請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/16974完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 吳青松(Ching-Sung, Wu) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Horng-Huei Po | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 柏鴻輝 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-07T23:51:27Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2014-01-27 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2014-01-16 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 中文資料
李承禹，2012，〈美國「戰略緊縮」與「重返亞洲」策略下的美「中」競局〉，《戰 略與評估》（Defense Strategy and Assessment Journal），3(3)：86-87。 林宜瑄譯，2007，《策略過程：軍事與商業之比較》，台北：國防部部辦室。譯自羅伯特•格雷坦Rober F. Grattan. The Strategy Process：A Military-Business Comparison. 吳福生、余忠勇譯，2001，《軍事事務革命與美軍轉型》，台北：國防部史政編譯局。譯自Richard O. Hundley. Past Revolutions, Future Transformations:What Can the History of Revolutions in Military Affairs Tell Us About Ransforming the U.S. Military. 張采靈著，2009，《影響世界歷史的50場經典戰爭》，台北：海鴿文化出版圖書有限公司。 張台航、謝豐安譯，2004，《軍事轉型與當代戰爭》，台北：國防部史政編譯室。譯自Hans Binnendijk. Military Transforming and Mondern Warfare.：A Reference Handbook. 黃文啟譯，2010，《美國軍事轉型》，台北：國防部史政編譯室。譯自艾莉諾•史龍Elinor Sloan. Transforming American’s Military. 陳悅琴等，2010，〈企業主策略意圖對企業轉型歷程之分析：以歐都納公司為例〉，《創業管理研究》，5(4)：3。 陳盈如譯，2013，《好策略壞策略》，台北：天下文化。譯自魯梅特Richard P. Rumelt. Good Strategy Bad Strategy: The Difference and Why It Matters. 蕭光霈譯，2011，《軍事轉型與戰略:軍事事務革新與小國》，台北:國防部史政編譯室。譯自盧福偉（Bernard Loo）編，Military Transforming Strategy : Revolutions in Military Affairs and Small States. 陳克仁譯，2006，〈無人飛行載具/無人戰鬥飛行載具－未來政策的可能任務及挑戰〉，《國防譯粹》，33(5)：5。譯自Pardesi, Manjeet Singh. Unmanned Aerial Vehicles/Unmanned Combat Aerial Vehicles-Likely Missions and Challenges for the Policy-Relevant Future. 曾祥穎譯，2005，〈軍事變革之根源〉，《軍事變革之根源：文化、政治與科技》，台北：國防部史政編譯局。譯自Farrell, Theo, Terry Terriff. The Sources of Military Change: Culture, Politics, Technology. 顧世純譯，1986，Mores Louis J.著，〈發展戰略所需美國制度上的調整〉，載於美國戰略論文集，臺北：黎明文化，頁237-240。 顧世純譯，1986，Archie D. Barret著，〈改組國防部所遭遇之困難〉，載於美國戰略論文集，臺北：黎明文化，頁242-301。 李育慈譯，2006，《掌控的迷思：美國21世紀的軍力與外交政策》，臺北：國防部部長辦公室。譯自Brown Seyom. The Illusion of Control: Force and Foreign Policy in the Twenty-First Centry. 高一中譯，2006，《落實轉型願景，軍事轉型彙編》，臺北：國防部部長辦公室。譯自Fairbanks Walter P. Implementing the Transformation Vision. 李育慈譯，2006，《2005年四年期國防總檢與國防轉型，軍事轉型彙編》，臺北：國防部部長辦公室，頁77-92。譯自Henry Ryan. Defense Transformation and the 2005 Quadrennial Defense Review. 李靜宜譯，2011，《權力大未來》，臺北：天下遠見。譯自Nye Joseph S. The Future of Power. 郭家琪、林宜瑄、李延輝等譯，2005，《美國國家安全》，臺北：國防部史政編譯室。譯自Sarkesian Sam C.等著U.S. National Security：Policymakers, Processes, and Politics. 安豐雄、邱伯浩、張彥之、羅慶生，軍事學導論（臺北：揚智，2002年）。 翁明賢，2003，「我國國防戰略前瞻規劃」，新世紀智庫論壇，第21期，頁26-58。 陳勁甫、邱榮守，2007，「論析美國『四年期國防總檢』的立法要求與影響」，問題與研究，46(3)：1-29。 曹雄源，2008，「後冷戰時期美國家安全戰略發展研析」，全球政治評論，第23期，頁1-28。 西文資料 Admiral M.G. Mullen, 2007.US Navy, “ CJCS Guidance for 2007-2008,” Office of the Chairman, Joint Chiefs of staff, 1 October 2007：3. Admiral William A. Owens,2002. US Navy（retired）, “The Once and Future Revolution in Military Affairs,”Joint Forces Quarterly 31（Summer 2002）:55-61 Alvin and Heidi Toffler,1980.The Third Wave, Harper Collins Publishers Limited, pp.23. Alvin and Heidi Toffler, 1993.War and Anti-War：Survival at the Dawn of the Twenty-first Century（Boston：Little, Brown,） Andrew Krepinevich,1994. “From Cavalry to Computer: The Pattern of Military Revolutions,” National Interest 37（Fall 1994）pp.30 Arthur K. Cebrowski, Military Transforming: A Strategic Approach, op.cit, P.8. Chairmen , Joint Chiefs of Staff , Joint Vision 2020（U.S. Goverment Printing Office , Washington , DC , June 2000）P.8, emphasis added. J. Keegan, 1993. The History of Warfare. Pimlico, London, pp.155。 K. Gien, 1996. “A Revolution in Military Affairs-The Stuff of Fables,” in Defence Forces Journal. Number 116, Jan./Feb. pp.6。 Klein, M.M.,1996. “Tips for Aspiring Reengineers, Planning Review”, Vol. 24, No. 1,p.40-41。 Lavy, A. & Merry, U. 1988. “Organizational transformation, revitalizing organization for a competitive world.” Jessey-Bass Inc. Mark Joyce,2004.“Transforming Transformation: America Trends and Transatlantic Implications”, RUSI Newbrief 24(7)（July 2004）. Mary C. FitzGerald,1987.“Marshal Ogarkov and the New Revolution in Soviet Military Affairs,”research memorandum, Center for Naval Analyses, January 1987 Mary C. FitzGerald,1994. “The Russian Image of Future War,” Comparative Strategy 13, pp.167。 Max Boot,2005.“The Struggle to Transform the Military,”Foreign Affairs 84(2)（March/April 2005）. Mark E. Manyin Chanlett-Avery and Mary Beth Nikitin, 2012. U.S.-South Korea Relations（Washington D.C.:U.S. Congressional Research Service, June 29, 2012）. pp.21-23. Michael J. Mazarr, Jeffrey Shaffer, and Benjamin Ederington,1993. The Military Technical Revolution（Washington, DC:Center for Strategic and International Studies, March 1993） 2001 Quadrennial Defense Review Report, Department of Defense,USA, p.18-20. 2010 Quadrennial Defense Review Report, Department of Defense,USA, p.10-20. U.S. DOD, “Elements of Defense Transformation”, Oct 2004,p.5。 US Office of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, ”Operation of the Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System,” Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Manual 3170.olc, 1 May 2007 A-1-18. US Office of the Joint Chiefs of Staff,” Capabilities-Based Assessment （CBA） User’s Guide”, Version 2, Joint Staff Force Structure, Resources, and Assessment Directorate（JCS J-8）（Washington, DC：GPO,2006）,28-60. Budget of the United States Government（Washington, DC：Government Printing Office, 2000） Congressional Budget Office, Budgeting for Defense：Maintaining Today’s Forces（Washington, DC：Government Printing Office, September, 2000） Office of the Secretary of Defense,” Transformation Study Report:Transforming Military Operational Capabilities ? （Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, April, 27,2001）, Chart 5. The Budget Control Act of 2011：The Effects on Spending and the Budget Deficits When the Automatic Spending Cuts are Implemented （Washington , DC：Congressional Research Service , 2012）. Transforming Defense: National Security in the 21st Century, Report of the National Defense Panel（December, 1997） “Transformed: A Survey of the Defense Industry”, Economist, 20 July 2002, pp.7。 U.S. Defense Dept., Network-Centric Warfare:Certing a Decisive Warfighting Advantage,（Washington, D.C.:Office of Defense Transformation, 2003）pp.2。 Washington Declaration on Defense Cooperation between The department of Defense of the United States if America and The Ministry of Defense of New Zealand and New Zealand Defense Force, signed in Washington, D.C.,June 19, 2012. Joint Statement Of The Security Consultative Committee: Toward a More Robust Alliance and Shared Responsibilities,” Japan Minister of Foreign Affairs, October, 3, 2013. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, Military Expenditure Database, www.sipri.org/research/armaments/milex_database. Office of the Press Secretary（2001） ”President Speaks on War Effort to Citadel Cadets”, White House,” December. Online, available at www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/12/print/20011211-6.html. http:/armedservices.house.gov/pdf/FC020608/Gates_Testimony020608.pdf.Testimony on Fiscal Year 2009 National Defense Budget,P1-7. Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments（CSBA）, The Emerging RMA（Washington, D.C.:n.d. ）,available at www.csbaonlin.org/2Strategic_Studies/2Emerging_RMA/Emerging_RMA.html。（檢索日期：2013年9月21日）。 White House, Office of Press Secretary, “Remarks By Tom Donilon, National Security Advisory to the President: 'The United States and The Asia-Pacific in 2013',” White House, March 11, 2013, <http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/03/11/remarks-tom-donilon-national-security-advisory-president-united-states-a>.（檢索日期:2013年9月21日） Sustaining U.S. Global Leadership:Priorities for 21st Century Defense, USDOD, p4-6, January 5, 2012, http://www.defense.gov/news/defense_strategic_guidance.pdf. （檢索日期:2013年12月1日）。 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/16974 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 1997年12月由美國兩黨共組的「國防小組」（National Defense Panel）公布一份名為《國防轉型：論21世紀國家安全》 （Transforming Defense：National Security in 21st Century）的報告，開啟了美國「國防轉型」（Defense Transformation）邁向21世紀軍事轉型的歷史新頁。
美國的國防轉型，在柯林頓政府時期是以冷戰時期蘇聯為最主要假想敵的「威脅為導向」（Threat-Base）的軍事轉型規劃；至布希政府時期已調整為打擊任何敵人，所應具備的以「能力為導向」（Capabilities-base）的國防戰略規劃。 21世紀美國「國防轉型」戰略規劃，不但是全球矚目的焦點，亦是世界各國學習及仿效的對象，換言之；美國的國防轉型正代表下一場先進作戰型態的出現，本文嘗試由企業與國防轉型的共通性為起點，論述美國「國防轉型」的戰略規劃，並區分三個面向：第一、美國國防轉型將受國防預算的刪減而被迫必須調整國防組織架構，以肆應「確保能打贏下一場主要戰爭及嚇阻其他區域潛在的衝突」的新戰略構想。第二、面對中共的崛起，導致亞洲區域權力的失衡，美國推展亞洲「再平衡」戰略，防範與對抗中共軍力的擴張，其戰略意涵將牽動美國全球軍事戰略的調整。第三、今日中華民國亦面臨國防預算不足，但又將實施「募兵制」等國防轉型的關鍵時刻，如何汲取美國國防轉型的經驗供我國參考，攸關中華民國是否能成功轉型，至為重要。 關鍵字：國防轉型；威脅導向；能力導向；美國亞洲「再平衡」；募兵制 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | In December, 1997, the bipartisan “National Defense Panel” published a report titled: Transforming Defense; National Security in 21st Century, which moved U.S. Defense Transformation toward military transformation of the 21st Century.
During Clinton Administration era, U.S. military transformation was a Threat-Base planning taking Cold War era Soviet Union as potential threat; it has been adjusted to a “Capabilities-Base” defense strategy which requires the capability to strike any enemy in Bush Jr. Administration. The strategic planning of 21st Century U.S. defense transformation not only attracts global attention, but also becomes a road model for countries in the world. In other words, U.S. defense transformation represents the emerging of next advanced operational mode. This essay attempts to illustrate the strategic planning of U.S. defense transformation from the commonalities of business and defense transformation, and divides it into three categories: 1. Due to defense budget cut, the U.S. is forced to reform its defense organizations to adapt to strategic concept of “ensuring the winning of next major war and deterring potential conflicts in other regions”; 2. The rise of PRC resulted in imbalance of power in Asia. The U.S. promotes its Asia rebalancing strategy in order to defend and confront PRC military expansion, which would lead to readjustment of U.S. global military strategies; 3. The R.O.C. is implementing defense transformation including promoting volunteer system while facing insufficiency in defense budget. How R.O.C. applies lessons learned from the U.S. is the essential to the success of its defense transformation. Key words: defense transformation, threat-base, capabilities-base, Asia rebalancing strategy, volunteer system. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-07T23:51:27Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-102-P98746013-1.pdf: 2557959 bytes, checksum: c8c85a919ed8886398641c420dea4e93 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 Ⅰ
誌 謝 Ⅱ 中文摘要 Ⅲ 英文摘要 Ⅳ 目 錄 Ⅴ 圖目錄 Ⅵ 表目錄 Ⅶ 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機與目的 1 第二節 研究方法 3 第三節 研究架構 9 第四節 研究範圍與限制 10 第二章 從企業轉型看國防轉型 11 第一節 「國防轉型」定義與演進 11 第二節 「國防轉型」管理與策略 30 第三節 「國防轉型」文獻探討 49 第四節 小結 64 第三章 美國國防轉型 67 第一節 美國「國防轉型」背景 67 第二節 美國「國防轉型」策略 75 第三節 小結 96 第四章 結論與建言 99 第一節 研究發現 99 第二節 中共對「美國國防轉型的反制」 111 第三節 本研究對我國的啟示與建議 116 第四節 小結 125 參考文獻 127 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 威脅導向 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 募兵制 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 國防轉型 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 能力導向 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 美國亞洲「再平衡」 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Defense Tansformation | en |
| dc.subject | Vlunteer System | en |
| dc.subject | Asia Rbalancing Srategy | en |
| dc.subject | Cpabilities-base | en |
| dc.subject | Treat-base | en |
| dc.title | 論美國國防轉型之研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | A Study On U.S Defense Transformation | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 102-1 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 趙義隆(Yi-Long, Jaw),吳學良(Hsueh-Liang, Wu) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 國防轉型,威脅導向,能力導向,美國亞洲「再平衡」,募兵制, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Defense Tansformation,Treat-base,Cpabilities-base,Asia Rbalancing Srategy,Vlunteer System, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 131 | |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2014-01-17 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 國際企業管理組 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 國際企業管理組 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-102-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 2.5 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。