以國家競爭力評比做政府政策制定之分析 -以台灣與南韓比較

Abstract

國家競爭力的研究大致以Michael Porter所建構之整體與一貫的理論體系為基礎，主要的分析方法有著重在鑽石模型分析、五力分析及SWOT分析等。 本文研究目的在於分析台灣與南韓在國家競爭力的情況和其國家政策對於各自競爭力的影響，並比較其異同，並得到下列結果： 一、台灣的總體國家競爭力優於南韓，但兩者尚有很大的進步空間。然而在分項比較上，台灣與南韓則各自有其擅場。 二、分析兩者在國家政策上的差異，台灣與南韓以往均著重在出口導向的製造業的發展；不過在未來發展的政策上，台灣則將觀光及文化創意等納入重點發展產業，南韓則無。

Researches of competitiveness of nations are almost based on the integrated and consistent theory, established by Michael Porter, and mainly by using the diamond model analysis, the five-power analysis, and the SWOT analysis. This article is to analyze the competitiveness of Taiwan and South Korea, and influences of national policies to it, and to compare the differences of the two nations. The results are: 1. The overall advantage of Taiwan is higher than that of South Korea, but each of them has their own advantages in detail. 2. Analyzing the differences of national policies of them, we found that both of them have encouraged export-oriented industries; however, Taiwan, policies of future developments, includes sightseeing and culture innovation, or soft industries, as key industries, and South Korea, on the other hand, does not.