請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/22257完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 江淳芳(Chun-Fang Chiang) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Tsai-Wei Wen | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 文采薇 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T04:14:30Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2010-08-18 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2010-08-11 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | References
Beaulieu, E. (2002). 'Facotr or Industry Cleavages in Trade Policy? AnEmpirical Analysis of the Stolper-Samuelson Theorem.' Economics andPolitics 14(2): 99-131. Beaulieu, E., Benarroch, M., Gaisford, J., Intra-Industry Trade Liberation, Wage Inequality and TradePolicyPreferences. University of Calgary Department of Economics Working Paper, 2004-06 Beaulieu, E., R. A. Yatawara, et al. (2005). 'Who Supports Free Trade in Latin America?' World Economy 28(7): 941-958. Beaulieu, E. and M. Napier (2008). 'Why are women more protectionist than men?' University of Oregon, Working Paper. Blonigen, B. a. (2009). 'New Evidence on the Formation of Individuals' Trade Policy Preferences.' University of Oregon, NBER, Working Paper 14627. Brinegar, A. P. and S. K. Jolly (2005). 'Location, Location, Location-National Contextual Factors and Public Support for European Integration.' European Union Politics 6(2): 155-180. Hooghe, L. and G. Marks (2004). 'Does Identity or Economic Rationality Drive Public Opinion on European Integration?' Political Science 37(3): 415-442. Irwin, D.A. (1994). “The political economy of free trade: Voting in the British general elections of 1906.” Journal of Law and economics 37, 75-108 Irwin, D.A. (1996). “Industry or class cleavages over trade policy?”Evidence from the British general election of 1923. In: Feenstra, R.C.,Grossman, G.M., Irwin, D.A. (Eds.), The Political Economy of Trade Policy: Paper in Honor of Jagdish Bhagwati. The MIT Press, Cambridge,MA, 53-75. Mayda, A. M. and D. Rodrik (2005). 'Why are some people (and countries) more protectionist than others?' European Economic Review 49: 1393-1430. Rodrik, D., (1995). “Political economy of trade policy”. In: Grossman,G., RogoD, K. (Eds.), Handbook of International Economics, Vol. 3. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, pp. 1457–1494. O’Rourke, K.H., Sinnott, R., (2001). “What determines attitudes towards protection? Some cross-country evidence.” In: Collins, S.M.,Rodrik, D. (Eds.), Brookings Trade Forum 2001. Brookings Institute Press, Washington DC, pp. 157–206. Scheve, K. F. and M. J. Slaughter (2001). 'What determines individual trade-policy preferences?' Journal of International Economics 54:267-292. Stolper, Wolfgang and Paul A. Samuelson (1941). “Protection and Real Wages,” Review of Economic Studies 9, 58-73. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/22257 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本篇論文主要的目的在於探討影響個人的自由貿易政策偏好的因素。另外，我們也討論人們在面對不同的貿易國家時，造成有不同的貿易偏好因素。我們的研究著重在台灣人民對於中國和美國的貿易偏好，並探討哪些因素造成在自由貿易偏好的分歧。初步調查結果是，高教育程度的個人在面對技術相對匱乏的國家，例如中國，會比較傾向支持自由貿易，證實了 Stolper–Samuelson 理論的預測。除此之外，我們也發現，個人的政治傾向、政黨支持偏好及國家認同也是解釋人們自由貿易態度的主要因素。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The main purpose of this paper is to examine factors that influence individuals’ free trade policy preference. We also examine whether people will have different attitudes toward free trade policy when facing different trade partners. In our research, we focus on China and the United States, and investigate which factors are related to differences in free trade preference. The preliminary finding is that people with higher education level are more pro-trade with a relatively skill-scarce country, China. These results have confirmed that theoretical prediction of Stolper-Samuelson Theory. Also, we find that individual’s political preferences are also significant elements in people free trade attitude formation. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T04:14:30Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-99-R97323045-1.pdf: 1195785 bytes, checksum: 8bd1b5ad52c6f96c1c3672df848953bb (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | Contents
1 Introduction 1 2 Related Literature 5 2.1 Trade Theory 5 2.2 Empirical Research on Trade Preference 5 3 The Economics and Political Situation in Taiwan 9 3.1 The Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA) 11 3.2 The Relation between Ethnicity and China Issue in Taiwan 13 4 Data 14 4.1 Globalization Survey 14 4.2 Variable Description 16 4.3 Summary Statistics 20 5 Empirical Model and Results 26 5.1 General Trade Preference 26 5.2 Free Trade Preference with Different Trade Partners Free trade with China and the United States 28 5.2.1 Bivariate Probit Model 28 5.2.2 Ordered Probit Model on Trade Partner Preference 31 6 Discussion 36 7 Conclusion 37 8 References 38 9 Appendix 40 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.subject | 政治經濟學 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 貿易 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 政策偏好 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Political economy | en |
| dc.subject | Policy preference | en |
| dc.subject | Trade | en |
| dc.title | 分析台灣民眾對自由貿易的支持度與貿易夥伴偏好 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Individual Preferences over Free Trade Partners: The Case of Taiwan | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 98-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 劉錦添(Jin-Tan Liu),林明仁(Ming-Jen Lin) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 貿易,政策偏好,政治經濟學, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Trade,Policy preference,Political economy, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 61 | |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2010-08-12 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 經濟學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 經濟學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-99-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.17 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。