請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/102221完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 蘇德徵 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Te-Cheng Su | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 黃克宸 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Ke-Chen Huang | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-04-08T16:24:29Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2026-04-09 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2026-04-08 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2026 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2026-03-11 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1. Bonollo, F., N. Gramegna, and G. Timelli, High-pressure die-casting: Contradictions and challenges. Jom, 2015. 67: p. 901-908.
2. Su, T., et al., Semi-solid deformation of Al-Cu alloys: A quantitative comparison between real-time imaging and coupled LBM-DEM simulations. Acta Materialia, 2019. 163: p. 208-225. 3. Gourlay, C. and A. Dahle, Dilatant shear bands in solidifying metals. Nature, 2007. 445(7123): p. 70-73. 4. Kareh, K., et al., Revealing the micromechanisms behind semi-solid metal deformation with time-resolved X-ray tomography. Nature communications, 2014. 5(1): p. 4464. 5. Yuan, L., C. O’Sullivan, and C. Gourlay, Exploring dendrite coherency with the discrete element method. Acta materialia, 2012. 60(3): p. 1334-1345. 6. Su, T.-C., et al., Quantitatively Comparing 3D Discrete Element Method Simulations With Drained Compression Experiments of the Semi-solid Deformation of Al-Cu Alloys. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, 2023. 54(10): p. 3882-3896. 7. Dantzig, J.A. and M. Rappaz, Solidification: -Revised & Expanded. 2016: EPFL press. 8. Glicksman, M.E., Principles of solidification: an introduction to modern casting and crystal growth concepts. 2010: Springer Science & Business Media. 9. Holman, J., Heat transfer, 10th editi. ed. Mc-GrawHill Higher education, 2010. 10. Smith, W.F. and J. Hashemi, Foundations of materials science and engineering. 2006: Mcgraw-Hill Publishing. 11. Scheil, E., Bemerkungen zur schichtkristallbildung. International Journal of Materials Research, 1942. 34(3): p. 70-72. 12. Campbell, J., Complete casting handbook: metal casting processes, metallurgy, techniques and design. 2015: Butterworth-Heinemann. 13. Huang, K. and R.E. Logé, A review of dynamic recrystallization phenomena in metallic materials. Materials & Design, 2016. 111: p. 548-574. 14. Pierce, D.T., et al., The influence of stacking fault energy on the microstructural and strain-hardening evolution of Fe–Mn–Al–Si steels during tensile deformation. Acta Materialia, 2015. 100: p. 178-190. 15. Sakai, T., et al., Dynamic and post-dynamic recrystallization under hot, cold and severe plastic deformation conditions. Progress in materials science, 2014. 60: p. 130-207. 16. Sitdikov, O., et al., Temperature effect on fine-grained structure formation in high-strength Al alloy 7475 during hot severe deformation. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2009. 516(1-2): p. 180-188. 17. Drury, M. and F. Humphreys, The development of microstructure in Al-5% Mg during high temperature deformation. Acta Metallurgica, 1986. 34(11): p. 2259-2271. 18. Zhang, J., et al., Dynamic recrystallization mechanisms of 2195 aluminum alloy during medium/high temperature compression deformation. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2021. 804: p. 140650. 19. Lifshitz, I.M. and V.V. Slyozov, The kinetics of precipitation from supersaturated solid solutions. Journal of physics and chemistry of solids, 1961. 19(1-2): p. 35-50. 20. Wagner, C., Theorie der alterung von niederschlägen durch umlösen (Ostwald‐reifung). Zeitschrift für Elektrochemie, Berichte der Bunsengesellschaft für physikalische Chemie, 1961. 65(7‐8): p. 581-591. 21. Zhang, J., F. Huang, and Z. Lin, Progress of nanocrystalline growth kinetics based on oriented attachment. Nanoscale, 2010. 2(1): p. 18-34. 22. Herring, C., Diffusional viscosity of a polycrystalline solid. Journal of applied physics, 1950. 21(5): p. 437-445. 23. Rappaz, M., A. Jacot, and W.J. Boettinger, Last-stage solidification of alloys: theoretical model of dendrite-arm and grain coalescence. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, 2003. 34: p. 467-479. 24. Nagira, T., et al., Direct observation of deformation in semi-solid carbon steel. Scripta Materialia, 2011. 64(12): p. 1129-1132. 25. Gourlay, C., et al., Synchrotron radiography studies of shear-induced dilation in semisolid Al alloys and steels. Jom, 2014. 66: p. 1415-1424. 