請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/1176
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 杜榮瑞(Rong-Ruey Duh) | |
dc.contributor.author | Yi-Hsuan Liao | en |
dc.contributor.author | 廖宜萱 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-12T09:33:46Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-08-08 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-12T09:33:46Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2018-08-08 | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2018-07-23 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 李建然、許書偉、陳政芳。 2003。 非審計服務與異常應計數之關聯性研究。會計評論 37: 1-30.
金融監督管理委員會。 2016。 會計師事務所服務業調查報告。 臺北市。 財團法人中華民國會計研究發展基金會。 1998。 查核歷史性財務資訊之品質管制(審計準則公報第四十六號)。 臺北市。 ———。 2009。 會計師事務所之品質管制(審計準則公報第四十四號)。 臺北市。 郭峰淵、曾繁絹、劉家儀。 2006。 從社會認知觀點探討醫師專業知識分享。 圖書資訊學刊 4 (1/2): 97-114. ———。 2007。 醫師專業知識分享之初探。 國立成功大學圖書館館刊。 臺南市。 黃振豊、曾俊傑。 2001。 臺灣六大會計師事務所教育訓練績效之分析。 淡江人文社會學刊 9: 47-80. 黃翊翔。 2007。 兩岸會計師事務所商業會計人才養成之比較研究—以國際性四大會計師事務所之一為例。 臺灣大學國家發展研究所學位論文:1-83。 楊誠民。 2006。 專業人士如何在實踐領域中進行學習-以會計師專業為例。 取自:https://myweb.ntut.edu.tw/~sylau/clementyang/CPA.htm(閱覽日期:2018年7月2日) Abdel-Khalik, A. R., and B. B. Ajinkya. 1979. Empirical Research in Accounting: A Methodological Viewpoint. Lakewood Ranch, FL: American Accounting Association. Agoglia, C. P., J. F. Brazel, R. C. Hatfield, and S. B. Jackson. 2010. How do audit workpaper reviewers cope with the conflicting pressures of detecting misstatements and balancing client workloads? Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 29 (2): 27-43. Ahmi, A., and S. Kent. 2012. The utilisation of generalized audit software (GAS) by external auditors. Managerial Auditing Journal 28 (2): 88-113. Ambrosini, V., and C. Bowman. 2001. Tacit knowledge: Some suggestions for operationalization. Journal of Management studies 38 (6): 811-829. Argote, L. 2012. Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge. New York, NY: Springer Science. Arthur, J. B., and C. L. Huntley. 2005. Ramping up the organizational learning curve: Assessing the impact of deliberate learning on organizational performance under gainsharing. Academy of Management Journal 48 (6): 1159-1170. Asare, S. K., and L. S. McDaniel. 1996. The effects of familiarity with the preparer and task complexity on the effectiveness of the audit review process. The Accounting Review 71 (2): 139-159. Asare, S. K., and A. M. Wright. 2004. The effectiveness of alternative risk assessment and program planning tools in a fraud setting. Contemporary Accounting Research 21 (2): 325-352. Bamber, E. M., and J. H. Bylinski. 1987. The effects of the planning memorandum, time pressure and individual auditor characteristics on audit managers’ review time judgments. Contemporary Accounting Research 4 (1): 127-143. Banker, R. D., H. Chang, and Y. C. Kao. 2002. Impact of information technology on public accounting firm productivity. Journal of Information Systems 16 (2): 209-222. Bartol, K. M., and A. Srivastava. 2002. Encouraging knowledge sharing: The role of organizational reward systems. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies 9 (1): 64-76. Becker, C. L., M. L. DeFond, J. Jiambalvo, and K. Subramanyam. 1998. The effect of audit quality on earnings management. Contemporary Accounting Research 15 (1): 1-24. Bierstaker, J. L., P. Burnaby, and J. Thibodeau. 2001. The impact of information technology on the audit process: An assessment of the state of the art and implications for the future. Managerial Auditing Journal 16 (3): 159-164. Birnberg, J. G., M. D. Shields, and S. M. Young. 1990. The case for multiple methods in empirical management accounting research with an illustration from budget setting. Journal of Management Accounting Research 2 (1): 33-66. Bobek, D. D., B. E. Daugherty, and R. R. Radtke. 2012. Resolving audit engagement challenges through communication. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 31 (4): 21-45. Bock, G.-W., R. W. Zmud, Y.-G. Kim, and J.-N. Lee. 2005. Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate. MIS Quarterly 29 (1): 87-111. Bonner, S. E. 1999. Judgment and decision-making research in accounting. Accounting Horizons 13 (4): 385-398. Bonner, S. E., and P. L. Walker. 1994. The effects of instruction and experience on the acquisition of auditing knowledge. The Accounting Review 69 (1): 157-178. Bordia, P., B. E. Irmer, and D. Abusah. 2006. Differences in sharing knowledge interpersonally and via databases: The role of evaluation apprehension and perceived benefits. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 15 (3): 262-280. Boritz, J. E. 1985. The effect of information presentation structures on audit planning and review judgments. Contemporary Accounting Research 1 (2): 193-218. Braun, R. L., and H. E. Davis. 2003. Computer-assisted audit tools and techniques: analysis and perspectives. Managerial Auditing Journal 18 (9): 725-731. Burgstahler, D., and I. Dichev. 1997. Earnings management to avoid earnings decreases and losses. Journal of Accounting and Economics 24 (1): 99-126. Cabrera, A., W. C. Collins, and J. F. Salgado. 2006. Determinants of individual engagement in knowledge sharing. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 17 (2): 245-264. Carpenter, T. D. 2007. Audit team brainstorming, fraud risk identification, and fraud risk assessment: Implications of SAS No. 99. The Accounting Review 82 (5): 1119-1140. Chen, C.C. 2011. Factors affecting high school teachers’ knowledge-sharing behaviors. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal 39 (7): 993. Chen, Y. S., B. G. Chang, and C. C. Lee. 2008. The association between continuing professional education and financial performance of public accounting firms. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 19 (9): 1720-1737. Chow, C. W., J. L. Ho, and S. C. Vera-Munoz. 2008. Exploring the extent and determinants of knowledge sharing in audit engagements. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics 15 (2): 141-160. Cohen, P. R., and H. J. Levesque. 1991. Teamwork. Nous 25 (4): 487-512. Cummings, J. N. 2004. Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization. Management Science 50 (3): 352-364. Danos, P., and R. Boley. 1980. Centralized research in CPA firms. The CPA Journal 50 (3): 10. DeAngelo, L. E. 1981. Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics 3 (3): 183-199. Dechow, P. M., R. G. Sloan, and A. P. Sweeney. 1995. Detecting earnings management. The Accounting Review 70 (2): 193-225. DeFond, M. L., and J. Jiambalvo. 1994. Debt covenant violation and manipulation of accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics 17 (1-2): 145-176. Dennis, A. R., and J. S. Valacich. 1993. Computer brainstorms: More heads are better than one. Journal of Applied Psychology 78 (4): 531. Dhaliwal, D. S. 1988. The effect of the firm’s business risk on the choice of accounting methods. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 15 (2): 289-302. Dillman, D. A. 2011. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method--2007 Update with New Internet, Visual, and Mixed-Mode Guide. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. Drucker, P. F. 1993. Post-Capitalist Society. New York, NY: HarperBusiness. Duh, R. R., W. R. Knechel, and C. C. Lin. 2017. The effects of audit firms’ knowledge sharing on audit quality and efficiency. Working paper, National Taiwan University, University of Florida, and National Pingtung University. Duh, R.R, L. C. Kuo, and J. C. Yan. 2018. The effects of review form and task complexity on auditor performance. Asia Pacific Journal of Accounting and Economics 25 (3-4): 449-462. Duh, R.R., and C.C. Lin. 2010. Determinants of auditors’ knowledge sharing propensity. Journal of Management 33 (3): 473-499. Earp, J., M. Ott, and F. Pozzi. 2013. Facilitating educators’ knowledge sharing with dedicated information systems. Computers in Human Behavior 29 (2): 445-455. Emby, C., and M. Gibbins. 1987. Good judgment in public accounting: Quality and justification. Contemporary Accounting Research 4 (1): 287-313. Francis, J. R. 2011. A framework for understanding and researching audit quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 30 (2): 125-152. Francis, J. R., E. L. Maydew, and H. C. Sparks. 1999. The role of Big 6 auditors in the credible reporting of accruals. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 18 (2): 17-34. Gagné, M. 2009. A model of knowledge-sharing motivation. Human Resource Management 48 (4): 571-589. Gendron, Y., J. Bedard, and M. Gosselin. 2004. Getting inside the black box: A field study of practices in “effective” audit committees. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 23 (1): 153-171. Glaser, B. G. 1978. Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory. Mill ValLey, CA: The Sociology Press. Gold, A., W. R. Knechel, and P. Wallage. 2012. The effect of the strictness of consultation requirements on fraud consultation. The Accounting Review 87 (3): 925-949. Goldstein, I. L., and J. K. Ford. 2002. Training in Organizations: Needs Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. Boston, MA: Wadsworth. Grant, R. M. 1996. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 17 (2): 109-122. Greenwood, R. G. 1991. Powershift: Knowledge, wealth, and violence at the edge of the 21st century. The Executive 5 (4): 91-92. Guzzo, R. A., and M. W. Dickson. 1996. Teams in organizations: Recent research on performance and effectiveness. Annual Review of Psychology 47 (1): 307-338. Hambrick, D. C., and P. A. Mason. 1984. Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review 9 (2): 193-206. Hammersley, J. S. 2011. A review and model of auditor judgments in fraud-related planning tasks. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 30 (4): 101-128. Harding, N., and K. T. Trotman. 1999. Hierarchical differences in audit workpaper review performance. Contemporary Accounting Research 16 (4): 671-684. Hew, K. F., and N. Hara. 2007. Empirical study of motivators and barriers of teacher online knowledge sharing. Educational Technology Research and Development 55 (6): 573. Ismail Al-Alawi, A., N. Yousif Al-Marzooqi, and Y. Fraidoon Mohammed. 2007. Organizational culture and knowledge sharing: Critical success factors. Journal of knowledge Management 11 (2): 22-42. Jackson, S. E., C.-H. Chuang, E. E. Harden, and Y. Jiang. 2006. Toward developing human resource management systems for knowledge-intensive teamwork. In Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 27-70. Somerville, MA: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. 1984. Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology 69 (1): 85. Javadi, M. H. M., N. D. Zadeh, M. Zandi, and J. Yavarian. 2012. Effect of motivation and trust on knowledge sharing and effect of knowledge sharing on employee’s performance. International Journal of Human Resource Studies 2 (1): 210. Jenkins, J. G., D. R. Deis, J. C. Bedard, and M. B. Curtis. 2008. Accounting firm culture and governance: A research synthesis. Behavioral Research in Accounting 20 (1): 45-74. Johnson, V. E., and S. E. Kaplan. 1991. Experimental-evidence on the effects of accountability on auditor judgments. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 10: 96-107. Joyce, E. J., & Biddle, G. C. 1981. Anchoring and adjustment in probabilistic inference in auditing. Journal of Accounting Research 19 (1): 120-145. Judge, G. G., R. C. Hill, W. Griffiths, H. Lutkepohl, and T. C. Lee. 1982. Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Econometrics. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Kadous, K., J. Leiby, and M. E. Peecher. 2013. How do auditors weight informal contrary advice? The joint influence of advisor social bond and advice justifiability. The Accounting Review 88 (6): 2061-2087. Kearns, G. S., and A. L. Lederer. 2003. A resource-based view of strategic IT alignment: How knowledge sharing creates competitive advantage. Decision sciences 34 (1): 1-29. Kennedy, J. 1993. Debiasing audit judgment with accountability: A framework and experimental results. Journal of Accounting Research 31 (2): 231-245. ———. 1995. Debiasing the curse of knowledge in audit judgment. The Accounting Review 70 (2): 249-273. Kerr, N. L., and R. S. Tindale. 2004. Group performance and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology 55: 623-655. Kinney Jr, W. R., and R. D. Martin. 1994. Does auditing reduce bias in financial reporting? A review of audit-related adjustment studies. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 13 (1): 149. Knechel, W. R. 2000. Behavioral research in auditing and its impact on audit education. Issues in Accounting Education 15 (4): 695-712. Knechel, W. R., and J. Leiby. 2016. If you want my advice: Status motives and audit consultations about accounting estimates. Journal of Accounting Research 54 (5): 1331-1364. Koonce, L., U. Anderson, and G. Marchant. 1995. Justification of decisions in auditing. Journal of Accounting Research 33 (2): 369-384. Kothari, S. P., A. J. Leone, and C. E. Wasley. 2005. Performance matched discretionary accrual measures. Journal of Accounting and Economics 39 (1): 163-197. Libby, R., & Luft, J. (1993). Determinants of judgment performance in accounting settings: Ability, knowledge, motivation, and environment. Accounting, Organizations and Society 18 (5): 425-450. Libby, R., and K. T. Trotman. 1993. The review process as a control for differential recall of evidence in auditor judgments. Accounting, Organizations and Society 18 (6): 559-574. Lin, H. F. 2007. Knowledge sharing and firm innovation capability: An empirical study. International Journal of manpower 28 (3/4): 315-332. Lin, H., and W. Fan. 2011. Leveraging organizational knowledge through electronic knowledge repositories in public accounting firms: An empirical investigation. Behavioral Research in Accounting 23 (2): 147-167. Lin, H. F., and G. G. Lee. 2006. Effects of socio-technical factors on organizational intention to encourage knowledge sharing. Management Decision 44 (1): 74-88. Lynch, A. L., U. S. Murthy, and T. J. Engle. 2009. Fraud brainstorming using computer-mediated communication: The effects of brainstorming technique and facilitation. The Accounting Review 84 (4): 1209-1232. Mautz, R. K., and H. A. Sharaf. 1961. The Philosophy of Auditing. Lakewood Ranch, FL: American Accounting Association. McCall, H., V. Arnold, and S. G. Sutton. 2008. Use of knowledge management systems and the impact on the acquisition of explicit knowledge. Journal of Information Systems 22 (2): 77-101. McDermott, R., and C. O’dell. 2001. Overcoming cultural barriers to sharing knowledge. Journal of knowledge Management 5 (1): 76-85. Mesmer-Magnus, J. R., and L. A. DeChurch. 2009. Information sharing and team performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology 94 (2): 535. Mincer, J. 1962. On-the-job training: Costs, returns, and some implications. Journal of Political Economy 70 (5, Part 2): 50-79. Morris, T., and L. Empson. 1998. Organisation and expertise: An exploration of knowledge bases and the management of accounting and consulting firms. Accounting, Organizations and Society 23 (5-6): 609-624. Murthy, U. S., and D. S. Kerr. 2004. Comparing audit team effectiveness via alternative modes of computer-mediated communication. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 23 (1): 141-152. Nelson, M., and H. T. Tan. 2005. Judgment and decision making research in auditing: A task, person, and interpersonal interaction perspective. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 24 (s-1): 41-71. Nonaka, I. 2000. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. In Knowledge, Groupware and the Internet, 3-42. New York, NY: Elsevier. Nonaka, I., and H. Takeuchi. 1995. The Knowledge-creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press. Nunnally, J. C., I. H. Bernstein, and J. M. t. Berge. 1967. Psychometric Theory. Vol. 226 New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. Osborn, A. F. 1953. Applied Imagination, Principles and Procedures of Creative Thinking. New York, NY: Charles Scribner's Sons. Peecher, M. E. 1996. The influence of auditors’ justification processes on their decisions: A cognitive model and experimental evidence. Journal of Accounting Research 34 (1): 125-140. Phillips, F. 1999. Auditor attention to and judgments of aggressive financial reporting. Journal of Accounting Research 37 (1): 167-189. Podsakoff, P. M., S. B. MacKenzie, J. Y. Lee, and N. P. Podsakoff. 2003. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology 88 (5): 879. Polanyi, M. 1966. The Tacit Dimension. New York, NY: Doubleday. Ranzilla, S., R. Chevalier, G. Herrmann, S. Glover, and D. Prawitt. 2011. Elevating Professional Judgment in Auditing: The KPMG Professional Judgment Framework. New York, NY: KPMG LLP. Reber, A. S. 1989. Implicit learning and tacit knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 118 (3): 219. Ricchiute, D. N. 1992. Working-paper order effects and auditors’ going-concern decisions. The Accounting Review 67 (1): 46-58. ———. 1999. The effect of audit seniors’ decisions on working paper documentation and on partners’ decisions. Accounting, Organizations and Society 24 (2): 155-171. Rich, J. S., I. Solomon, and K. T. Trotman. 1997. The audit review process: A characterization from the persuasion perspective. Accounting, Organizations and Society 22 (5): 481-505. Riege, A. 2005. Three-dozen knowledge-sharing barriers managers must consider. Journal of Knowledge Management 9 (3): 18-35. Salterio, S. 1994. Researching for accounting precedents: Learning, efficiency, and effectiveness. Contemporary Accounting Research 11 (1): 515-542. ———. 1996. The effects of precedents and client position on auditors’ financial accounting policy judgment. Accounting, Organizations and Society 21 (5): 467-486. Salterio, S., and R. Denham. 1997. Accounting consultation units: An organizational memory analysis. Contemporary Accounting Research 14 (4): 669-691. Salterio, S., and L. Koonce. 1997. The persuasiveness of audit evidence: The case of accounting policy decisions. Accounting, Organizations and Society 22 (6): 573-587. Schaefer, T. J. 2013. The effects of social costs and internal quality reviews on auditor consultation strategies. Doctoral dissertation, University of South Carolina. Sergeeva, A., and T. Andreeva. 2016. Knowledge sharing research: Bringing context back in. Journal of Management Inquiry 25 (3): 240-261. Shim, H. S., and G. L. Roth. 2007. Sharing tacit knowledge among expert teaching professors and mentees: Considerations for career and technical education teacher educators. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education 44 (4): 5-28. Skinner, D. J., and R. G. Sloan. 2002. Earnings surprises, growth expectations, and stock returns or don’t let an earnings torpedo sink your portfolio. Review of Accounting Studies 7 (2-3): 289-312. Smith, E. A. 2001. The role of tacit and explicit knowledge in the workplace. Journal of Knowledge Management 5 (4): 311-321. Solomon, I. 1987. Multi-auditor judgment/decision making research. Journal of Accounting Literature 6: 1-25. Sprinkle, G. B., and R. M. Tubbs. 1998. The effects of audit risk and information importance on auditor memory during working paper review. The Accounting Review 73 (4): 475-502. Stasser, G., and W. Titus. 1985. Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 48 (6): 1467. Tan, H. T. 1995. Effects of expectations, prior involvement, and review awareness on memory for audit evidence and judgment. Journal of Accounting Research 33 (1): 113-135. Tan, H. T., & Libby, R. 1997. Tacit managerial versus technical knowledge as determinants of audit expertise in the field. Journal of Accounting Research 35 (1): 97-113. Trotman, K. T., T. D. Bauer, and K. A. Humphreys. 2015. Group judgment and decision making in auditing: Past and future research. Accounting, Organizations and Society 47: 56-72. Trotman, K. T., and P. W. Yetton. 1985. The effect of the review process on auditor judgments. Journal of Accounting Research 23 (1): 256-267. Tsai, W. 2002. Social structure of “coopetition” within a multiunit organization: Coordination, competition, and intraorganizational knowledge sharing. Organization Science 13 (2): 179-190. Turner, C. W. 2001. Accountability demands and the auditor’s evidence search strategy: The influence of reviewer preferences and the nature of the response (belief vs. action). Journal of Accounting Research 39 (3): 683-706. Var, I. 1998. Multivariate data analysis. Vectors 8 (2): 125-136. Vera-Munoz, S. C., J. L. Ho, and C. W. Chow. 2006. Enhancing knowledge sharing in public accounting firms. Accounting Horizons 20 (2): 133-155. Wah, L. 2000. Making knowledge stick. In The Knowledge Management Yearbook 2000-2001, 145-156. Oxford, U.K.: Butterworth-Heinemann. Wang, S., and R. A. Noe. 2010. Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research. Human Resource Management Review 20 (2): 115-131. Wasko, M. M., and S. Faraj. 2005. Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quarterly 29 (1): 35-57. Watts, R. L., and J. L. Zimmerman. 1978. Towards a positive theory of the determination of accounting standards. The Accounting Review 53 (1): 112. Whiting, L. S. 2008. Semi-structured interviews: guidance for novice researchers. Nursing Standard 22 (23): 35. Wilkesmann, U., M. Wilkesmann, and A. Virgillito. 2009. The absence of cooperation is not necessarily defection: Structural and motivational constraints of knowledge transfer in a social dilemma situation. Organization Studies 30 (10): 1141-1164. Witherspoon, C. L., J. Bergner, C. Cockrell, and D. N. Stone. 