請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/20502
標題: | 喬伊斯《尤里西斯》的檔案文本:談<單眼巨人>中之檔案欲力,政治與鬼魅 The Archi/texture of James Joyce’s Ulysses: Archive Fever, Politics, and Spectrality in “Cyclops” |
作者: | Po-chou Liao 廖柏州 |
指導教授: | 曾麗玲(Li-ling Tseng) |
關鍵字: | 詹姆士‧喬伊斯,雅克‧德希達,檔案欲力,記憶術,《尤里西斯》,身分認同, James Joyce,Jacques Derrida,archive fever,memory technics,Ulysses,identity, |
出版年 : | 2017 |
學位: | 碩士 |
摘要: | 詹姆士‧喬伊斯企圖以建立都柏林城全貌的野心,在每個章節利用各式各樣的風格與視角的轉換的技巧書寫《尤里西斯》。喬伊斯的《尤里西斯》試圖捉捕全世界的所有事物,就像一個百科全書的過程與操作。然而,當閱讀或評論喬伊斯的《尤里西斯》時,卻很少人察覺到(有意識或無意識地)潛藏在《尤里西斯》之下的保存慾望。這個希望將所有事物寫進一本小說,或絕對地銘刻所有事物的姿態,意味著一種想要保存所有的慾望。因此,正是喬伊斯的詭譎或者幾近瘋狂去記憶,保存,建檔的慾望形塑了《尤里西斯》這本百科全書。本論文將以雅克‧德希達檔案欲力的視角來閱讀《尤里西斯》。
本論文企圖重新-建檔,重新-追溯,和重新-詮釋喬伊斯的《尤里西斯》。地一部分,我將以德希達的檔案欲力將喬伊斯在<單眼巨人>使用的名字清單放置理論的脈絡,並藉由麥可‧果登對其章節出版的觀察同時將其歷史化。再者,我將把檔案欲力的政治面向帶入討論;也就是,被納入<單眼巨人>清單中的名字是經過篩選或者過濾的程序。最後,我將連結名字與身分認同的關係。 James Joyce writes Ulysses with the ambition to seek to establish the whole picture of Dublin in Ireland, with various styles and transition of perspectives in each of its chapter in Ulysses. Joyce’s Ulysses tries to embrace everything in the world like the process and operation of an encyclopedia. However, when reading, or commenting on Joyce’s Ulysses, few ever perceive (consciously or unconsciously) the undercurrent circulating behind Ulysses’s ambition of duplicating the whole vivid picture of Dublin: the preserving desire. The wish to write down everything into one novel, or to inscribe everything absolutely, means a desire to preserve it totally without remains. Consequently, it is Joyce’s uncanny or nearly lunatic desire to memorize, record, or archive everything in the encyclopedia called Ulysses that we want to consider and theorize─it is in the perspective of Jacques Derrida’s archive fever that will help to further the reading of Ulysses. The thesis is an attempt to re-archive, re-trace, and re-translate Joyce’s Ulysses. In the first part, I try to theorize Joyce’s use of the lists of names in “Cyclops” in the perspective of Derrida’s archive fever and at the same time historicize with Michael Groden’s observation and documentation of the publication of “Cyclops.” Secondly, I manage to bring up the political dimension of archive fever; that is, the names which are included in “Cyclops” are under the process of selection, or of filtration. Last, I strive to connect the aspect of names with the issue of identity. |
URI: | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/20502 |
DOI: | 10.6342/NTU201703343 |
全文授權: | 未授權 |
顯示於系所單位: | 外國語文學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-106-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 977.48 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。