26. Gourlay, C., et al., Granular deformation mechanisms in semi-solid alloys. Acta Materialia, 2011. 59(12): p. 4933-4943. 27. Cai, B., et al., In situ synchrotron tomographic quantification of granular and intragranular deformation during semi-solid compression of an equiaxed dendritic Al–Cu alloy. Acta Materialia, 2014. 76: p. 371-380. 28. Terzi, S., et al., In situ X-ray tomography observation of inhomogeneous deformation in semi-solid aluminium alloys. Scripta Materialia, 2009. 61(5): p. 449-452. 29. Yasuda, H., et al., Development of X-ray imaging for observing solidification of carbon steels. ISIJ international, 2011. 51(3): p. 402-408. 30. Hubbell, J.H., Tables of x-ray mass attenuation coefficients and mass energy-absorption coefficients. http://physics. nist. gov/PhysRefData/XrayMassCoef/, 1996. 31. Ganesan, S. and D.R. Poirier, Densities of aluminum-rich. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, 1987. 18: p. 721-723. 32. Jimbo, I. and A. Cramb, The density of liquid iron-carbon alloys. Metallurgical Transactions B, 1993. 24: p. 5-10. 33. McLean, M., The kinetics of spheroidization of lead inclusions in aluminium. Philosophical Magazine, 1973. 27(6): p. 1253-1266. 34. Boettinger, W., et al., A study of the coarsening of liquid-solid mixtures using synchrotron radiation microradiography. Metall. Trans., A;(United States), 1988. 18(3). 35. Curreri, P.A. and W.F. Kaukler, Real-time X-ray transmission microscopy of solidifying Al-In alloys. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, 1996. 27: p. 801-808. 36. Sen, S., et al., Dynamics of solid/liquid interface shape evolution near an insoluble particle—An X-ray transmission microscopy investigation. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, 1997. 28: p. 2129-2135. 37. Kaukler, W.F., F. Rosenberger, and P.A. Curreri, In situ studies of precipitate formationin Al-Pb monotectic solidification by X-ray transmission microscopy. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, 1997. 28: p. 1705-1710. 38. Kaukler, W.F. and F. Rosenberger, X-ray microscopic observations of metal solidification dynamics. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, 1994. 25: p. 1775-1777. 39. Mathiesen, R.H., et al., Time resolved x-ray imaging of dendritic growth in binary alloys. Physical Review Letters, 1999. 83(24): p. 5062. 40. Zeng, G., et al., Solidification of Sn-0.7 Cu-0.15 Zn solder: in situ observation. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, 2014. 45: p. 918-926. 41. Gourlay, C., et al., In situ investigation of unidirectional solidification in Sn–0.7 Cu and Sn–0.7 Cu–0.06 Ni. Acta Materialia, 2011. 59(10): p. 4043-4054. 42. Yasuda, H., et al., Direct observation of stray crystal formation in unidirectional solidification of Sn–Bi alloy by X-ray imaging. Journal of Crystal Growth, 2004. 262(1-4): p. 645-652. 43. Li, B., H. Brody, and A. Kazimirov, Real time synchrotron microradiography of dendrite coarsening in Sn-13 wt pct Bi alloy. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, 2007. 38: p. 599-605. 44. Li, B., H. Brody, and A. Kazimirov, Synchrotron microradiography of temperature gradient zone melting in directional solidification. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, 2006. 37: p. 1039-1044. 45. Yasuda, H., et al., In situ observation of nucleation, fragmentation and microstructure evolution in Sn–Bi and Al–Cu alloys. International Journal of Cast Metals Research, 2008. 21(1-4): p. 125-128. 46. Li, B., et al., Real time observation of dendritic solidification in alloys by synchrotron microradiography. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 2006. 39(20): p. 4450. 47. Billia, B., et al., In Situ synchrotron x-ray characterization of microstructure formation in solidification processing of Al-based metallic alloys. ISIJ international, 2010. 50(12): p. 1929-1935. 48. Arnberg, L. and R.H. Mathiesen, The real-time, high-resolution x-ray video microscopy of solidification in aluminum alloys. Jom, 2007. 59: p. 20-26. 49. Sistaninia, M., et al., 3-D granular modeling and in situ X-ray tomographic imaging: A comparative study of hot tearing formation and semi-solid deformation in Al–Cu alloys. Acta materialia, 2013. 61(10): p. 3831-3841. 50. Limodin, N., et al., In situ investigation by X-ray tomography of the overall and local microstructural changes occurring during partial remelting of an Al–15.8 wt.% Cu alloy. Acta Materialia, 2007. 55(9): p. 3177-3191. 51. Limodin, N., et al., In situ and real-time 3-D microtomography investigation of dendritic solidification in an Al–10 wt.% Cu alloy. Acta Materialia, 2009. 57(7): p. 2300-2310. 52. Liu, D.R., et al., Coupled cellular automaton (CA)–finite element (FE) modeling of directional solidification of Al-3.5 wt% Ni alloy: a comparison with X-ray synchrotron observations. ISIJ international, 2014. 54(2): p. 392-400. 53. Nagira, T., et al., Characterization of shear deformation based on in-situ observation of deformation in semi-solid Al–cu alloys and water-particle mixture. ISIJ international, 2013. 53(7): p. 1195-1201. 54. Gourlay, C., et al. Synchrotron radiography of direct-shear in semi-solid alloys. in IOP conference series: materials science and engineering. 2012. IOP Publishing. 55. Nagira, T., et al., In situ observation of shear deformation in semi-solid Al–Cu alloys. Proceedings of visual-JW2012, Osaka, 2012: p. 215-216. 56. Gourlay, C.M., et al., In situ study of the altering globule packing-density during semisolid alloy deformation. Solid State Phenomena, 2013. 192: p. 185-190. 57. Phillion, A., et al., In situ X-ray observation of semi-solid deformation and failure in Al–Cu alloys. Acta Materialia, 2011. 59(4): p. 1436-1444. 58. Zabler, S., et al., Direct observation of particle flow in semi‐solid alloys by synchrotron X‐ray micro‐radioscopy. physica status solidi (a), 2010. 207(3): p. 718-723. 59. Zabler, S., et al., Particle and liquid motion in semi-solid aluminium alloys: A quantitative in situ microradioscopy study. Acta Materialia, 2013. 61(4): p. 1244-1253. 60. Mao, F., et al., Real time observation on the solidification of strontium-modified zinc–aluminum–silicon alloys by synchrotron microradiography. Journal of alloys and compounds, 2014. 608: p. 343-351. 61. Yasuda, H., et al., In situ observation of solidification phenomena in Al–Cu and Fe–Si–Al alloys. International Journal of Cast Metals Research, 2009. 22(1-4): p. 15-21. 62. Henao, H.M., A. Sugiyama, and K. Nogita, Comparison of solidification behavior between in situ observation and simulation of Fe–C–Si system. Journal of alloys and compounds, 2014. 613: p. 132-138. 63. Fonseca, J., et al., In situ study of granular micromechanics in semi-solid carbon steels. Acta Materialia, 2013. 61(11): p. 4169-4179. 64. Nagira, T., et al., In situ observation of deformation in semi-solid Fe-C alloys at high shear rate. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, 2014. 45: p. 5613-5623. 65. Willmott, P., An introduction to synchrotron radiation: techniques and applications. 2019: John Wiley & Sons. 66. Wang, M., et al., Dendritic morphology of α-Mg during the solidification of Mg-based alloys: 3D experimental characterization by X-ray synchrotron tomography and phase-field simulations. Scripta Materialia, 2011. 65(10): p. 855-858. 67. Wang, M., et al., Growth orientations and morphologies of α-Mg dendrites in Mg–Zn alloys. Scripta Materialia, 2012. 67(7-8): p. 629-632. 68. Puncreobutr, C., et al., Influence of Fe-rich intermetallics on solidification defects in Al–Si–Cu alloys. Acta Materialia, 2014. 68: p. 42-51. 69. Puncreobutr, C., et al., Synchrotron tomographic characterization of damage evolution during aluminum alloy solidification. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, 2013. 44: p. 5389-5395. 70. Puncreobutr, C., et al., Coupling in situ synchrotron X-ray tomographic microscopy and numerical simulation to quantify the influence of intermetallic formation on permeability in aluminium–silicon–copper alloys. Acta Materialia, 2014. 64: p. 316-325. 71. De Groh, H., et al., Calculation of dendrite settling velocities using a porous envelope. Metallurgical Transactions B, 1993. 24: p. 749-753. 72. Felberbaum, M. and M. Rappaz, Curvature of micropores in Al–Cu alloys: an X-ray tomography study. Acta Materialia, 2011. 59(18): p. 6849-6860. 73. Stock, S., Recent advances in X-ray microtomography applied to materials. International materials reviews, 2008. 53(3): p. 129-181. 74. Bruyant, P.P., Analytic and iterative reconstruction algorithms in SPECT. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 2002. 43(10): p. 1343-1358. 75. Tiryakioǧlu, M., M. Jolly, and G. Byczynski, Shape Casting: 6th International Symposium 2016. 2016: John Wiley & Sons. 76. Volmer, M. and A. Weber, Zeitschr. f. phys. Chem, 1926. 119: p. 277. 77. Volmer, M., Kinetics of Phase Formation:(Kinetik Der Phasenbildung). 1939: T. Steinkopff. 78. Becker, R. and W. Döring, Kinetische behandlung der keimbildung in übersättigten dämpfen. Annalen der physik, 1935. 416(8): p. 719-752. 79. Fisher, J., J. Hollomon, and D. Turnbull, Nucleation. Journal of Applied Physics, 1948. 19(8): p. 775-784. 80. Fisher, J.C., The fracture of liquids. Journal of applied Physics, 1948. 19(11): p. 1062-1067. 