請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/19730
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 王泰昌 | |
dc.contributor.author | Yuan-Xing Huang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 黃源興 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T02:15:51Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2016-02-15 | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2015-11-09 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Altman, E. I. 1968. Financial Ratios, Discriminant Analysis and Prediction of Corporate Bankruptcy. Journal of Finance. 23 (September): 589-610.
Avramov, D., Chordia, T., Jostova, G., & Philipov, A. 2013. Anomalies and Financial Distress. Journal of Financial Economics, 108(April): 139-159. Ashbaugh Skaife, Hollis, Daniel W. Collins, and Ryan LaFond. 2009. The Effect of SOX Internal Control Deficiencies on Firm Risk and Cost of Equity. Journal of Accounting Research. 47 (March): 1-43. Barclay, M. J., and Holderness, C. 1989. Private Benefits from Control of Public Corporations. Journal of Financial Economics. 25 (December): 371– 395 Barclay, M. J., and Holderness, C. 1991. Negotiated Block Trades and Corporate Control. Journal of Finance. 56 (July): 861– 878. Beaver H William. 1966. Financial Ratios as Predictors of Failure. Journal of Accounting Research, Empirical Research in Accounting: Selected Studies (1966): 71-111 Berle, Adolf Augustus, and Gardiner Gardiner Coit Means. 1932 The Modern Corporation and Private Property. Transaction publishers: 52-207 Bloomberg. 2014. Global M&A Market Review Financial Rankings. Bloomberg. 1-37 Dyck, A. I. I., and Zingales, L. 2004. Private Benefits of Control: An International Comparison. The Journal of Finance. 59 (April): 537-600 Faccio, M. and Masulis, R. W. 2005. The Choice of Payment Method in European Mergers and Acquisitions. Journal of Finance. 60 (May): 1345-1388 Fama, E. F., and French, K. R. 1992. The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns. Journal of Finance. 47 (June): 427-465. Grullon, G., Michaely R., and Swary, I. 1997. Capital Adequacy, Bank Mergers & the Medium of Payment. Journal of Business, Finance & Accounting. 24 (January): 97-124. Harry Deangelo, Linda Deangelo., and Douglas J. Skinner. 1994. Accounting Choice in Troubled Companies. Journal of Accounting and Economics. 17 (January): 113-143. Jensen, M.C. and Richard S. Ruback. 1983. The Market for Corporate Control: The Scientific Evidence. Journal of Financial Economics. 11 (April): 5-50. Jensen, M.C. and W. H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics. 3 (October): 305-360. Kevin C. W. Chen and Bryan K. Church. 1996. Going Concern Opinions and The Market’s Reaction to Bankruptcy Filings. Accounting Review. 71 (January): 117-128 Kristian Rydqvist. 1996. Takeover Bids and the Relative Prices of Shares that Differ in Their in Voting Rights. Journal of Banking & Finance. 20 (September): 1407-1425 La Porta, R., Lopez D, Silanes, Andrei Shleifer, and Robert Vishny. 2000 Investor protection and corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics 58 (December): 3-27 La Porta, R., Lopez D, Silanes, F. and Shleifer, A. 1999. Corporate Ownership around the World. Journal of Finance. 54 (April): 471-517. La Porta, R., Lopez D, Silanes, F., Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R., 1997. Legal Determinants of External Finance. Journal of Finance. 52 (July): 1131-1150. Mark E. Zmijewski. 1984. Methodological Issues Related to the Estimation of Financial Distress Prediction Models. Journal of Accounting Research. 22 (Supplement): 59-82 Ninon Kohers and Theodor Kohers. 2001. Takeovers of Technology Firms: Expectations vs. Reality. Financial Management. 30 (Autumn): 5-30 Ohlson, J. 1995. Earnings, Book Value, and Dividends in Security Valuation. Contemporary Accounting Research. 11 (Spring): 661-687. Ole Kristian Hope. Wayne B. Thomas., and Dushyantkumar Vyas. 2013. Financial Reporting Quality of U.S. Private and Public Firms. The Accounting Review. 88 (September): 1715-1742 Pae, Jinhan, Daniel B. Thornton, and Michael Welker. 2005. The Link between Earnings Conservatism and the Price to Book Ratio. Contemporary Accounting Research. 22 (Fall): 693-717 Ronald C. Lease., John J. McConnell., and Wayne H. Mikkelson. 1983. The Market Value of Control in Publicly-Traded Corporations. Journal of Financial Economics. 