請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/10239完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 章良渭(Liang-Wey Chang) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yen-Yi Tsai | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 蔡燕怡 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-20T21:13:03Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2014-07-06 | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-05-20T21:13:03Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2011-07-06 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2011-02-11 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1. Gauchard GC, Lascombes P, Kuhnast M, Perrin PP. Influence of different types of
progressive idiopathic scoliosis on static and dynamic postural control. Spine 2001; 26:1052-1058. 2. Nault ML, Allard P, Hinse S, Blanc RL, Caron O, Labelle H, Sadeghi H. Relations between standing stability and body posture parameters in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2002; 27:1911-1917. 3. Lenke LG, Engsberg JR, Ross SA, Reitenbach A, Blanke K, Bridwell KH. Prospective dynamic functional evaluation of gait and spinal balance following spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2001; 26:E330-E337. 4. Chen PQ, Wang JL, Tsuang YH, Liao TL, Huang PI, Hang YS. The postural stability and gait pattern of idiopathic scoliosis adolescent. Clinical Biomechanics 1998;13:S52-S58. 5. Giakas G, Baltzopoulos V, Dangerfield PH, Dorgan JC, Dalmira S. Comparison of gait patterns between healthy and scoliotic patients using time and frequency domain analysis of ground reaction forces. Spine 1996; 21:2235-2242. 6. Mahaudens P, Banse X, Mousny M, Detrembleur C. Gait in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: kinematics and electromyographic analysis. Eur Spine J 2009;18:512–521 7. Liu T, Chu WC, Young G, Li K, Yeung BH, Guo L, Man GC, Lam WW, Wong ST, Cheng JC. MR Analysis of Regional Brain Volume in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Neurological Manifestation of a Systemic Disease. J of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2008;27:732–736. 8. Rigo M, Reiter CH, Weiss HR. Effect of conservative management on the prevalence of surgery in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Ped Reha 2003;6:209–214. 9. Maruyama T; Takeshita K; KitagawaT. Milwaukee brace today. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 2008;3:136–138. 10. Nachemson AL, Peterson LE, Members of Brace Study Group of the Scoliosis Research Society: Effectiveness of treatment with a brace in girls who have adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg 1995, 77:815-822. 11. Gabos PG, Bojescul MJ, Bowen JR, Keeler K, Rich L. Long-Term Follow-up of Female Patients with Idiopathic Scoliosis Treated with the Wilmington Orthosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004;86:1891-1899. 12. Sadeghi H, Allard P, Barbier F, Chavet P, Gatto L, Rivard CH, Hinse S, Simoneau M. Bracing has no effect on standing balance in females with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Med Sci Monit, 2008;14:CR293-298. 13. Smith KM. Coronal plane trunk shifts and decompensational perspectives in a new design of an asymmetrical TLSO module. JPO 2004; 16:16-22. 85 14. Stokes IAF: Three dimensional terminology of spinal deformity: A report presented to the Scoliosis research Society by the Scoliosis Research Society Working Group on 3-D Terminology of Spinal Deformities. Spine 1994, 19:236-248. 15. James IP. IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS: The prognosis, diagnosis, and operative indications related to curve patterns and the age at onset. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 1954;36:36-49. 16. Rogala EJ, Drummond DS, Gurr J: Scoliosis: Incidence and natural history. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1978, 60:173-176. 17. Barrack RL, Whitecloud TS, Burke SW, Cook SD, Harding AF. Proprioception in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1984; 9:681-685. 18. Kramers-de Quervain IA, Müller R, Stacoff A, Grob D, Stüssi E. Gait analysis in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 2004;13:449–456 19. Lao MLM, Chow DHK, Guo X, MD, Cheng JCY, Holmes AD. Impaired Dynamic Balance Control in Adolescents With Idiopathic Scoliosis and Abnormal Somatosensory Evoked Potentials. J Pediatr Orthop 2008;28:846-849. 20. Lowry KA, Smiley-Oyen AL, Carrel AJ, Kerr JP. Walking Stability Using Harmonic Ratios in Parkinson’s Disease. Movement Disorders 2009;24:261-267. 21. Menz HB, Lord SR, Fitzpatrick RC. Acceleration patterns of the head and pelvis when walking are associated with risk of falling in community-dwelling older people. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2003a;58:M446–452. 22. Menz HB, Lord SR, Fitzpatrick RC. Age-related differences in walking stability. Age and Ageing 2003; 32: 137–42. 23. Kavanagh JJ, Morrison S, Barrett RS. Coordination of head and trunk accelerations during walking. Eur J Appl Physiol 2005;94:468–475. 24. Brach JS, McGurl D, Wert D, VanSwearingen JM, Perera S, Cham R, Studenski S. Validation of a Measure of Smoothness of Walking. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2011; 66A: 136-141. 25. Menz HB, Lord SR, Fitzpatrick RC. Acceleration patterns of the head and pelvis when walking on level and irregular surfaces. Gait Posture 2003b;18:35–46. 26. Yack HJ and Berger RC. Dynamic Stability in the Elderly: Identifying a Possible Measure. Clinical Biomechanics 1989;4:34-40. 27. Menz HB, Lord SR, George RS, Fitzpatrick RC. Walking Stability and Sensorimotor Function in Older People With Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:245-52. 28. Zabjek KF, Leroux MA, Coillard C, Rivard CH, Princec F. Evaluation of segmental postural characteristics during quiet standing in control and Idiopathic Scoliosis patients. Clinical Biomechanics 2005;20: 483–90 29. Beaulieu M, Toulotte C, Gatto L, Rivard CH, Teasdale N, Simoneau M, Allard P. 86 Postural imbalance in non-treated adolescent idiopathic scoliosis at different periods of progression. Eur Spine J 2009 ;18:38–44. 30. Baratto L, Morasso PG, Re C, Spada G. A new look at posturographic analysis in the clinical context: sway-density versus other parameterization techniques. Motor Control 2002;6:246–70 31. Simoneau M, Richer N, Mercier P, Allard P, Teasdale N. Sensory deprivation and balance control in idiopathic scoliosis adolescent. Exp Brain Res 2006 ;170:576–582 32. Massion J. Postural Control Systems in Developmental Perspective. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews1998;22: 465–72 33. Byl NN, Holland S, Jurek A, Hu SS. Postural imbalance and vibratory sensitivity in patients with idiopathic scoliosis: implications for treatment. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1997;26:60–68 34. Sahlstrand T, Ortengren R, Nachemson A. Postural equilibrium in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Acta Orthop Scand. 1978;49(4):354Y365. 35. Mac-Thiong J, Labelle H, Charlebois M, Huot M, de Guise JA. Sagittal Plane Analysis of the Spine and Pelvis in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis According to the Coronal Curve Type. Spine 2003;28:1404–9 36. O hlen G, Aaro S, Bylund P. The sagittal configuration and mobility of the spine in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1988;13:413–6. 37. Allard P, ChavetP, Barbier F, Gatto L, Labelle H, Sadeghi H. Effect of Body Morphology on Standing Balance in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2004;83:689–97. 38. Allard P, Nault ML, Hinse S, LeBlanc R, Labelle H. Relationship between morphologic somatotypes and standing posture equilibrium. Annals ofhuman biology 2001; 28:624-33 39. Watts HG, Hall JE, Stanish W. The Boston brace system for the treatment of low thoracic and lumbar scoliosis by the use of a girdle without superstructure. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1977;126: 87-92. 40. Winter RB, Carlson MC. Modern orthotics for spinal deformities. Clin Orthop 1977;126:74-86. 41. Chow DH, Leung DS, Holmes AD. The effects of load carriage and bracing on the balance of schoolgirls with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 2007;16:1351-1358. 42. Ridding MC, Rothwell JC. Afferent input and cortical organisation: a study with magnetic stimulation. Exp Brain Res 1999;126:536–544. 43. Nitz A, Peck D. Comparison of muscle spindle concentrations in large and small 87 human epaxial muscles acting in parallel combinations. Am. Surg.1986; 52:273-277. 44. Smania N, Picelli A, Romano M, Negrini S. Neurophysiological basis of rehabilitation of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Disability and Rehabilitation 2008;30:763–771. 45. Burridge JH, LadouceurM. Clinical and Therapeutic Applications of Neuromuscular Stimulation: A Review of Current Use and Speculation into Future Developments. Neuromodulation 2001;4:147–154. 46. Winter DA. Human balance and posture control during standing and walking. Gait&Posture 1995;3:193-214. 47. Wolff DR, Rose J, Jones VK, Bloch DA, Oehlert JW, Gamble JG.Postural balance measurements for children and adolescents. J Orthop Res 1998;16:271–275. 48. Rose J, Wolff DR, Jones VK, Bloch DA, Oehlert JW, Gamble JG. Postural balance in children with cerebral palsy. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology 2002;44:58–63. 49. Jacono M, Casadio M, Morasso PG, Sanguineti V. The Sway-Density Curve and the Underlying Postural Stabilization Process. Motor Control 2004; 8:292-311 50. Dupertuis CW and Michael NB. COMPARISON OF GROWTH IN HEIGHT AND WEIGHT BETWEEN ECTOMORPHIC AND MESOMORPHIC BOYS. Child development 1953;24:203-14 51. Smeathers JE. Measurement of transmissibility for the human spine during walking and running. Clinical Biomechanics 1989; 4: 34-40. 52. Hilibrand AS, Tannenbaum DA, Graziano GP, et al. The sagittal alignment of the cervical spine in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 1995;15:627–32. 53. Mallau S, Bollini G, Jouve JL, Assaiante C. Locomotor Skills and Balance Strategies in Adolescents Idiopathic Scoliosis. Spine. 2007;32: E14–E22. 54. Guo X, Chau WW, Hui-Chan CW, et al. Balance control in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis and disturbed somatosensory function. Spine. 2006;31(14):E437-E440. 55. Hubert L, Dansereau, Jean D, Christian B, Poitras, Benoit P. Three-dimensional Effect of the Boston Brace on the Thoracic Spine and Rib Cage. Spine 1996;21:59-64 56. Konz R, Fatone S, Gard S. Effect of restricted spinal motion on gait. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development 2006; 43:161-70 57. Mahaudens P, Banse X, Detrembleur C. Effects of short-term brace wearing on the pendulum-like mechanism of walking in healthy subjects. Gait & Posture 2008; 28: 703–7 58. Assaiante C, Amblard B. Ontogenesis of head stabilization in space during locomotion in children: influence of visual cues. Exp Brain Res 1993; 93:499-515 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/10239 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 背景 少有研究探討背架對青春期自發性脊柱側彎女性病人動靜態的效應。
目的 1) 比較青春期自發性脊柱側彎女性病人和健康人的動靜態表現差異; 2) 研究背架治療對青春期自發性脊柱側彎女性病人在立即和四個月後,跟治療前比 較,在動靜態表現差異; 3) 探討背架治療對青春期自發性脊柱側彎女性病人是 否帶來四個月的動作適應能力。 研究設計 前瞻性研究設計 受試者 15 位青春期自發性脊柱側彎女性病人,Cobb 角度介於20 到50 度,和健 康女孩15 位。 治療介入 為每位青春期自發性脊柱側彎女性病人量身訂製胸腰薦椎矯具 方法 測量走路時運動學資料及收集站姿時足底壓力軌跡。健康人僅測量一次, 病人則測量四次,分別是 治療前、背架立即治療後、治療四個月後沒有穿背架, 和治療四個月後有穿背架。 測量參數 動態參數包括: 行走時的時空參數、行走韻律及流暢性(諧波比值)、 行走身體旋轉偏置角度;靜態參數包含: 站姿足底壓力軌跡分佈、站姿時身體旋 轉偏置角度、頭部偏離身體中心線的距離。 結果 用諧波比值來測量行走時的韻律及流暢性,發現青春期自發性脊柱側彎女性 病人的表現較健康人不好,以絕對空間來看,是發生在上下的運動方向,以相對 空間來看,則是發生在前後的運動方向。四個月的背架效應,影響青春期自發性 vii 脊柱側彎女性病人頭部的左右運動的流暢性有變差,但從相對空間來看,從骨盆 看頭及從骨盆看肩膀的運動韻律,則是沒有影響。此外,背架限制了骨盆和從骨 盆看肩膀,行走中在冠狀面的運動。在四個月動作適應上,從相對空間來看,背 架治療有改善上下運動的走路流暢性,但從絕對空間看,頭部左右的行走韻律有 變差。 總論 青春期自發性脊柱側彎女性病人在背架治療前的行走韻律及流暢性有比健 康人差。病人在行走及站姿,身體存在旋轉偏置角度。背架治療四個月後,雖然 背架限制了身體的活動角度,從相對空間來看,並不干擾走路時的韻律及流暢性。 在背架治療4個月後,從相對空間來看,有發現動作的適應能力。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Background. Few studies have discussed the dynamic effects of spinal orthotic
intervention on patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), nor have they investigated the motion adaptation on them. Objectives. The objectives of this study is three-fold: 1) To evaluate dynamic and static balance between AIS patients and normal subjects; 2) to investigate the dynamic and static balance effects of spinal orthotic intervention in the AIS patients during investigative periods of immediate in-brace wearing and after four-month in-brace treatment; 3) to evaluate the motion adaptation after four-month brace treatment in the AIS patients. Design. A prospective cohort study was performed for this investigation. Participants. Fifteen adolescent females with AIS with Cobb angle of 20 to 50 degrees and fifteen age-matched healthy females participated in this study. Interventions. The intervention treatment for the females with AIS was a custom-made total contact thoracolumbar spinal orthosis. Methods. The gait kinematic data and the standing centre of pressure (COP) data were collected. For each AIS patient, data were collected for the following four conditions—pre-brace, immediate in-brace, after four-month of brace treatment data without the brace, and after four-month of brace treatment data in the brace. Normal iv subjects acted as the control and participated in gait analysis just one time. Main outcome measures. The dynamic variables of temporal-distance parameters, walking smoothness with harmonic ratios, and torsional offset of central segments during gait were calculated. The static variables included COP sway, postural orientation and head decompensation in static standing were also calculated for all subjects and conditions. Results. The walking smoothness measured by harmonic ratios was reduced in AIS patients compared with healthy teenagers, especially in the vertical direction on the head (p=.001), trunk (p=.001) and pelvis (p=.005) as well as the antero-posterior direction on the segments of the head on pelvis (p=.025) and the trunk on pelvis (p=.01). For the four-month effect of bracing, bracing negatively affected the smoothness in the medio-lateral direction on the head (p=.001), in the global reference, but the smoothness was not changed on the body reference in AIS patients. Moreover, the effect of bracing restricted the pelvis motion during gait in the frontal plane causing the limited motion on the trunk on pelvis. For the four-month motion adaptation, brace treatment promoted the walking rhythm and smoothness in the vertical direction on the segment of the head on pelvis (p=.026), but decreased in the medio-lateral direction on the head (p=.018). Conclusion. AIS patients before the brace treatment exhibited significantly poor v walking symmetry compared with age-matched girls. AIS patients had abnormal segmental offset during gait and abnormal segmental orientation in standing posture. Bracing stiffened the range of motion on the body but did not disturb walking rhythm in on the body reference in the four-month brace intervention. Brace treatment yielded motion adaptation for walking rhythm in the body reference in the four-month brace intervention. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-20T21:13:03Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-100-R97548050-1.pdf: 2402638 bytes, checksum: 94fd1d9450c3eb1f6e97e2932e52a41d (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝辭------------------------------------------------------------------------------------i
Abstract -----------------------------------------------------------------------------iii 中文摘要----------------------------------------------------------------------------vi Contents----------------------------------------------------------------------------viii Figure Lists------------------------------------------------------------------------xiii Table Lists------------------------------------------------------------------------xv CHAPTER I Introduction ------------------------------------------1 1.1 Foreword---------------------------------------------------------------------1 1.2 Literatures Review ---------------------------------------------------------2 1.2.1 The Comparison between AIS Patients and Normal Subjects---2 1.2.1.1 Definition and Incidence of AIS -----------------------------------------2 1.2.1.2 Gait Asymmetry in the AIS Patients -------------------------------------2 1.2.1.3 The Measurement of Smoothness on Head, Trunk & Pelvis--------------5 1.2.1.4 Standing Balance Dysfunction and Malposture in the AIS Patients ------7 1.2.2 The Effects of Spinal Orthotic Treatment in the AIS Patients ---10 1.2.3 Motion Adaptation after bracing in AIS patients ------------------13 1.2.4 Purposes and Hypotheses ---------------------------------------------14 CHAPTER II Methods and Materials ---------------------------17 ix 2.1 Subjects ---------------------------------------------------------------------17 2.2 Study design ---------------------------------------------------------------19 2.2.1 Experiment procedures ------------------------------------------------19 2.2.2 Instrument ---------------------------------------------------------------22 2.2.3 Protocol design----------------------------------------------------------25 2.2.3.1 Gait motion task ----------------------------------------------------------------25 2.2.3.2 Standing balance task ----------------------------------------------------------26 2.2.4 Data analysis ------------------------------------------------------------27 2.2.4.1 Gait analysis- --------------------------------------------------------------------27 2.2.4.2 Standing balance tasks ---------------------------------------------------------30 2.2.5 Analysis design----------------------------------------------------------36 2.3 Definition of special terms-----------------------------------------------37 2.4 Statistical Analysis --------------------------------------------------------38 CHAPTER III Results ---------------------------------------------41 3.1 Dysfunction and impairment in AIS patients--------------------------41 3.1.1 Anthropometric data and spatial-temporal gait parameters ------ 41 3.1.2 Harmonic ratios on the head, trunk and pelvis during gait--------43 3.1.3 Peak-to-peak range and offset of all segmental obliquities and rotations during gait ----------------------------------------------------- 46 x 3.1.4 Postural orientation in static standing ------------------------------ 49 3.1.5 Correlation between the segmental offset during gait and the postural orientation in standing in AIS patients -------------------- 52 3.1.6 Head decompensation in standing position ----------------------- 53 3.1.7 COP parameters in standing------------------------------------------54 3.1.8 Summary ---------------------------------------------------------------55 3.2 The effect of bracing and motion adaptation in AIS patients ----- 57 3.2.1 The walking rhythm for AIS patients------------------------------- 57 3.2.1.1 In the Antero-Posterior Direction-----------------------------------------------57 3.2.1.2 In the Medio-Lateral Direction -------------------------------------------------58 3.2.1.3 In the Vertical Direction ---------------------------------------------------------59 3.2.2 The peak-to-peak range of segmental obliquity and rotation during gait for AIS patients with double curve ------------------------------- 64 3.2.2.1 In the Frontal Plane --------------------------------------------------------------64 3.2.2.2 In the Transverse Plane ----------------------------------------------------------66 3.2.3 Other parameters ------------------------------------------------------68 3.2.4 Summary ------------------------------------------------------------------68 Chapter IV Discussion -----------------------------------------------------71 4.1 Dysfunction and impairment in AIS patients -------------------------71 xi 4.1.1 Smoothness of walking ------------------------------------------------71 4.1.2 The peak-to-peak range and offset during walking and the postural orientation in standing for segmental obliquity and rotation -------------------------------------------------------------------73 4.1.3 Head decompensation in standing -----------------------------------74 4.1.4 The static standing balance -------------------------------------------74 4.1.5 Brief summary ----------------------------------------------------------76 4.2 The influence of the immediate effect and four-month effect of bracing in AIS patients --------------------------------------------------76 4.2.1 Walking rhythm and smoothness -----------------------------------76 4.2.2 Segmental peak-to-peak range and offset during walking -------78 4.2.3 Standing balance ------------------------------------------------------79 4.2.4 Brief summary ---------------------------------------------------------79 4.3 The four-month motion adaptation of brace treatment in AIS patient ----------------------------------------------------------------------80 4.3.1 Walking rhythm and smoothness-------------------------------------80 4.3.2 Standing balance -------------------------------------------------------82 4.3.3 Brief summary ----------------------------------------------------------82 Chapter V Conclusion ------------------------------------------------------83 xii References------------------------------------------------------------------------84 Appendix -------------------------------------------------------------------------88 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.title | 脊柱矯具對於自發性脊柱側彎女性患者之動態表現 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Dynamic Effects of Custom-Made Spinal Orthoses on Females with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 99-1 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 湯佩芳(Pei-Fang Tang),林啟禎(Chii-Jeng Lin),楊緒南(Bruce Yang) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 青春期自發性脊柱側彎女性病人,量身訂製胸腰薦椎矯具,背架,諧波比值,行走韻律,平衡,足底壓力軌跡,身體旋轉偏置角度, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | adolescent idiopathic scoliosis,spinal orthosis,brace,harmonic ratios,walking rhythm,balance,center of pressure,torsional offset, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 104 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2011-02-11 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 醫學工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 醫學工程學研究所 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-100-1.pdf | 2.35 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
