請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/10533
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 陳毓文(Yu-Wen Chen) | |
dc.contributor.author | Yao-Nan Chuang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 莊耀南 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-20T21:37:08Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2011-08-23 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-20T21:37:08Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2011-08-23 | |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2011-08-18 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Adams, R.(2008)《培力、參與、社會工作(Empowerment, Participation and Social Work)》(陳秋山譯,2010)。台北:心理。
Andersson, G. (2005). Family relations, adjustment and well-being in a longitudinal study of children in care. Child & Family Social Work, 10(1), 43-56. Ashford, J. B., LeCroy C. W., & Lortie, K. L.(2001)《人類行為與社會環境(Human behavior in the social environment : a multidimensional perspective)》(林哲立等譯,2007)。台北:雙葉。 Baker, B. L., Brightman, A. J., Blacher, J. B., Heifet, L. J., Hinshaw, S. P., & Murphy, D. M.(2004)《幼兒獨立生活技能訓練手冊(Steps to Independence: Teaching Everyday Skills to Children with Special Needs)》(徐儷瑜等譯,2006)。台北:心理。 Baltes, M. M., & Silverberg, S. B. (1994). The dynamics between dependency and autonomy : Illustrations across the life span. In D. L. Featherman, R. M. Lerner & M. Perlmutter (Eds.). Life-Span Development and Behavior, 12, pp. 41-90. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum. Biehal, N., Clayden, J., Stein, M. & Wade, J. (1995). Moving on: young people and leaving care schemes. London: HMSO. Broad, B. (1998). Young People Leaving Care: life after the Children Act 1989. London: Jessica Kingsley. Clark, C.(2004)《我們的孩子都受了傷(HURT: inside the world of today's teenagers)》(屈貝琴譯,2008)。台北:校園書坊。 Cole, B. (2003). Youth. In P. Alcock, A. Erskine & M. May (Eds.). The student’s companion to social policy (pp. 296-302). Malden, MA: Blackwell. Collins, M. E. (2001). Transition to adulthood for vulnerable youths: A review of research and implications for policy. Social Service Review, 75, pp. 271-291. Collins, W. A., & Repinski, D. J. (1994). Relationships during adolescence: Continuity and change in interpersonal perspective. In R. Montemayor, G. R. Adams, & T. P. Gullotta (Eds.), Personal relationship during adolescence. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Dean, M. (1994). Critical and effective histories: Foucault, methods and historical sociology. London: Routledge. Department of Health (2001). Children (Leaving Care) Act 2000: Regulations and guidance. Dixon, J. (2008). Young people leaving care: health, well-being and outcomes. Child and Family Social Work 2008, 13, pp. 207-217. UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Dixon, J., & Stein, M. (2006). Young people leaving care in Scotland. European Journal of Social Work, 9(4), pp. 407-423. UK: Taylor & Francis. Dixon, J., & Stein, M. (2005). Leaving care: Throughcare and aftercare in Scotland. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers. Dixon, J., & Stein, M. (2002). Still a bairn? Throghcare and aftercare services in Scotland: Final report to the Scottish Executive. York: University of York. DeWoddy, M., Ceja, K., & Sylvester, M. (1993). Independent living services for youths in out-of-home care. Washington, DC: Child Welfare League of America. Dominelli, L. (1997). Sociology for Social Work (pp.138-150). London: Palgrave Macmillan. Egan, G., & Cowan, M. (1980). Moving into adulthood. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishers. Frost, N., Mills, S., & Stein, M. (1999). Leaving residential care. Understanding Residential Child Care (pp. 115-122). England: Ashgate Publishing Ltd. Freundich, M., & Avery, R. J. (2005). Planning for permanency for youth in congregate care. Children and Youth Services Review, 27, pp. 115-134. Garnett, L. (1992). Leaving Care and After. London: National Children’s Bureau. Gilligan, R. (2000). The Importance of Listening to the Child in Foster Care. In G. Kelly & R. Gilligan (Eds.). Issues in foster care: Policy practice and research. London: Jessica Kingsley. Gusfield, J. (1989). Constructing the ownership of social problems: Fun and profit in the welfare state. Social Problems, 36(5), pp. 431-441. Hasenfeld, Y. (1992). Power in Social Work Practice. In Hasenfeld, Y. (Ed.). Human services as complex organization (pp. 259-275). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Havighurst, R. J. (1972). Developmental tasks and education (3rd ed.). New York: David McKay Co. Hurlock, E. B. (1980). Developmental psychology. New York: McCraw-Hill. Johnson, P. R., & Yoken, C. (1995). Family foster care placement: The child’s perspective. Child Welfare, 74(5), 959-974. Kirshenbaum, M., & Foster, C.(1995)《你的孩子長大了:如何與青春期孩子相處(Parent-Teen Breakthrough: The Relationship Approach)》(鄧文華譯)。台北:生命潛能。 Loman, L. A., & Siegel, G.. L. (2000). A review of literature on independent living of youths in foster and residential care. St. Louis, Mo.: Institute of Applied Research. Lerner, R. M. (1995). Developing individuals within changing contexts: Implications of developmental contextualism for human development, research, policy and programs. In T. A. Kindermann & J. Valsiner (Eds.). Development of Person-Context Relations. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Lincoln, Y. S., & Cuba, E. G. (1984). Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage. Mann-Feder V. R. (Ed.). (2007). Transition or Eviction: Youth exiting care for independent living. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass/Wiley, Inc. Markus, H., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224-253. McGoldrick, M., & Carter, B. (1999). Self in conetext: The individual life cycle in systemic perspective In B. Carter & McGoldrick (Eds.) The expanded family life cycle: Individual, family, and social perspectives (3rd ed.) (pp.27-46). Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Mech, E. V. (1994). Foster youths in transition: research perspectives on preparation for independent living. Child Welfare, 73, pp.603-623. Washington, DC: Child Welfare League of America. Miller, J. B. & Stiver, I. P. (1997). The healing connection: How women form relationships in therapy and in life. Boston: Beacon Press. Milligan, I., & Stevens, I.(2006)《安置兒童照顧:協同合作實務(Residential Child Care: Collaborative Practice)》(翁毓秀、曾麗吟譯,2009)。台北:洪葉文化。頁108-122。 Noom, M. J., Dekovic, M., & Meeus, W. H. J. (2001). Conceptual analysis and measurement of adolescent autonomy. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, Vol. 30, No.5, 577-595. OHCHR (2006). Excerpted from the report of the fortieth session of the Committee on the Rights of the Child, CRC/C/153, 636-689. Pallas, A. M. (1993). Schooling in the course of human lives : The social context of education and the transition to adulthood in industrial society. Review of Educational Research, 63, 409-447. Peterson, S., Watson, D. & Whiteford, J. (2003). Let’s face it: young people in care tell it as it is. Glasgow: Who Cares? Scotland. Peterson, G. W. (1986). Parent-youth power dimensions and the behavioral autonomy of adolescents. Journal of Adolescent, 1(2), 231-249. Pinkerton, J. (2000). Leaving care and fostering. In G. Kelly & R. Gilligan (Eds.). Issues in foster care : policy practice and research. London : Jessica Kingsley. Pinkerton, J., & Coyle, D. (2008). Leaving care in the UK: General reflections on developments and delivery. 2008 International Conference on Developing & Delivering Care Leaving Services for Youth in Out-of-home Care. Rubin, A., & Babbie, E.(2005)《社會工作研究法(Research Methods for Social Work)》(陳若平、張祐綾等譯,2007)。台北:五南。 Ryan, R. M., & Lynch, J. H. (1989). Emotional autonomy versus detachment: Revisiting the vicissitudes of adolescence and young adulthood. Child Development, 60, 340-356. Schaie, K. W. & Willis, S. L.(2002)《成人發展與老化(Adult Development and Aging)》(樂國安等譯,2007)。台北:五南。 Seidman, I. (1998). Technique isn't everything, but it is a lot. In Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences (2nd ed., pp. 63-78). New York: Teachers College, Columbia University. Sherrod, L. R., Haggerty, R. J., & Featherman, D. L. (1993). Introduction: Late adolescence and the transition to adulthood. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 3, 217-226. Shirk, M., & Stangler, G. (2004). Conclusion: What We Must Do. On their own: What happens to kids when they age out of the foster care system (pp. 245-268). Oxford: Westview Press. Stein, M., & Munro, E. (2008). Young people’s transitions from care to adulthood: International research and practice. London: Jessica Kingsley. Stein, M. (2005). Resilience and young people leaving care. London: Joseph Rowntree Foundation. Stein, M. (1997). What Works in Leaving Care? Barkingside: Barnardos. Stein, M., & Carey, K. (1986). Leaving Care. Oxford: Blackwell. Stein, M., & Ellis, S. (1983). Gizza Say? London: National Association of Young People in Care. Steinberg, L., & Silverberg, S. (1986). The vicissitudes of autonomy in early adolescence. Child Development, 57, 841-851. Stone, H. D. (1987). Ready, set, go – An agency guide to independent living. Washington, DC: Child Welfare League of America. Taylor, S. E., Peplau, L. A., & Sears, D. O.(1999)《社會心理學(Social Psychology)》(張滿玲譯,2003)。台北:雙葉。 Thomas, N. (2005). Social Work with Young People in Care: Looking After Children in Theory and Practice. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Tweddle, A. (2007). Youth leaving care: How do they fare? Transition or Eviction: Youth exiting care for independent living (pp. 15-31). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass/Wiley. Valentine, G. (2001). At the drawing board: Developing a research design. In M. Limb & C. Dwyer (Eds.), Qualitative methodologies for geographers: Issues and debates (pp. 41-54). London: Arnold. Weiten, W., & Lloyd, M. A.(2005)《心理學:日常生活中的應用(Psychology applied to modern life: adjustment in the 21st century)》(陸洛、高旭繁譯,2006)。台北:聖智學習。 Yeh, K. H., Liu, Y. L., Huang, H. S., & Yang, Y. J. (2007). Individuating and relating autonomy in culturally Chinese adolescents. In J. Liu, C. Ward, A. Bernardo, M. Karasawa & R. Fischer (Eds.). Casting the individual in societal and cultural contexts (pp.123-146). Korea: Kyoyook-Kwahak-Sa Publishing. Zastrow, C., & Kirst-Ashman, K. K.(2007)《人類行為與社會環境(Understanding Human Behavier the Social Environment, 7th)》。台北:湯姆生。 王順民(1998)〈迎接跨世紀青少年福利展望的若干議題〉。《社區發展季刊》,84,184-196。 內政部兒童局(2010)《兒童及少年福利機構及服務概況》。2011.2.17,取自http://www.cbi.gov.tw/CBI_2/internet/main/doc/doc_sec.aspx?uid=115。 成中英(1986)〈論儒家孝的倫理及其現代化:責任、權利與德性〉。《漢學研究》,4(1),頁83-106。 余漢儀(2002)〈少年安置機構的展望:與政府之互動〉。《折翼天使的「另類天堂」:兒童安置機構現況與展望研討會》,頁135-144。 余德慧(1992)〈中國社會的人際苦痛及其分析〉。收錄於楊中芳、高尚仁合編,《中國人中國心:人格與社會篇》,頁291-362。台北:遠流。 余德慧(1987)《中國人的父母經》。台北:張老師。 何凱維(2002)《非行少年司法轉向安置輔導保護處分司法單位與社福機構之契約關係–以南投地方法院與南投家扶中心為例》。台中:靜宜大學青少年兒童福利研究所碩士論文。 杜慈容(1999)童年受虐少年獨立生活經驗探討–以台北市少年獨立生活方案為例。台北:國立台灣大學社會學研究所碩士論文。 李自強(2004)〈從安置輔導少年需求論資源網絡建構〉。《兒童及少年福利期刊》,7,165-180。 吳麗娟(1998)〈父母自我分化、教養態度對青少年子女自我分化、因應策略及適應影響之研究〉。《教育心理學報》,30卷,1期,頁91-132。 林平安(2010)〈從依賴到獨立,進而到互相依賴:將孩子養育成人的親子之旅〉。《青年研究學報》,第13卷,第1期(25號),頁133-148。 林玉潔(2005)《影響少年安置滿意度之相關因表探究–以機構安置為例》。台北:國立台灣大學社會工作研究所碩士論文。 林俐君(2000)《育幼機構院童成長脈絡之探討-以受刑人子女為例》。台北:國立台灣大學社會學研究所碩士論文。 林惠雅(2007a)〈青少年獨立自主發展之探討〉。《應用心理研究》,35期,頁153-183。 林惠雅(2007b)〈大學生對自主的界定及其發展歷程:以親子關係為脈絡〉。《應用心理研究》,33期,頁231-251。 林惠雅(2002)〈大學生對自主意涵的看法及其自主發展歷程〉。《第四屆華人心理學家學術研討會暨第六屆華人心理與行為科際學術研討會:泛華心理學研究的切磋與交流》。 林涵瑜(2008)《女性社會工作者與安置機構少女衝突經驗之探究》。台北:東吳大學社會工作研究所碩士論文。 洪文惠(2010)《台北市弱勢少年自立生活能力評估指標編製說明暨使用手冊》。 台北:台北市政府社會局。 胡中宜(2010)〈離院少年自立生活準備的服務內涵與標準〉。《青年研究學報》,第13卷,第1期(25號),頁179-189。香港:香港青年協會。 胡幼慧、姚美華(2002)〈一些質性方法上的思考:信度與效度?如何抽樣?如何收集資料、登錄與分析?〉。收錄於胡幼慧主編,《質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例》,頁141-158。台北:巨流。 孫壹鳳(2002)〈我國少年安置服務政策分析〉。《財團法人國家政策研究基金會國政研究報告》。2004.5.28,取自http://www.npf.org.tw/PUBLICATION/SS/091/SS-R-091-016.htm。 莊文芳(2009)〈賦權VS.父權:論充權觀點在少年安置機構之應用〉。《兒童及少年福利期刊》,第16期,頁89-105。 許令旻(2010)《經歷兒少安置的自立生活者之安全依附關係探究》。台北:國立台北大學社會工作學系碩士論文。 許雅娟(2010)《CCSA「2010安置少年自立服務發展趨勢國際交流系列活動」:英國學者分享國際經驗,政府、學者、實務界一同關注》。2010.11.8,取自http://www.childrenhome.org.tw/?tid=57&id=1372。 彭淑華(2006)〈保護為名,權控為實?少年安置機構工作人員的觀點分析〉。《東吳社會工作學報》,第15期,頁1-36。 彭淑華(2007)〈「寧缺勿濫」?「寧濫勿缺」?兒童少年保護工作人員機構安置決策困境之研究〉。《中華心理衛生學刊》,20(2),127-154。 彭淑華(2009)《兒童及少年安置教養機構離院個案評估及追蹤輔導研究》。台灣:內政部。 張紉(2002)〈少年安置機構的發展與轉變〉。《折翼天使的「另類天堂」:兒童安置機構現況與展望研討會》,頁30-40。 張紉(2000)〈青少年安置服務福利屬性之探討〉。《台大社會工作學刊》,2,191-215。 陳仲良(2008)〈台灣現行的離院少年自立服務方案〉。《「安置少年自立生活方案:英國與國內經驗分享」國際研討會》,頁1-12。 陳毓文(2004)〈國內少年接受機構安置服務之現況分析〉。《第二屆民間社會福利研討會–台灣的社會福利發展:全球化vs.在地化》。 陳毓文(2002)〈安置機構處遇計畫的轉銜〉。《折翼天使的「另類天堂」:兒童安置機構現況與展望研討會》,頁77-88。 陳向明(2002)《社會科學質的研究》。台北:五南。 陳彥竹(2001)《為何不再犯?少年時期進入矯正機構者離開後生活經驗之探究》。台北:國立台灣大學社會學研究所碩士論文。 陳威宇(2001)《給我一個家:淺談少年安置工作》。台北:台北市政府社會局。 畢恆達(1996)〈詮釋學與質性研究〉。收錄於胡幼慧主編,《質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例》,頁27-45。台北:巨流。 畢國蓮(2006)《歷經長期安置機構安置的兒少保護個案結案後的生活經驗初探》。台北:國立台灣大學社會學研究所碩士論文。 黃巧婷(2003)《從事性交易(之虞)少年離開機構後之生活經驗》。台北:國立台灣大學社會學研究所碩士論文。 黃貞容(2002)《育幼機構安置服務院童權益維護指標之研究》。南投:國立暨南國際大學社會政策與社會工作學系碩士班論文。 黃聖桂、程小蘋(2005)〈青少年自主展現之研究–一個開放家庭的分析〉。《輔導與諮商學報》,27卷1期,頁23-46。 黃聖桂(2003)《家庭脈絡中青少年自主行為展現之研究–從系統整合歷程的觀點探討》。彰化:彰化師範大學輔導與諮商系博士論文。 黃麗娟(2001)《保護處分之安置輔導少年機構內生活適應之探討》。台北:文化大學兒童福利研究所碩士論文。 曾文星(2004)《文化與心理治療》。香港:香港中文大學。 曾華源、郭靜晃(1999)《少年福利》。台北:亞太。 趙雍生(1997)《社會變遷下的少偏差與犯罪》。台北:桂冠。 劉仲冬(1996)〈量與質社會研究的爭議及社會研究未來的走向與出路〉。收錄於胡幼慧主編,《質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例》,頁121-140。台北:巨流。 潘美玲(2003)《中途之家受虐少女處遇模式的探討》。南投:國立暨南國際大學社會政策與社會工作學系碩士班論文。 葉光輝、曹惟純(2010)〈透視台灣社會的依賴新一代:親子互動關係的反思〉。《青年研究學報》,第13卷,第1期(25號),頁109-119。 葉肅科(2007)《社會心理學》。台北:洪葉文化。 歐姿秀(2004)〈兒童家外安置服務〉。於彭淑華等著,《兒童福利:理論與實務》,頁305-329。台北:巨流。 賴靜眉(2006)《「重建」抑或是「管控」?依少年事件處理法裁定安置輔導》台北:國立台灣大學社會學研究所碩士論文。 簡春安、鄒平儀(1998)《社會工作研究法》。台北:巨流。 謝雨生、伊慶春、周玉慧(2004)Adolescent autonomy in Taiwan: Changes and determinants。「台灣青少年成長歷程研究:第一次學術研討會」發表之論文。 蘇芳儀(2007)《「求助之路」:少年保護個案對服務處遇之主體經驗探究》。台北:國立台灣大學社會工作研究所碩士論文。 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/10533 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 台灣的機構安置少年不僅同樣經歷轉銜階段,面對青春期過渡到成人的發展任務,比一般少年提早經歷成為成人的標誌事件,加上身處華人文化「自主–依賴」交錯的自立情境,過去在寄養家庭、育幼機構及中途之家等短期安置,或社區高風險、失能家庭處遇方案較少提供少年自立生活能力的準備,使其僅能在缺乏資訊與資源的情況下求存,以致於生活不穩定的情況下,勉強維持生計與自身安全。此外,在複製家族主義式照顧的機構情境中,權力與控制影響少年對於自立生活的想像,且過度代理的服務輸送忽略少年主體的參與和詮釋。因此,本研究檢視機構安置少年面對自立生活的事實時,如何重新定義與建構自立意涵,同時思考自立生活準備工作的權控關係及助人角色。
本研究採用質性研究的深度訪談法,透過機構介紹並徵得當事人同意後,訪談六位年齡介於十六至二十歲、接受自立生活準備服務、已結束安置及仍在安置的青少年。研究發現自立意涵的認知存在復原力菱形的三種類型、處在不同階段安置少年的自立發展轉變:順應–折衝–自立、少年自立生活需求與條件欠缺關注,以及缺權管控的自立生活準備經驗,同時根據上述研究的發現,對安置體系提出幾點建議,包括提供自立生活養成所需要的機會與經驗、完善符合自立意涵的機構安置服務,以及維持貼近自立生活現實的經濟補助與相關支援等三方面,期能提供相關單位或實務工作者,共同建構適合少年自立發展的安置環境。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | All adolescents have to face the developmental tasks in transition to adulthood. As for adolescents in residential care, they not only have to experience the same transitional tasks, but to deal with the task of independence earlier than other adolescents. In Taiwan, where the Chinese culture of autonomy versus dependence has influence on the issue of independence, the meaning of independence to young people experiencing residential care might mean differently. For adolescents experienced placements, such as foster care, residential institutions, or halfway houses, few have received independent living preparation skills. Lack of trainings and resources might make them live in unstable and insecure living situations when they left the care system. In addition, the power and control in the care system might have influence the youth’s imagination of independent living. Most institutions did not involve in their youth in preparing for independent living. Therefore, this study attempts to understand how young people in residential care face the issue of leaving care, how they define the meaning of independent living, and to discuss the appropriate preparation for their independence.
In this study, qualitative research designed was used. Data were collected by face-to-face interviews of 6 adolescents. They were first introduced by social workers of residential institutions, then with the consent of adolescents, personal interviews were conducted. They were between the age of 16 to 20, had been accepting the Independent Living/Leaving Care services. It’s found that to these interviewees, the idea of independent living existed in three types of the resilience diamond; placed at different developmental stages, including: adapt - conciliation – independent; lack of attention to the needs of independent living; and lack of self control right on preparing for independent living. Regarding to the findings, some suggestions were proposed to the residential care system, such as providing opportunities and experiences of independent living to develop the skills required for independence and to provide support and related economic benefits to these young people. Professionals in residential care should work together to help their youth develop independent living skills before they leave the care system. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-20T21:37:08Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-100-R95330003-1.pdf: 1183606 bytes, checksum: 6488f2340a7d1540165e995472c19b73 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書__________________________________________i
誌謝_____________________________________________________ii 中文摘要_________________________________________________iv 英文摘要__________________________________________________v 第一章 緒論_______________________________________________1 第一節 問題背景___________________________________________1 第二節 研究動機___________________________________________4 第三節 研究目的___________________________________________6 第二章 文獻探討___________________________________________7 第一節 關於少年及少年轉銜自立的觀點_______________________7 壹、轉銜中的少年__________________________________________7 貳、自主與獨立____________________________________________9 第二節 面臨轉銜之機構安置少年____________________________13 壹、遭逢的處境與挑戰_____________________________________14 貳、自立需求與因應策略___________________________________18 第三節 從權力視角來看少年自立生活________________________21 壹、照顧體系中的權控兩難_________________________________21 貳、自立生活服務發展的權控挑戰___________________________24 第三章 研究方法__________________________________________30 第一節 研究設計與研究選象選取____________________________30 壹、研究設計_____________________________________________30 貳、研究對象選取與範圍___________________________________31 參、研究對象來源與結果___________________________________32 第二節 資料蒐集、分析步驟與嚴謹度策略____________________34 壹、資料蒐集、整理與分析_________________________________34 貳、嚴謹度策略___________________________________________38 第三節 研究者角色與研究倫理______________________________39 壹、研究者角色___________________________________________40 貳、研究倫理_____________________________________________41 第四章 研究發現__________________________________________44 第一節 少年的生命故事____________________________________44 壹、小偉_________________________________________________44 貳、麗子_________________________________________________46 參、小潔_________________________________________________47 肆、阿茂_________________________________________________48 伍、聖哥_________________________________________________49 陸、芊芊_________________________________________________50 柒、小結_________________________________________________52 第二節 自立的意涵、範疇與發展____________________________53 壹、自立的意涵___________________________________________54 貳、權控情境中自立的發展_________________________________61 參、小結_________________________________________________72 第三節 自立生活圖像、需求與自立準備經驗__________________74 壹、自立生活圖像_________________________________________74 貳、自立生活的需求與條件_________________________________79 參、自立準備經驗_________________________________________85 肆、小結_________________________________________________96 第五章 研究結論與建議____________________________________98 第一節 研究結論__________________________________________98 壹、自立意涵的認知存在復原力菱形的三種類型_______________98 貳、處在不同階段安置少年的自立發展轉變:順應–折衝–自立_99 參、安置少年的自立生活需求與條件欠缺關注________________100 肆、缺權管控的少年自立生活準備經驗______________________100 第一節 研究建議_________________________________________101 壹、提供自立生活養成所需要的機會與經驗__________________101 貳、完善符合自立意涵的機構安置服務______________________102 參、維持貼近自立生活現實的經濟補助與相關支援____________103 第三節 研究限制_________________________________________104 第四節 研究者現身_______________________________________106 參考文獻_______________________________________________108 附錄一:訪談綱要________________________________________115 附錄二:訪談同意書______________________________________117 附錄三:研究參與者檢核回饋表____________________________118 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 「自立生活」對歷經機構安置青少年之意涵 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Meaning of “Independent Living” to Young People Experienced Residential Care | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 99-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 彭淑華(Su-Hwa Pong),鄭麗珍(Li-Chen Cheng) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 機構安置,轉銜,獨立自主,自立生活, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | residential care,transition,autonomy/independence,independent living, | en |
dc.relation.page | 118 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2011-08-19 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 社會工作學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 社會工作學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-100-1.pdf | 1.16 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。