Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/23787| Title: | 在美國會計財務會計準則之下,併購之研發中資產是否為資產 Under SFAS No. 141(R), is acquired IPRD really an asset? |
| Authors: | Pi-Chi Wu 吳必琪 |
| Advisor: | 吳琮璠 |
| Keyword: | 美國財務會計準則141號公報,在研發中無形資產,無形資產, SFAS 141(R),In-process research and development(IPRD),Intangibles asset, |
| Publication Year : | 2011 |
| Degree: | 碩士 |
| Abstract: | In December 2007, Financial Accounting Standard Board (FASB) issued a revised version of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141 (SFAS No. 141(R)) which has changed the accounting policies of acquired in-process research and development (IPRD). Since December 15, 2008, the acquiring companies have to record acquired IPRD as an intangible asset with an indefinite life regardless of alternative future usages. After the business combination, it is subject to impairment testing annually. This change motivates the following study. In the past, IPRD was considered as an expense if it did not have alternative usages. This study examines whether IPRD is worthy of capitalizing as an asset. As an asset, IPRD should reflect the market value of firms and the subsequent benefits. My results do not support that IPRD is an asset from the investors’ views or the subsequent cash-flows. |
| URI: | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/23787 |
| Fulltext Rights: | 未授權 |
| Appears in Collections: | 資訊管理學系 |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-100-1.pdf Restricted Access | 266.96 kB | Adobe PDF |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
