請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/32482完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 廖朝陽(Chaoyang Liao) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Hung-chiung Li | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 李鴻瓊 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T03:52:02Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2013-07-25 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2006-07-27 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2006 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2006-07-25 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Works Cited
Abrams, M. H. (1953). The Mirror and the Lamp: Romantic Theory and the Critical Tradition. New York: Norton. —— (1993). A Glossary of Literary Terms. 6th ed. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. Adams, Hazard, ed. (1971). Critical Theory since Plato. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. Adorno, Theodor W. (1992). Notes to Literature, Volume Two (1974). Ed. Rolf Tiedemann. Trans. Shierry Weber Nicholsen. New York: Columbia UP. —— (1997). Aesthetic Theory (1970). Ed. Gretel Adorno and Rolf Tiedemann. Trans. Robert Hullot-Kentor. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P. Alexander, Flora M. (1983). “‘The Treson of Launcelote du Lake’: Irony in the Stanzaic Morte Arthur.” In Grout et al. 15-27. Allen, Don Cameron (1970). Mysteriously Meant: The Rediscovery of Pagan Symbolism and Allegorical Interpretation in the Renaissance. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP. Alpers, Paul J. (1967). The Poetry of The Faerie Queene. Princeton: Princeton UP. ——, ed. (1969). Edmund Spenser: A Critical Anthology. Harmondsworth: Penguin. Anderson, Benedict (1991). Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. 2nd ed. London: Verso. Anderson, Judith (1982). “‘In Liuing Colours and Right Hew’: The Queen of Spenser’s Central Books.” In Mack and Lord 47-66. —— (1989). “‘Myn Auctour’: Spenser’s Enabling Fiction and Eumnestes’ ‘Immortall Scrine.’” In Logan and Teskey 16-31. —— (1998). “Narrative Reflections: Re-envisaging the Poet in The Canterbury Tales and The Faerie Queene.” In Krier 87-105. Aptekar, Jane (1969). Icons of Justice: Iconography and Thematic Imagery in Book V of The Faerie Queene. New York: Columbia UP. Aquinas, Saint Thomas (1971). “From The Nature and Domain of Sacred Doctrine.” In Adams 116-19. Ariosto, Ludovico (1983). Orlando Furioso. Trans. Guido Waldman. Oxford: Oxford UP. Aristotle (1980). The Nicomachean Ethics. Rev. ed. Trans. David Ross. Rev. J. L. Ackrill and J. O. Urmson. Oxford: Oxford UP. —— (1982). Nicomachean Ethics. Trans. Martin Ostwald. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill. —— (1996). Poetics. Trans. Malcolm Heath. London: Penguin. Ascham, Roger (1994). The Scholemaster, or, Plaine and Perfite Way of Teachyng Children. Bristol: Thoemmes P. Atkinson, Stephen C. B. (1988). “‘Now I Se and Undirstonde’: The Grail Quest and the Education of Malory’s Reader.” In Braswell and Bugge 90-108. Auerbach, Erich (1984). Scenes from the Drama of European Literature. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P. Badiou, Alain (2000). “What Is Love?” In Salecl 263-81. Barnard, Suzanne (2002). “Tongues of Angels: Feminine Structure and Other Jouissance.” In Barnard and Fink 171-85. ——, and Bruce Fink, eds. (2002). Reading Seminar XX: Lacan’s Major Work on Love, Knowledge, and Feminine Sexuality. Albany: State U of New York P. Barney, Stephen A. (1979). Allegories of History, Allegories of Love. Hamden: Archon Books. Barron, W. R. J. (1987). English Medieval Romance. London: Longman. Bednarz, James P. (1990). “Geryoneo.” In Hamilton, 1990, 331. Bellamy, Elizabeth Jane, Patrick Cheney, and Michael Schoenfeldt (2003a). “Introduction: Towards Defining a Poetics of Death in Spenser and Milton.” In Bellamy, Cheney, and Schoenfeldt, 2003b, 1-27. ——, eds. (2003b). Imagining Death in Spenser and Milton. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. Benjamin, Walter (1977). The Origin of German Tragic Drama (1963). Trans. John Osborne. London: Verso. —— (1985). Illuminations: Essays and Reflections. Ed. Hannah Arendt. Trans. Harry Zohn. New York: Schocken. —— (1986). Reflections: Essays, Aphorisms, Autobiographical Writings. Ed. Peter Demetz. Trans. Edmund Jephcott. New York: Schocken. —— (1989). “N [Re the Theory of Knowledge, Theory of Progress].” Trans. Leigh Hafrey and Richard Sieburth. In Gary Smith 43-83. Berger, Harry, Jr. (1986). “The ‘Mutabilitie Cantos’: Archaism and Evolution in Retrospect.” In Bloom 111-39. —— (1988). Revisionary Play: Studies in the Spenserian Dynamics. Berkeley: U of California P. Berry, Craig A. (1998). “‘Sundrie Doubts’: Vulnerable Understanding and Dubious Origins in Spenser’s Continuation of the Squire’s Tale.” In Krier 106-27. Bieman, Elizabeth (1988). Plato Baptized: Towards the Interpretation of Spenser's Mimetic Fictions. Toronto: U of Toronto P. Bloom, Harold, ed. (1986). Edmund Spenser. New York: Chelsea House Publishers. Boccaccio, Giovanni (1956). Boccacio on Poetry: Being the Preface and the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Books of Boccaccio’s Genealogia Deorum Gentilium. Trans. Charles G. Osgood. New York: Bobbs-Merrill. Brand, C. P. (1965). Torquato Tasso: A Study of the Poet and of His Contribution to English Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. Braswell, Mary Flowers, and John Bugge, eds. (1988). The Arthurian Tradition: Essays in Convergence. Tuscaloosa: U of Alabama P. Britt, Brian (1996). Walter Benjamin and the Bible. New York: Continuum. Burns, E. Jane (1985). Arthurian Fictions: Rereading the Vulgate Cycle. Columbus: Ohio State UP. Burrow, John A. (1990). “Chaucer, Geoffrey.” In Hamilton, 1990, 144-48. Castro, Nancy Campi de (1994). “Allegory, You Are Woman.” In Kronegger and Tymieniecka 151-57. Cavallo, Jo Ann (1999). “Tasso’s Armida and the Victory of Romance.” In Finucci 77-111. Chaucer, Geoffrey (1989). The Complete Poetry and Prose of Geoffrey Chaucer. Ed. John H. Fisher. 2nd ed. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. —— (1998). The Canterbury Tales. Trans. David Wright. Oxford: Oxford UP. Church, R. W. (1909). Spenser. Ed. John Morley. London: Macmillan. Coleridge, Samuel Taylor (1936). Coleridge’s Miscellaneous Criticism. Ed. Thomas Middleton Raysor. London: Constable. —— (1969). “From Notes for Lectures and Marginal Notes in a Copy of The Faerie Queene.” In Alpers, 1969, 138-47. Copjec, Joan (1994). Read My Desire: Lacan against the Historicists. Cambridge: MIT P. —— (2002). Imagine There’s No Woman: Ethics and Sublimation. Cambridge: MIT P. Crossland, Jessie (1956). Medieval French Literature. Oxford: Blackwell. Cummings, R. M., ed. (1971). Spenser: The Critical Heritage. London: Routledge. Davies, Stevie (1986). The Idea of Woman in Renaissance Literature: The Feminine Reclaimed. Brighton: Harvester U. De Man, Paul (1986). The Resistance to Theory. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P. DeNeef, A. Leigh (1982). Spenser and the Motives of Metaphor. Durham: Duke UP. —— (1990). “Timias.” In Hamilton, 1990, 690-91. Derrida, Jacques (1976). Of Grammatology (1967). Trans. and intro. Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP. —— (1994). Specters of Marx: The State of the Debt, the Work of Mourning, and the New International (1993). Trans. Peggy Kamuf. New York: Routledge. Dixon, Michael F. N. (1996). The Polliticke Courtier: Spenser’s The Faerie Queene as a Rhetoric of Justice. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s UP. Dundas, Judith (1985). The Spider and the Bee: The Artistry of Spenser’s Faerie Queene. Urbana: U of Illinois P. Dryden, John (1971). “John Dryden.” In Cummings, 202-06. Eggert, Katherine (2000). Showing like a Queen: Female Authority and Literary Experiment in Spenser, Shakespeare, and Milton. Philadelphia: U of Pennsylvania P. Ficino, Marsilio (1985). Commentary on Plato’s Symposium on Love. Trans. Sears Jayne. 