請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/101604完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 堯里昂 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Leon van Jaarsveldt | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 賴柏偉 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | George Po-Wei Lai | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-02-11T16:42:22Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2026-02-12 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2026-02-11 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2026 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2026-02-04 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Agrawal, V. V., Atasu, A., & van Ittersum, K. (2015). Remanufacturing, Third-Party Competition, and Consumers' Perceived Value of New Products. Management Science, 61(1), 60–72. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2099
Albiter, N. L., Pérez, O. S., Klotz, M., Ganesan, K., Carrasco, F., Dagréou, S., Maspoch, M. L., & Valderrama, C. (2022). Implications of the Circular Economy in the Context of Plastic Recycling: The Case Study of Opaque PET. Polymers (Basel), 14(21), 4639. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14214639 Alfieri, F., Sanfélix, J., Bernad Beltrán, D., Spiliotopoulos, C., Graulich, K., Moch, K., & Quack, D. (2021). Revision of the EU green public procurement (GPP) criteria for computers and monitors (and extension to smartphones) : technical report v3.0 : final criteria. (EUR 30722 EN). https://doi.org/10.2760/124337 Amazon. (n.d.). AVLT Single 17"-49" Super Ultrawide Monitor Arm for Screens Up to 50 lbs, Premium Aluminum Desk Stand, Adjustable Pneumatic Height, Full Motion Swivel Tilt Rotation, USB 3.0 & AUX Ports, White. Retrieved December 12, 2025 from https://www.amazon.com/AVLT-Single-Monitor-Desk-Stand/dp/B0819Q8583/ Arduin, R. H., Grimaud, G., Leal, J. M., Pompidou, S., Charbuillet, C., Laratte, B., Alix, T., & Perry, N. (2019). Influence of scope definition in recycling rate calculation for European e-waste extended producer responsibility. Waste Management, 84, 256–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.12.002 Aristei, D., & Gallo, M. (2024). Green management, access to credit, and firms' vulnerability to the COVID-19 crisis. Small Business Economics, 62, 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-023-00759-1 Armutcu, B. (2025). The Impact of Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Aspects on Consumers' Equity. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 14(3), 1779–1798. https://doi.org/10.15869/itobiad.1721561 Aybars, A., Ataünal, L., & Gürbüz, A. O. (2019). ESG and Financial Performance: Impact of Environmental, Social, and Governance Issues on Corporate Performance. In Handbook of Research on Managerial Thinking in Global Business Economics, edited by Hasan Dinçer and Serhat Yüksel (pp. 520–536). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-7180-3.ch029 Bhattacharjee, S., & Cruz, J. (2015). Economic sustainability of closed loop supply chains: A holistic model for decision and policy analysis. Decision Support Systems, 77, 67–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2015.05.011 Blagova, I., Romanishina, T., Bobovnikova, A., Kushelev, I., & Myagkova, Y. (2024). ESG business transformation as a way to mitigate corporate risks. E3S Web of Conferences, 548, 01006. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202454801006 Bungaard, A. M. (2017). Reconditioning of Computers: Identifying Contextual and Design Barriers. Proceeding from 18th European Roundtable on Sustainable Consumption and Production. Chen, S., Song, Y., & Gao, P. (2023). Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance and financial outcomes: Analyzing the impact of ESG on financial performance. Journal of Environmental Management, 345, 118829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118829 Chen, Y., Wang, J., & Jia, X. (2020). Refurbished or Remanufactured?-An Experimental Study on Consumer Choice Behavior. Front Psychol, 11, 781. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00781 Cini, A. C., & Ricci, C. (2018). CSR as a Driver where ESG Performance will Ultimately Matter. Symphonya. Emerging Issues in Management(1), 68–75. https://doi.org/10.4468/2018.1.05cini.ricci Confente, I., Russo, I., Peinkofer, S., & Frankel, R. (2021). The challenge of remanufactured products: the role of returns policy and channel structure to reduce consumers' perceived risk. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 51(4), 350–380. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijpdlm-03-2020-0089 Corsini, F., Gusmerotti, N. M., & Frey, M. (2020). Consumer’s Circular Behaviors in Relation to the Purchase, Extension of Life, and End of Life Management of Electrical and Electronic Products: A Review. Sustainability, 12(24). https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410443 da Silva, F. M., Ogasavara, M. H., & Pereira, R. (2023). Institutional distances and equity-based entry modes: a systematic literature review. Management Review Quarterly, 74(3), 1723–1790. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-023-00346-4 Dert, V. (2024). Marketing Aspects for IMACS. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11549042 Dimerco. (2026). US Tariff Update. Dimerco. Retrieved January 12, 2026 from https://dimerco.com/news-press/us-tariff-update-2025/ Dong, B. (2023). A Systematic Review of the ESG Strategy Literature and Future Outlook. Frontiers in Sustainable Development, 3(4), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.54691/fsd.v3i4.4784 Ego, P., & Pidun, U. (2025). Roles of Market Characteristics and Experience in Ventures’ International Growth Mode Choice: A Conjoint Experiment. Management International Review, 65(2), 329–357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-024-00566-0 El Mehtedi, M., Buonadonna, P., Carta, M., El Mohtadi, R., Mele, A., & Morea, D. (2023). Sustainability Study of a New Solid-State Aluminum Chips Recycling Process: A Life Cycle Assessment Approach. Sustainability, 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151411434 Genovese, A., & Pansera, M. (2020). The Circular Economy at a Crossroads: Technocratic Eco-Modernism or Convivial Technology for Social Revolution? Capitalism Nature Socialism, 32(2), 95–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/10455752.2020.1763414 Goyal, S., & Gupta, S. (2024). A comprehensive review of current techniques, issues, and technological advancements in sustainable E-waste management. e-Prime - Advances in Electrical Engineering, Electronics and Energy, 9(100702). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prime.2024.100702 Grandhi, S. P., Dagwar, P. P., & Dutta, D. (2024). Policy pathways to sustainable E-waste management: A global review. Journal of Hazardous Materials Advances, 16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hazadv.2024.100473 Hakola, L., Abedi, F., Nordman, S., Smolander, M., & Paltakari, J. (2025). Smart Tags as Enablers for Digital Product Passports in Circular Electronics Value Chains. Circular Economy and Sustainability, 5(3), 2033–2055. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-025-00500-y Haleem, A. (2025). Who are the Top 10 U.S. retailers in 2025? Digital Commerce 360. Retrieved January 12, 2026 from https://www.digitalcommerce360.com/2025/07/16/who-are-the-top-10-us-retailers-in-2025/ Han, X., Yang, Q., Shang, J., & Pu, X. (2017). Optimal strategies for trade-old-for-remanufactured programs: Receptivity, durability, and subsidy. International Journal of Production Economics, 193, 602–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.07.025 Hassan, S. M. (2024). Greenwashing in ESG: Identifying and Addressing False Claims of Sustainability. Journal of Business and Strategic Management, 9(8), 90 – 105. https://doi.org/10.47941/jbsm.2390 He, Z., Yue, Y., & Wang, Y. (2022). The hazards, treatment measures and sustainable development of electronic waste. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1011, Article 012023. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1011/1/012023 Hoepner, A., Oikonomou, I., Scholtens, B., & Schröder, M. (2016). The Effects of Corporate and Country Sustainability Characteristics on the Cost of Debt: An International Investigation. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 43(1-2), 158–190. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12183 Humanscale. (2020). M2.1, M8.1, M10 Monitor Arms Life Cycle Assessment. Humanscale. https://fr.humanscale.com/userfiles/file/Humanscale_%20MArms_LCA%20Report_092120.pdf Hunnicutt, T. (2025, October 11). Trump ratchets up US-China trade war, promising new tariffs. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/world/china/trump-says-weighing-massive-increase-tariffs-chinese-imports-no-reason-meet-with-2025-10-10/ Iacovidou, E., Hahladakis, J. N., & Purnell, P. (2021). A systems thinking approach to understanding the challenges of achieving the circular economy. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(19), 24785–24806. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11725-9 Intelligence Node. (n.d.). Amazon’s Latest Strategy to Minimize eCommerce Returns. Intelligence Node. Retrieved January 12, 2026 from https://www.intelligencenode.com/blog/how-to-prevent-ecommerce-returns/ Islam, M. T., Huda, N., Baumber, A., Shumon, R., Zaman, A., Ali, F., Hossain, R., & Sahajwalla, V. (2021). A global review of consumer behavior towards e-waste and implications for the circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 316, 128297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128297 Jaunich, M. K., DeCarolis, J., Handfield, R., Kemahlioglu-Ziya, E., Ranjithan, S. R., & Moheb-Alizadeh, H. (2020). Life-cycle modeling framework for electronic waste recovery and recycling processes. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 161, 104841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104841 Ji, G., Sun, Z., & Tan, K. H. (2021). Collaborative Rebate Strategy of Business-to-Customer Platforms Considering Recycling and Trade-Ins Simultaneously. Sustainability, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041679 Jones, P., & Comfort, D. (2017). Towards the circular economy: A commentary on corporate approaches and challenges. Journal of Public Affairs, 17(4), e1680. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.1680 Kaenzig, J., Friot, D., Saadé, M., Margni, M., & Jolliet, O. (2011). Using life cycle approaches to enhance the value of corporate environmental disclosures. Business Strategy and the Environment, 20(1), 38–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.667 Kassier, L. (2024). Identifying transitions in corporate sustainability reporting: a content analysis of JSE/FTSE multinational sustainability reports from 2016 to 2021. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 9(12). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-024-00099-7 Kaur, H. (2024). Towards sustainable business practices: Circular economy principles for resource optimisation and waste reduction. Paripex Indian Journal of Research, 13(4), 76–81. https://doi.org/10.36106/paripex/2506575 Khanna, R., Park, M., Cayumil, R., Mishra, S. K., & Mukherjee, P. S. (2018). Global Perspectives on Regulatory Measures and Collection Procedures for Electronic Waste: A Critical Assessment. Open Access Journal of Waste Management & Xenobiotics, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.23880/oajwx-16000101 Kouloumpis, V., Konstantzos, G. E., Chroni, C., Abeliotis, K., & Lasaridi, K. (2023). Does the circularity end justify the means? A life cycle assessment of preparing waste electrical and electronic equipment for reuse. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 41, 291–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2023.08.008 Kumar, S., Gorodnichenko, Y., & Coibion, O. (2023). The Effect of Macroeconomic Uncertainty on Firm Decisions. Econometrica, 91(4), 1297–1332. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA21004 Liao, H.-T., Pan, C.-L., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Collaborating on ESG consulting, reporting, and communicating education: Using partner maps for capability building design. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11, 1119011. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1119011 Lingegård, S., & von Oelreich, K. (2023). Implementation and management of a circular public procurement contract for furniture. Frontiers in Sustainability, 4, 1136725. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2023.1136725 Lucier, C. A., & Gareau, B. J. (2019). Electronic Waste Recycling and Disposal: An Overview. In H. M. Saleh (Ed.), Assessment and Management of Radioactive and Electronic Wastes (pp. 1–12). IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.85983 Mbabu, M., & Gulali, D. (2024). Strategic Market Assessment for International Market Entry: A Comparative Analysis of Market Selection Criteria and Entry. International Journal of Business Management, Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 6(2), 178–185. https://doi.org/10.35942/hy38dc55 Mboli, J. S., Thakker, D., & Mishra, J. L. (2020). An Internet of Things‐enabled decision support system for circular economy business model. Software: Practice and Experience, 52(3), 772–787. https://doi.org/10.1002/spe.2825 Mihai, F.-C., & Gnoni, M.-G. (2016). E-waste Management as a Global Challenge (Introductory Chapter). In F.-C. Mihai (Ed.), E-Waste in Transition - From Pollution to Resource. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/64596 Morschett, D., Schramm-Klein, H., & Swoboda, B. (2010). Decades of research on market entry modes: What do we really know about external antecedents of entry mode choice? Journal of International Management, 16(1), 60–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2009.09.002 National Conference of State Legislatures. (2023). Extended producer responsibility. National Conference of State Legislatures. Retrieved January 12, 2026 from https://www.ncsl.org/environment-and-natural-resources/extended-producer-responsibility Nickerson, D., Lowe, M., Pattabhiramaiah, A., & Sorescu, A. (2021). The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Brand Sales: An Accountability Perspective. Journal of Marketing, 86(2), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222429211044155 NSF International. (2013). Product category rule for environmental product declarations: BIFMA PCR for storage (UN CPC 3812). NSF International. https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.bifma.org/resource/resmgr/sustainability/storage_pcr_draft_3-27-2013.pdf Office of the United States Trade Representative. (n.d.). How to Navigate the Section 301 Tariff Process. Office of the United States Trade Representative,. Retrieved January 12, 2026 from https://ustr.gov/issue-areas/enforcement/section-301-investigations/search Ortiz-de-Mandojana, N., & Bansal, P. (2016). The long-term benefits of organizational resilience through sustainable business practices. Strategic management journal, 37(8), 1615–1631. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2410 Pedersen, E. R. G., Earley, R., & Andersen, K. R. (2019). From singular to plural: exploring organisational complexities and circular business model design. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 23(3), 308–326. https://doi.org/10.1108/jfmm-04-2018-0062 Peng, P., & Shehabi, A. (2022). Waste Electronics in the United States: Future Trends and Economical Potential. Nature Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1297140/v1 Phan, T. T. H., Tran, H. Đ., & Pham, H. T. M. (2025). Impact of circular economy practices on financial performance of construction enterprises in Vietnam. Management Science Letters, 15(2), 55–62. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2024.5.005 Phantratanamongkol, S., Casalin, F., Pang, G., & Sanderson, J. (2018). The price-volume relationship for new and remanufactured smartphones. International Journal of Production Economics, 199, 78–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.02.010 Psarommatis, F., May, G., & Azamfirei, V. (2025). Product reuse and repurpose in circular manufacturing: a critical review of key challenges, shortcomings and future directions. Journal of Remanufacturing, 15, 273–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13243-025-00153-y Quinto, S., Law, N., Fletcher, C., Le, J., Jose, S. A., & Menezes, P. L. (2025). Exploring the E-Waste Crisis: Strategies for Sustainable Recycling and Circular Economy Integration. Recycling, 10(2), 72. https://doi.org/10.3390/recycling10020072 Ra, W. (2020). Determinants of the choice of combined modes for foreign market entry: the case of Korean firms entering into Uzbekistan. Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research, 7(1), 83–94. https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v7i1.380 Raabe, D., Ponge, D., Uggowitzer, P. J., Roscher, M., Paolantonio, M., Liu, C., Antrekowitsch, H., Kozeschnik, E., Seidmann, D., Gault, B., De Geuser, F. e. e., Deschamps, A., Hutchinson, C., Liu, C., Li, Z., Prangnell, P., Robson, J., Shanthraj, P., Vakili, S.,…Pogatscher, S. (2022). Making sustainable aluminum by recycling scrap: The science of “dirty” alloys. Progress in Materials Science, 128, 100947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2022.100947 Rautela, R., Arya, S., Vishwakarma, S., Lee, J., Kim, K.-H., & Kumar, S. (2021). E-waste management and its effects on the environment and human health. Science of The Total Environment, 773, 145623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145623 ReportLinker. (2021). Global Monitor Arms Market to Reach $1.6 Billion by 2027: Abstract: - Global Monitor Arms Market to Reach $1. 6 Billion by 2027. - Amid the COVID-19 crisis, the global market for Monitor Arms estimated at US$1. 3 Billion in the year 2020, is projected to reach a revised size of US$1. Yahoo Finance. Retrieved January 12, 2026 from https://finance.yahoo.com/news/global-monitor-arms-market-reach-205500587.html Scelles, N., Inoue, Y., Perkin, S. J., & Valenti, M. (2024). Social Impact Assessment of Corporate Social Responsibility Initiatives: Evaluating the Social Return on Investment of an Inclusion Offer. Journal of Business Ethics, 197, 613–629. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-024-05786-w Schellenberg, M., Harker, M. J., & Jafari, A. (2018). International market entry mode – a systematic literature review. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 26(7), 601–627. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965254X.2017.1339114 Schumacher, K. A., & Agbemabiese, L. (2019). Towards comprehensive e-waste legislation in the United States: Design considerations based on quantitative and qualitative assessments. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 149, 605–621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.06.033 Sharma, A., Gaikwad, A., Singh, D. P., Kalra, R., Keerthi, S. S., Raj, V. H., & Shaghnab, M. L. (2023). Reshaping Industry: Adoption of Sustainable Techniques providing Remanufacturing Solutions in High-Tech industries. E3S Web of Conferences, 453, 01028. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202345301028 Singh, N., & Ogunseitan, O. A. (2022). Disentangling the worldwide web of e-waste and climate change co-benefits. Circular Economy, 1(2), 100011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cec.2022.100011 Soesanto, H., Maarif, M. S., Anwar, S., & Yurianto, Y. (2023). Current Trend, Future Direction, and Enablers of e-Waste Management: Bibliometric Analysis and Literature Review. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 32(4), 3455–3465. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/163607 Sönnichsen, S. D. (2021). Exploring the Interface Between Public Demand and Private Supply for Implementation of Circular Economy Principles. Copenhagen Business School [Phd]. https://research-api.cbs.dk/ws/portalfiles/portal/66833199/s_nnich_dahl_s_nnichsen_phd_series_14_2021.pdf Srivastava, V. K. (2024). Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) initiatives on brand reputation: A study on how CSR activities enhance brand reputation and consumer loyalty in the context of sustainable marketing practices. International Journal of Science and Research Archive, 13(01), 1910–1930. https://doi.org/10.30574/ijsra.2024.13.1.1869 Stone, D. L. (2021). Type of Board: Lead Independent Director and Sustainability Reporting. Journal of Accounting and Finance, 21(3), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.33423/jaf.v21i3.4393 Sun, X., Behr, S. M., & Kücük, M. (2024). Enabling Circular Economy Dynamics in the Plastics and Steel Industries: Perspectives from Multiple Stakeholders. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4907471 Syam, M. A., Djaddang, S., Adam, A., Merawati, E. E., & Roziq, M. (2024). Carbon Accounting: Its Implications on Accounting Practices and Corporate Sustainability Reports. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 14(4), 178–187. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijefi.16333 Tatyana, T. (2025). The integration of ESG principles into financial strategy. International Journal of Science and Research Archive, 16(02), 1372–1382. https://doi.org/10.30574/ijsra.2025.16.2.2389 The White House. (2025a). Fact Sheet: President Donald J. Trump Strikes Deal on Economic and Trade Relations with China. The White House. Retrieved January 12, 2026 from https://www.whitehouse.gov/fact-sheets/2025/11/fact-sheet-president-donald-j-trump-strikes-deal-on-economic-and-trade-relations-with-china/ The White House. (2025b). Modifying reciprocal tariff rates consistent with the economic and trade arrangement between the United States and the People’s Republic of China. The White House. Retrieved January 12, 2026 from https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/11/modifying-reciprocal-tariff-rates-consistent-with-the-economic-and-trade-arrangement-between-the-united-states-and-the-peoples-republic-of-china/ Tolkach, V. (2023). The importance of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and the new sustainability reporting standards, IFRS S1 and IFRS S2, in sustainable business development in the U.S. Věda a perspektivy, 7(26), 282–290. https://doi.org/10.52058/2695-1592-2023-7(26)-282-290 U.S International Trade Commission. (n.d.). HTS.USITC.GOV. U.S International Trade Commission. Retrieved January 12, 2026 from https://hts.usitc.gov/search?query=8302.50.0000 United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2024). Greenhouse Gas Equivalencies Calculator. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Retrieved January 12, 2026 from https://www.epa.gov/energy/greenhouse-gas-equivalencies-calculator United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2026). GHG Emission Factors Hub. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Retrieved January 12, 2026 from https://www.epa.gov/climateleadership/ghg-emission-factors-hub Vermeulen, W. J. V., Friant, M. C., Campbell-Johnston, K., Deutz, P., Newsholme, A., Pusz, M., Klein, N., Ramos, T. B., Diaz, A., & Thapa, K. (2024). Policy Considerations for a Circular Economy. In Circular economy realities: Critical perspectives on sustainability (1 ed., pp. 173–202). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003295631-8 Wang, J. X., Burke, H., & Zhang, A. (2022). Overcoming barriers to circular product design. International Journal of Production Economics, 243, 108346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108346 Williams, T. (2021). Using Amazon Return Data To Your Advantage And Reducing Return Rates. Envision Horizons. Retrieved January 12, 2026 from https://www.envisionhorizons.com/using-amazon-return-data-to-your-advantage-and-reducing-return-rates/ Xiao, H. (2023). Different Strategies and Management between Countries towards Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) to the Realization of Sustainability. SHS Web of Conferences, 154, Article 03010. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202315403010 Xu, J. (2024). Double jeopardy: FCPA enforcement and MNC risk-mitigation strategies. Asian Review of Political Economy, 3, Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44216-023-00021-1 Yurdaanik Eskiyerli, D., & Ewertz, S. (2024). Foreign market entry with circular business models: a customer-centric approach. Frontiers in Sustainability, 5:1344801, Article 1344801. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2024.1344801 Zhu, X. (2021). Latest Technology Developments in Consumer Electronics and Their Impacts on Household Energy Use and the Design of Policies and Programmes in Developing Countries. U. D. Partnership. https://unepccc.org/publications/latest-technology-developments-in-consumer-electronics-and-their-impacts-on-household-energy-use-and-the-design-of-policies-and-programmes-in-developing-countries/ | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/101604 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本商業計畫論文提出一項具高度策略意義之創業構想,聚焦於美國顯示器支架以舊換新與回收服務之市場進入策略。此一構想旨在回應當前全球電子廢棄物(e-waste)日益嚴峻之挑戰,特別針對顯示器支架此一利基產品類別進行深入探討,並在同時創造實質經濟價值與強化企業永續發展成果。
本事業之核心在於建立一套系統化流程,用以回收、翻新及再利用顯示器支架,並透過可量化方法提供與二氧化碳(CO₂)減量相關之環境、社會與公司治理(ESG)數據。此模式有效避免新材料生產過程中高度耗能的製程,特別是鋁材與鋼材等關鍵結構零組件。透過將顯示器支架自掩埋途徑中策略性轉移至翻新與回收體系,可實現顯著之能源節省與碳排放減量效益。 隨著企業與消費者對環境友善產品與服務之需求持續攀升,本商業模式高度契合當前市場之永續發展趨勢。此外,美中地緣政治緊張局勢所引發之高額關稅環境,亦為本事業創造市場機會,使其得以為美國客戶提供相較於購買全新產品更具成本效益之替代方案。 本研究所提出之合資股權模式著重於效率與結構簡化,透過整合既有之逆向物流體系與電子商務平台,有效管理顯示器支架之回收、再銷售與材料回收流程,同時為企業客戶提供ESG行銷支援,以展現更高層次之企業社會責任承諾。尤為關鍵的是,目前市場中尚缺乏專注於此一利基領域之直接專業競爭者,使本事業具備顯著的先行者優勢(First-Mover Advantage)。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This business plan thesis presents a strategically significant business venture for the Market Entry Strategy for a Monitor Arm Trade-In & Recycling Service in the U.S.. This initiative was designed to address the critical global challenge of electronic waste, particularly focusing on monitor arms, while simultaneously creating meaningful economic value and enhancing corporate sustainability efforts.
The fundamental core of this business is to systematically collect, refurbish, and recycle monitor arms while also providing valuable ESG data focusing on reducing Carbon Dioxide (CO2) emissions through measurable methods. The approach avoids the energy-intensive production of new materials, especially for components using aluminum and steel. The refurbishment and recycling paths offer high energy savings when monitor arms are strategically diverted from the landfill. As there is a growing demand from both businesses and consumers for products and services that are environmentally friendly, the business venture follows the trend of today’s market needs. The geopolitical tension between the U.S. and China with high tariff’s also presents an opportunity to offer U.S. customers an alternative solution for a cheaper alternative compared with buying new. The joint venture equity model is built for efficiency and simplicity. It systematically integrates existing reverse logistic networks and e-commerce platforms. Most importantly, the current market lacks a direct, specialized competitor in this niche, giving the business venture a valuable first-mover advantage. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2026-02-11T16:42:22Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2026-02-11T16:42:22Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | Acknowledgment ii
