請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/92716
標題: | 泰國當代政治中的司法獨立 Judicial Independence in Thailand’s Contemporary Politics |
作者: | 徐睿萍 Raksuda Shinmeteepitak |
指導教授: | 葉俊榮 Jiunn-rong Yeh |
關鍵字: | 司法獨立,司法政治,司法研究,政治司法化,司法激進主義,泰國, judicial independence,judicial politics,judicial study,judicialization of politics,judicial activism,Thailand, |
出版年 : | 2024 |
學位: | 碩士 |
摘要: | 司法獨立被視為法治和民主的重要支柱,但在泰國的情況下,它可能被看作是對法治和民主本身的挑戰。泰國憲法確實為司法獨立提供了保障,但並未保證實際獨立。
法院和法官被認為“過於獨立”,被指控對泰國建制派的政治對手以及批評並要求改變的人存在偏見、意識形態和政治偏見。因此,泰國司法只能被視為與人民和選舉政府獨立。這引發了關於其獨立性和公正性的問題,特別是司法獨立的含義。 通過制度和情境方法的結合,這項研究探討了泰國當代政治中持續近二十年的政治危機。它突出了泰國法院的歷史、發展以及在政治混亂中的角色。通過揭示和理解泰國政治中的權力關係,司法與其他政治角色的關係,以及獨立且強大的司法如何保護並服務新建立的憲法意識形態和泰國保守派建制的利益。這些歷史、文化和社會政治背景將幫助我們理解司法獨立的概念及其在西方自由民主體制之外的語境中的矛盾角色。最後,論文提出了平衡司法獨立和問責制的改革和和解建議。 Judicial independence is considered and understood to be the important pillar of the rule of law and democracy, but in Thai case, it can be seen otherwise: the challenge to the rule of law and democracy itself. The Constitution of Thailand indeed provides safeguards for judicial independence, but they do not guarantee de facto independence. Being seen as “having too much independence”, the courts and judges are alleged to have prejudicial, ideological, and political biases against political opponents of the Thai establishment and people who criticize and demand changes. As a result, the Thai judiciary can only be seen as independent from the people and the elected government. This raises the questions of its independence and impartiality; and particularly, the meaning of judicial independence. This study looks at the political crises in Thai contemporary politics which has been prevailed for almost two decades. It highlights Thai courts’ history, developments, role in the midst of political chaos. By uncovering and understanding the power relations in Thai politics, the judiciary’s relationships with other political actors, and the way in which the independent and powerful judiciary has been safeguarding and serving the newly constructed constitutional ideology and the interests of the Thai conservative establishment. These historical, cultural, and sociopolitical contexts will help us comprehend the conception of judicial independence and its paradoxical role in the context outside western liberal democracy. Finally, the thesis proposes suggestions for reforms and reconciliation that bring balance to judicial independence and accountability. |
URI: | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/92716 |
DOI: | 10.6342/NTU202401072 |
全文授權: | 同意授權(限校園內公開) |
顯示於系所單位: | 法律學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-112-2.pdf 授權僅限NTU校內IP使用(校園外請利用VPN校外連線服務) | 1.41 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。