2nd ed. Dallas: Spring Publications. Finucci, Valeria, ed. (1999). Renaissance Transactions: Ariosto and Tasso. Durham: Duke UP. Fletcher, Angus (1964). Allegory: The Theory of a Symbolic Mode. Ithaca: Cornell UP. —— (1971). The Prophetic Moment: An Essay on Spenser. Chicago: U of Chicago P. Focillon, Henri (1963). The Art of the West in the Middle Ages, Volume Two: Gothic Art. Ed. and intro. Jean Bony. Oxford: Phaidon. —— (1989). The Life of Forms in Art. New York: Zone. Fowler, Alastair (1964). Spenser and the Numbers of Time. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. —— (1982). Kinds of Literature: An Introduction to the Theory of Genres and Modes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP. Fowler, Elizabeth (2003). Literary Character: The Human Figure in Early English Writing. Ithaca: Cornell UP. Frappier, Jean (1959). “The Vulgate Cycle.” In Loomis 295-318. Frushell, Richard C. (1999). Edmund Spenser in the Early Eighteenth Century: Education, Imitation, and the Making of a Literary Model. Pittsburgh: Duquesne UP. Frye, Northrop (1957). Anatomy of Criticism: Four Essays. Princeton: Princeton UP. —— (1976). The Secular Scripture: A Study of the Structure of Romance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP. —— (1986). “The Structure of Imagery in The Faerie Queene.” In Bloom 23-40. Goldberg, Jonathan (1981). Endlesse Worke: Spenser and the Structures of Discourse. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP. Gombrich, E. H. (1966). The Story of Art. 11th ed. London: Phaidon. Greene, Thomas (1987). “Mutability and the Theme of Process.” In Bloom 57-71. Gregerson, Linda (1995). The Reformation of the Subject: Spenser, Milton, and the English Protestant Epic. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. Gross, Kenneth (1985). Spenserian Poetics: Idolatry, Iconoclasm, and Magic. Ithaca: Cornell UP. Grout, P. B., R. A. Lodge, C. E. Pickford, and E. K. C. Varty, eds. (1983). The Legend of Arthur in the Middle Ages. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer. Hamilton, A. C. (1980). “Chronological Table of Spenser’s Life and Principal Publications.” In Spenser, 1980b, viii-xii. ——, general ed. (1990). The Spenser Encyclopedia. Toronto: U of Toronto P. Harington, Sir John (1904). “A Preface, or rather a Briefe Apologie of Poetrie” (prefixed to the translation of Orlando furioso). In G. Gregory Smith, 2: 194-222. Harvey, Gabriel (1971). “From Three Proper, and Wittie Familiar Letters.” In Cummings 50-52. Heale, Elizabeth (1987). The Faerie Queene: A Reader’s Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. Heath, Malcolm (1996). Introduction to Aristotle, 1996, vii-lxxi. Heinze, Richard (1993). Virgil’s Epic Technique. Trans. Hazel Harvey, David Harvey, and Fred Robertson. Berkeley: U of California P. Helgerson, Richard (1996). “Tasso on Spenser: The Politics of Chivalric Romance.” In Suzuki 221-36. Hobbes, Thomas (1957). “Answer to Davenant’s Preface to Gondibert.” In Spingarn, 1957, 54-67. Honour, Hugh, and John Fleming (2005). A World History of Art. 7th ed. London: Laurence King Publishing. Horace (Quintus Horatius Flaccus) (1971). “Art of Poetry.” In Adams 67-75. Hugh, John (1971). “An Essay on Allegorical Poetry.” In Cummings 248-76. Hullot-Kentor, Bob (1984). “Introduction to Adorno’s ‘Idea of Natural-History.’” Telos 60: 97-110. Hume, Anthea (1984). Edmund Spenser: Protestant Poet. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. Hunt, Tony (1970). “The Rhetorical Background to the Arthurian Prologue.” In Owen 1-23. Hurd, Richard (2001). Letters on Chivalry and Romance. London: Routledge. Javitch, Daniel (1991). Proclaiming a Classic: The Canonization of Orlando Furioso. Princeton: Princeton UP. Kaske, Carol V. (1989). “How Spenser Really Used Stephen Hawes in the Legend of Holiness.” In Logan and Teskey 119-36. Kawanishi, Susumu (1990). “Lust.” In Hamilton, 1990, 442-43. Kennedy, William J. (1990). “Virgil.” In Hamilton, 1990, 717-19. King, John N. (1990). Spenser’s Poetry and the Reformation Tradition. Princeton: Princeton UP. Krier, Theresa M., ed. (1998). Refiguring Chaucer in the Renaissance. Gainesville: UP of Florida. Kronegger, Marlies, and Anna-Teresa Tymieniecka, eds. (1994). Allegory Old and New in Literature, the Fine Arts, Music and Theatre, and Its Continuity in Culture. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Kuin, Roger, and Anne Lake Prescott (2003). “‘After the First Death, There is No Other’: Spenser, Milton, and (Our) Death.” In Bellamy, Cheney, and Schoenfeldt, 2003b, 78-94. Lacan, Jacques (1975). Le Séminaire de Jacques Lacan, Livre XX, Encore, 1972-1973. Ed. Jacques-Alain Miller. Paris: Seuil. —— (1977). Écritis: A Selection (1966). Trans. Alan Sheridan. New York: Norton. —— (1982). Feminine Sexuality: Jacques Lacan and the École Freudienne. Ed. Juliet Mitchell and Jaqueline Rose. Trans. Jacqueline Rose. Houndmills: Macmillan. —— (1991). The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book II: The Ego in Freud’s Theory and in the Technique of Psychoanalysis, 1954-1955 (1978). Ed. Jacques-Alain Miller. Trans. Sylvana Tomaselli. New York: Norton. —— (1998). The Seminar of Jacques Lacan: On Feminine Sexuality, The Limits of Love and Knowledge, Book XX, Encore, 1972-1973 (1975). Ed. Jacques-Alain Miller. Trans. Bruce Fink. New York: Norton. —— (2002). Écrits: A Selection (1966). Trans. Bruce Fink. New York: Norton. Laplanche, Jean (1999). Essays on Otherness. London: Routledge. Leslie, Michael (1983). Spenser’s “Fierce Warres and Faithfull Loves”: Martial and Chivalric Symbolism in The Faerie Queene. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer. Lewis, C. S. (1936). The Allegory of Love: A Study in Medieval Tradition. Oxford: Oxford UP. —— (1964). The Discarded Image: An Introduction to Medieval and Renaissance Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. —— (1966). Studies in Medieval and Renaissance Literature. Ed. W. Hooper. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. —— (1967). Spenser’s Images of Life. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. Logan, George M., and Gordon Teskey, eds. (1989). Unfolded Tales: Essays on Renaissance Romance. Ithaca: Cornell UP. Loomis, Roger Sherman, ed. (1959). Arthurian Literature in the Middle Ages: A Collaborative History. Oxford: Clarendon P. Lot, Ferdinand (1918). Étude sur le Lancelot en Prose. Paris: Champion. McCabe, Richard A. (1989). The Pillars of Eternity: Time and Providence in The Faerie Queene. Dublin: Irish Academic P. MacCaffrey, Isabel Gamble (1976). Spenser's Allegory: The Anatomy of Imagination. Princeton: Princeton UP. Mack, Maynard, and George de Forest Lord, eds. (1982). Poetic Traditions of the English Renaissance. New Haven: Yale UP. MacLachlan, Hugh, and Philip B. Rollinson (1990). “Magnanimity, Magnificence.” In Hamilton, 1990, 448. Maley, Willy (1994). A Spenser Chronology. Houndmills: Macmillan. Malory, Thomas (1977). Malory: Works. Ed. Eugène Vinaver. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford UP. Marinelli, Peter V. (1990). “Ariosto, Lodovico.” In Hamilton, 1990, 56-57. Marre, Louis A. (1990). “Corflambo, Poeana.” In Hamilton, 1990, 192. Meister, Peter, ed. (1999). Arthurian Literature and Christianity: Notes from the Twentieth Century. New York: Garland. Miller, David Lee (1988). The Poem’s Two Bodies: The Poetics of the 1590 Faerie Queene. Princeton: Princeton UP. Miskimin, Alice (1975). The Renaissance Chaucer. New Haven: Yale UP. Murrin, Michael (1969). The Veil of Allegory: Some Notes toward a Theory of Allegorical Rhetoric in the English Renaissance. Chicago: U of Chicago P. —— (1980). The Allegorical Epic: Essays in Its Rise and Decline. Chicago: U of Chicago P. Nägele, Rainer (1991). Theater, Theory, Speculation: Walter Benjamin and the Scenes of Modernity. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP. Nelson, William (1963). The Poetry of Edmund Spenser. New York: Columbia UP. Oppenheim, Lois (1994). “Michel Butor’s L’Embarquement de la Reine de Saba.” In Kronegger and Tymieniecka 131-39. Osborne, Peter (1995). The Politics of Time: Modernity and the Avant-Garde. London: Verso. Owen, D. D. R., ed. (1970). Arthurian Romance. New York: Barnes & Noble. Parker, Patricia A. (1979). Inescapable Romance: Studies in the Poetics of a Mode. Princeton: Princeton UP. —— (1990). “Romance.” In Hamilton, 1990, 609-18. Puttenham, George (1904). The Arte of English Poesie. In G. Gregory Smith, 2: 1-193. The Quest of the Holy Grail (1969). Trans. Pauline M. Matarasso. Harmondsworth: Penguin. Quilligan, Maureen (1983). Milton’s Spenser: The Politics of Reading. Ithaca: Cornell UP. Quitslund, Jon A. (1990). “Platonism.” In Hamilton, 1990, 546-48. Radcliffe, David Hill (1996). Edmund Spenser: A Reception History. Columbia: Camden House. Ragland, Ellie (2004). The Logic of Sexuation: From Aristotle to Lacan. Albany: State U of New York P. Roche, Thomas (1969). The Kindly Flame: A Study of the Third and Fourth Books of Spenser’s Faerie Queene. Princeton: Princeton UP. —— (1989). “Spenser’s Muse.” In Logan and Teskey, 162-88. Rollinson, Philip B. (1990). “Maleger.” In Hamilton, 1990, 449-50. Salecl, Renata, ed. (2000). Sexuation. Durham: Duke UP. Saussure, Ferdinand de (1959). Course in General Linguistics. Ed. Charles Bally and Albert Sechehaye. Trans. Wade Baskin. New York: McGraw-Hill. Schoenfeldt, Michael C. (1999). Bodies and Selves in Early Modern England: Physiology and Inwardness in Spenser, Shakespeare, Herbert, and Milton. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. Sidney, Philip (1904). An Apologie for Poetrie. In G. Gregory Smith, 1: 148-207. Smith, G. Gregory, ed. (1904). Elizabethan Critical Essays. 2 vols. Oxford: Oxford UP. Smith, Gary, ed. (1989). Benjamin: Philosophy, History, Aesthetics. Chicago: U of Chicago P. Smith, J. C., and E. De Selincourt, eds. (1971). Spenser: Poetical Works. Oxford: Oxford UP. Spenser, Edmund (1971). “From Three Proper, and Wittie Familiar Letters.” In Cummings 43-44. —— (1980a). “A Letter of the Authors to Walter Raleigh.” In Spenser, 1980b, 737-38. —— (1980b). The Faerie Queene. Ed. A. C. Hamilton. London: Longman. Spenser, Edmund, and Gabriel Harvey (1971). “Spenser-Harvey Correspondence.” In Smith and Selincourt 609-43. Spingarn, Joel Elias (1963). A History of Literary Criticism in the Renaissance. New York: Harbinger Books. ——, ed. (1957). Critical Essays of the Seventeenth Century. Vol. II: 1650-1685. Bloomington: Indiana UP. Stephens, Dorothy (1998). The Limits of Eroticism in Post-Petrarchan Narrative: Conditional Pleasure from Spenser to Marvell. New York: Cambridge UP. Suzuki, Mihoko, ed. (1996). Critical Essays on Edmund Spenser. New York: G. K. Hall. Talarico, Kathryn Marie (1999). “Romancing the Grail: Fiction and Theology in the Queste del Saint Graal.” In Meister 29-59. Tasso, Torquato (1973). Discourses on the Heroic Poem. Trans. Mariella Cavalchini and Irene Samuel. Oxford: Oxford UP. —— (1987a). “The Allegory of the Poem.” In Tasso, 1987b, 469-74. —— (1987b). Jerusalem Delivered. Trans. and ed. Ralph Nash. Detroit: Wayne State UP. Teskey, Gordon (1990a). “Allegory.” In Hamilton, 1990, 16-22. —— (1990b). “Homer.” In Hamilton, 1990, 374-76. —— (2003). “Death in Allegory.” In Bellamy, Cheney, and Schoenfeldt, 2003b, 65-77. Tonkin, Humphrey (1989). The Faerie Queene. London: Unwin Hyman. Treip, Mindele Anne (1994). Allegorical Poetics and the Epic: The Renaissance Tradition to Paradise Lost. Lexington: UP of Kentucky. Tuve, Rosemond (1966). Allegorical Imagery: Some Mediaeval Books and Their Posterity. Princeton: Princeton UP. Vinaver, Eugène (1971). The Rise of Romance. Oxford: Oxford UP. Virgil (1971). The Aeneid. Trans. Allen Mandelbaum. Berkeley: U of California P. Watkins, John (1995). The Specter of Dido: Spenser and Virgilian Epic. New Haven: Yale UP. Whitman, Jon (1987). Allegory: The Dynamics of an Ancient and Medieval Technique. Cambridge: Harvard UP. Wind, Edgar (1968). Pagan Mysteries in the Renaissance. Revised ed. New York: Norton. Wofford, Susanne (1992). The Choice of Achilles: The Ideology of Figure in the Epic. Stanford: Stanford UP. Wolin, Richard (1994). Walter Benjamin: An Aesthetic of Redemption. Berkley: U of California P. Woolf, Virginia (1980). Collected Essays. Vol. 1. London: Hogarth. Worringer, Wilhelm (1964). Form in Gothic. Trans. and ed. Herbert Read. London: A. Tiranti. Wright, Elizabeth (2000). Lacan and Postfeminism. Cambridge: Icon Books. Žižek, Slavoj (1993). Tarrying with the Negative: Kant, Hegel, and the Critique of Ideology. Durham: Duke UP. —— (1999). “Death and the Maiden.” In The Žižek Reader. Ed. Elizabeth Wright and Edmond Wright. Oxford: Blackwell. 206-21. Zupančič, Alenka (2000). “The Case of the Perforated Sheet.” In Salecl 282-96. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/32482 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本論文旨在探討史賓色《仙后》第三與第四卷的特殊結構。主要方向有二：一是釐清詩中傳奇與寓言的辯證關係，二是討論史氏寓言詩學中的陰性結構。第一章處理十六世紀義大利文壇上的一大辯論。主要討論內容包括牽涉在這場辯論中的兩位詩人（阿里歐斯多與塔叟）以及主導文壇的亞里斯多德主義，討論的目的則在說明史賓色與這場辯論的關係。第二章討論史賓色與維及爾和新柏拉圖主義的關係，目的在說明史氏的兼容性以及《仙后》的寓言結構特色。第三章討論《仙后》的特殊結構設計，以說明此詩的文類混成性。主要討論的對象為史氏的詩與傳統亞瑟王傳奇結構之間的關連，目的在說明史氏詩中傳奇與寓言的均勢辯證關係。第四章討論《仙后》的哥德結構與哥德式建築之間的類似性，以說明詩中所存在的哥德空間如何中介、溝通傳奇與寓言以及物質性與精神性。第五章討論史賓色與當代理論之間可能的關連性。所討論的理論家包括德希達、班雅民與拉崗。本章藉著討論詩中主角之一布莉托瑪特的閱讀行動與身體實踐來說明解構主義的侷限性與困境。班雅民與拉崗的理論則用來說明《仙后》第三與第四卷所呈現的唯物陰性寓言結構。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This dissertation aims at explicating the complex structure of Books III and IV of Edmund Spenser’s The Faerie Queene. One of the main objectives is to delineate the dialectical interactions between romance and allegory of the poem; the other is to enquire into the feminine structure of Spenser’s allegorical poetics. Chapter 1 deals with an intense literary debate in the sixteenth-century Italy. Two poets involved in the debate, Ariosto and Tasso, and the sway of Aristotelianism are the central subjects of this chapter. The aim is to illustrate Spenser’s differences from both the two poets and the Aristotelian vein. Chapter 2 deals with Spenser’s eclecticism by exploring his relationships with Virgil and the Virgilian-Landinian exegetical tradition. The aim is to show that The Aeneid and the Neoplatonist tradition contribute to Spenser’s ability to combine a large, complicated allegorical system with an extended narrative. Besides, Spenser’s divergence from Virgil is also discussed. Chapter 3 deals with the peculiar design of The Faerie Queene in order to specify the generic mixture of the poem. Spenser’s continuation and divergence from the Arthurian romance tradition are discussed in order to clarify the dialectical equiponderant relationship between romance and allegory of the poem. Chapter 4 describes the Gothic structure of Spenser’s poem by way of discussing two principles of Gothic architectonics. The purpose is to clarify how the Spenserian Gothic space mediates and joins romance with allegory or sensual materialization with spiritual dematerialization. Chapter 5 constructs a dialogue between Spenser and the (post)modern literary theories of Derrida, Benjamin, and Lacan in order to explore the possible significance of Spenser for our age. Deconstructionists’ politics of the infinite play of language may result into a vicious infinity of antagonistic and evasive politics. Britomart’s engagement with Busirane’s art is discussed in order to show how she de-deconstructively returns to the reality of love and initiates ethical practices. Benjamin’s theory of allegory and Lacan’s theory of the feminine are enlisted to clarify Spenser’s practice, via Britomart, of a materialist, feminine allegory. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T03:52:02Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-95-D86122002-1.pdf: 849906 bytes, checksum: c410c0de85ea79118feea7db40f6eb55 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2006 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | Table of Contents
Introduction 1 Part I: Continuity and Discontinuity from Virgil to Spenser Chapter 1 The Renaissance Debate on Epic and Romance: Ariosto, Tasso, and Spenser 11 Chapter 2 Spenser’s Allegorical Poetics and the Virgilian Tradition 53 Part II: From the Romantic to the Gothic Spenser Chapter 3 Beyond the Arthurian Romance: The Structure of Romance Allegory of The Faerie Queene 83 Chapter 4 From the Allegorical to the Gothic: Dematerialization and the Third Space of The Faerie Queene 121 Part III: Between Spenser and the Postmodern Chapter 5 How Britomart Reads and Comes: The Feminine Allegory of The Faerie Queene 173 Conclusion: Death and End 223 Works Cited 233 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.subject | 亞瑟王傳奇 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 史賓色 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 仙后 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 傳奇 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 寓言 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 阿里歐斯多 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 塔叟 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 維及爾 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 編織結構 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 哥德式 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 陰性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 德希達 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 班雅民 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 拉崗 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 布莉托瑪特 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Walter Benjamin | en |
| dc.subject | Britomart | en |
| dc.subject | Jacques Lacan | en |
| dc.subject | Edmund Spenser | en |
| dc.subject | The Faerie Queene | en |
| dc.subject | romance | en |
| dc.subject | allegory | en |
| dc.subject | Ariosto | en |
| dc.subject | Tasso | en |
| dc.subject | Virgil | en |
| dc.subject | Arthurian romance | en |
| dc.subject | entrelacement | en |
| dc.subject | Gothic | en |
| dc.subject | feminine | en |
| dc.subject | Jacques Derrida | en |
| dc.title | 多層次整體與陰性結構──讀史賓色《仙后》第三與第四卷 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Multifold Whole and the Feminine: Reading Books III and IV of Spenser’s The Faerie Queene | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 94-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 周樹華(Shu-hua Chou),劉毓秀(Yu-hsiu Liu),雷碧琦(Bi-qi Lei),林質心(Chih-hsin Lin) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 史賓色,仙后,傳奇,寓言,阿里歐斯多,塔叟,維及爾,亞瑟王傳奇,編織結構,哥德式,陰性,德希達,班雅民,拉崗,布莉托瑪特, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Edmund Spenser,The Faerie Queene,romance,allegory,Ariosto,Tasso,Virgil,Arthurian romance,entrelacement,Gothic,feminine,Jacques Derrida,Walter Benjamin,Jacques Lacan,Britomart, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 246 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2006-07-26 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 文學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 外國語文學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 外國語文學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-95-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 829.99 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。