請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/10635
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 江才健(Tsai-Chien Chiang) | |
dc.contributor.author | Ya-Chu Hsu | en |
dc.contributor.author | 許雅筑 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-20T21:45:38Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2010-08-12 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-20T21:45:38Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2010-08-12 | |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2010-08-06 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 彭家發 (2000)。《 特寫寫作》,台北: 臺灣商務印書館。
費昌勇 (2002)。《 動物倫理與公共政策》,台北: 臺灣商務印書館。第一版。 費昌勇 (2004)。〈外交部補助參加世界動物衛生組織「動物福利研討會」報告〉(中華民國九十三年四月十五日星期四) 林聖蘋 (2006)。《從Tom Regan的動物權利觀探究臺灣流浪犬問題》, 國立中央大學哲學研究所碩士論文。 李以彬譯 (2000)。《憤怒的獸籠》,台北:高寶國際。(原書 Wise, S. M. (2000). Rattling the Cage towards Legal Rights for Animals. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.) 郭秉瑛 (2000)。《生命無價?--談教學用動物實驗的道德爭議》, 國立臺灣大學新聞研究所碩士論文。 洪曉菁 (2000)。《 說故事研究》,臺東師範學院兒童文學研究所碩士論文。 胡幼慧 (1996)。《質性研究-理論、方法及本土女性研究實例》,台北:巨流。 簡麗芬 (2006)。《動物權之爭議︰雷根對辛格與科恩》, 國立中央大學哲學研究所碩士論文。 江麗美譯(1995)。《生與死-現代道德困境的挑戰》。台北:桂冠。( 原書 Pojman, L. P. (1992). Life and Death: Grappling with the Moral Dilemmas of Our Time. Boston, Jones And Bartlett.) 石慧美 (2000)。〈公立動物收容所評鑑〉,《農政與農情》,101。上網日期:2009年 4月 22日,取自http://www.coa.gov.tw/view.php?catid=2487 葉力森 (1995)。《動物與法律》,台北:動物保護協會。 葉力森、廖瑪莉 (1999),《和牠相伴一生──人與動物的深情相遇》。台北,時報文化。 葉力森、石正人 (1995)。《臺灣棄犬問題與對策》。台北:中華民國動物保護協會。 公立流浪動物收容所安樂死真相公開記者會新聞稿(2003)。上網日期:2009年 4月 22日,取自http://www.lca.org.tw/action/a36.htm Animal Rights Frequently Asked Questions text, (1995). Retrived April 29, 1995, from http://www.animal-rights.com/faqfile.html DeGrazia, D. (2002). Animal Rights A very short introduction, New York:Oxford University Press Inc. Edwards, J. (2004). The role of the veterinarian in animal welfare---A global perspective. Global Conference on Animal Welfare: An OIE initiative: 27-32. Fraser, D. (2001). Farm Animal Production: Changing Agriculture in a Changing Culture. Journal of Applied Animal WelfareScience, 4(3), 175-190. Hare, B., Brown, M., Willilamson, C. & Tomasello, M. (2002). The Domestication of Social Cognition in Dogs. Science, 298(5598), 1634-1636. Hummer, R. L. (1975). Pets in Today’s Society. American Journal of Public Health, 65(10),1095-1097. Landau, R. E. (1999). A Survey of Teaching and Implementation: The Veterinarian’s Role in Recognizing and Reporting Abuse. JAVMA, 215(3), 328-331. Patronek, G. J. (1996). Risk Factors for relinquishment of Dogs to An Animal Shelter. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 209(3), 572-581. Patronek, G. J. (1997). Issues for Veterinarians in Recognizing and Reporting Animal Neglect and Abuse. Society and Animals, 5(3), 267-280. Petrini, A. & Wilson, D. (2005). Philosophy, Policy and Procedures of the World Organisation for Animal Health for the Development of Standards in Animal Welfare. Rev. sci. tech. Off. inf. Epiz., 24(2), 665-671. Rhoades, R. H. (2002). The Humane Society of the United States Euthanasia Training Manual. United States: Humane Society , 2nd ed. Regenstein, J. M. (2008). Muhammad Munir Chaudry. Animal Welfare Policy and Practice: Cultural and Religious Issues. 2nd Global Conference on Animal Welfare, Cairo (Egypt) 20-22, October. Ryder, R. D. (1989). Animal Revolution: Changing Attitudes Towards Speciesism, Oxford: Basil Blackwell. WSPA 2008. Concepts in Animal Welfare modules nos. 10, 20, 31, 33, published by World Society for the Protection of Animals (WSPA), 2nd ed. 2008. WSPA 2008 Euthanasia, module 10 Animal Welfare Ethics, module 20 Euthanasia, module 33 Religion and Animal Welfare, from: Concepts in Animal Welfare, a teaching syllabus of animal welfare to students at veterinary institutes, collaborated between the World Society for the Protection of Animals (WSPA) and the School of Clinical Veterinary Science at the University of Bristol in England. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/10635 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 以深度報導的寫作方式,呈現臺灣公立流浪動物收容所內,安樂死實施程序的狀況,包括法律規定、收容所管理制度、人員進用與篩選,以及硬體方面的收容所資源和設備。經採訪發現,安樂死的源頭-即街頭流浪動物或被棄養的動物-的來源,主要來自不負責任的飼主與不良的寵物業者。
藉由描述公立動物收容所執行安樂死的相關環節,發掘背後隱含的社會價值觀,並點出臺灣社會對於動物的態度,普遍仍於將其視為「物品」,而這樣的價值觀,正是造成上述各環節問題的真正因素。 對此議題的背景、環境、現況充分了解後,整理出專家學者的意見,列出對臺灣未來政策與制度改進的具體建議。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Through in-depth reporting, this article describes different aspects of euthanasia practiced in Taiwan public shelters, which includes related laws, methods of management, employee recruitment standards, facilities and resources of the space. After interviewing experts, scholars, officials, staff and animal protection association members, I discovered what contributed to the problem of stray dogs: irresponsible pet owners and unethical pet breeders. These people are the main cause of stray dogs.
By examining the practice of animal euthanasia in Taiwan, one can observe the society's objectification of animals; more concretely, its perception of animals as 'things' instead of 'beings' This kind of attitude toward animals leads to serious problems of stray animals and public stray animal shelters of poor quality. Finally, recommendations by experts and scholars on how to improve animal welfare-related policies in order to bring forth an animal friendly environment are discussed. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-20T21:45:38Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-99-R96342010-1.pdf: 1203313 bytes, checksum: 8ecbf5c5ecdb9a16dbcbc7d98e90d6cd (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄
第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究問題與研究動機 1 第二節 研究目的 5 第二章 研究方法 7 第一節 深度採訪報導與訪談 7 第二節 採訪對象 9 第三章 文獻探討 10 第一節 動物安樂死的定義、技術與人道考量 10 第二節 動物安樂死的進行方式、時機、過程與生理學機制 12 第三節 動物安樂死的重要思想觀點 15 第四節 動物福利倫理學的道德觀 17 第五節 主流宗教對屠殺動物生命的看法 18 第四章 深度報導 19 第五章 報導後記 43 參考文獻 51 附錄一 動物保護法 53 附錄二 寵物管理法(加州州法) 58 附錄三 世界動物衛生組織(OIE)致函各會員國 65 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 不安樂的安樂死?探討臺灣公立流浪動物收容所的安樂死環節 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Painful Euthanasia?A Discussion about The Practice of Animal Euthanasia in Taiwan Public Animal Shelters | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 98-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | 費昌勇(Chang-Young Fei) | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 彭文正,王俊秀 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 安樂死,公立收容所,流浪動物,動物保護, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | euthanasia,public shelters,stray animal,animal protection, | en |
dc.relation.page | 65 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2010-08-06 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 新聞研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 新聞研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-99-1.pdf | 1.18 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。