請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/99884完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 鄭守夏 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Shou-Hsia Cheng | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 高毓復 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | YU-FU KAO | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-09-19T16:11:36Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-09-20 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2025-09-19 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2025-08-07 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Algunmeeyn, A., Alrawashdeh, M., & Alhabashneh, H. (2020). Benefits of applying for hospital accreditation: The perspective of staff. Journal of Nursing Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.13066
Alkhenizan, A., & Shaw, C. (2011). Impact of Accreditation on the Quality of Healthcare Services: a Systematic Review of the Literature. Annals of Saudi Medicine, 31(4), 407-416. https://doi.org/10.4103/0256-4947.83204 Araujo, C. A. S., Siqueira, M. M., & Malik, A. M. (2020). Hospital accreditation impact on healthcare quality dimensions: a systematic review. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 32(8), 531-544. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzaa090 Assurance, N. C. f. Q. (2018). HEDIS and Performance Measurement. https://doi.org/https://www.ncqa.org/hedis/ Brubakk, K., Vist, G. E., Bukholm, G., Barach, P., & Tjomsland, O. (2015). A systematic review of hospital accreditation: the challenges of measuring complex intervention effects. BMC Health Services Research, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-0933-x Chassin, M. R., Galvin, R. W., & Natl Roundtable Hlth Care, Q. (1998). The urgent need to improve health care quality - Institute of medicine National Roundtable on Health Care Quality. Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association, 280(11), 1000-1005. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.280.11.1000 Chen, J., Rathore, S. S., Radford, M. J., & Krumholz, H. M. (2003). JCAHO Accreditation And Quality Of Care For Acute Myocardial Infarction. Health Affairs, 22(2), 243-254. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.22.2.243 Chetta, M., Islam, S., Cassell, D., Bandara, B., & Sanchez, D. (2017). A Qualitative Model for Customer Behavioral Decisions and Satisfaction in the Hospitality Industry. https://doi.org/10.18059/jmi.v3i2.42 Commission, T. J. (2025). History of The Joint Commission. https://doi.org/https://www.jointcommission.org/who-we-are/facts-about-the-joint-commission/history-of-the-joint-commission/ Davlyatov, G., He, M., Orewa, G., Qu, H., & Weech-Maldonado, R. (2023). Are Hospice Google Ratings Correlated With Patient Experience Scores? Evidence from a National Hospice Study. Am J Hosp Palliat Care, 40(12), 1365-1370. https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091231160186 Donabedian, A. (1966). Evaluating the Quality of Medical Care. The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 44(3), 166. https://doi.org/10.2307/3348969 Donabedian, A. (1988). The Quality of Care. JAMA, 260(12), 1743. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1988.03410120089033 Donabedian, A. (1990). The seven pillars of quality. Arch Pathol Lab Med, 114(11), 1115-1118. Dyer, N., Sorra, J. S., Smith, S. A., Cleary, P. D., & Hays, R. D. (2012). Psychometric Properties of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS®) Clinician and Group Adult Visit Survey. Medical Care, 50, S28-S34. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0b013e31826cbc0d Fennell, M. L. (2001). Health Care Delivery Services. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/03909-7 Gao, G. G., McCullough, J. S., Agarwal, R., & Jha, A. K. (2012). A changing landscape of physician quality reporting: analysis of patients' online ratings of their physicians over a 5-year period. J Med Internet Res, 14(1), e38. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2003 Goldstein, E., Farquhar, M., Crofton, C., Darby, C., & Garfinkel, S. (2005). Measuring hospital care from the patients' perspective: an overview of the CAHPS Hospital Survey development process. Health Serv Res, 40(6 Pt 2), 1977-1995. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00477.x Google. (2025). About Google. https://doi.org/https://about.google/ Greaves, F. (2012). Associations Between Web-Based Patient Ratings and Objective Measures of Hospital Quality. Archives of Internal Medicine, 172(5), 435. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2011.1675 Greaves, F., & Millett, C. (2012). Consistently Increasing Numbers of Online Ratings of Healthcare in England [Letter to the Editor]. J Med Internet Res, 14(3), e94. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2157 Greaves, F., Pape, U. J., King, D., Darzi, A., Majeed, A., Wachter, R. M., & Millett, C. (2012). Associations between internet-based patient ratings and conventional surveys of patient experience in the English NHS: an observational study. BMJ Quality & Safety, 21(7), 600-605. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2012-000906 Greenfield, D., & Braithwaite, J. (2009). Developing the evidence base for accreditation of healthcare organisations: a call for transparency and innovation. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 18(3), 162-163. https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2009.032359 Griffis, H. M., Kilaru, A. S., Werner, R. M., Asch, D. A., Hershey, J. C., Hill, S., Ha, Y. P., Sellers, A., Mahoney, K., & Merchant, R. M. (2014). Use of Social Media Across US Hospitals: Descriptive Analysis of Adoption and Utilization. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16(11), e264. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3758 Griffith, J. R., Knutzen, S. R., & Alexander, J. A. (2002). Structural versus outcomes measures in hospitals a comparison of Joint Commission and Medicare outcomes scores in hospitals. Quality Management in Healthcare, 10(2), 29-38. Huang, P. (1995). An overview of hospital accreditation in Taiwan, Republic of China. The International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 10(3), 183-191. https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.4740100304 Huang, P. (1996). Quality assurance in Taiwan, the Republic of China. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 8(1), 75-82. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/8.1.75 Hussein, M., Pavlova, M., Ghalwash, M., & Groot, W. (2021). The impact of hospital accreditation on the quality of healthcare: a systematic literature review. BMC Health Services Research, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07097-6 Islam, S., Mir, S., Defina, C., & Silva, C. (2021). Content Analysis of Hospital Reviews From Differing Sources: Does Review Source Matter? Journal of Excellence in Nursing and Healthcare Practice, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.5590/jswgc.2021.3.1.01 Jha, A. K., Orav, E. J., Zheng, J., & Epstein, A. M. (2008). Patients' Perception of Hospital Care in the United States. New England Journal of Medicine, 359(18), 1921-1931. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmsa0804116 Joint Commision International, J. (2023). Definitions of Quality and Patient Safety in Health Care. Kazley, A. S., Ford, E. W., Diana, M., & Menachemi, N. (2015). Market factors related to hospitals’ patient satisfaction ratings. Journal of Hospital Administration, 4(4), 40. https://doi.org/10.5430/jha.v4n4p40 Leape, L. L. (2021). When the IOM Speaks: IOM Quality of Care Committee and Report. In (pp. 127-142). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71123-8_9 Lembcke, P. A. (1952). MEASURING THE QUALITY OF MEDICAL CARE THROUGH VITAL STATISTICS BASED ON HOSPITAL SERVICE AREAS .1. COMPARATIVE STUDY OF APPENDECTOMY RATES. American Journal of Public Health, 42(3), 276-286. <Go to ISI>://WOS:A1952XR16700010 Mahmood, A. (2020). Identifying the influence of various factor of apps on google play apps ratings. 2, 15-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42488-019-00015-w Mavragani, A., Ochoa, G., & Tsagarakis, K. P. (2018). Assessing the Methods, Tools, and Statistical Approaches in Google Trends Research: Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 20(11), e270. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.9366 Miller, M. R., Pronovost, P., Donithan, M., Zeger, S., Zhan, C. L., Morlock, L., & Meyer, G. S. (2005). Relationship between performance measurement and accreditation: Implications for quality of care and patient safety. American Journal of Medical Quality, 20(5), 239-252. https://doi.org/10.1177/1062860605277076 Nadzam, D. M. (1991). DEVELOPMENT OF MEDICATION-USE INDICATORS BY THE JOINT COMMISSION ON ACCREDITATION OF HEALTH-CARE ORGANIZATIONS. American Journal of Hospital Pharmacy, 48(9), 1925-1930. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/48.9.1925 Nuti, S. V., Wayda, B., Ranasinghe, I., Wang, S., Dreyer, R. P., Chen, S. I., & Murugiah, K. (2014). The Use of Google Trends in Health Care Research: A Systematic Review. PLoS ONE, 9(10), e109583. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109583 Roberts, J. S., Coale, J. G., & Redman, R. R. (1987). A HISTORY OF THE JOINT-COMMISSION-ON-ACCREDITATION-OF-HOSPITALS. Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association, 258(7), 936-940. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.258.7.936 Schembri, S. (2015). Experiencing health care service quality: through patients' eyes. Aust Health Rev, 39(1), 109-116. https://doi.org/10.1071/ah14079 Shaw, C. D. (2004). Toolkit for Accreditation Programs.The International Society for Quality In Health Care. International Society for Quality in Health Care. Tse, M. P., Dhalla, I., & Nayyar, D. (2024). Google star ratings of Canadian hospitals: a nationwide cross-sectional analysis. BMJ Open Qual, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002713 Zitek, T., Bui, J., Day, C., Ecoff, S., & Patel, B. (2023). A cross-sectional analysis of Yelp and Google reviews of hospitals in the United States. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open, 4(2), e12913. https://doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12913 王拔群. (2024). 醫療評鑑與醫療品質. 醫療品質雜誌, 18(3), 6-9. 王俊文, 葉德豐, & 曾坤儀. (2003). 台灣醫院評鑑趨勢之探討 [The Meta-Analysis for the Trend of Hospital Accreditation in Taiwan]. 中山醫學雜誌, 14(4), 513-522. https://doi.org/10.30096/csmj.200312.0004 全國法規資料庫. (2023). 醫療法. https://doi.org/https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=L0020021&kw=%e9%86%ab%e7%99%82%e6%b3%95 邱聖豪, 鍾翰其, & 黃莉蓉. (2011). 醫院評鑑基準2011年版之革新方向與初步成果. 醫療品質雜誌, 5(1), 58-62. https://doi.org/10.30160/jhq.201101.0014 姚開屏, 蕭宇佑, 郭耿南, & 鄭守夏. (2010). 病人報告之醫院品質:問卷發展與信效度分析 [Patient Reported Hospital Quality (PRHQ): Scale Development, Reliability, and Validity]. 台灣公共衛生雜誌, 29(5), 440-451. https://doi.org/10.6288/tjph2010-29-05-07 財團法人台灣網路資訊中心. (2020). 2020 台灣網路報告. 財團法人醫院評鑑暨醫療品質策進會醫院評鑑組, & 衛生福利部醫事司. (2019). 新一循環醫院評鑑研修重點. 醫療品質雜誌, 13(5), 30-34. https://doi.org/10.3966/199457952019091305006 陳佩妮, 鄭守夏, 鍾國彪, & 林王美園. (1997). 台灣地區醫療品質指標適用性之探討 [A Study on the Applicability of Medical Quality Indicators in Taiwan]. 中華公共衛生雜誌, 16(2), 133-142. https://doi.org/10.6288/cjph1997-16-02-03 陳怡欣, & 陳珮郁. (2021). 醫院評鑑 四十年由繁入簡. 台中醫林, 100. https://doi.org/http://www.tcmed.org.tw/edcontent.php?lang=tw&tb=86&id=18 陳建勳. (2020). 以社交媒體行銷相關因素預測醫院形象:機器學習分析法 (Publication Number 2020年) 義守大學]. AiritiLibrary. 傅健泰. (2024). 從Google評論負評口碑分析健檢服務品質改善關鍵 [Analyzing the Key to Improving the Quality of Health Checkup Services Based on Negative Comments from Google Reviews]. 醫務管理期刊, 25(4), 351-376. https://doi.org/10.6174/jhm.202412_25(4).351 楊漢湶, & 蔡素玲. (2019). 