81. Bankoff, S., Ebullition from solid surfaces in the absence of a pre-existing gaseous phase. Transactions of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1957. 79(4): p. 735-740. 82. Bernath, L., Theory of Bubble Formation in Liquids. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry, 1952. 44(6): p. 1310-1313. 83. Brooks, H., Impurities and imperfections. Cleveland: American Society for Metals, 1955: p. 107-133. 84. Jackson, K., The nucleation of dislocation loops from vacancies. Philosophical Magazine, 1962. 7(79): p. 1117-1127. 85. Yousefian, P. and M. Tiryakioğlu, Pore formation during solidification of aluminum: reconciliation of experimental observations, modeling assumptions, and classical nucleation theory. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, 2018. 49: p. 563-575. 86. Fox, S. and J. Campbell, Visualisation of oxide film defects during solidification of aluminium alloys. Scripta materialia, 2000. 43(10): p. 881-886. 87. Green, N.R. and J. Campbell, Statistical distributions of fracture strengths of cast Al 7Si Mg alloy. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 1993. 173(1-2): p. 261-266. 88. Mackie, D., et al., Characterisation and modelling of defect formation in direct-chill cast AZ80 alloy. Materials Characterization, 2015. 104: p. 116-123. 89. Shafaei, A. and R. Raiszadeh, Reduced pressure test verification of healing of double oxide film defects in Al-Mg alloys. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, 2014. 45: p. 2486-2494. 90. Tang, M. and P.C. Pistorius, Oxides, porosity and fatigue performance of AlSi10Mg parts produced by selective laser melting. International Journal of Fatigue, 2017. 94: p. 192-201. 91. Campbell, J. and M. Tiryakioğlu, Bifilm defects in Ni-based alloy castings. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, 2012. 43: p. 902-914. 92. Nadella, R., et al., Macrosegregation in direct-chill casting of aluminium alloys. Progress in Materials Science, 2008. 53(3): p. 421-480. 93. Eskin, D., Q. Du, and L. Katgerman, Relationship between shrinkage-induced macrosegregation and the sump profile upon direct-chill casting. Scripta Materialia, 2006. 55(8): p. 715-718. 94. Du, Q., D. Eskin, and L. Katgerman, Modeling macrosegregation during direct-chill casting of multicomponent aluminum alloys. Metallurgical and materials transactions A, 2007. 38: p. 180-189. 95. Du, Q., D. Eskin, and L. Katgerman, The effect of ramping casting speed and casting temperature on temperature distribution and melt flow patterns in the sump of a DC cast billet. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2005. 413: p. 144-150. 96. Campbell, J., Castings practice: the ten rules of castings. 2004: Elsevier. 97. Ludwig, A., M. Wu, and A. Kharicha, On macrosegregation. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, 2015. 46: p. 4854-4867. 98. Hales, T.C., A proof of the Kepler conjecture. Annals of mathematics, 2005: p. 1065-1185. 99. Kobayashi, R., Modeling and numerical simulations of dendritic crystal growth. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 1993. 63(3-4): p. 410-423. 100. Dahle, A. and D. StJohn, Rheological behaviour of the mushy zone and its effect on the formation of casting defects during solidification. Acta materialia, 1998. 47(1): p. 31-41. 101. Arnberg, L., L. Backerud, and G. Chai, Solidification characteristics of aluminum alloys. Dendrite coherency, 1996. 3: p. 132-135. 102. Veldman, N.L., et al., Dendrite coherency of Al-Si-Cu alloys. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, 2001. 32: p. 147-155. 103. Kapranos, P., D. Kirkwood, and C. Sellars. Semisolid Processing of Alloys and Composites, 4th Int. in Conf., Sheffield, United Kingdom. 1996. 104. Backerud, L. and B. Chalmers, Some aspects of dendritic growth in binary alloys-study of the aluminum-copper system. Trans Met Soc AIME, 1969. 245(2): p. 309-318. 105. Malekan, M. and S. Shabestari, Effect of grain refinement on the dendrite coherency point during solidification of the A319 aluminum alloy. Metallurgical and materials transactions A, 2009. 40: p. 3196-3203. 106. Sumitomo, T., D. StJohn, and T. Steinberg, The shear behaviour of partially solidified Al–Si–Cu alloys. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2000. 289(1-2): p. 18-29. 107. Altuhafi, F.N., et al., Triaxial compression on semi-solid alloys. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, 2021. 52: p. 2010-2023. 108. Belheine, N., et al., Numerical simulation of drained triaxial test using 3D discrete element modeling. Computers and geotechnics, 2009. 36(1-2): p. 320-331. 109. Schofield, A.N. and P. Wroth, Critical state soil mechanics. Vol. 310. 1968: McGraw-hill London. 110. Ancey, C., P. Coussot, and P. Evesque, A theoretical framework for granular suspensions in a steady simple shear flow. Journal of Rheology, 1999. 43(6): p. 1673-1699. 111. Lun, C. and A. Bent, Numerical simulation of inelastic frictional spheres in simple shear flow. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1994. 258: p. 335-353. 112. Brady, J.F., et al., Dynamic simulation of hydrodynamically interacting suspensions. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1988. 195: p. 257-280. 113. Babić, M., H.H. Shen, and H.T. Shen, The stress tensor in granular shear flows of uniform, deformable disks at high solids concentrations. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1990. 219: p. 81-118. 114. Meakin, P. and A.T. Skjeltorp, Application of experimental and numerical models to the physics of multiparticle systems. Advances in physics, 1993. 42(1): p. 1-127. 115. Smart, J.R. and D.T. Leighton Jr, Measurement of the hydrodynamic surface roughness of noncolloidal spheres. Physics of Fluids A: Fluid Dynamics, 1989. 1(1): p. 52-60. 116. Foerster, S.F., et al., Measurements of the collision properties of small spheres. Physics of Fluids, 1994. 6(3): p. 1108-1115. 117. Ancey, C., P. Evesque, and P. Coussot, Motion of a single bead on a bead row: theoretical investigations. Journal de Physique I, 1996. 6(5): p. 725-751. 118. Cox, R., The motion of suspended particles almost in contact. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 1974. 1(2): p. 343-371. 119. Coimbra, C. and R. Rangel, General solution of the particle momentum equation in unsteady Stokes flows. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1998. 370: p. 53-72. 120. Lian, G., M. Adams, and C. Thornton, Elastohydrodynamic collisions of solid spheres. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1996. 311: p. 141-152. 121. Da Cruz, F., et al., Rheophysics of dense granular materials: Discrete simulation of plane shear flows. Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 2005. 72(2): p. 021309. 122. Perez, J.L., et al., Assessing the quasi-static conditions for shearing in granular media within the critical state soil mechanics framework. Soils and Foundations, 2016. 56(1): p. 152-159. 123. Dye, D. MSE203 Mechanical Behaviour: Continuum Mechanics. 2014 2013/12/23 [cited 2013 2025/3/14]; Available from: https://dyedavid.com/mse203/. 124. Hibbeler, R.C., Statics and mechanics of materials. (No Title), 2004. 125. Knappett, J., Craig's soil mechanics. Vol. 8. 2012: Spon Press London. 126. Meguid, M., R. Rowe, and K.Y. Lo, EFFECTS OF BOUNDARY LOCATION ON THE FINITE ELEMENT PREDICTIONS FOR LARGE OPENINGS IN ROCK. 2002. 127. Su, T.C., et al. Exploring Semi-solid Deformation of Al–Cu Alloys by a Quantitative Comparison Between Drained Die Compression Experiments and 3D Discrete Element Method Simulations. in TMS Annual Meeting & Exhibition. 2023. Springer. 128. Cundall, P.A., The measurement and analysis of accelerations in rock slopes. Ph. D Thesis, Imperial College, 1971. 129. Cundall, P.A. and R.D. Hart, Numerical modelling of discontinua. Engineering computations, 1992. 9(2): p. 101-113. 130. Itasca, C., UDEC (universal Distinct Element Code) version 5.0. Mineapolis: ICG, 2011. 131. Chung, Y., Granular stresses in granular flows subjected to different obstacles. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2023. 247: p. 108190. 132. Kafui, K., C. Thornton, and M. Adams, Discrete particle-continuum fluid modelling of gas–solid fluidised beds. Chemical engineering science, 2002. 57(13): p. 2395-2410. 133. Jing, L. and O. Stephansson, Fundamentals of discrete element methods for rock engineering: theory and applications. Vol. 85. 2007: Elsevier. 134. Buss, S.R., Accurate and efficient simulation of rigid-body rotations. Journal of Computational Physics, 2000. 164(2): p. 377-406. 135. Johnson, S.M., J.R. Williams, and B.K. Cook, Quaternion‐based rigid body rotation integration algorithms for use in particle methods. International journal for numerical methods in engineering, 2008. 74(8): p. 1303-1313. 136. Salimi, M. and A. Lashkari, Undrained true triaxial response of initially anisotropic particulate assemblies using CFM-DEM. Computers and Geotechnics, 2020. 124: p. 103509. 137. Irani, N., et al., Deep learning-based analysis of true triaxial DEM simulations: Role of fabric and particle aspect ratio. Computers and Geotechnics, 2024. 173: p. 106529. 138. Gu, X., M. Huang, and J. Qian, Discrete element modeling of shear band in granular materials. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, 2014. 