中文摘要 iii Executive Summary v Table of Contents vi List of Tables ix List of Figures x List of Abbreviations xi 1. Business Description 1 1.1 Overview of the Business 1 1.2 Importance and Significance of the Business 2 1.3 Business Objectives 4 1.4 Mission and Vision of the Business 4 1.5 Key Objectives 5 1.6 Market Entry Strategy 8 1.7 Uncertainty and Risk 10 2. Market Overview 13 2.1 Market Size of Monitor Arm 13 2.2 Different Existing Services 13 2.3 Porter’s Five Force Analysis 15 2.4 SWOT Analysis 16 2.5 Market Feasibility 17 2.5.1 Demand Feasibility 17 2.5.2 Supply Feasibility 18 2.5.3 Competitive Feasibility 18 2.5.4 Regulatory and Policy Alignment 19 2.5.5 Financial and Economic Feasibility 19 2.6 Collection Strategy for Unwanted Monitor Arms 19 2.6.1 Primary Collection Channels 20 2.6.2 Incentive Mechanisms and Partnership Programs 21 2.6.3 Monitoring and Performance Metrics 22 2.7 Value Proposition 22 2.7.1 CO2e Calculation Framework 22 2.7.2 Enabling Firms to Report Improved ESG Scores 23 2.7.3 Low-Cost Service Model 23 2.7.4 Partnership with Existing Monitor Arm Brands 24 2.8 Product Material & Breakdown Analysis 25 2.8.1 Component-Level Identification Table 25 2.8.2 Material Categories & Weights 27 2.9 Reaching out to ESG spokespersons and companies 28 3. Market Feasibility & Operations 30 3.1 Business Model Canvas 30 3.2 Case Proposition to Persuade Companies to Participate 30 3.3 Incentive Mechanisms for Customers 33 3.4 Pathways for Refurbishing Partnerships 33 3.5 Selling ESG Marketing Services to Firms 34 3.6 PEST Analysis 35 4. Scalability & Mass Market Integration 39 4.1 Key Enablers for Scaling 39 4.1.1 Strengthen Manufacture and Brand Collaborations 39 4.1.2 Standardization to Verify Environmental Impact 39 4.1.3 Improve Robustness of Reverse Logistics 39 4.1.4 Utilize Integrated Tracking 40 4.1.5 Increased Market Demand for Sustainable Products 40 4.2 Key Barriers to Scaling 40 4.2.1 Logistical Complexity and costs of Reverse Supply Chains 40 4.2.2 Perception of Refurbished Goods 40 4.2.3 Manufacturer Resistance 41 4.2.4 Regulatory and Policy Environment Fluctuations 41 4.2.5 Capital Investment Funds 41 4.2.6 Economic Competitiveness Against Virgin Materials 42 5. Environmental Impact Analysis 43 5.1 Environmental Impact Analysis 43 5.1.1 Guiding Principles from Humanscale’s LCA For CO2e Calculation 43 5.1.2 Monitor Arm Components and Materials Breakdown 44 5.1.3 CO2e Calculation Methodology and Estimate 45 5.1.4 Calculating CO2e using the evaluated product sample 47 5.1.5 Expressing Benefits with Greenhouse Gas Equivalencies 49 5.2 Social Return on Investment 51 5.3 Carbon Reduction Benefit for ESG Reports 52 6. Roles & Responsibilities 53 6.1 Organizational Structure 53 6.2 Founder and Managing Director 53 6.3 Operations and Reverse Logistics Specialist 54 6.4 ESG and Compliance Coordinator 54 6.5 Business Development and Customer Service Specialist 55 6.6 Scalability Potential 55 7. Financial Model & Projections 56 7.1 Financial & Implementation Analysis 56 7.2 Pilot Business Assumptions 56 7.3 Cost Structure Analysis 56 7.3.1 Incentive Structure for Used Monitor Arm Acquisition 57 7.4 Start-up Cost Estimates 58 7.5 Projected Income Statement 61 7.6 Projected Cash Flow Statement 62 7.7 Projected Balance Sheet 64 7.8 Break-even Analysis 65 8. Conclusion 66 References 68 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | - |
| dc.subject | 顯示器支架 | - |
| dc.subject | 回收 | - |
| dc.subject | 以舊換新 | - |
| dc.subject | 翻新 | - |
| dc.subject | 生命週期分析 | - |
| dc.subject | 二氧化碳排放量 | - |
| dc.subject | monitor arm | - |
| dc.subject | recycling | - |
| dc.subject | trade-in | - |
| dc.subject | refurbish | - |
| dc.subject | lifecycle analysis | - |
| dc.subject | carbon emission | - |
| dc.title | 美國顯示器支架以舊換新與回收服務之市場分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Monitor Arm Trade-In & Recycling Service in the U.S.: A Market Analysis | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 114-1 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 簡睿哲;鄭名道 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Bryan Jean;Ming Daw Cheng | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 顯示器支架,回收以舊換新翻新生命週期分析二氧化碳排放量 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | monitor arm,recyclingtrade-inrefurbishlifecycle analysiscarbon emission | en |
| dc.relation.page | 82 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202600481 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2026-02-06 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 企業管理碩士專班 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2026-02-12 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 管理學院企業管理專班(Global MBA) | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-114-1.pdf 授權僅限NTU校內IP使用(校園外請利用VPN校外連線服務) | 2.19 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