臺灣醫院評鑑發展回顧 [A Review of the Development of Hospital Accreditation]. 醫療品質雜誌, 13(2), 5-8. 楊漢湶、王美芳. (1992). 我國醫院評鑑工作之回顧與展望. 醫院雜誌, 25(1), 19-43. 趙玟惠. (2024). 以線上評論探討連鎖大樹藥局門市顧客滿意度 (Publication Number 2024年) 國立高雄師範大學]. AiritiLibrary. 劉彩卿, & 吳佩璟. (2001). 全民健保下病患在各醫療層級間的就醫選擇-台北市小兒科病患為例 [The Choice of Medical Institutions under NHI-An Example of Pediatric Patients in Taipei]. 醫務管理期刊, 2(2), 87-108. https://doi.org/10.6174/jhm2001.2(2).87 蔡雅芳, 陳啟禎, & 鄭守夏. (2023). 病人報告醫院品質的問卷發展與信效度分析 [Development and validation of a questionnaire for patient-reported hospital quality]. 台灣公共衛生雜誌, 42(6), 678-688. https://doi.org/10.6288/tjph.202312_42(6).112032 衛生福利部. (2015). 醫院評鑑有其存在之必要與價值. https://doi.org/https://www.mohw.gov.tw/cp-2646-20321-1.html 衛生福利部. (2016). 暫緩或停止醫院評鑑影響深遠應總體考量. https://doi.org/https://www.mohw.gov.tw/cp-2625-19310-1.html 衛生福利部. (2021). 醫院評鑑停辦二年 醫護全力投入防疫. 衛生福利部. (2024). 113年度醫院評鑑基準. https://doi.org/https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/DOMA/cp-948-78341-106.html 盧美秀. (2001). 實證醫學、實證護理與實證管理 [Evidence-Based Medicine, Nursing and Management]. 新臺北護理期刊, 3(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.6540/ntjn.2001.1.001 醫策會. (2021). 評鑑與訪查簡介. 財團法人醫院評鑑暨醫療品質策進會. https://doi.org/https://www.jct.org.tw/cp-46-2579-a5a35-1.html 醫策會. (2025). 114年度醫院評鑑基準及評量項目(區域醫院、地區醫院適用).https://doi.org/https://www.jct.org.tw/dl-10382-0df49c57dea2433d840eaa7197bae76c.html | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/99884 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 背景:評鑑是國際間公認用來評估、確保與提升醫療照護品質的評價過程,臺灣醫院評鑑制度近年來也已從過去著重醫院基礎建設等結構面要求,轉而提升至過程面與結果面的品質評估。近年來數位化與資訊公開的快速發展,Google評分成為臺灣民眾最常使用社群媒體平台,相較於傳統評鑑制度,Google評分可能成為臺灣民眾反應醫療院所就醫經驗的重要管道。
目的:探討Google醫院評分與病人住院經驗中,醫病互動以及病人滿意度之間的關係。並從各個面向來瞭解目前臺灣醫院評鑑等級與病人住院經驗中的醫病互動關係、病人滿意度以及Google醫院評分之間的關係。 研究方法:本研究之資料來源為「全民健保病人住院經驗調查問卷」中收錄9,390名病患就醫之165間醫療院所;並以網路搜尋方式收集此165間醫院的Google醫院評分,透過各項統計分析方法,探討醫病互動、病人滿意度以及Google醫院評分三個品質指標之間的關係;以及在控制醫院特徵後,醫院評鑑等級與醫病互動、病人滿意度以及Google醫院評分之間的關聯性。 研究結果:Google醫院評分與醫病互動、病人滿意度的指標有正向的相關性。不同的醫院評鑑等級在控制醫院特徵後,發現與醫病互動、病人滿意度以及Google醫院評分沒有直接的關聯性存在,僅有地區醫院在病人滿意度及醫病互動中的兩個指標上比區域醫院來的高分。 結論:Google醫院評分與醫療品質結果面中病人滿意度為一樣的概念,與醫療品質過程面之間也證實醫病互動的關係越好,民眾在醫院的Google評分上有越高分的趨勢。而在醫院評鑑等級與醫療品質的關係上,兩者可能不是單一的因果關係,需要考量到其他的影響因素。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Background:
Accreditation is an internationally recognized process used to evaluate, ensure, and improve the quality of healthcare services. In recent years, Taiwan’s hospital accreditation system has shifted from focusing primarily on structural requirements such as infrastructure to emphasizing quality evaluations in terms of process and outcome. With the rapid development of digitalization and information transparency, Google ratings have become one of the most widely used social media platforms for the Taiwanese. Compared to traditional accreditation systems, Google ratings may serve as an important channel for reflecting patients’ healthcare experiences in Taiwan. Objective: To explore the relationship between Google hospital ratings and inpatient experiences, specifically in terms of doctor–patient interaction and patient satisfaction. Furthermore, the study examines the relationship between hospital accreditation levels, inpatient doctor–patient interaction, patient satisfaction, and Google hospital ratings from multiple perspectives. Methods: The data source for this study is from "National Health Insurance Inpatient Experience Survey," which includes 9,390 patient responses from 165 healthcare institutions. Google ratings for these 165 hospitals were collected through online search. Statistical analyses were conducted to investigate the relationships among doctor–patient interaction, patient satisfaction, and Google hospital ratings as indicators of healthcare quality. In addition, the study examined the association between hospital accreditation levels and these three quality indicators after controlling for hospital characteristics. Results: Google hospital ratings