72: p. 37-49. 139. Zhang, J., et al., DEM modeling of large-scale triaxial test of rock clasts considering realistic particle shapes and flexible membrane boundary. Engineering Geology, 2020. 279: p. 105871. 140. Gao, G. and M. Meguid, Effect of particle shape on the response of geogrid-reinforced systems: Insights from 3D discrete element analysis. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2018. 46(6): p. 685-698. 141. Wang, Z., et al., A 3D Voronoi clump based model for simulating failure behavior of brittle rock. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2021. 248: p. 107720. 142. Wu, M., F. Zhou, and J. Wang, DEM modeling of mini-triaxial test on soil-rock mixture considering particle shape effect. Computers and Geotechnics, 2023. 153: p. 105110. 143. Dratt, M. and A. Katterfeld, Coupling of FEM and DEM simulations to consider dynamic deformations under particle load. Granular Matter, 2017. 19(3): p. 49. 144. Du, B., et al., FEM-DEM coupling analysis for solid granule medium forming new technology. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2017. 249: p. 108-117. 145. Wangyang, L., S. Chong, and Z. Cong, Numerical study on the effect of grain size on rock dynamic tensile properties using PFC-GBM. Computational Particle Mechanics, 2024. 11(1): p. 481-489. 146. Zhang, T., et al., Effect of the mineral spatial distribution heterogeneity on the tensile strength of granite: Insights from PFC3D-GBM numerical analysis. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2023. 15(5): p. 1144-1160. 147. Zhang, T., et al., Influence of grain size and basic element size on rock mechanical characteristics: insights from grain-based numerical analysis. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 2022. 81(9): p. 347. 148. Braccini, M., et al., Low shear rate behavior at high solid fractions of partially solidified Al–8 wt.% Cu alloys. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2002. 337(1-2): p. 1-11. 149. Itasca, C. Sleeved Triaxial Test of a Bonded Material. 2021 [cited 2021; Available from: https://docs.itascacg.com/pfc600/pfc/wallsel/test3d/ExampleApplications/SleevedTriaxialTest/SleevedTriaxialTest.html?highlight=sleeve%20triaxial. 150. Weisstein, E.W., Spherical cap. From MathWorld–A Wolfram Web Resource. URL http://mathworld. wolfram. com/SphericalCap. html, 2014. 151. Lommen, S., et al., DEM particle upscaling for large-scale bulk handling equipment and material interaction. Powder Technology, 2019. 352: p. 273-282. 152. Ng, T.-T., Input parameters of discrete element methods. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2006. 132(7): p. 723-729. 153. Ahlinhan, M.F., et al., Experiments and 3D DEM of triaxial compression tests under special consideration of particle stiffness. Geomaterials, 2018. 8(04): p. 39. 154. Pohl, M., Modellierung von granularen Böden und biegsamen Bauwerken mit Hilfe der DEM am Beispiel einer eingebetteten Spundwand. 2005, Wuppertal. 155. Chareyre, B. and P. Villard, Discrete element modeling of curved geosynthetic anchorages with known macro-properties, in Numerical modeling in micromechanics via particle methods. 2017, Routledge. p. 197-203. 156. Salot, C., P. Gotteland, and P. Villard, Influence of relative density on granular materials behavior: DEM simulations of triaxial tests. Granular matter, 2009. 11(4): p. 221-236. 157. Collop, A.C., G.R. McDowell, and Y.W. Lee, Modelling dilation in an idealised asphalt mixture using discrete element modelling. Granular Matter, 2006. 8: p. 175-184. 158. Xia, C., Z. Liu, and C. Zhou, Burger’s bonded model for distinct element simulation of the multi-factor full creep process of soft rock. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 2021. 9(9): p. 945. 159. Gbadam, E. and S. Frimpong, Micromechanical and microstructural DEM modeling of the viscoelastic behavior of oil sands. Advanced Materials Science, 2017. 2(1): p. 1-11. 160. Gong, G. and X. Zha, DEM simulation of undrained behaviour with preshearing history for saturated granular media. Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering, 2013. 21(2): p. 025001. 161. Thornton, C., Numerical simulations of deviatoric shear deformation of granular media. Géotechnique, 2000. 50(1): p. 43-53. 162. Oda, M., J. Konishi, and S. Nemat-Nasser, Experimental micromechanical evaluation of strength of granular materials: effects of particle rolling. Mechanics of materials, 1982. 1(4): p. 269-283. 163. Yimsiri, S. and K. Soga, Effects of soil fabric on behaviors of granular soils: Microscopic modeling. Computers and Geotechnics, 2011. 38(7): p. 861-874. 164. Zhu, M., et al., DEM investigation of strength and critical state behaviours of granular materials under true triaxial loadings. Particuology, 2024. 85: p. 198-212. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/102221 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 鑄造是一項人類傳承千年的傳統金屬加工工藝,其低廉的成本與高效的生產能力,使其在製造業中扮演著重要角色。然而,與其他加工方法相比,鑄造工藝通常在相對高溫的環境下進行。在金屬冷卻過程中,由於固液體積差異、表面氧化物生成,以及固液間對氣體溶解度的不同,鑄件內部常產生孔洞。目前最有效消除孔洞的方法之一,是在凝固過程中施加壓力,藉由擠壓初晶晶粒以促使其移動與變形來填補孔洞。但後續研究發現,若施加壓力過大,不僅無法消除孔洞,反而可能導致孔洞擴張,甚至造成鑄件破裂。此外,由於鑄件內部不同位置冷卻速率不一,導致晶粒形貌與尺寸差異顯著,使得受壓行為也存在不均。因此,理解壓力與初晶晶粒運動行為之間的關係,成為鑄造工藝優化的重要研究方向。
隨著同步輻射技術的進展,研究發現晶粒在半固態階段呈現出類似於土壤顆粒的準剛性特性,這促使學者開始以土壤力學的角度探討晶粒的運動行為。Altuhafi 等人便以三軸壓縮試驗研究半固態鋁合金晶粒的機械性質。然而,由於實驗設備限制,其研究未能深入觀察晶粒受剪後的微觀運動過程。因此本研究參考 Su 等人之方法,利用第六代離散元素法模擬軟體 Particle Flow Code 3D (PFC3D),模擬半固態鋁合金的三軸壓縮行為。我們首先以 Avizo 重建同步輻射斷層掃描所得之晶粒結構,並導入 PFC 模擬系統中。接著採用 Su 等人於排水壓縮測試中提出的接觸模型,以 Hertz 模型模擬顆粒與牆體間的非線性接觸,並以 Burgers 模型描述顆粒間的黏彈性作用,所需參數則依據文獻中提出的微觀壓縮模型決定。 此外,為了提高模擬效率,我們參考 Ng 等人提出的方法,透過增加顆粒質量以提升時間步長,降低總計算量。根據微觀模型評估結果,即使質量增加,只要系統維持連續接觸狀態,應力-應變曲線的變化趨勢幾乎不受影響。因此,本研究將伺服牆之最大應變速率設定為 5×10^(-4) s^(-1),以確保整體顆粒系統處於準靜態(quasi-static) 狀態。 三軸壓縮測試中,首先施加圍壓以模擬鑄造過程中晶粒所受環境壓力,隨後自試樣上方以固定應變速率施加軸向偏應力,觀察顆粒在剪切作用下的運動行為。剪切階段結束後,我們將模擬所得之偏應力、體積應變與孔隙率變化,與 Altuhafi 等人之實驗結果進行比較。模擬結果顯示,在固相率較高 (550°C) 的條件下,施加偏應力後試樣體積呈壓縮趨勢,與 Altuhafi 等人觀察到的膨脹現象不符。為探究差異原因,我們建立了混合接觸模型 (mixed contact model),並進一步發現體積應變在剪切過程中呈現先壓縮後膨脹之行為。我們推測此差異可能源於模擬中忽略了間隙液體壓力對晶粒運動的影響。 相較於 Su 等人進行的排水壓縮模擬,本研究在三軸剪切條件下更明顯觀察到晶粒滑移與變形對宏觀機械性質的影響,並深化了對間隙液體在半固態行為中所扮演角色的理解。此外,我們亦進一步分析剪切過程中的接觸力分佈與應力傳遞變化,為未來探索高壓鑄造中晶粒行為提供了新的模擬視角與參考依據。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Casting is a traditional metal processing technique that has been passed down for thousands of years. Due to its low cost and high production efficiency, it plays a vital role in the manufacturing industry. However, compared to other processing methods, casting is typically carried out at relatively high temperatures. During the cooling process, internal porosity often forms in the castings as a result of volume differences between solid and liquid phases, the formation of surface oxides, and differing gas solubility between the solid and liquid states.One of the most effective ways to eliminate such porosity is to apply pressure during solidification. This compressive force promotes the movement and deformation of primary solid grains to fill in the voids. However, subsequent studies have shown that excessive pressure can not only fail to eliminate porosity but may even enlarge the voids or cause cracking in the castings.Additionally, variations in cooling rates across different regions of the casting result in significant differences in grain morphology and size, leading to uneven responses to applied pressure. Therefore, understanding the relationship between pressure and the motion of primary grains has become a key research direction in the optimization of casting processes.
With advances in synchrotron radiation technology, studies have revealed that grains in the semi-solid state exhibit quasi-rigid behavior similar to that of soil particles. This finding has led researchers to analyze grain motion from a geomechanics perspective. For instance, Altuhafi et al. conducted triaxial compression tests to investigate the mechanical properties of semi-solid aluminum alloys. However, due to experimental limitations, their study was unable to capture the detailed micro-scale motion of grains under shear. To address this, the present study adopts the approach proposed by Su et al., using the sixth-generation Discrete Element Method (DEM) simulation software, Particle Flow Code 3D (PFC3D), to simulate the triaxial compression behavior of semi-solid aluminum alloys. We first reconstructed the grain structure from synchrotron tomography data using Avizo, and then imported it into the PFC simulation system. The contact model follows that used by Su et al. in drained compression tests: the nonlinear contact between particles and walls is modeled using the Hertz contact law, while the viscoelastic behavior between particles is described using the Burgers model. The required parameters are determined based on micro-scale compression models reported in the literature. To improve computational efficiency, we adopted the method proposed by Ng et al., increasing the particle mass to enlarge the time step and thus reduce total computation time. According to the micro-scale model evaluation, even with increased mass, the stress–strain response remains nearly unaffected as long as continuous contact within the system is maintained. Therefore, the maximum strain rate of the servo-controlled walls was set to 5×10⁻⁴ s⁻¹ to ensure quasi-static conditions for the entire granular system. In the triaxial compression test, confining pressure was first applied to simulate the ambient pressure experienced by grains during casting. Axial deviatoric stress was then applied from the top of the specimen at a fixed strain rate to observe grain motion under shear. After the shear phase, the simulated results—such as deviatoric stress, volumetric strain, and porosity evolution—were compared with the experimental results from Altuhafi et al. The simulation results revealed that under higher solid fraction conditions (550 °C), the specimen exhibited volumetric compression after applying deviatoric stress, which contrasts with the dilation observed by Altuhafi et al. To investigate the cause of this discrepancy, a mixed contact model was developed. It was found that the volumetric strain exhibited a compress-then-dilate trend during shearing. We speculate that this difference arises from the simulation's omission of interstitial liquid pressure, which influences grain movement. Compared to Su et al.’s drained compression simulation, this study more clearly observes the influence of grain sliding and deformation on macroscopic mechanical behavior under triaxial shear conditions. It also deepens our understanding of the role of interstitial liquid in semi-solid behavior. Furthermore, we analyzed contact force distributions and stress transmission during shear, providing new simulation perspectives and references for investigating grain behavior in high-pressure casting applications. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2026-04-08T16:24:29Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2026-04-08T16:24:29Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 ii
摘要 iii Abstract v 目次 viii 圖次 xiii 表次 xxvii 縮寫詞列表 xxix 符號列表 xxx Chapter 1 前言 1 Chapter 2 文獻回顧 3 2.1 晶粒形貌在不同凝固階段的變化 3 2.1.1 成核 3 2.1.2 介面能對晶粒形貌的影響 7 2.1.3 熱流對晶粒形貌的影響 10 2.1.4 平衡凝固模型 12 2.1.5 Scheil 凝固模型 13 2.1.6 穩態溶質擴散 15 2.1.7 組成過冷 17 2.2 晶粒形貌在半固態熱機階段的變化 19 2.2.1 鋁合金連續動態再結晶機制 19 2.2.2 鋁合金球化熱處理 22 2.3 同步輻射X光造影技術應用在合金凝固與糊狀區現象 25 2.3.1 X光衰減理論 25 2.3.2 半固態合金的同步輻射X光成像 32 2.3.3 半固態合金的同步輻射X光斷層掃描 34 2.4 缺陷形成的機制 38 2.4.1 孔洞形成的機制 38 2.4.2 宏觀偏析現象 46 2.5 半固態合金變形機制 56 2.5.1 單軸壓縮 56 2.5.2 枝晶接觸 63 2.5.3 三軸壓縮測試以及臨界狀態土壤力學 67 2.5.4 排水壓縮 74 2.6 顆粒流變性質 79 2.6.1 顆粒間的交互作用 79 2.6.2 顆粒流動狀態 82 2.6.3 破壞準則 86 2.7 離散元素法 96 2.7.1 離散元素法在半固態合金上的應用 96 2.7.2 離散元素法原理 98 2.7.3 離散元素法形狀設計 105 2.7.4 接觸模型 108 2.7.5 伺服剛性壁與伺服柔性壁 117 Chapter 3 研究流程與方法 121 3.1 實驗流程 121 3.2 試片製備 122 3.2.1 實驗材料製備 122 3.2.2 Avizo影像重構與晶粒尺寸及球度分析 124 3.2.3 顆粒模型設計與建模 127 3.3 微觀模擬 129 3.3.1 尋找適合的接觸模型參數 129 3.3.2 顆粒尺寸對應力應變的影響 130 3.3.3 顆粒密度對時間步長以及應力應變的影響 131 3.4 三軸壓縮模擬 132 3.4.1 15Cu-570°C 132 3.4.2 15Cu-550°C 136 3.4.3 混合碰撞模型 138 3.4.4 模擬後處理 141 Chapter 4 結果與討論 142 4.1 微觀模擬結果 142 4.1.1 顆粒尺寸對於應力應變曲線的影響 142 4.1.2 顆粒密度對於應力應變曲線的影響 144 4.2 三軸壓縮測試 147 4.2.1 三軸壓縮碰撞參數設定 147 4.2.2 15Cu-570℃三軸壓縮結果 148 4.2.3 15Cu-550℃三軸壓縮結果 161 4.2.4 混合模型 166 4.2.5 各三軸壓縮模擬最終臨界狀態 173 Chapter 5 結論 175 Chapter 6 未來工作 177 參考文獻 179 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 半固態鋁合金 | - |
| dc.subject | 同步輻射 | - |
| dc.subject | 離散元素法 | - |
| dc.subject | 三軸壓縮測試 | - |
| dc.subject | 接觸力學 | - |
| dc.subject | semi-solid aluminum alloy | - |
| dc.subject | synchrotron radiation | - |
| dc.subject | discrete element method | - |
| dc.subject | triaxial compression test | - |
| dc.subject | contact mechanics | - |
| dc.title | 應用離散元素法與同步輻射X光斷層掃描探討不同固相分率半固態鋁合金之晶粒形貌變化與變形機制 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Investigation of Grain Morphology Evolution and Deformation Mechanisms in Semi-Solid Aluminum Alloys with Varying Solid Fractions Using Discrete Element Method and Synchrotron X-ray Tomography | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 114-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳俊杉;鍾雲吉;張慰慈 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Chuin-Shan Chen;Yun-Chi Chung;Wei-Tze Chang | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 半固態鋁合金,同步輻射離散元素法三軸壓縮測試接觸力學 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | semi-solid aluminum alloy,synchrotron radiationdiscrete element methodtriaxial compression testcontact mechanics | en |
| dc.relation.page | 190 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202502687 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2026-03-12 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 材料科學與工程學系 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2026-04-09 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 材料科學與工程學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-114-2.pdf | 11.86 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
