Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 文學院
  3. 外國語文學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/16737
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor張惠娟(Hui-chuan Chang)
dc.contributor.authorMing-ming Chenen
dc.contributor.author陳旼旼zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-07T23:44:44Z-
dc.date.copyright2014-07-11
dc.date.issued2014
dc.date.submitted2014-07-07
dc.identifier.citationAbbot, Philip. “Should Utopians have Perfect Bodies?”
Futures 42 (2010): 874-881. Print.
Adams, Carol J. “Ecofeminism and the Eating of Animals.”
Hypatia 6.1 (1991): 125-145.
---. “The Feminist Traffic in Animals.” Gaard 195-218.
---. The Sexual Politics of Meat: A Feminist-Vegetarian
Critical Theory. New York: The Continuum Publishing
Company, 1990. Print.
Archambault, Anne. “A Critique of Ecofeminism.” Canadian
Woman Studies 13.3 (1993): 19-22.
Atwood, Margaret. Oryx and Crake: a Novel. London: Virago,
2004. Print.
---. The Year of the Flood: a Novel. New York: O.W. Toad,
2009. Print.
Bordo, Susan. “The Body and the Reproduction of Femininity.”
Unbearable Weight: Feminism, Western Culture, and the
Body. Berkeley: University of California P, 2003.
165-184. Print.
Burgess, Olivia Anne. “Utopian Body: Alternative Experience
of Embodiment in 20th Century Utopian Literature.” Diss.
Texas A&M University, 2010.
Collard, Andree, and Joyce Contrucci. Rape of the Wild:
Man’s Violence against Animals and the Earth. Bloominton:
Indiana UP, 1989. Print.
Cooke, Grayson. “Technics and the Human at Zero-Hour:
Margaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake.” Studies in Canadian
Literature 31.2 (2006): 63-83. Print.
Cudworth, Erika. “Embodiment, Materiality, and Symbolic
Regimes.” Developing Ecofeminist Theory: The Complexity
of Difference. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005. 128-
155. Print.
Davies, Madeleine. “Margaret Atwood’s Female Bodies.”
Howells 58-71.
Diamond, Irene. Fertile Ground: Women, Earth, and the Limits
of Control. Boston: Beacon P, 1994. Print.
Dunayer, Joan. “Sexist Words, Speciesist Roots.” Animal and
Women: Feminist Theoretical Explorations. Eds. Carol J.
Adams and Josephine Donovan. Durham: Duke UP, 1995.
11-31. Print.
Eckersley, Robyn. “Ecofeminism.” Environmentalism and
Political Theory: Toward an Ecocentric Approach. Albany:
State University of New York Press, 1992. 63-72. Print.
Gaard, Greta. Ecocriticism: the New Critical Idiom.
London: Routledge, 2004. Print.
---, ed. Ecofeminism: Women, Animals, Nature. Philadelphia:
Temple UP, 1993.
---. “Vegetarian Ecofeminism: A Review Essay.” Frontiers: A
Journal of Women Science 23.3 (2002): 117-146. Print.
Galeano, Eduardo H. Walking Words. New York: W.W. Norton &
Company Incorporated, 1997. Print.
Gomel, Elana. “The Plague of Utopias: Pestilence and the
Apocalyptic Body.” Twentieth Century Literature 46.4
(2000): 405-433.
Griffin, Susan. Pornography and Silence: Culture’s Revenge
against Nature. New York: Harper and Row, Publishers,
1981. Print.
Gruen, Lori. “Dismantling Oppression: An Analysis of the
Connection between Women and Animals.” Gaard 60-90.
Hengen, Shannon. “Margaret Atwood and Environmentalism.”
Howells 58-71.
Howells, Coral Ann. ed. The Cambridge Companion to Margaret
Atwood. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2006. Print.