were positively correlated with both doctor–patient interaction and patient satisfaction. After controlling for hospital characteristics, hospital accreditation level was not directly associated with doctor–patient interaction, patient satisfaction, or Google hospital ratings. The only significant finding was that district hospitals scored higher than regional hospitals on two indicators of doctor–patient interaction and patient satisfaction. Conclusion: Google hospital ratings and patient satisfaction both reflect aspects of healthcare quality outcomes, and there is also a confirmed relationship between Google ratings and healthcare process quality, specifically doctor–patient interaction. In terms of the relationship between hospital accreditation level and healthcare quality, the results suggest that no single causal relationship exists, and other influencing factors should be taken into account. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2025-09-19T16:11:35Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2025-09-19T16:11:36Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 i
中文摘要 ii Abstract iii 目次 v 圖次 viii 表次 ix 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景 1 第二節 研究重要性 4 第三節 研究目的 7 第二章 文獻回顧 8 第一節 醫院評鑑的定義、歷史與其重要性 8 一、評鑑的定義 8 二、國外評鑑的歷史 9 三、國內評鑑的歷史 11 第二節 醫療品質的定義與衡量 13 一、醫療品質的定義 13 二、醫療品質的衡量 14 三、醫療品質衡量工具 16 第三節 Google評分 18 一、Google評分的定義 18 二、Google評分的影響 18 三、Google評分與醫療照護體系 20 第四節 影響醫療院所間評估之重要因素 22 第三章 研究方法 25 第一節 研究架構與假說 25 一、研究架構 25 二、研究假說 26 第二節 研究工具與研究對象 28 一、資料來源 28 二、研究對象 29 第三節 研究變項與操作型定義 33 一、自變項 33 二、控制變項 33 三、依變項 35 第四節 資料處理與統計 42 一、描述性統計 42 二、雙變項分析 42 三、多變項分析 42 第四章 研究結果 43 第一節 描述性統計 43 一、自變項 43 二、控制變項 44 三、依變項 44 第二節 醫院評鑑等級與各變項之雙變項分析 47 一、自變項與各變項之雙變項分析 47 第三節 Google醫院評分、醫病互動、病人滿意度之雙變項分析 53 一、醫病互動與各變項之雙變項分析 53 二、病人滿意度與各變項之雙變項分析 59 三、Google 醫院評分與各變項之雙變項分析 64 第四節 醫院評鑑等級與病人經驗及Google評價之多變項分析 67 一、醫院評鑑等級與醫病互動 67 二、醫院評鑑等級與病人滿意度 72 三、醫院評鑑等級與Google醫院評分 76 第五章 討論 78 第一節 研究結果討論 78 一、Google醫院評分、住院服務品質過程面、結果面相關性討論 78 二、醫院評鑑等級與醫病互動、病人滿意度、Google醫院評分相關性討論 79 一、醫療院所地域性問題 81 二、Google醫院評分 81 三、醫病互動 81 四、病人滿意度 82 第六章 結論與建議 83 第一節 研究結論 83 第二節 研究建議 85 一、對未來研究者的建議 85 二、對醫院評鑑制度的建議 85 三、對醫療服務提供者的建議 85 第七章 參考文獻 86 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 醫療品質 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 醫院評鑑 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Google評分 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 病人滿意度 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 醫病互動 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Doctor–patient Interaction | en |
| dc.subject | Patient Satisfaction | en |
| dc.subject | Google Ratings | en |
| dc.subject | Healthcare Quality | en |
| dc.subject | Hospital Accreditation | en |
| dc.title | 臺灣醫院評鑑制度與病人經驗及Google評價之相關性研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | An Investigation into the Association Between Taiwan’s Hospital Accreditation System, Patient Experience, and Google Ratings | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 113-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 董鈺琪;陳啟禎 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Yu-Chi Tung;Chi-Chen Chen | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 醫院評鑑,醫療品質,醫病互動,病人滿意度,Google評分, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Hospital Accreditation,Healthcare Quality,Doctor–patient Interaction,Patient Satisfaction,Google Ratings, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 92 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202503901 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2025-08-07 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 公共衛生學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 健康政策與管理研究所 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2025-09-20 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 健康政策與管理研究所 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-113-2.pdf | 1.74 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