2013. Antecedents of organizational knowledge sharing: A meta-analysis and critique. Journal of Knowledge Management 17 (2): 250-277. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/1176 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本研究探討會計師事務所內知識分享與審計品質的相關性,並焦注在分享機制及審計階段於其中扮演的角色。除有系統地整理會計師事務所內使用的知識分享機制及資源種類外,亦檢視各機制在不同階段的使用情形,並分析該機制如何影響審計品質、該影響是否因審計階段而有不同。研究採用多重研究方法,資料來源包括深度訪談六家會計師事務所之合夥人共五位、協理共兩位,及會計系教授一位;自該六家事務所不同層級之查核人員回收之有效問卷共140份;及公開資料庫。結果顯示會計師事務所內透過複核程序、所內諮詢、案件會議、及教育訓練分享知識,知識分享資源則包括前期工作底稿、審計軟體、資料庫、出版品、及內網,並將審計工作區分為兩階段:規劃階段、外勤工作及形成查核意見階段。本研究使用異常應計數之絕對值作為審計品質的替代變數,迴歸結果顯示查核人員在第二階段的知識分享程度與審計品質呈正相關;並且,在該階段中透過複核程序分享知識的程度對審計品質有正向影響,參閱工作底稿、以案件會議分享知識的工作程度則與審計品質負向相關;最後,於第二階段執行複核程序時,搭配審計軟體的程度與審計品質有正向關聯。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | This study examines the association between knowledge sharing in audit firms and audit quality with the focus on the roles of sharing mechanism and audit stage. Specifically, this study identifies knowledge sharing mechanisms and resources employed in audit firms, and examines questions including how these mechanisms are employed in different audit stages, how the use of these mechanisms is associated with audit quality, and whether the association varies with audit stage. Adopting a multi-method approach, this study collects data through in-depth interviews with five partners and two senior managers in six audit firms and an accounting professor, a questionnaire survey with 140 auditors at various ranks coming from the same six audit firms, and a publicly available database. The results show that review process, consultation within the firm, engagement meeting, and employee training are the mechanisms through which knowledge sharing is implemented. Knowledge sharing resources include previous working papers, audit software, databases, publications, and intranet. Audit work is proceeded with two stages: planning, and fieldwork and forming audit opinion. Using absolute discretionary accruals as a proxy of audit quality, regression analyses show that the extent of knowledge sharing at the second stage of audit work has positive effects on audit quality. Furthermore, during the second stage, the extent of sharing knowledge through review process is positively associated with audit quality while through previous working papers or engagement meetings are negatively associated. Lastly, when conducting review process during the second stage, the extent of using audit software is positively related to audit quality. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-12T09:33:46Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-107-R05722046-1.pdf: 1704129 bytes, checksum: cf6ff055dddc6569ba9e6a23863d420d (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 II
摘要 III ABSTRACT IV 目錄 VI 表目錄 VIII 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機及問題 1 第二節 本文結構 2 第二章 文獻探討與研究假說 4 第一節 文獻探討 4 一、 知識分享研究之起源 4 二、 知識分享研究之發展 5 三、 會計專業的知識分享研究 6 第二節 研究假說 11 第三章 研究方法 14 第一節 半結構性訪談 14 第二節 問卷調查 16 一、 問卷發放 17 二、 問卷設計 19 三、 共同方法變異、效度、及信度分析 21 第三節 檔案研究 25 一、 自變數:各審計階段知識分享程度、透過各機制分享知識程度、搭配各資源分享知識程度 25 二、 應變數:審計品質 25 三、 控制變數 27 四、 樣本選取及資料來源 31 第四章 訪談結果 34 第一節 知識分享機制 34 一、 複核程序 35 二、 所內諮詢 36 三、 案件會議 38 四、 教育訓練 39 第二節 知識分享資源 40 第三節 綜合討論 42 一、 查核人員所需之知識 42 二、 審計工作階段之區分 42 三、 在職訓練 43 第五章 檔案研究結果 44 第一節 敘述統計 44 第二節 迴歸分析結果 49 一、 H1之測試結果 49 二、 H2之測試結果 50 三、 H3之測試結果 52 第六章 研究結論、限制與建議 57 參考文獻 59 附錄一 研究問卷 70 附錄二 變數定義表 72 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 會計師事務所內知識分享與審計品質:分享機制及審計階段的角色 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Knowledge Sharing in Audit Firms and Audit Quality: The Roles of Sharing Mechanisms and Audit Stages | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 106-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳鴻基(Houn-Gee Chen),尤琳蕙(Lin-Hui Yu) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 知識分享,審計品質,審計階段,知識分享機制,知識分享資源, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | knowledge sharing,audit quality,audit stage,knowledge sharing mechanism,knowledge sharing resource, | en |
dc.relation.page | 72 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201801841 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2018-07-24 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 會計學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 會計學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-107-1.pdf | 1.66 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。