請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/1289
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 陳良治(Liang-Chih Chen) | |
dc.contributor.author | Tzu-Yu Chen | en |
dc.contributor.author | 陳姿妤 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-12T09:35:37Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-03-02 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-12T09:35:37Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2018-03-02 | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2018-02-08 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Al-Ani, Ban, Trainer, Erik, Redmiles, David, & Simmons, Erik. (2012). Trust and Surprise in Distributed Teams: Towards an Understanding of Expectations and Adaptations. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Intercultural Collaboration (ICIC 2012), Bengaluru.
Armstrong, David J., & Cole, Paul. (2002). Managing Distances and Differences in Geographically Distributed Work Groups. In Pamela J. Hinds & Sara Kiesler (Eds.), Distributed Work (pp. 167-190). Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. Bao, Xiaowen, & Bouthillier, France. (2007). Informaiton Sharing: As a Type of Information Behavior Information Sharing in a Fragmented World: Crossing Boundaries. Montreal: McGill University. Bathelt, Harald, & Henn, Sebastian. (2014). The Geographies of Knowledge Transfers over Distance: Toward a Typology. Environment and Planning A, 46(6), 1403-1424. Bathelt, Harald, Malmberg, Anders, & Maskell, Peter. (2004). Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography, 28(1), 31-56. Bathelt, Harald, & Schuldt, Nina. (2008). Between Luminaires and Meat Grinders: International Trade Fairs as Temporary Clusters. Regional studies, 42(6), 853-868. Bathelt, Harald, & Turi, Philip. (2011). Local, global and virtual buzz: The importance of face-to-face contact in economic interaction and possibilities to go beyond. Geoforum, 42(5), 520-529. Ben-Zur, Hasida, & Breznitz, Shlomo J. (1981). The Effect of Time Pressure on Risky Choice Behavior. Acta psychologica, 47, 89–104. Boschma, Ron. (2005). Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment. Regional studies, 39(1), 61-74. Bouba-Olga, Olivier, & Grossetti, Michel. (2007). Why Are There Still Proximity Effects in Innovation Processes? Working Paper CRIEF, T2007-02. Breschi, Stefano, & Lissoni, Francesco. (2002). Mobility and Social Networks: Localised Knowledge Spillovers Revisited. Paper presented at the Workshop 'Clusters in High-Technology: Aerospace, Biotechnology and Software Compared', Montreal. Briscoe, Gerard, & Mulligan, Catherine. (2014). Digital Innovation: The Hackathon Phenonmenon. Creativeworks London Working Paper, No.6. Briscoe, Gerard, Virani, Tarek E., & Dima, Mariza. (2015). Hackathons: Why Co-location? Creativeworks London Working Paper, No.11. Chen, Liang-Chih, & Chu, Ling-I. (2015). Upgrading of latecomer industries in Taiwan and the case of the Taipei International Machine Tool Show. In Harald Bathelt & Gang Zeng (Eds.), Temporary Knowledge Ecologies: The Rise of Trade Fairs in the Asia-Pacific Region (pp. 254-272). UK: Edward Elgar. Chiu, Chao-Min, Hsu, Meng-Hsiang, & Wang, Eric T.G. (2006). Understanding Knowledge Sharing in Virtual Communities: An Integration of Social Capital and Social Cognitive Theories. Decision Support Systems, 42, 1872-1888. Choi, Minjung. (2016). Organizing Open Digital Innovation: Evidence from Hackathons. Paper presented at the Thirty Seventh International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2016), Dublin. Christensen-Szalanski, Jay J. J. (1980). A Further Examination of the Selection of Problem-Solving Strategies: The Effects of Deadlines and Analytic Aptitudes. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 25(1), 107-122. Cramton, Catherine Durnell. (2002). Attribution in Distributed Work Groups. In Pamela J. Hinds & Sara Kiesler (Eds.), Distributed Work (pp. 191-212). Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. Derks, Daantje, Fischer, Agneta H., & Bos, Arjan E.R. (2008). The role of emotion in computer-mediated communication A review. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3), 766-785. Durham, Cathy C., Locke, Edwin A., Poon, June M. L., & McLeod, Poppy L. (2000). Effects of Group Goals and Time Pressure on Group Efficacy, Information-Seeking Strategy, and Performance. Human Performance, 13(2), 115-138. Edmondson, Amy C., Winslow, Ann B., Bohmer, Richard M. J., & Pisano, Gary P. (2003). Learning How and Learning What: Effects of Tacit and Codified Knowledge on Performance Improvement Following Technology Adoption. Decision Sciences, 34(2), 197-224. Edquist, Charles, & Johnson, Björn. (1997). Institutions and organizations in systems of innovation. In Charles Edquist (Ed.), System of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations (pp. 41-63). London: Printer. Fattal, Alex. (2012). Facebook: Corporate Hackers, a Billion Users, and the Geo-politics of the 'Social Graph'. Anthropological Quarterly, 85(3), 927-955. Florida, Richard. (2006). 創意新貴Ⅱ:城市與創意階級 (傅振焜, Trans.). 臺北市: 日月文化. Florida, Richard, Adler, Patrick, & Mellander, Charlotta. (2017). The City as Innovation Machine. Regional studies, 51(1), 86-96. Frances, Cairncross. (2001). 地球零距離:邁向電子商務世界的數位管理藍圖 (黃喻麟, Trans.). 臺北縣汐止鎮: 新新聞文化. Freeman, Christopher, & Perez, Carlota. (1988). Structural Crisis of Adjustment, Business Cycles and Investment Behaviour. In Giovanni Dosi, Christopher Freeman, Richard Nelson, Gerald Silverberg, & Luc Soete (Eds.), Technical Change and Economic Theory (pp. 38-66). London: Pinter. Grabher, Gernot, & Stark, David. (1997). Organizing Diversity: Evolutionary Theory, Network Analysis and Postsocialism. Regional studies, 31(5), 533-544. Graham, Mark, Straumann, Ralph K., & Hogan, Bernie. (2015). Digital Divisions of Labor and Informational Magnetism: Mapping Participation in Wikipedia. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 105(6), 1158-1178. Granovetter, Mark. (1985). Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481-510. Hall, Peter A., & Soskice, David. (2001). An Introduction to Varieties of Capitalism. In Peter A. Hall & David Soskice (Eds.), Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage (pp. 1-68). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Hannan, Michael, & Freeman, John. (1977). The Population Ecology of Organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), 929-964. Hara, Noriko. (2007). Information Technology Support for Communities of Practice: How Public Defenders Learn About Winning and Losing in Court. Journal of American Society for Information Science & Technology, 58(1), 76-87. Harrison, Bennett. (1992). Industrial Districts: Old Wine in New Bottles? Regional studies, 26(5), 469-483. Hearn, Gregory N., & Foth, Marcus. (2005). Action Research in the Design of New Media and ICT Systems. In Kwamena Kwansah-Aidoo (Ed.), Topical Issues in Communications and Media Research (pp. 79-94). New York: Nova Science. Hew, Khe Foon, & Hara, Noriko. (2007). Knowledge Sharing in Online Environments: A Qualitative Case Study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(14), 2310-2324. Hinds, Pamela J., & Kiesler, Sara. (2002). Distributed Work. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. Jacobs, Jane (1970). The Economy of Cities. New York: Vintage Books. Johnson, Björn, Lorenz, Edward, & Lundvall, Bengt‐Åke. (2002). Why All this Fuss about Codified and Tacit Knowledge? Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(2), 245-262. Johnson, Björn, & Lundvall, Bengt-Åke. (1994). The Learning Economy. Journal of Industry Studies, 1(2), 23-42. Jones, Steven G. . (1995). Understanding Community in the Information Age. In Steven G. Jones (Ed.), CyberSociety : Computer-Mediated Communication and Community (pp. 10-35). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Jordan, Tim. (1999a). The Virtual Individual. In Tim Jordan (Ed.), Cyberpower: The Culture and Politics of Cyberspace and the Internet (pp. 59-99). London and New York: Routledge. Jordan, Tim. (1999b). The Virtual SocialⅠ: The Social in Cyberspace. In Tim Jordan (Ed.), Cyberpower: The Culture and Politics of Cyberspace and the Internet (pp. 100-141). London and New York: Routledge. Kiesler, Sara, & Cummings, Jonathon N. (2002). What Do We Know about Proximity and Distance in Work Groups? A Legacy of Research. In Pamela J. Hinds & Sara Kiesler (Eds.), Distributed work (pp. 57-81). Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. Kirat, Thierry, & Lung, Yannick. (1999). Innovation and proximity. Territories as loci of collective learning processes. European Urban and Regional Studies, 6(1), 27-38. Klitmøller, Anders, & Lauring, Jakob. (2013). When global virtual teams share knowledge: Media richness, cultural difference and language commonality. Journal of World Business, 48(3), 398-406. Kmetz, John L. . (1984). An Information-Processing Study of a Complex Workflow in Aircraft Electronics Repair. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(2), 255-280. Komssi, Marko, Pichlis, Danielle, Raatikainen, Mikko, Kindstrom, Klas, & Jarvinen, Janne. (2015). What are Hackathons for? IEEE Software, 32(5), 60-67. Kruman, Paul. (1991). Localization Geography and Trade (pp. 35-67). Lorentzen, Anne. (2008). Knowledge Networks in Local and Global Space. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 20(6), 533-545. Lundvall, Bengt-Åke (1993). Explaining interfirm cooperation and innovation. Limits of the transaction-cost approach. In Gernot Grabher (Ed.), The Embedded Firm. On the Socioeconomics of Industrial Networks (pp. 52-64). London: Routledge. Mark, Gloria. (2002). Conventions for Coordinating Electronic Distributed Work A Longitudinal Study of Groupware Use_ p 259-282. In Pamela J. Hinds & Sara Kiesler (Eds.), Distributed Work (pp. 259-282). Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. Marshall, Alfred. (1919). Industry and Trade. London. Marshall, Alfred. (1986). Principles of Economics (8th ed.). London: Macmillan and Co. Maskell, Peter, Bathelt, Harald, & Malmberg, Anders. (2004). Temporary Clusters and Knowledge Creation: The Effects of International Trade Fairs, Conventions and Other Professional Gatherings. Spatial Aspects Concerning Economic Structures Working Paper (SPACES), 2004-04. Maskell, Peter, Bathelt, Harald, & Malmberg, Anders. (2006). Building Global Knowledge Pipelines: The Role of Temporary Clusters. European Planning Studies, 14(8), 997-1013. Miller, James G. (1960). Information Input Overload and Psychopathology. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 116, 695-704. Monge, Peter R., & Kirste, Kenneth K. (1980). Measuring Proximity in Human Organization. Social Psychology Quarterly, 43(1), 110-115. Morgan, Kevin. (2004). The exaggerated death of geography learning, proximity and territorial innovation systems. Journal of Economic Geography, 4(1), 3-21. Nooteboom, Bart (2000). Learning and Innovation in Organizations and Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. O'Sullivan, Dan. (2009). Wikipedia: A New Community of Practice? Burlinton, VT: Ashgate. Olson, Judith S., Teasley, Stephanie, Covi, Lisa, & Olson, Gary. (2002). The (Currently) Unique Advantages of Collocated Work. In Pamela J. Hinds & Sara Kiesler (Eds.), Distributed Work (pp. 113-135). Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. Payne, John, Bettman, James, & Johnson, Eric. (1988). Adaptive Strategy Selection in Decision Making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 534-552. Polanyi, Karl. (1944). The Great Transformation. Boston: Beacon Press. Polanyi, Michael. (1966). Tacit Knowing. In Michael Polanyi (Ed.), The Tacit Dimension (pp. 3-25). New York: Doubleday and Company. Porter, Michael E. (2000). Location, Clusters and Company Strategy. In Gordon L. Clark, Meric S. Gertler, & Maryann P. Feldman (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Ecnomic Geography (pp. 253-274). New York: Oxford University Press. Rallet, Alain, & Torre, André. (1999). Is geographical proximity necessary in the innovation networks in the era of global economy? GeoJouranl, 49(4), 373-380. Rallet, Alain, & Torre, André. (2005). Proximity and localization. Regional studies, 39(1), 47-59. Rocco, Elena. (1998). Trust Breaks Down in Electronic Contexts But Can Be Repaired by Some Initial Face-to-Face Contact. Paper presented at the Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York. Sabel, Charles. (1989). Flexible Specialization and the Re-Emergence of Regional Economies. In Paul Q. Hirst & Jonathan. Zeitlin (Eds.), Reversing Industrial Decline? : Industrial Structure and Policy in Britain and Her Competitors (pp. 17-70). New York: St. Martin's Press. Saxenian, Annalee (1999). 區域優勢:矽谷與一二八公路的文化與競爭 (彭蕙仙 & 常雲鳳, Trans.). 臺北市: 天下遠見. Schamp, Eike W., Rentmeister, Bernd, & Lo, Vivien. (2004). Dimensions of Proximity in Knowledge-based Networks: The Case of Investment Banking and Automobile Design. European Planning Studies, 12(5), 607-624. Schmitz, Hubert, & Nadvi, Khalid. (1999). Clustering and Industrialization: Introduction. World Development, 27(9), 1503-1514. Schunn, Christian, Crowley, Kevin, & Okada, Takeshi. (2002). What Makes Collaborations Across a Distance Succeed The Case of the Cognitive Science Community. In Pamela J. Hinds & Sara Kiesler (Eds.), Distributed Work (pp. 407-431). Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. Storper, Michael. (2013). Face-to-Face Contact. In Michael Storper (Ed.), Keys to the City: How Economics, Institutions, Social Interaction, and Politics Shape Development (pp. 167-182). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Storper, Michael, & Venables, Anthony J. (2004). Buzz: face-to-face contact and the urban economy. Journal of Economic Geography, 4(4), 351-370. Talja, Sanna. (2002). Information Sharing in Academic Communities: Types and Levels of Collaboration in Information Seeking and Use. The New Review of Information Behaviour Research, 3, 143-160. Talja, Sanna, & Hansen, Preben. (2006). Informaiton Sharing. In Amanda Spink & Charles Cole (Eds.), New Directions in Human Informaiton Behavior (pp. 113-134). Dordrect: Springer. Tapscott, Don, & Williams, Anthony D. (2010). Macrowikinomics: Rebooting Business and the World. New York: Portfolio Penguin. Teasley, Stephanie, Covi, Lisa, Krishnan, Mayuram S., & Olson, Judith S. (2000). How Does Radical Collocation Help a Team Succeed? Paper presented at the Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer-Support Cooperative Work (CSCW' 00), Philadelphia. Torre, André. (2008). On the Role Played by Temporary Geographical Proximity in Knowledge Transmission. Regional studies, 42(6), 869-889. Trainer, Erik H., Chaihirunkarn, Chalalai, Kalyanasundaram, Arun, & Herbsleb, James D. (2014). Community Code Engagements: Summer of Code & Hackathons for Supporting Community Building in Scientific Software. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Supporting Group Work (GROUP 2014), Sanibel. Trainer, Erik H., Chaihirunkarn, Chalalai, Kalyanasundaram, Arun, & Herbsleb, James D. (2016). How to Hackathon: Socio-technical Tradeoffs in Brief, Intensive Collocation. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW 2016), San Francisco. Uzzi, Brian (1997). Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 35-67. Vernon, Raymond. (1960). External Economies Metropolis (pp. 99-118). New York: Doubleday. Wasko, Molly McLure, & Faraj, Samer. (2000). It is What One Does: Why People Participate and Help Others in Electronic Communities of Practice. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 9, 155-173. Wasko, Molly McLure, & Faraj, Samer. (2005). Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 35-57. Wright, Peter. (1974). The Harassed Decision Maker: Time Pressures, Distractions, and the Use of Evidence. Journal of Applied Psychchology, 59, 555-561. Zajonc, Robert B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of personality and social psychology, 9(2), 1-27. Zukin, Sharon, & Dimaggio, Paul. (1990). Structures of Capital: The Social Organization of the Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 王政彥. (2004). 從「實體社區」到「虛擬社群」的成人學習探究取向. 成人及終身教育, 1, 19-27. 金家禾, & 周志龍. (2007). 台灣產業群聚區域差異及中國效應衝擊. 地理學報, 49, 55-79. 孫足承, 高禾純, 張超盛, & 王天津. (2009). 網路社群資訊交換行為模式. Paper presented at the 第二十屆國際資訊管理學術研討會, 臺北市. 許小慧, & 張博昌. (2000). 入門網站將死?虛擬社群的現在與未來. 網際先鋒, 68, 105-108. 陳佑寰. (2016). 跨平臺行銷的成長:成長駭客的行銷法術與法網. 能力雜誌(726), 44-51. 陳良治, & 朱凌毅. (2016). 技術變遷:後進國家的技術學習. In 簡旭伸 & 王振寰 (Eds.), 發展研究與當代臺灣社會 (pp. 239-265). 高雄市: 巨流. 陳貞樺. (2015). 阿宅的鍵盤革命. (碩士論文), 國立台灣大學. 黃貝玲. (2000). 虛擬社群的發展現況與趨勢分析. 電子化企業:經理人報告, 12, 15-22. 楊文全. (2011). 開放城市:開放原始碼年代的創新城市-孕育Linux-Based EeePC的台北. 建築與城鄉研究學報, 18, 49-72. 蔡至欣, & 賴玲玲. (2011). 虛擬社群的資訊分享行為. 圖書資訊學刊, 9(1), 161-196. 鄭晃二, & 陳亮全. (1999). 社區動力遊戲:工作坊使社區活起來. 臺北市: 遠流. 「HackInnovation 社會創新黑客松」活動頁面。取用日期:2017/10/23。https://www.accupass.com/event/1410281804011710954879 2009 Yahoo!奇摩Open Hack Day官網。取用日期:2017/03/17。https://openhacktaiwan.pbworks.com/w/page/12980986/FrontPage 2016 HackNTU官方網站:https://major2016.hackntu.org/ 2017 HackNTU官方網站。取用日期:2017/08/11。http://major.hackntu.taipei/ 2017 NASA黑客松─臺灣 活動網頁。取用日期:2017/08/10。https://2017.spaceappschallenge.org/locations/taipei 2017 UnaHack1 活動網頁。取用日期:2017/08/10。http://unahack.unabiz.com/ 2017嘉義黑蚵松 活動頁面。取用日期:2017/11/21。https://www.accupass.com/event/1704140234301547836531 2B Hackathon - 2B, or not to be? Let's hack 臉書粉絲專頁。取用日期:2017/08/10。https://www.facebook.com/2BHackathon/photos/a.354707428072474.1073741828.354409368102280/355781847965032/?type=3&theater ACCUPASS活動通網站:https://www.accupass.com/?city=all Broussard, Meredith(2015)。The Atlantic:The Secret Lives of Hackathon Junkies。取用日期:2017/03/02。https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2015/07/the-secret-lives-of-hackathon-junkies/397895/ Code Project:http://www.codeproject.com/ g0v零時政府官方網站:http://g0v.tw/zh-TW/index.html g0v零時政府臉書粉絲專頁:https://www.facebook.com/g0v.tw/?fref=ts GitHub:https://github.com/ Hackathon Taiwan 官方網站:https://hackathon.tw/ Hackathon Taiwan臉書粉絲專頁:https://www.facebook.com/HackathonTaiwan/?fref=ts HackNTU臉書粉絲專頁:https://www.facebook.com/hackNTU/?fref=ts KKTIX活動售票網站:https://kktix.com/ Leckart, Steven(2015)。The New York Times(2015/04/12):The Hackathon Fast Track, From Campus to Silicon Valley。Page ED12 of Education Life。取用日期:2017/03/02。https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/12/education/edlife/the-hackathon-fast-track-from-campus-to-silicon-valley.html?_r=1 Lewis-Kraus, Gideon(2015)。The New York Times Magazine(2015/07/19): Powers in Numbers。Page MM44。取用日期:2017/03/02。http://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/19/magazine/power-in-numbers.html?_r=1LIS(2012) LIS(2012)。T客邦:臺灣團隊贏得 Facebook 開發者大獎!搶先專訪團隊成員分享獲勝秘技。取用日期:2015/11/09。http://www.techbang.com/posts/11030-taiwan-team-won-the-facebook-developer-awards-first-to-interview-members-of-the-team-share-the-winning-secret Stack Overflow:http://stackoverflow.com/ Taiwan 2012 Open Hack官網。取用日期:2016/11/30。http://edm.bnext.com.tw/2012hackday/index.html?_ga=1.28637948.1716268257.1449043255 李靚慧(2015)。自由時報電子報:臺灣金融業首見黑客松實體賽 72人參加挑戰賽。取用日期:2016/11/30。http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/business/breakingnews/1523139 知識贏家:http://kmw.chinatimes.com/ 洪士灝(2015)。數位時代:洪士灝:從自造者、黑客松談以社群合作發展知識經濟。取用日期:2017/03/02。http://www.bnext.com.tw/column/view/id/35823 陳碧芬(2015)。中時電子報:金融業首場黑客松 星展臺灣抓住新趨勢。取用日期:2016/11/30。http://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20151128002642-260410 開放吧!汽車 第一屆臺灣車客松 活動網頁。取用日期:2017/11/21。http://carmaker.panmedia.asia/ 新竹市政府全球資訊網 行動版。市政新聞:新竹市政府全臺首創「2015新竹黑客松─市府官網設計大賽」活動圓滿落。取用日期:2016/11/30。http://webadm.hccg.gov.tw/mobile/content/message-01-01.jsp?postId=267214 經濟部工業局(2017)。資料服務產業應用推動計畫。取用日期:2017/10/12。https://www.moeaidb.gov.tw/external/ctlr?PRO=project.ProjectView&id=1552 數位時代(2008)。數位時代:Yahoo!奇摩 Open Hack Day 正式登臺。取用日期:2017/04/21。https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/1125/BN-ARTICLE-1125 獎金獵人:https://bhuntr.com/tw/ 蔣金(2015)。臺大校訊1236期:黑客松風潮興起─臺大發動亞洲最大黑客松。 聯合知識庫:http://udndata.com/library/ 藍色小舖:http://www.blueshop.com.tw/ | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/1289 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本研究自既有經濟地理學研究出發,意圖理解在資通訊技術日益發達的數位時代下,實體空間與虛擬空間各自在知識交流過程所扮演的角色。本研究選擇聚集一群善用資通訊科技的行動者於一個實體空間的黑客松(Hackathon)活動為主要的田野,透過訪談與實際觀察黑客松行動者在活動當下的知識交流行為、工作方式,以及其個人分別於實體空間與虛擬空間的使用經驗,並採用「鄰近性(proximity)」理論進行分析,以釐清影響行動者在兩個空間進行知識交流的因素。
整體而言,黑客松可被視為一種暫時性群聚(temporary clusters)。首先,要促成群聚中行動者之間完整且持續的對話,達成知識交流的目的與效果,需要地理鄰近(geographical proximity)、認知鄰近(cognitive proximity)、組織鄰近(organizational proximity)、制度鄰近(institutional proximity)與社會鄰近(social proximity)等要素交織配合。在這些鄰近性因素中,尤以社會鄰近性對行動者交流的知識內容深淺最具影響力。其次,黑客松行動者在黑客松外的虛擬空間使用經驗與習慣,皆會影響其於黑客松中進行知識搜尋與團隊協作的方法,並同時有助加強他們與他人的鄰近性關係,促進彼此於活動當下的互動。最後,黑客松行動者在實體空間與虛擬空間的使用經驗,呈現了兩個空間在知識含量與時機應用的互補動態。在時間有限的黑客松當下,當參賽者確知其所需要的協助時,實體空間能藉其資源匯集性,提供參賽者相應的技術設備,以及深度聚焦的知識諮詢。此外,在參賽者發現技術問題的當下,虛擬空間則能藉其資訊廣泛性,讓參賽者可以直接搜尋他人的經驗,確認問題方向,以縮短尋找解決方案的時間。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Starting from the research of Economic Geography, with a view to the growth of information and communication technology (ICT), this study aims to explore the interactions between physical spaces and virtual spaces in the process of knowledge exchange in the digital age. To clarify the factors influencing the process of knowledge exchange in physical and virtual spaces, this study chooses Hackathons, the events that gather people apt at using ICT to conduct projects in the physical space, as the main study field. Base on the data through observing and interviewing Hackathons’ participants regarding their knowledge exchange, this study applies the “proximity” concept to analyze the dynamics of participants’ knowledge exchange.
In general, this study considers a Hackathon as a form of temporary cluster. Firstly, to facilitate the knowledge exchange between actors in Hackathons, it requires five proximity factors, namely geographical proximity, cognitive proximity, organizational proximity, institutional proximity, and social proximity. Among these factors, this study argues the social proximity is the most influential on the depth of the contents of knowledge exchange. Secondly, actors’ habits and experiences of using virtual spaces outside Hackathons influence the ways of knowledge searching and group cooperation in Hackathons. In addition, the interactions in virtual spaces can help to reinforce their non-geographical proximity, which can be the basis of conversations during Hackathons. Finally, through actors’ experiences of using virtual spaces and working in physical spaces, this study shows the complementary dynamics of knowledge contents and timing in both spaces. Within the limited time period of Hackathons, when participants know exactly what they need, the physical spaces can offer them specific facilities and knowledge via pooling of resources. Besides, when participants notice technical problems, the virtual spaces can offer their wide range of information to help participants find the possible solutions and shorten the time of solving problems. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-12T09:35:37Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-107-R03544003-1.pdf: 3896907 bytes, checksum: d8563801ad3ed9c401770dfbd8ac4fd6 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝誌 i
摘要 ii Abstract iii 目錄 iv 圖目錄 vii 表目錄 viii 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究內容 3 一、 黑客松實體空間中,有助知識交流的因素 3 二、 參賽者於虛擬空間的互動交流 3 三、 時間壓力下的知識交流與資訊使用 4 四、 有助知識交流的虛實互動 4 第三節 研究方法 5 第二章 文獻回顧 8 第一節 實體空間的聚集效果 8 第二節 虛擬空間的知識交流與互動 11 第三節 鄰近性理論 15 一、 地理鄰近性 16 二、 認知鄰近性 17 三、 組織鄰近性 17 四、 社會鄰近性 18 五、 制度鄰近性 19 六、 小結 19 第四節 知識類型 22 第三章 一場黑客松的誕生 24 第一節 黑客松基本介紹 24 一、 定義 24 二、 與工作坊之異同 28 三、 在臺灣的發展現況 30 第二節 黑客松的空間安排 33 一、 城市區位 33 二、 活動場地 33 三、 虛擬空間 35 第三節 黑客松的制度設計 36 一、 主題制定 36 二、 獎項設置 37 三、 評審機制 37 四、 活動安排 38 五、 團隊管理 40 第四節 小結 42 第四章 當我們聚在一起:黑客松的實體空間 43 第一節 參賽者之間的知識交流 44 一、 團隊內部 44 二、 團隊之間 48 第二節 參賽者與其他行動者的知識交流 52 一、 專家學者的技術短講 52 二、 贊助廠商的技術諮詢 54 第三節 小結 56 第五章 最熟悉的陌生人:虛擬空間的活動 57 第一節 黑客松之外的活動 57 一、 知識學習 57 二、 社交連結 62 三、 跨域合作 64 第二節 黑客松當下的活動 68 一、 資料搜尋 68 二、 團隊協作 69 第三節 小結 71 第六章 實與虛缺一不可:黑客松空間的特殊性 72 第一節 黑客松的集體感 72 第二節 黑客松的時間壓力 74 第三節 小結 77 第七章 結論與建議 78 第一節 研究結論與發現 78 一、 社會鄰近性之種類為影響實體空間知識交流內容的重要因素 78 二、 參賽者可藉黑客松外的虛擬空間互動經驗加深鄰近性關係 79 三、 在時間壓力下,需藉實的知識深度與虛的知識廣度解決問題 80 四、 行動者於黑客松中的互動為重要的創新學習過程 80 第二節 理論意涵與研究貢獻 82 一、 暫時性群聚中的合作動態 82 二、 群聚氛圍對知識交流深度的影響 83 三、 實體空間與虛擬空間在知識含量與時機應用的互補特性 83 第三節 研究限制與未來研究建議 85 一、 不同城市區位對黑客松的影響 85 二、 政府單位在黑客松的角色 85 三、 受訪者個性的多元性 86 四、 活動成效的討論 86 參考文獻 87 附錄一:受訪者列表 97 附錄二:訪談大綱 99 一、 針對黑客松的參賽者 99 二、 針對黑客松的主辦方 104 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | Hackers Get Together:數位時代的知識交流空間 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Knowledge Exchange Spaces in the Digital Age | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 106-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 周志龍,申欽鳴 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 黑客松,實體空間,虛擬空間,知識交流,鄰近性,暫時性群聚, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Hackathons,Physical Spaces,Virtual Spaces,Knowledge Exchange,Proximity,Temporary Clusters, | en |
dc.relation.page | 105 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201800398 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2018-02-09 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 建築與城鄉研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 建築與城鄉研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-107-1.pdf | 3.81 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。