Jaroff, Leon. “The Gene Hunt.” Time. Time Inc. 20 March
1989. Web. 19 Apr 2014.
Kheel, Marti. “From Heroic to Holistic Ethics: the
Ecofeminist Challenge.” Gaard 243-271.
---. Nature Ethics: An Ecofeminist Perspective. Lanham:
Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2008. Print.
King, Ynestra. “Healing the Wounds: Feminism, Ecology, and
the Nature/Culture Dualism.” Reweaving the World: The
Emergence of Ecofeminism. Ed. Irene Diamond and Gloria
Feman Orenstein. San Francisco: Sierra Club, 1990. 106-
121. Print.
---. “The Ecology of Feminism and the Feminism of Ecology.”
Healing the Wounds: The Promise of Ecofeminism. Ed.
Judith Plant. Philadelphia: New Society Publishers, 1989.
18-39. Print.
Ko, Dorothy. “Bodies in Utopia and Utopian Bodies in
Imperial China.” Thinking Utopia: Steps into Other
Worlds. Ed. Jorn Rusen, Michael Fehr and Thomas W.
Rieger. New York: Berghahn Books, 2005. 89-103. Print.
Lewes. Darby. “Introduction: Utopian Sexual Landscapes.”
Nudes From Nowhere:Utopian Sexual Landscapes. Lanham:
Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2000. 1-14. Print.
Loughney, Robert. “Margaret Atwood[‘s] The Year of the
Flood: Why Painball is Awesome.” Suite. Suite, 15 Aug.
2010. Web. 28 May 2014.
Mak Ngah Lam, Elaine. “Eugenics in Fictional Dystopia:
Ecofeminist Praxis.” Postmodern Productions. U of Hong
Kong., n.d. Web. 19 Apr. 2014. <http://www.gradnet.de/
papers /pomo2.papers/mak00.htm>
Messer, Melissa. “Writing the World: Ursula K. Le Guin and
Margaret Atwood’s Literary Contributions to Ecofeminism.”
Honors College Capstone Experience/Thesis Projects.
Western Kentucky University, 2007. Print.
Midgley, Mary. Animals and Why They Matter. Athens:
University of Georgia P, 1983. Print.
Mies, Maria, and Vandana Shiva. Ecofeminism. Halifax:
Fernwood Publications, 1993. Print.
Parker, Emma. “You Are What You Eat: The Politics of Eating
in the Novels of Margaret Atwood.” Twentieth Century
Literature 41.3 (1995): 349-367.
Parrinder, Patrick. “Eugenics and Utopia: Sexual Selection
from Galton to Morris.” Utopian Studies 8.2 (1997): 1 –
12. Print.
Soper, Kate. “Naturalized Woman and Feminized Nature.” The
Green Studies Reader: From Romanticism to Ecocriticism.
Ed. Laurence Coupe. London: Routledge, 2000. 139-143.
Print.
Spretnak, Charlene. “Earthbody and the Personal Body as
Sacred.” Ecofeminism and the Sacred. Ed. Carol J. Adams.
New York: Continuum, 1993. 261-280. Print.
Stanford, Craig B. “Meat’s Patriarchy.” The Hunting Apes:
Meat Eating and the Origins of Human Behavior. Princeton:
Princeton UP, 1999. 199-218. Print.
Twine, Richard T. “Ma (r) king Essence—Ecofeminism and
Embodiment.” Ethics & the Environment 6.2 (Autumn 2001):
31-58. Print.
Vale, Valhalla, and Andrea Juno. Modern Primitives: An
Investigation of Contemporary Adornment and Ritual. San
Francisco: RE/Search P, 1989. Print.
Warkentin, Traci. “Dis/intergrating Animals: Ethical
Dimensions of the Genetic Engineering of Animals for
Human Consumption.” AI & Soc 20 (2006): 82-102. Print.
Warren, Karen J. Ecofeminist Philosophy: A Western
Perspective on What it is and Why it Matters. Lanham:
Rowman & Littlefield P, 2000. Print.
Wolf, Naomi. The Beauty Myth: How Images of Beauty are Used
against Women. New York: Doubleday, 1992. Print.
Yilmaz, Saadet. “Eugenics with Regard to Biotechnology and
Women: An Ecofeminist Perspective.” Turkish Journal of
Politics 1.1 (2010): 27-35.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/16737-
dc.description.abstract有關身體的論述,一直是人類生存史上最富爭議性的話題之一。文學作品中對於身體的描寫,尤其是在烏托邦的場域裡,往往打破了生理的枷鎖,超越了理性的束縛,並且被賦予多方想像與幻想的色彩。本文以生態女性主義的角度來檢視瑪格麗特•愛特伍的兩部反烏托邦作品—《末世男女》與《洪荒年代》,並依序由生育,情色,與食素三大主軸切入來討論身體在其文本中的再現。生態女性主義集結了生態主義與女性主義的學說,不僅對於自然以及女性在父權體制下所遭受的宰制有新穎的解讀,也提供了本文批判現代理性與科學主流的環境下,將身體視為可重複被拆解、被重組、被消費、被客製化等等,以期全然符合人類需求特性的立論依據。瑪格麗特•愛特伍的兩本反烏托邦作品中對於基因改造、情色文化、素食主義等的著墨演示了一種人類投射於肉體上的弔詭:一方面它體現了通往解放和烏托邦境界的潛能,另一方面它又受制裁與壓迫背後的極權主義和反烏托邦陰影的籠罩。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThe body has been one of the most contested sites in the history of human existence. Literary portrayals of the body, especially in utopian settings, often break the yoke of biological constraints, transcend the confinement of rationality, and manifest all guises of imaginations and fantasies. This thesis approaches Margaret Atwood’s two dystopias—Oryx and Crake, and The Year of the Flood from an ecofeminist perspective, and examines the representation of the body as it pertains to the issue of reproduction, pornography, and vegetarianism. Drawing from ecologism and feminism in their discussion of the dual subordination of nature and women in the patriarchal structure of domination, ecofeminist discourse on the body makes room for the discussion of the precarious state of the body as physically collectable, controllable, consumable, and customizable. As embodiment becomes endlessly alterable for human ends, this thesis demonstrates how the representation of the bodies in Margaret Atwood’s two dystopias exemplify both the liberating and utopian potential, and the totalitarian dystopian mechanisms that lurk behind the system that sanctions oppression.en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-07T23:44:44Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-103-R99122005-1.pdf: 1163815 bytes, checksum: bdb59c80b2b417829fee1c887848c5b2 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2014
en
dc.description.tableofcontentsIntroduction 1
Major Argument 8
Literature Review 9
Original Contribution 12
Methods and Procedures 13
Structure and Organization 16
Chapter One: the Reproductive Body 18
Genetic Engineering 23
Eugenics 30
Chapter Two: the Pornographic Body 40
Violence and Visual Spectacle 46
Pornography and Prostitution 51
Chapter Three: the Vegetarian Body 61
The Patriarchy of Meat 66
Vegetarianism 71
Conclusion 77
Works Cited 80
dc.language.isoen
dc.title身體的論述: 從生態女性主義角度探討愛特伍的兩本反烏托邦小說zh_TW
dc.titleDiscourse on the Body: An Ecofeminist Reading of Margaret
Atwood’s two Dystopias
en
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear102-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee李欣穎(Sherry Li),劉毓秀(Yu-hsiu Liu)
dc.subject.keyword身體,生態女性主義,生育,情色,食素,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordBody,Ecofeminism,Reproduction,Pornography,Vegetarianism,en
dc.relation.page83
dc.rights.note未授權
dc.date.accepted2014-07-07
dc.contributor.author-college文學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept外國語文學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:外國語文學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-103-1.pdf
  目前未授權公開取用
1.14 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved