論顧憲成之本體工夫論及其對朱王之評論

Abstract

本文處理關於顧憲成的一些當代爭議，並試圖用四方架構還原顧憲成的見解，作為解決此類爭議的證據。首先筆者釐清顧憲成在工夫論上的主張，並說明為何當代學者有這些爭議，並澄清這些爭議是否存在。接著釐清顧憲成的本體論，分析顧憲成對「無善無惡」此一問題的立場。最後，筆者對當代顧憲成研究的研究方法進行檢討，並提出這類研究方法可能造成的缺失，透過此一澄清，更進一步地說明顧憲成思想。

This thesis deals with some contemporary disputes of Gu Xiancheng‘s theory, and tries to reconstruct his statements using the Four Square Framework in order to respond to these disputes. To achieve the purpose, I will explain Gu Xiancheng's statements of practical theory and the backgrounds of these opinions first, and discuss why there are disputes between contemporary scholars’ theory. Then I will clarify whether these disputes exist or not. Second, I will explain Gu Xiancheng's theories on ontology, and analyze Gu Xiancheng’s standpoint about the famous argument “Neither Good Nor Evil.” At last, I will criticize the contemporary methodology for Gu Xiancheng theory. And I will explain what Gu Xiancheng’s thoughts should be through this criticism.