Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 生物資源暨農學院
  3. 園藝暨景觀學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/10311
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor鄭佳昆(Chia-Kuen Cheng)
dc.contributor.authorYing-Hsiu Chenen
dc.contributor.author陳盈秀zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-20T21:19:08Z-
dc.date.available2021-07-31
dc.date.available2021-05-20T21:19:08Z-
dc.date.copyright2011-08-22
dc.date.issued2011
dc.date.submitted2011-08-19
dc.identifier.citation參考文獻
1. 李明宗(1993),民眾參與都市之綠化美化,台北市:藝術家出版。
2. 李鳳真(1990),嵌出噶瑪蘭地童年歡笑-記錄冬山河水岸設計之民眾參與,造園季刊,1990 秋,p.28~31。
3. 林文浹、黃俊豪、陳昱良(2005),土溝聚落藝術改造行動-以竹仔腳為例,藝術與公共領域 藝術進入社區,台北市:文建會。
4. 原友蘭、劉俊志(2004),地方依附初探:一個實驗性的測量,景觀認知與偏好,台北:中華民國戶外遊憩學會暨台灣大學園藝系。
5. 張凱智(2010),民眾參與, 地方依附對觀光發展態度關係之研究-以三個不同觀光發展形態社區為例,觀光休閒學報,第十六卷,第二期,p.89。
6. 畢恆達(2010),教授為什麼沒告訴我,台北市:小畢空間出版社
7. 陳明竺 (2004),都市的發展願景與公共藝術,解放公共藝術:破與立之間,p.29,台北市:台北市文化局。
8. 陳東宏(2006),應用公共藝術共同參與及學校認同之研究-以台東縣豐里國小畢業班為例,國立台東大學教育研究所碩士論文。
9. 陳盈秀、鄭佳昆(2010),民眾參與對地方依附在不同地理層級上之影響,2010第12屆休閒、遊憩、觀光學術研討會暨國際論壇論文集,南投縣:中華民國戶外遊憩學會。
10. 曾旭正(2005),重思台灣的社區參與-社區建築中「參與」的概念與作法,藝術與公共領域 藝術進入社區,台北市:文建會。
11. 楊沛儒(2004),參與式設計之研究-專業者介入:社區空間的認同、動員與生產,國立台灣大學建築與城鄉研究所碩士論文。
12. 謝平芳(1988),國內民眾參與與實質環境規劃可行性之探討,造園季刊,第三卷,第三期,p.45~60。
13. Arnstein, S. R.(1969),A Ladder of Citizen Participation,Journal of the American Planning Association, Volume 35, Issue 4, pp. 216 - 224
14. Belk, R.W (1992), Attachment to Possessions, Place Attachment, Altman & Low, (37-62), New York and London: Plenum Press.
15. Chawla, L. (1992), Childhood Place Attachments, Place Attachment, Altman & Low, (63-86), New York and London: Plenum Press.
16. Cresswell, T. (2004), Place: a short introduction, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
17. Giuliani, M. V. (2003), Theory of Attachment and Place Attachment, Psychological Theories for Environmental Issues, Bonnes, Lee, Bonaiuto, (137-170), Hants: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
18. Hay, R. (1998). Sense of place in developmental context. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 18, 5-29.
19. Hidago, M. C. (2001), Place Attachment: Conceptual and Empirical Questions, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21:273-281.
20. Hummon, D. M.(1992). Community attachment. Local sentiment and sense of place. In I. Altman, & S. M. Low (Eds.), Place Attachment (pp. 253-277). New York and London: Plenum Press.
21. Kasarda, J. D. (1974), Community Attachment in Mass Society, American Sociological Review, 39(3):328-339.
22. Kyle, G. T. (2007).The Social Construction of a Sense of Place. Leisure Sciences, 29: 209–225.
23. Kyle, G. T. , Graefe, A., & Manning, R. (2005). Testing the dimensionality of place attachment in recreational settings. Environment and Behavior, 37, 153-177.
24. Lewicka, M. (in press), Place attachment: How far have we come in the last 40 years?, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.10.001
25. Lewicka, M. (2005) Ways to make people active: Role of place attachment, cultural capital and neighborhood ties. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 4, 381-395.
