identity formation. In M. Rosenberg & R. Turner (Eds.), Sociological perspectives on social psychology. New York: Basic Books. Arkin, R. M. (1981). Self-presentation styles. In J. T. Tedeschi (Ed.), Impression management: Theory and social psychological research (pp. 311-333). New York: Academic Press. Beach, S. R., Tesser, A., Mendolia, M., & Anderson, P. (1996). Self-evaluation maintenance in marriage: Toward a performance ecology of the marital relationship. Journal of Family Psychology, 10, 379-396. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1978). Politeness: Some universal in language usage. London: Cambridge University Press. Cheng, C. Y. (1986). The concept of face and its Confucian roots. Journal of Chinese Philosophy ,13, 329-348. Chou, M. L. (1997). Protective and acquisitive face orientations: A person by situation approach to face dynamics in social interaction. (Unpublished Ph. D. thesis). Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong. Crawford, M. T. (2003). Strategic self-categorization as a self-evaluation maintenance strategy. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences & Engineering, 63 (12-B), 6140. Cross, S. E., Bacon, P. L., & Morris, M. L. (2000). The relational-interdependent self-construal and relationships. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 78, 791-808. Cross, S. E., Morris, M. L., & Gore, J. S. (2002). Thinking about oneself and others: The relational-interdependent self-construal and social cognition. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 82, 399-418. Fitzsimons, G. M. & Bargh, J. A. (2003). Thinking of you: Nonconscious pursuit of interpersonal goals associated with relationship partners. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 84, 148-163. Frome, P. M. & Eccles, J. S. (1998). Parents' influence on children's achievement-related perceptions. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 74, 435-452. Goffman, E. (1955). On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry, 18, 213-231. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday, Anchor. Ho, D. Y. F. (1976). On the concept of face. American Journal of Sociology, 81, 867-884. Ho, D. Y. F. (1991). Relational orientation and methodological relationalism. Bulletin of the Hong Kong Psychological Society, 26, 81-95. Ho, D. Y. F. (1995). Selfhood and identity in Confucianism, Taoism, Buddhism, and Hinduism: Constructs with the West. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 25, 115-139. Ho, D. Y. F. (1998). Interpersonal relationships and relationship dominance: An analysis based on methodological relationalism. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 1-16. Hsu, F. L. K. (1971). Psychological homeostasis and jen:Conceptual tools for advancing psychological anthropology. American Anthropologist, 73, 23-44. Hu, H. C. (1944). The Chinese concepts of face. American Anthropologist, 46, 45-64. Hwang, K. K. (1987). Face and favor: The Chinese power game. American Journal of Sociology, 92(4), 944-974. Hwang, K. K. (1999). Filial piety and loyalty: The types of social identification in Confucianism. Asian journal of Social Psychology, 2, 129-149. Hwang, K. K. (2000). Chinese relationalisnm: Theoretical construction and methodological considerations. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 30, 155-178. Hwang, K. K. (2001). Morality: East and West. In N. J. Smelser (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavior science. Amsterdam: Pergamon. In press. Hwang, K. K. (2004). Moral face and social face: Contingent self-esteem in Confucian society. International Journal of Psycholgoy. In press. Kfir, D., Fresko, B. & Benjamin-Paul, I. (2002). Professional responsibility and grade inflation. Megamot, 42, 296-313. King, A. Y. S., & Myers, J. T. (1977). Shame as an incomplete conception of Chinese culture: A study of face. Hong Kong: Social Research Center, The Chinese University of Hong Kong. Kitayama, S., Markus, H. R., Matsumoto, H., & Norasakkunkit, V. (1997). Individual and collective processes in the construction of the self: Self-enhancement in the United States and self-criticism in Japan. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 72, 1245-1267. O'Mahen, H. A., Beach, S. R., & Tesser, A. (2000). Relationship ecology and negative communication in romantic relationships: A self-evaluation maintenance perspective. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1343-1352. Sampson, E. E. (1988). The debate on individualism: Indigenous psychology of the individual and their role in personal and societal functioning. American Psychologist, 1, 15-22. Schlenker, B. R. (1975). Self-presentation: managing the impression of consistency when reality interferes with self-enhancement. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 32, 1030-1037. Shah, J. (2003). Automatic for the people: How representations of significant others implicitly affect goal pursuit. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 84, 661-681. Stover, L. E. (1974). The Cultural Ecology of Chinese Civilization, Ch16, (pp. 242-263). New York: New American Library. Tafarodi, R. W., Marshall, T. C., & Katsura, H. (2004). Standing out in Canada and Japan. Journal of Personality, 72, 785-814. Tedeschi, J. T., & Riess, M. (1981a). Predicaments and verbal tactics of impression management. In C. Antaki (Ed.), Ordinary language explanations of social behavior. London: Academic Press. Tedeschi, J. T., & Riess, M. (1981b). Identities, the phenomenal self, and laboratory research. In J. T. Tedeschi (Ed.), Impression maneagement theory and social psychological research. New York: Academic Press. Tesser, A.(1986). Some effects of self-evaluation maintenance on cognition and action. In R. M. Sorrentino (Ed). Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (pp. 435-464). New York, NY, US: Guilford Press. Tesser, A. (1988). Toward a self-evaluation maintenance model of social behavior. In Berkowitz & Leonard (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 21: Social psychological studies of the self: Perspectives and programs (pp. 181-227). San Diego, CA, US: Academic Press. Tesser, A. (1991). Emotion in social comparison and reflection processes. In J. Suls (Ed). Social comparison: Contemporary theory and research (pp. 115-145). Hillsdale, NJ, England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Tesser, A., Millar, M., & Moore, J. (2000). Some affective consequences of social comparison and reflection processes: The pain and pleasure of being close. In A. W. Kruglanski (Ed). Motivational science: Social and personality perspectives. Key reading in social psychology (pp. 60-75). Philadelphia, PA, US: Psychology Press. Ting-Toomey, S. (1988). Intercultural conflict styles: A face-negotiation theory. In Y. Kim & W. Gudykanst (Eds.), Theories in intercultural communication (pp. 213-235). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Ting-Toomey, S. (1990). Intergroup diplomatic communication: A face-negotiation perspective. In F. Korzenny & S. Ting-Toomey (Eds.), Communicating for peace: Diplomacy and vegotiation (pp. 77-95). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Van Lange, P. A., Rusbult, C. E., Drigotas, S. M., & Arriaga, X. B. (1997). Willingness to sacrifice in close relationships. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 72, 1373-1395. Yang, K. S. (1986). Chinese personality and its change. In M. H. Bond (Ed.), The psychology of the Chinese people (pp. 106-170). Hong Kong: Oxford University Press. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/35138 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本研究的主要目的在探討:在不同的「關係類型」下,行動者在不同「事件性質」上的成就表現與互動雙方的「情感狀態」,對關係他人「面子」的影響。依據過去有關面子的理論與實徵的發現,本研究提出三個命題:(1)行動者的行為表現,對父母面子影響最大,教師次之,同學最小;(2)在家人關係中,父母的面子感受較不易因親子關係好壞而有所差異;但在非家人關係中,教師與同學的面子感受則較易受到雙方情感狀態的影響;(3)相較於屬於個人興趣的橫向事件,行動者在社會高度讚許事件上的成敗表現,父母與教師會覺得比較「有面子」或是「沒面子」。同學的面子則視成敗結果有所不同,當行動者成功時,其在橫向事件的傑出表現,同學會覺得比較「有面子」,當行動者失敗時,其在縱向事件的失敗表現,同學會覺得比較「沒面子」。本研究採情境故事法,由研究者根據本研究之概念架構,自行編擬問卷設計研究工具。結果顯示:(1)父母對行動者成就表現的面子感受最為強烈,教師次之,同學最末;不過父母與教師的面子差距程度並沒有達到統計上的顯著水準;(2)親子關係中,親子情感好壞對父母「有面子」的感受沒有影響,但因親子處於負向情感時,父母的「沒面子」感受會更強烈。師生與同儕關係處於正向情感時,教師及同學的「有面子」感受高於其處於負向情感時。但行動者失敗時,教師的「沒面子」感受不因師生情感好壞而有所差異。同學則是處於正向情感的「沒面子」感受高於負向情感者;(3)父母與教師對於行動者在「縱向事件」的成敗表現,其面子得、失感受的程度,較其在「橫向事件」的成敗表現為強。在同儕關係中,當行動者成功時,相較於「縱向事件」,同學對行動者在「橫向事件」的成功,會覺得比較「有面子」,但是當行動者失敗時,同學對行動者在「縱向事件」的失敗,會覺得比較「沒面子」。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | This research was designed to study how the relational other’s feeling of face might be affected by his/her role relationship with the actor, his/her affective relationship with the actor, and actor’s achievement on different types of task. Based on an intensive review of literatures on Chinese concept of face, it is hypothesized that (1) the actor’s achievement has the most significant impact on his/her parents’ feeling of face, which is followed by his/her teacher, and the least impact on his/her peers; (2)The affective relationship between two parties has no significant influence on the parents’ feeling of face as response to the actor’s achievement, but it has a significant impact on teacher’s and peer’s feeling of face. (3) The actor’s achievement of vertical distinctiveness may cast greater impact on parents’ and teacher’s feeling of having face or losing face. But, peers’ feeling of face depended on the nature of task: When the actor succeeded in achieving horizontal distinctiveness, his peers may enhance of feeling of having face, when he failed in pursing vertical distinctiveness, his peers may have a feeling of losing face, scenarios were constructed on the basis of this concept framework, and a questionnaire was developed as instrument as research instrument. Results of experiment generally support the aforementioned hypotheses. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T06:42:00Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-94-R91227017-1.pdf: 463151 bytes, checksum: 1d337eba6d84fb290db67d8ce161d646 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2005 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論-----------------------------------------------1
第一節 前言----------------------------------------------1 第二節 「面子」的概念-------------------------------------2 第三節 研究概念與架----------------------------------10 第二章 研究一--------------------------------------------18 第一節 研究方法---------------------------------------18 第二節 研究結果與討論----------------------------------21 第三章 討論與建議----------------------------------------61 第一節 主要發現---------------------------------------61 第二節 研究限制及討論-----------------------------------65 第三節 未來研究方向與建議-------------------------------66 參考文獻-------------------------------------------------67 附錄 施測問卷--------------------------------------------75 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 「關係類型」、「情感狀態」與「事件性質」對關係他人「面子」的影響 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The effect of guanxi, state of affection, and type of achievement on relational other’s feelings of face | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 93-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 王叢桂,李美枝 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 關係類型,情感狀態,縱向成就,橫向成就,面子, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | guanxi type,affective status,vertical distinctiveness,horizontal distinctiveness,face, | en |
dc.relation.page | 87 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2005-08-01 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 心理學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 心理學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-94-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 452.3 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。