11 (April): 439-471 Sheryl Ann K. Stephen and Pieter J. de Jong. 2012. The Impact of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) on the Cost of Equity Capital of S&P Firms. Journal of Applied Business and Economics. 13 (March): 102 - 115 Tatiana Nenova. 2001. The Value of Corporate Voting Rights and Control: A Cross-Country Analysis. Journal of Financial Economics. 68 (June): 325–351 Thomas J George and Chuan Yang Hwang. 2010. A Resolution of the Distress Risk and Leverage Puzzles in the Cross Section of Stock Returns. Journal of Financial Economics. 96 (April): 56-79 Tim Loughran and Anand M. Vijh. 1997. Do Long-Term Shareholders Benefit From Corporate Acquisitions? Journal of Finance. 5 (December): 1765-1790 Villalonga Belen, and Raphael Amit. 2006. How Do Family Ownership, Control and Management Affect Firm Value? Journal of financial Economics 80 (March): 385-417. Zingales, L. 1995. The Value of the Voting Right: A Study of the Milan Stock Exchange Experience. The Review of Financial Studies. 7 (Spring): 125–148. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/19730 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本研究探討目標公司為財務困難公司及併購公司於併購交易時雙方的協商關係,併購後對於併購公司股價報酬的影響,以及資訊不對稱與控制權溢價的關係等議題。併購活動為現今企業是擴增規模的主要策略之一,而選擇財務困難公司作為併購標的,是否對併購公司有所助益?最後,探討資訊不對稱對控制權溢價之影響。
本論文實證研究顯示併購財務困難公司時,因賣方的議價能力較差,故會使得買方支付的併購價格減少。因為此緣故,避免併購公司在心態上有Roll(1986)指出的過度自信之情況,而享有併購綜效,因而股價反應出異常報酬。除此之外,本論文指出沙賓法案實施後,降低控制股東與非控制股東之間的資訊不對稱,進而減少控制權溢價。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | This study explores the negotiation between two parties of a merger, the firm is to be merged due it financial distress and the merging one; the impact on stock return ratio of the company that merged the other one, and issues such as effect on control premium due to information asymmetric. Merger is one of the most major strategies for an enterprise to expand its size; however we wonder, if choosing a company with financial difficulty to be a target of merger any good to the merging company? Finally, we explore the impact on right of control by information asymmetric.
This study is done with experimental study to prove that, while a company with financial distress is being merged, since the seller has worse negotiation ability, it will eventually reduce the price the buyer determines to pay. Therefore, we need to prevent the circumstance that, the merging company is convinced by its over self-confidence, proposed by Roll (1986), and motivates its stock price to react with an abnormal return due to multiple effects of such merger. Moreover, this study points out that, after the implementation of Sarbanes-Oxley Act in 2002, it reduced the information asymmetric between controlling shareholders and non-controlling shareholders and finally further reduced the control premium. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-08T02:15:51Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-104-R02722046-1.pdf: 1066739 bytes, checksum: 8896d6b8c70bcb62ec52f907b634543f (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論
第一節 研究背景 2 第二節 研究動機 4 第三節 研究架構 6 第二章 相關文獻探討暨假說建立 第一節 公司價值調整因素 7 第二節 控制權溢價的衡量 8 第三節 財務困難的定義 9 第四節 資訊不對稱與控制權溢價 10 第五節 假說建立 10 第三章 研究方法 第一節 迴歸模型及相關變數介紹 13 第二節 樣本選取 22 第四章 實證結果暨分析 第一節 目標公司為財務困難公司與控制權溢價之關聯 24 第二節 併購公司之異常報酬與併購財務困難公司之關聯 31 第三節 沙賓法案得以減少資訊不對稱與控制權溢價之關聯 37 第四節 額外測試 44 第五章 結論與研究限制 第一節 結論 45 第二節 研究限制 46 參考文獻 47 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 併購財務困難之公司對控制權溢價之影響 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Effect of a Merger of a Financially Distressed Company on Control Premium | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 104-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | 劉嘉雯(acliu@ntu.edu.tw) | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林瑞青 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 財務困難,控制權溢價,資訊不對稱,沙賓法案, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Financial Distress,Control Premium,Information Asymmetric,Sarbanes, | en |
dc.relation.page | 50 | |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2015-11-10 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 會計學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 會計學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-104-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.04 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。