26. Lewicka, M. (2010). What makes neighborhood different from home and city? Effects of place scale on place attachment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 35-51.
27. Low, S. M. & Altman, I. (1992), Place Attachment- A Conceptual Inquiry, Place Attachment, Altman, Low, (1-12), New York and London: Plenum Press.
28. Morgan, P. (2010). Towards a developmental theory of place attachment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(1), 11-22.
29. Proshansky, H. M. (1978). The city and self-identity. Environment and Behaviour, 10, 147-169.
30. Relph, E. (1976). Place and placelessness. London: Pion Limited.
31. Riley, R. B. (1992), Attachment to the Ordinary Landscape, Place Attachment, Altman & Low, (13-35), New York and London: Plenum Press.
32. Scannell, L. (2010), Defining place attachment: A tripartite organizing framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(1):1-10.
33. Seidman, I. (2006), Interviewing as Qualitative Research: A Guide for Researchers in Education and The Social Sciences, Teachers College Press, New York, NY.
34. Stokols, D., & Shumaker, S. A. (1981). People in places: A transactional view of settings. In J. H. Harvey (Ed.), Cognition, social behavior, and the environment (pp. 441-488). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
35. Williams, D. R., Patterson, M. E., Roggenbuck, J. W., & Watson, A. (1992), Beyond the Commodity Metaphor: Examining Emotional and Symbolic Attachment to Place. Leisure Sciences, 14: 29–46.
36. Williams, D. R., & Roggenbuck, J. W. (1989). Measuring place attachment: Some preliminary results. Paper presented at the National Recreation and Park Association Symposium on Leisure Research, San Antonio, TX.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/10311-
dc.description.abstract在許多景觀公共空間規劃案中常引入民眾參與設計,希望這些民眾能藉由擁有參與活動的經驗,對活動發生的地點及對其地區能產生較高的地方依附感。地方依附相關理論中也常提到個人的經驗與記憶會影響人對地方的情感連結,但記憶及經驗在人的生命歷程中是一種動態的變化,因此本次研究希望能深入探討經驗與記憶如何影響民眾的地方依附感。
本研究之研究案例為臺灣第一個民眾參與公園規劃設計案,民國78年宜蘭縣冬山河親水公園規劃設計案中,挑選宜蘭縣內國小及幼稚園的學童參與河岸看台馬賽克拼貼活動,期許他們在長大後能對公園及其家鄉有較高的認同感。研究者以滾雪球法找到當年曾經參與此活動之民眾並與之聯繫,取得同意後進行訪談。
先前曾以實證研究證實這些參與的民眾在20年後相較於相同社經背景的民眾有較高的地方依附感,本研究針對參與民眾進行深入訪談,藉由質性訪談將這些民眾的經驗記憶再詮釋,進一步瞭解民眾參與的經驗及記憶,在民眾的生命歷程中帶來如何的影響,而他們與地方的連結,又是如何被加強及深化。
在對15位受訪者進行深入訪談後,將訪談內容錄音轉成逐字稿,依照受訪者對曾經參加過此活動的經驗重述、對冬山河親水公園的情感描述和對家鄉宜蘭的關係進行整理及討論。研究發現曾經參與過冬山河親水公園的鑲嵌拼貼活動的經驗對受訪者而言是在冬山河親水公園裡一項很重要的回憶,在這當中,受訪者對自己當年所創作的作品十分看重,由於有作品被固定在公共空間內,讓這個經驗變得更加特別。然而在這二十年來,初始的參與經驗會受到後續的經驗而有所改變,像是受訪者的重訪互動、接受本研究訪談時的「再回憶」、以及與家人、朋友相關的互動等等都會讓參與經驗經過堆疊後,影響了他們對於這個經驗的看法,也會影響有關地方的記憶和情感連結。
最後本研究對於設計規劃單位給予一些建議。因為對參與者的重要性,故需選擇耐用且不容易被破壞的材料,才能真正留下永久的紀念。同時也鼓勵規劃單位在舉辦這類型的活動後,可以有一些後續的活動,增加參與者和自己的作品以及同伴的互動,能讓參與經驗更豐富。另外,對於地方形象的塑造以及整體榮譽感的建構也能影響民眾對地方的看法,如此一來能更有效的達到規劃設計目標,增強民眾的地方依附感。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractCitizen participation was arranged into many public landscape design and planning projects to improve people’s attachment to the places. This kind of practice had been generally recognized, but only a few researches have tackled this issue to confirm the effects of participatory design on place attachment. Studies have mentioned that place attachment is influenced by people's experiences and memories. But memories and experiences change dynamically in a person’s whole life. As a result, the main purpose of this study is to understand how experiences affect people's place attachment in a long time.
Dong-Shan River Park planning project was choose as the study site. The project was held in 1989 as the studying case. It is the first participatory design project of public space in Taiwan. Many local elementary school and kindergarten students were invited in the project to decorate the river bank with mosaic collage. Snowball sampling technique was used to find 15 participants who had involved in the mosaic collage activity 20 years ago that accepted an in-depth interview.
In a previous empirical study we had proved that these participants have higher place attachment in caparison with other people with the same social background after 20 years. The current study focused on in-depth interview with the participants, and re-interpreted these people’s experiences and memories by the qualitative interview to know more about how these experiences and memories affect their lives and how the emotional bonding between the place and they are strengthen and deepen.
After having in-depth interviews with 15 respondents, we converted the records into transcript. We arrange and discuss about the relation between the participants and Dong-Shan River Park and I-Lan County according to their descriptions. We discover that the experiences of joining this activity is a very important memory for these respondents. And the respondents attach importance to their artifacts since they think that their pieces were fixed in the public space makes the experience more special. However, during the 20 years, the re-visit, the re-memorizing during the interview in this study, and the related interactions among the participants and their families and friends plus the initial participating experience all affect their emotional bonding with the place.
Lastly, we provided some suggestions to the planning and design organizations. Because of the importance to the participants, they should choose durable materials that are not easy to be broken so that it can definitely make permanent memories. In the mean while, we encourage that the planning and design authorities can hold some follow-up activities after this type of activities to increase the interaction among the participants and their own artifact and other coworkers, and improve the popularity of the place. By doing so, the experience of participation can be enriched, and the goal to strengthen the participants’ place attachment can be achieved easier.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-05-20T21:19:08Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-100-R98628312-1.pdf: 1398212 bytes, checksum: 603550534c2daa859481c78a0667ec07 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2011
en
dc.description.tableofcontents目錄
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究緣起 1
第二節 研究案例介紹 2
第三節 研究目的 3
第二章 文獻回顧與概念架構 4
第一節 民眾參與相關文獻 4
第二節 民眾參與和地方依附之關係 8
第三節 地方依附相關文獻 10
第四節 研究架構與研究問題 16
第三章 研究方法 18
第一節 研究方法 18
第二節 研究對象 19
第三節 訪談流程及問題 22
第四章 分析與討論 23
第一節 「冬山河童趣鑲嵌活動」參與經驗如何影響地方依附 23
第一節 地方依附的內涵 25
第二節 童趣鑲嵌活動參與經驗的內涵 32
第三節 時間堆疊對參與經驗的影響 39
第四節 後續回娘家活動 46
第五章 結論與建議 49
第一節 結論 49
第二節 建議 53
第三節 研究反思與未來研究方向 55
參考文獻 57
附錄 61
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.title民眾參與景觀設計對其地方依附之影響zh_TW
dc.titleThe Effects of Citizen Participatory Design to Place Attachmenten
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear99-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee張錦華(Jin-hua Zhang),歐聖榮(Sheng-Jung Ou),張俊彥(Chun-Yen Chang),王正平(Cheng-Ping Wang)
dc.subject.keyword地方依附,參與式設計,經驗,記憶,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordplace attachment,citizen participatory design,experience,memory,en
dc.relation.page62
dc.rights.note同意授權(全球公開)
dc.date.accepted2011-08-20
dc.contributor.author-college生物資源暨農學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept園藝學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:園藝暨景觀學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-100-1.pdf1.37 MBAdobe PDF檢視/開啟
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved